REFERENCES
1. Zhang, Z.; Huang, J.; Yao, Y.; et al. Environmental impacts of cotton and opportunities for improvement. Nat. Rev. Earth. Environ. 2023, 4, 703-15.
2. Zhang, L.; Leung, M. Y.; Boriskina, S.; Tao, X. Advancing life cycle sustainability of textiles through technological innovations. Nat. Sustain. 2022, 6, 243-53.
3. Kranthi, K. R.; Stone, G. D. Long-term impacts of Bt cotton in India. Nat. Plants. 2020, 6, 188-96.
4. Niinimäki, K.; Peters, G.; Dahlbo, H.; Perry, P.; Rissanen, T.; Gwilt, A. The environmental price of fast fashion. Nat. Rev. Earth. Environ. 2020, 1, 189-200.
5. Sovbetov, I. Carbon footprint embodied in global fiber trades. J. Nat. Fibers. 2025, 22, 2503970.
6. Sandin, G.; Peters, G. M. Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling - A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 184, 353-65.
7. Tolentino-Zondervan, F.; Divito, L. Sustainability performance of Dutch firms and the role of digitalization: the case of textile and apparel industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 459, 142573.
8. Witt, T. W.; Ulloa, M.; Pelletier, M. G.; Mendu, V.; Ritchie, G. L. Irrigation’s effect and applied selection on the fiber quality of Ethyl MethaneSulfonate (EMS) treated upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). J. Cotton. Res. 2018, 1, 17.
9. Huang, W.; Wu, F.; Han, W.; et al. Carbon footprint of cotton production in China: composition, spatiotemporal changes and driving factors. Sci. Total. Environ. 2022, 821, 153407.
10. Chen, Z.; Xu, C.; Ji, L.; et al. Effects of multi-cropping system on temporal and spatial distribution of carbon and nitrogen footprint of major crops in China. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2020, 22, e00895.
11. Zhang, Z.; An, J.; Han, Y.; et al. Advantages of an orychophragmus violaceus-maize rotation in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and reactive nitrogen losses and increasing net ecosystem economic benefits on the North China Plain. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 317, 128426.
12. Wang, Z.; Wang, G.; Han, Y.; et al. Improving cropping systems reduces the carbon footprints of wheat-cotton production under different soil fertility levels. Arch. Agron. Soil. Sci. 2020, 67, 218-33.
13. Koudahe, K.; Sheshukov, A. Y.; Aguilar, J.; Djaman, K. Irrigation-water management and productivity of cotton: a review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10070.
14. Feng, L.; Chi, B.; Dong, H. Cotton cultivation technology with Chinese characteristics has driven the 70-year development of cotton production in China. J. Integr. Agric. 2022, 21, 597-609.
15. Wen, Y.; Liu, J.; Dhital, Y.; et al. Integrated effects of plastic film residues on cotton growth and field carbon sequestration under drip irrigation in arid oasis regions. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 2022, 339, 108131.
16. Chen, J.; Guo, H.; Pu, X.; Wang, X.; Xi, Y.; Hu, C. Traditional weaving craft for one-piece self-charging power textile for wearable electronics. Nano. Energy. 2018, 50, 536-43.
17. Cristea, A.; Hummels, D.; Puzzello, L.; Avetisyan, M. Trade and the greenhouse gas emissions from international freight transport. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2013, 65, 153-73.
18. Paris Agreement. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its 21st session, held in Paris from 30 November to 13 December 2015: addendum. Available from: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/831052?v=pdf [Last accessed on 3 Apr 2026].
19. Magacho, G.; Espagne, E.; Godin, A. Impacts of the CBAM on EU trade partners: consequences for developing countries. Climate. Policy. 2023, 24, 243-59.
20. Yu, Z.; Yang, Y. Carbon footprint of global cotton production. Resour. Environ. Sustain. 2025, 20, 100214.
21. Wang, S.; Chong, C.; Huang, W.; et al. Tracing the carbon footprint of cotton garments from seed to garment: evidence from an empirical study of multiple sites in China. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2025, 217, 108200.
