REFERENCES
1. United Nations Environment Programme. Emissions gap report 2022: the closing window - climate crisis calls for rapid transformation of societies. 2022.
2. Beiser-Mcgrath, L. F.; Bernauer, T. Could revenue recycling make effective carbon taxation politically feasible? Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaax3323.
3. Carley, S.; Konisky, D. M. The justice and equity implications of the clean energy transition. Nat. Energy. 2020, 5, 569-77.
4. Drews, S.; Van Den Bergh, J. C. What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies. Clim. Policy. 2015, 16, 855-76.
5. Tian, J.; Sun, M.; Gong, Y.; Chen, X.; Sun, Y. Chinese residents’ attitudes toward consumption-side climate policy: the role of climate change perception and environmental topic involvement. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2022, 182, 106294.
6. Andor, M. A.; Lange, A.; Sommer, S. Fairness and the support of redistributive environmental policies. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2022, 114, 102682.
7. Tian, J.; Li, Y.; Sun, Y.; Yang, B.; Chen, X. Warming climate apathy to mitigate the disparity in climate policy support across distinct income strata. Energy. Policy. 2024, 192, 114245.
8. Dechezleprêtre, A.; Fabre, A.; Kruse, T.; Planterose, B.; Sanchez Chico, A.; Stantcheva, S. Fighting climate change: international attitudes toward climate policies. Am. Econ. Rev. 2025, 115, 1258-300.
9. Konc, T.; Drews, S.; Savin, I.; Van Den Bergh, J. C. Co-dynamics of climate policy stringency and public support. Global. Environ. Chang. 2022, 74, 102528.
10. Nielsen, K. S.; Bauer, J. M.; Debnath, R.; et al. Underestimation of personal carbon footprint inequality in four diverse countries. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2024, 14, 1136-43.
11. Tamasiga, P.; Onyeaka, H.; Bakwena, M.; Ouassou, E. H. Pricing the future: unveiling the effects of carbon pricing on socio-economic outcomes and energy poverty. Int. J. Sustain. Energy. 2024, 43, 2362334.
12. Bürgisser, R.; Stadelmann-Steffen, I.; Armingeon, K. Can information, compensation and party cues increase mass support for green taxes? J. Eur. Public. Policy. 2024, 33, 821-48.
13. Kahan, D. M.; Braman, D.; Gastil, J.; Slovic, P.; Mertz, C. K. Culture and identity‐protective cognition: explaining the white-male effect in risk perception. J. Empir. Legal. Stud. 2007, 4, 465-505.
14. Mildenberger, M.; Lachapelle, E.; Harrison, K.; Stadelmann-Steffen, I. Limited impacts of carbon tax rebate programmes on public support for carbon pricing. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2022, 12, 141-7.
15. Feygina, I.; Jost, J. T.; Goldsmith, R. E. System justification, the denial of global warming, and the possibility of “system-sanctioned change". Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2009, 36, 326-38.
16. Hamilton, L. C. Education, politics and opinions about climate change evidence for interaction effects. Clim. Chang. 2010, 104, 231-42.
17. Heiskanen, E.; Matschoss, K.; Rinkinen, J.; Pyrhönen, T. Taking the car out of the countryside: Understanding opposition to climate policy in rural Finland. Energy. Res. Soc. Sci. 2024, 117, 103741.
18. Linder, N.; Sörqvist, P.; Lindvall, D.; Jagers, S.; Barthel, S. It would feel weird to not drive my car! Ambio 2024, 54, 670-9.
19. Mittenzwei, K.; Gustavsen, G. W.; Grimsrud, K.; Lindhjem, H.; Bjørkhaug, H. Perceived effects of climate policy on rural areas and agriculture: a rural-urban- divide. J. Rural. Stud. 2023, 100, 103001.
20. Tallent, T. A green divide? Climate policy support and its rural geography in Europe. West. Eur. Polit. 2025, 1-31.
21. Benegal, S.; Green, J. Cost sensitivity, partisan cues, and support for the Green New Deal. J. Environ. Stud. Sci. 2024, 14, 763-75.
22. Eom, K.; Kim, H. S.; Sherman, D. K. Social class, control, and action: socioeconomic status differences in antecedents of support for pro-environmental action. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2018, 77, 60-75.
23. Kruglanski, A. W.; Jasko, K.; Chernikova, M.; et al. The rocky road from attitudes to behaviors: charting the goal systemic course of actions. Psychol. Rev. 2015, 122, 598-620.
24. Vlasceanu, M.; Doell, K. C.; Bak-Coleman, J. B.; et al. Addressing climate change with behavioral science: a global intervention tournament in 63 countries. Sci. Adv. 2024, 10, eadj5778.
