REFERENCES
1. Rennings, K. Redefining innovation - eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecol. Econ. 2000, 32, 319-32.
2. Kemp, R.; Pearson, P. Final report MEI project about measuring eco-innovation. Available from: https://lab.unu-merit.nl/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Final-report-MEI-project-about-measuring-eco-innovation-1.pdf [Last accessed on 14 May 2026].
3. Indiran, L.; Fu, C.; Fahim, N. A.; Ishak, M. K.; Aslan, M. Eco-innovation methodologies: a literature review. Discov. Sustain. 2025, 6, 1143.
4. Shabur, M. A. A comprehensive review on the impact of Industry 4.0 on the development of a sustainable environment. Discov. Sustain. 2024, 5, 97.
5. Santos, A. D. M.; Sant’anna, ÂMO. Industry 4.0 technologies for sustainability within small and medium enterprises: A systematic literature review and future directions. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 467, 143023.
6. UNEP releases guidelines to curb the environmental impact of data centres. Available from: https://www.unep.org/technical-highlight/unep-releases-guidelines-curb-environmental-impact-data-centres [Last accessed on 8 May 2026].
7. Mouthaan, M.; Frenken, K.; Piscicelli, L.; Vaskelainen, T. Systemic sustainability effects of contemporary digitalization: a scoping review and research agenda. Futures 2023, 149, 103142.
8. Widdicks, K.; Lucivero, F.; Samuel, G.; et al. Systems thinking and efficiency under emissions constraints: addressing rebound effects in digital innovation and policy. Patterns 2023, 4, 100679.
9. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. 2024 Digital economy report. Available from: https://lab.unu-merit.nl/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Final-report-MEI-project-about-measuring-eco-innovation-1.pdf [Last accessed on 14 May 2026].
10. Herrera, M.; Xie, X.; Menapace, A.; Zanfei, A.; Brentan, B. M. Sustainable AI infrastructure: a scenario-based forecast of water footprint under uncertainty. J. Clean. Prod. 2025, 526, 146528.
11. De Vries-Gao, A. The carbon and water footprints of data centers and what this could mean for artificial intelligence. Patterns 2026, 7, 101430.
12. Lövehagen, N.; Malmodin, J.; Bergmark, P.; Matinfar, S. Assessing embodied carbon emissions of communication user devices by combining approaches. Renew. Sustain. Energy. Rev. 2023, 183, 113422.
13. De Carolis, A.; Macchi, M.; Negri, E.; Terzi, S. A maturity model for assessing the digital readiness of manufacturing companies. In: Lödding H, Riedel R, Thoben K, Von Cieminski G, Kiritsis D, editors. Advances in Production Management Systems. The Path to Intelligent, Collaborative and Sustainable Manufacturing. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017. pp. 13-20.
14. Mick, M. M. A. P.; Kovaleski, J. L.; Chiroli, D. M. D. G. Sustainable digital transformation roadmaps for SMEs: a systematic literature review. Sustainability 2024, 16, 8551.
15. Xu, J.; Macaskill, K. Carbon data and its requirements in infrastructure-related GHG standards. Environ. Sci. Policy. 2024, 162, 103935.
16. Creutzig, F.; Roy, J.; Lamb, W. F.; et al. Towards demand-side solutions for mitigating climate change. Nature. Clim. Chang. 2018, 8, 260-3.
17. Pichler, P.; Zwickel, T.; Chavez, A.; Kretschmer, T.; Seddon, J.; Weisz, H. Reducing urban greenhouse gas footprints. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 14659.
18. Ranganathan, J.; Corbier, L.; Schmitz, S.; et al. WBCSD/WRI, 2004. Greenhouse gas protocol: a corporate accounting and reporting standard, 2004.
19. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 14067:2018: greenhouse gases - Carbon footprint of products - Requirements and guidelines for quantification. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2018. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/71206.html [Last accessed on 14 May 2026].
20. European Environment Agency. EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2023: technical guidance to prepare national emission inventories. LU: Publications Office, 2023.
21. Meng, X.; Wu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Ren, J.; Yue, D.; Manzardo, A. Critical review: a standardized blueprint for green certificate integration in life cycle assessment. Carbon. Footprints. 2025, 4, 29.
22. Flore, A. Reifegradmodell für Smart grids: bewertung der migrationspfade anhand von zwei fallstudien. Oldenburg: Universität Oldenburg; 2020. Available from: https://www.shaker.de/de/site/content/shop/index.asp?ID=8&ISBN=978-3-8440-7749-0 [Last accessed on 14 May 2026].
23. Becker, J.; Knackstedt, R.; Pöppelbuß, J. Developing maturity models for IT management: a procedure model and its application. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2009, 1, 213-22.