22. Alriksson, S.; Oberg, T. Conjoint analysis for environmental evaluation-a review of methods and applications. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2008, 15, 244-57.
23. Hammar, T.; Peñaloza, D.; Hanning, A.; Haatanen, N.; Pakkasmaa, J. Life cycle assessment of textile fibre-to-fibre recycling by cellulose carbamate technology. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 426, 139189.
24. Vitale, G. S.; Iacuzzi, N.; Zingale, S.; Lombardo, S.; Tuttolomondo, T.; Guarnaccia, P. Environmental sustainability of cotton: a systematic literature review of life cycle assessments. J. Agric. Food. Res. 2025, 22, 102069.
25. Brunner, S.; Flachsland, C.; Marschinski, R. Credible commitment in carbon policy. Climate. Policy. 2012, 12, 255-71.
26. Liu, T.; Wang, Q.; Su, B. A review of carbon labeling: standards, implementation, and impact. Renew. Sustain. Energy. Rev. 2016, 53, 68-79.
27. Der Velden NM, Patel MK, Vogtländer JG. LCA benchmarking study on textiles made of cotton, polyester, nylon, acryl, or elastane. Int. J. Life. Cycle. Assess. 2013, 19, 331-56.
28. Beylot, A.; Corrado, S.; Sala, S. Environmental impacts of European trade: interpreting results of process-based LCA and environmentally extended input-output analysis towards hotspot identification. Int. J. Life. Cycle. Assess. 2019, 25, 2432-50.
29. Zhang, Y.; Yan, D.; Hu, S.; Guo, S. Modelling of energy consumption and carbon emission from the building construction sector in China, a process-based LCA approach. Energy. Policy. 2019, 134, 110949.
30. Xiao, M.; Li, X.; Zhang, H.; Meng, H.; Dong, J. Environmental impact assessment and remediation decision-making of a contaminated megasite: combining LCA and IO-LCA. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 462, 142586.
31. Chang, Y.; Ries, R. J.; Man, Q.; Wang, Y. Disaggregated I-O LCA model for building product chain energy quantification: a case from China. Energy. Build. 2014, 72, 212-21.
32. Yue, D.; Pandya, S.; You, F. Integrating hybrid life cycle assessment with multiobjective optimization: a modeling framework. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 1501-9.
33. Gao, T.; Liu, Q.; Wang, J. A comparative study of carbon footprint and assessment standards. Int. J. Low. Carbon. Technol. 2014, 9, 237-43.
34. Greenhouse Gas Protocol. The World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development: Washington, DC, USA, 2004. Available from: https://ghgprotocol.org/ [Last accessed on 8 Apr 2026].
35. Hou, N.; He, L.; Zhao, S.; Li, R. Research on the carbon footprint grading of viscose fiber based on clean production standards. Cotton. Textile. Technol. 2025, 53, 10.
36. Wu, P.; Xia, B.; Wang, X. The contribution of ISO 14067 to the evolution of global greenhouse gas standards - a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy. Rev. 2015, 47, 142-50.
37. Wang, Z.; Zhai, L.; Xiong, S.; et al. February orchid cover crop improves sustainability of cotton production systems in the Yellow River basin. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2021, 41, 67.
38. Chai, Q.; Nemecek, T.; Liang, C.; et al. Integrated farming with intercropping increases food production while reducing environmental footprint. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2021, 118, e2106382118.
39. Zhang, Z.; Wang, J.; Huang, W.; et al. Growing cover crop mixtures are more sustainable than single cover crop in continuous cotton cropping: comprehensive assessment from 3-year field experiment. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 420, 138350.
40. Gu, B.; Zhang, L.; Van, Dingenen. R.; et al. Abating ammonia is more cost-effective than nitrogen oxides for mitigating PM(2.5) air pollution. Science 2021, 374, 758-62.
41. Huang, W.; Wu, F.; Zhang, Z.; et al. The nitrogen footprint and reactive nitrogen reduction potential of cotton production in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 402, 136808.