25. Kotyza, P.; Cabelkova, I.; Pierański, B.; et al. The predictive power of environmental concern, perceived behavioral control and social norms in shaping pro-environmental intentions: a multicountry study. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2024, 12, 1289139.
26. Brohmer, H.; Köstenbaumer, D.; Thaller, A. E.; Fleiß, E.; Athenstaedt, U.; Posch, A. Changing behavior while having climate change in mind? An investigation of social-psychological predictors for specific pro-environmental behaviors in the energy domain. Energy. Effic. 2023, 16, 80.
27. Al Mamun, A.; Mohamad, M. R.; Yaacob, M. R. B.; Mohiuddin, M. Intention and behavior towards green consumption among low-income households. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 227, 73-86.
29. Pearson, A. R.; Tsai, C. G.; Clayton, S. Ethics, morality, and the psychology of climate justice. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 2021, 42, 36-42.
30. Fairbrother, M.; Johansson, Sevä. I.; Kulin, J. Political trust and the relationship between climate change beliefs and support for fossil fuel taxes: Evidence from a survey of 23 European countries. Global. Environ. Chang. 2019, 59, 102003.
31. Carattini, S.; Carvalho, M.; Fankhauser, S. Overcoming public resistance to carbon taxes. WIREs. Clim. Chang. 2018, 9, e531.
32. Majumdar, R.; Weber, E. U. Multilevel intergroup conflict at the core of climate (in)justice: psychological challenges and ways forward. WIREs. Clim. Chang. 2023, 14, e836.
33. Douenne, T.; Fabre, A. French attitudes on climate change, carbon taxation and other climate policies. Ecol. Econ. 2020, 169, 106496.
35. Bruckner, B.; Hubacek, K.; Shan, Y.; Zhong, H.; Feng, K. Impacts of poverty alleviation on national and global carbon emissions. Nat. Sustain. 2022, 5, 311-20.
36. Schöngart, S.; Nicholls, Z.; Hoffmann, R.; Pelz, S.; Schleussner, C. High-income groups disproportionately contribute to climate extremes worldwide. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2025, 15, 627-33.
37. Han, X.; Xu, W. The income distribution effects of market-based environmental regulation: Who bears the cost of environmental governance. Finan. Trade. Econ. 2023, 44, 1-143.
38. Wagdi, O.; Afify, A. S.; Habib, A. F. The impact of social media marketing activities on green consumption intention: evidence from emerging countries. Entrep. Sustain. Issues. 2022, 10, 158-74.
39. Carattini, S.; Kallbekken, S.; Orlov, A. How to win public support for a global carbon tax. Nature 2019, 565, 289-91.
40. Klenert, D.; Mattauch, L.; Combet, E.; et al. Making carbon pricing work for citizens. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2018, 8, 669-77.
41. Baranzini, A.; Van Den Bergh, J. C. J. M.; Carattini, S.; Howarth, R. B.; Padilla, E.; Roca, J. Carbon pricing in climate policy: seven reasons, complementary instruments, and political economy considerations. WIREs. Clim. Chang. 2017, 8, e462.
42. Sörgel, B.; Kriegler, E.; Bertram, C.; et al. Joint implementation of the sustainable development goals, climate change mitigation and biosphere protection: policy options for tackling multiple crises simultaneously. Potsdam: Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK); 2022, 33p.
43. Jagers, S. C.; Martinsson, J.; Matti, S. The impact of compensatory measures on public support for carbon taxation: an experimental study in Sweden. Clim. Policy. 2018, 19, 147-60.
44. Jagers, S. C.; Lachapelle, E.; Martinsson, J.; Matti, S. Bridging the ideological gap? How fairness perceptions mediate the effect of revenue recycling on public support for carbon taxes in the United States, Canada and Germany. Rev. Policy. Res. 2021, 38, 529-54.
45. Maestre-Andrés, S.; Drews, S.; Savin, I.; Van Den Bergh, J. Carbon tax acceptability with information provision and mixed revenue uses. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 7017.
46. Grabe, M. E.; Lang, A.; Zhou, S.; Bolls, P. D. Cognitive access to negatively arousing news: an experimental investigation of the knowledge gap. Commun. Res. 2000, 27, 3-26.
47. Shen, F. An economic theory of political communication effects: how the economy conditions political learning. Commun. Theory. 2009, 19, 374-96.
48. Kitt, S.; Axsen, J.; Long, Z.; Rhodes, E. The role of trust in citizen acceptance of climate policy: comparing perceptions of government competence, integrity and value similarity. Ecol. Econ. 2021, 183, 106958.
