REFERENCES

1. Moshood, T. D.; Rotimi, J. O.; Shahzad, W.; Bamgbade, J. Moshood TD, Rotimi JO, Shahzad W, Bamgbade J. Infrastructure digital twin technology: a new paradigm for future construction industry. Technol. Soc. 2024, 77, 102519.

2. Hák, T.; Janoušková, S.; Moldan, B. Sustainable development goals: a need for relevant indicators. Ecol. Indic. 2016, 60, 565-73.

3. United Nation. The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2024. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2024/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2024.pdf (accessed 2025-09-23).

4. Alaloul, W. S.; Musarat, M. A.; Rabbani, M. B. A.; Iqbal, Q.; Maqsoom, A.; Farooq, W. Construction Sector contribution to economic stability: Malaysian GDP distribution. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5012.

5. Rhodes, C. The Construction Industry: Statistics and Policy. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn01432/ (accessed 2025-09-23).

6. Chih, Y.; Hsiao, C. Y. Brace for another crisis: empirical evidence from US Construction industry and firm performance during and after 2007-2009 global financial crisis. J. Manage. Eng. 2023, 39, 04022069.

7. Apata, T. G. Public spending mechanisms and gross domestic product (GDP) growth in the agricultural sector (1970-2016): lessons for Nigeria from agricultural policy progressions in China. Bull. Geogr. Sci. Ser. 2019, 44, 57-72.

8. Mavi, N.; Brown, K.; Fulford, R.; Goh, M. Forecasting project success in the construction industry using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Int. J. Constr. Manag. 2023, 24, 1550-68.

9. Barthorpe, S. Implementing corporate social responsibility in the UK construction industry. Prop. Manag. 2010, 28, 4-17.

10. Cheung, S.; Ng, T. S.; Wong, S.; Suen, H. C. Behavioral aspects in construction partnering. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2003, 21, 333-43.

11. Latham, S. M. Constructing the team: the Latham report. London: HMSO; 1994. https://constructingexcellence.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Constructing-the-team-The-Latham-Report.pdf (accessed 2025-10-09).

12. Farmer, M. Modernise or die: the farmer review of the UK construction labour model. London: Construction Leadership Council. https://www.constructionleadershipcouncil.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Farmer-Review.pdf (accessed 2025-09-23).

13. Watts, G. The engagement of the UK construction industry towards achievement of the sustainable development goals. Built. Environ. Proj. Asset. Manag. 2024, 14, 384-98.

14. Ebiega-Oselebe, O.; Watts, G.; Higham, A. Construction project success as a wicked problem: the role of the local community in Ebonyi, Nigeria. Constr. Hum. Settl. Manag. J. 2021, 1, 49-66. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357407074_Construction_Project_Success_as_a_Wicked_Problem_The_role_of_the_local_community (accessed 2025-09-23).

15. Ahmed, M. O.; El-adaway, I. H.; Caldwell, A. Comprehensive understanding of factors impacting competitive construction bidding. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 2024, 150, 04024017.

16. Opoku, A. Biodiversity and the built environment: implications for the sustainable development goals (SDGs). Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 141, 1-7.

17. United Nations. United Nation Department of Economic and Social Affairs: sustainable development. The 17 goals. https://sdgs.un.org/goals (accessed 2025-09-23).

18. Belmonte-ureña, L. J.; Plaza-úbeda, J. A.; Vazquez-brust, D.; Yakovleva, N. Circular economy, degrowth and green growth as pathways for research on sustainable development goals: a global analysis and future agenda. Ecological. Economics. 2021, 185, 107050.

19. GOV·UK. Net zero strategy: build back greener. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/net-zero-strategy (accessed 2025-09-23).

20. Owusu-manu, D.; Adjei, T. K.; Sackey, D. M.; Edwards, D. J.; Hosseini, R. M. Mainstreaming sustainable development goals in Ghana’s energy sector within the framework of public-private partnerships: challenges, opportunities and strategies. J. Eng. Des. Technol. 2021, 19, 605-24.