24. Lahrmann, G.; Marx, F.; Mettler, T.; Winter, R.; Wortmann, F. Inductive design of maturity models: applying the rasch algorithm for design science research. In: Jain H, Sinha AP, Vitharana P, editors. Service-Oriented Perspectives in Design Science Research. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2011. pp. 176-91.
25. World Resources Institute; World Business Council for Sustainable Development. GHG Protocol scope 2 guidance: an amendment to the GHG protocol corporate standard. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute; 2015. Available from: https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/ghgp/standards/Scope%202%20Guidance_Final_0.pdf [Last accessed on 14 May 2026].
26. Holzapfel, P.; Bach, V.; Finkbeiner, M. Electricity accounting in life cycle assessment: the challenge of double counting. Int. J. Life. Cycle. Assess. 2023, 28, 771-87.
27. Fortier, J.; Gamache, S.; Fonrouge, C. Integrating sustainable performance into the digital maturity models for SMEs in manufacturing. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 4041.
29. Schumacher, A.; Erol, S.; Sihn, W. A maturity model for assessing Industry 4.0 readiness and maturity of manufacturing enterprises. Proc. CIRP. 2016, 52, 161-6.
30. Criado-Perez, C.; Collins, C.; Shinkle, G. A.; Höllerer, M. A.; Pan, S.; Roberts, M. The convergence of two imperatives: a maturity model for digital sustainability. SSRN 2025. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5218075 [Last accessed on 14 May 2026].
31. Salles, A. C.; Lunardi, G. L.; Thompson, F. A framework proposal to assess the maturity of green IT in organizations. Sustainability 2022, 14, 12348.
32. Software Engineering Institute. Smart grid maturity model, version 1.1: model definition. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University; 2010.
33. Mani, M. Developing a sustainability manufacturing maturity model. Manufacturing Strategy. Available from: https://www.nist.gov/publications/developing-sustainability-manufacturing-maturity-model [Last accessed on 14 May 2026].
34. EDEN e.V. EDEN reifegradmodell - Übersicht. Nürnberg: BPM Club Deutschland; 2009. Available from: https://www.yumpu.com/de/document/view/15729417/white-paper-eden/4 [Last accessed on 14 May 2026].
35. Chrissis, M. B. CMMI for development: guidelines for process integration and product improvement, 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison-Wesley; 2011. 1p. Available from: https://www.sei.cmu.edu/library/cmmi-for-development-guidelines-for-process-integration-and-product-improvement-third-edition/ [Last accessed on 14 May 2026].
36. Sgambaro, L.; Raji, Y.; Chiaroni, D.; Lettieri, E. Towards a novel circular maturity model to foster circular economy in the healthcare industry. Sustain. Prod. Consump. 2025, 55, 434-43.
37. Saari, L.; Valkokari, K.; Martins, J. T.; Acerbi, F. Circular economy matrix guiding manufacturing industry companies towards circularity - a multiple case study perspective. Circ. Econ. Sustain. 2024, 4, 2505-30.
38. Farfán Chilicaus, G. C.; Cruz Salinas, L. E.; Silva León, P. M.; et al. Circular economy and water sustainability: systematic review of water management technologies and strategies (2018-2024). Sustainability 2025, 17, 6544.
39. Kreutzer, D.; Müller-Abdelrazeq, S. L.; Isenhardt, I. Circular economy maturity models: a systematic literature review. Int. J. Econ. Manag. Eng. 2023, 17, 666-78. Available from: https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/981209 [Last accessed on 14 May 2026].
40. Mankins, J. Technology readiness level - a white paper. 1995. Available from: https://spacese.spacegrant.org/SEModules/Technology%20Mods/Mankins_trl.pdf [Last accessed on 14 May 2026].
41. Scholta, H. F.; Blaschke, M. J. Temporal matching as an accounting principle for green electricity claims. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 9280.
42. Hevner, A. R. A.; March, S. T.; Park, J.; Ram, S. Design science in information systems research. Manag. Inf. Syst. Q. 2004, 28, 75.
43. Peffers, K.; Tuunanen, T.; Rothenberger, M. A.; Chatterjee, S. A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2014, 24, 45-77.
44. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate change 2022: mitigation of climate change. Cambridge University Press; 2023.
45. Ferreira, R. M. F. D.; Grilo, A.; Maia, M. Piloting a maturity model for responsible artificial intelligence: a portuguese case study. J. Responsib. Technol. 2025, 22, 100117.
46. Elhady, A. M.; Shohieb, S. AI-driven sustainable finance: computational tools, ESG metrics, and global implementation. Futur. Bus. J. 2025, 11, 209.
47. Martínez-Peláez, R.; Escobar, M. A.; Félix, V. G.; et al. Sustainable digital transformation for SMEs: a comprehensive framework for informed decision-making. Sustainability 2024, 16, 4447.