21. Mio, C.; Panfilo, S.; Blundo, B. Sustainable development goals and the strategic role of business: a systematic literature review. Bus. Strat. Env. 2020, 29, 3220-45.

22. Ferrer-estévez, M.; Chalmeta, R. Integrating sustainable development goals in educational institutions. Int. J. Manag. Educ. 2021, 19, 100494.

23. Vinuesa, R.; Azizpour, H.; Leite, I.; et al. The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the sustainable development goals. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 233.

24. Palomares, I.; Martínez-Cámara, E.; Montes, R.; et al. A panoramic view and swot analysis of artificial intelligence for achieving the sustainable development goals by 2030: progress and prospects. Appl. Intell. 2021, 51, 6497-527.

25. Tavanti, M. Technology innovations for the SDGs. In Developing sustainability in organizations, 1th ed.; Sustainable Development Goals Series (SDGS); Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2023; pp. 389-404.

26. Miao, Z.; Zhao, Z.; Long, T.; Chen, X. Carbon footprint in agriculture sector: a literature review. Carbon. Footprints. 2023, 2, 13.

27. Zhou, Y.; Yu, X.; Zhang, X. Lifecycle carbon footprints of buildings and sustainability pathways in China. Carbon. Footprints. 2024, 3, 9.

28. Dong, Q.; Zhong, C.; Geng, Y.; Dong, F.; Chen, W.; Zhang, Y. A bibliometric review of carbon footprint research. Carbon. Footprints. 2024, 3, 3.

29. Grunwald, S. Artificial intelligence and soil carbon modeling demystified: power, potentials, and perils. Carbon. Footprints. 2022, 1, 5.

30. Lekan, A.; Aigbavboa, C.; Babatunde, O.; Olabosipo, F.; Christiana, A. Disruptive technological innovations in construction field and fourth industrial revolution intervention in the achievement of the sustainable development goal 9. Int. J. Constr. Manag. 2022, 22, 2647-58.

31. Mohy, A. A.; Bassioni, H. A.; Elgendi, E. O.; Hassan, T. M. Innovations in safety management for construction sites: the role of deep learning and computer vision techniques. Constr. Innov. 2024.

32. Yevu, S. K.; Yu, A. T.; Darko, A. Digitalization of construction supply chain and procurement in the built environment: emerging technologies and opportunities for sustainable processes. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 322, 129093.

33. Antai, I.; Lenka, S.; Achtenhagen, L. Digital platforms and the construction supply chain: trends and emerging themes in extant AEC research. Constr. Manag. Econ. 2025, 43, 113-29.

34. Wyk, L.; Kajimo-shakantu, K.; Opawole, A. Adoption of innovative technologies in the South African construction industry. Int. J. Build. Pathol. Adapt. 2024, 42, 410-29.

35. Li, X.; Liu, X.; Huang, Y.; Li, J.; He, J.; Dai, J. Evolutionary mechanism of green innovation behavior in construction enterprises: evidence from the construction industry. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2024, 31, 159-78.

36. TechUK. Unlocking value across the UK’s digital twin ecosystem. https://www.techuk.org/what-we-deliver/events/unlocking-value-across-the-uk-s-digital-twin-ecosystem.html (accessed 2025-09-23).

37. Ramos, H. M.; Kuriqi, A.; Coronado-hernández, O. E.; López-jiménez, P. A.; Pérez-sánchez, M. Are digital twins improving urban-water systems efficiency and sustainable development goals? Urban. Water. Journal. 2024, 21, 1164-75.

38. Hassani, H.; Huang, X.; Macfeely, S. Enabling digital twins to support the UN SDGs. Big. Data. Cogn. Comput. 2022, 6, 115.

39. Ketzler, B.; Naserentin, V.; Latino, F.; Zangelidis, C.; Thuvander, L.; Logg, A. Digital twins for cities: a state of the art review. Built. Environ. 2022, 46, 547-73. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347920058_Digital_Twins_for_Cities_A_State_of_the_Art_Review (accessed 2025-09-23).

40. Tzachor, A.; Sabri, S.; Richards, C. E.; Rajabifard, A.; Acuto, M. Potential and limitations of digital twins to achieve the sustainable development goals. Nat. Sustain. 2022, 5, 822-9.

41. Varriale, V.; Cammarano, A.; Michelino, F.; Caputo, M. The role of digital technologies in production systems for achieving sustainable development goals. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2024, 47, 87-104.

42. Saleeb, N. Digital twins and Sustainable Development Goals. In Architectural design and management in the digital age: international perspectives. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2024;33-47.

43. Oti-Sarpong, K.; Leringerm, R.; Zhang, S. A critical examination of BIM policy mandates: implications and responses. In Construction Research Congress 2020. 2020.

44. Borkowski, A. S.; Drozd, W.; Zima, K. The status of the implementation of the building information modeling mandate in Poland: a literature review. ISPRS. Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2024, 13, 343.

45. McAuley, B.; West, R.; Hore, A. The Irish construction industry’s state of readiness for a BIM mandate in 2020. In Proceedings of the Civil Engineering Research in Ireland 2020 Conference, Cork, August 27-8, 2020, 2020;740-5. https://arrow.tudublin.ie/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1030&context=schmuldistcon (accessed 2025-09-30).

46. Ganah, A.; Lea, G. A global analysis of BIM standards across the globe: a critical review. J. Proj. Manag. Pract. 2021, 1, 52-60. https://jpmm.um.edu.my/index.php/JPMP/article/view/29153/13352 (accessed 2025-09-23).

47. Watts, G.; Mcdermott, P.; Kolo, S. Framing the barriers to construction industry transformation. Built. Environ. Proj. Asset. Manag. 2023, 13, 185-99.

48. Gillespie, D.; McIlwaine, S. Reducing embodied carbon in the construction sector. In Proceedings of the 37^th Annual ARCOM Conference, UK, September 6-7, 2021; Scott, L., Neilson, C. J., Eds; Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 2021;744-53. https://www.arcom.ac.uk/-docs/proceedings/b993b0702596b86a7056221aea3d0a64.pdf (accessed 2025-09-30).

49. Çıdık, M. S.; Boyd, D. Value implication of digital transformation: the impact of the commodification of information. Constr. Manag. Econ. 2022, 40, 903-17.

50. Chen, L.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Z.; et al. Biomaterials technology and policies in the building sector: a review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2024, 22, 715-50.

51. Zhang, J.; Chen, M.; Ballesteros-pérez, P.; Ke, Y.; Gong, Z.; Ni, Q. A new framework to evaluate and optimize digital transformation policies in the construction industry: a China case study. J. Build. Eng. 2023, 70, 106388.

52. Walsh, P.; Murphy, E.; Horan, D. The role of science, technology and innovation in the UN 2030 agenda. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 2020, 154, 119957.

53. Patel, U. R.; Ghaffarianhoseini, A.; Ghaffarianhoseini, A.; Burgess, A. Digital twin technology for sustainable urban development: a review of its potential impact on SDG 11 in New Zealand. Cities 2024, 155, 105484.

54. Cresswell, J. W.; Creswell, J. D. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 6th ed.; London: Sage Publications, 2022.

55. Clark, T.; Foster, L.; Sloan, L.; Bryman, A. Bryman’s social research methods, 6th ed.; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.

56. Byrne, D. UK sociology and quantitative methods: are we as weak as they think? Or are they barking up the wrong tree? Sociology 2012, 46, 13-24. https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1501754 (accessed 2025-09-23).

57. Phellas, C. N.; Bloch, A.; Seale, C. Structured methods: interviews, questionnaires and observation. In Researching society and culture, 3rd ed.; London: Sage Publications, 2012; p. 182-205.

58. Sandelowski, M. Telling stories: narrative approaches in qualitative research. Image. J. Nurs. Sch. 1991, 23, 161-6.

59. Loosemore, M.; Bridgeman, J. The social impact of construction industry schools-based corporate volunteering. Constr. Manag. Econ. 2018, 36, 243-58.