42. Caro, D.; Bastianoni, S.; Borghesi, S.; Pulselli, F. M. On the feasibility of a consumer-based allocation method in national GHG inventories. Ecol. Ind. 2014, 36, 640-3.
43. Li, F.; Zhang, K.; Yang, P.; et al. Information exposure incentivizes consumers to pay a premium for emerging pro-environmental food: Evidence from China. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 363, 132412.
44. Pacetti, T.; Lombardi, L.; Federici, G. Water-energy Nexus: a case of biogas production from energy crops evaluated by Water Footprint and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methods. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 101, 278-91.
45. Pan, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Li, J.; et al. A global synthesis of nitrous oxide emissions across cotton-planted soils. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2024, 51, 315-26.
46. Bertolini, M.; Duttilo, P.; Lisi, F. Accounting carbon emissions from electricity generation: A review and comparison of emission factor-based methods. Appl. Energy. 2025, 392, 125992.
47. Walling, E.; Vaneeckhaute, C. Greenhouse gas emissions from inorganic and organic fertilizer production and use: a review of emission factors and their variability. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 276, 111211.
48. Steubing, B.; De, Koning. A.; Merciai, S.; Tukker, A. How do carbon footprints from LCA and EEIOA databases compare? A comparison of ecoinvent and EXIOBASE. J. Ind. Ecol. 2022, 26, 1406-22.
49. Yang, X.; Li, S.; Du, T.; Kang, S.; Siddique, K. H.; Butterbach-Bahl, K. Greenhouse gas emissions and crop-specific emission factors of eight upland crops based on a six-year field experiment in the North China Plain. Sustain. Prod. Consump. 2024, 50, 416-30.
50. Ma, R.; Zou, J.; Han, Z.; et al. Global soil-derived ammonia emissions from agricultural nitrogen fertilizer application: a refinement based on regional and crop-specific emission factors. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2021, 27, 855-67.
51. Harris, E.; Yu, L.; Wang, Y. P.; et al. Warming and redistribution of nitrogen inputs drive an increase in terrestrial nitrous oxide emission factor. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 4310.
52. Shahriari-khalaji, M.; Alassod, A.; Nozhat, Z. Cotton-based health care textile: a mini review. Polym. Bull. 2022, 79, 10409-32.
53. Li, P.; Wang, S.; Qi, H.; et al. Soil replacement combined with subsoiling improves cotton yields. J. Cotton. Res. 2019, 2, 25.
54. Zhang, Z.; An, J.; Xiong, S.; et al. Orychophragmus violaceus-maize rotation increases maize productivity by improving soil chemical properties and plant nutrient uptake. Field. Crops. Res. 2022, 279, 108470.
55. You, L.; Ros, G. H.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, F.; de, Vries. W. Optimized agricultural management reduces global cropland nitrogen losses to air and water. Nat. Food. 2024, 5, 995-1004.
56. Xiao, C.; Zhang, F.; Li, Y.; et al. Optimizing drip irrigation and nitrogen fertilization regimes to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, increase net ecosystem carbon budget and reduce carbon footprint in saline cotton fields. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 2024, 366, 108912.
57. Zhang, Z.; Wang, J.; Huang, W.; et al. Respective advantages of growing different green manure with nitrogen fertilization in cotton-based cropping systems: insights from a three-year field study. Food. Energy. Security. 2024, 13, e70015.
58. Bai, Z.; Zhang, D.; Wang, Z.; et al. Challenges and strategies in estimating soil organic carbon for multi-cropping systems: a review. Carbon. Footprints. 2024, 3, 19.
59. Zhang, Z.; Wang, J.; Xiong, S.; et al. Orychophragmus violaceus/cotton relay intercropping with reduced N application maintains or improves crop productivity and soil carbon and nitrogen fractions. Field. Crops. Res. 2023, 291, 108807.
60. Chen, F.; Ji, X.; Chu, J.; Xu, P.; Wang, L. A review: life cycle assessment of cotton textiles. Ind. Textila. 2021, 72, 19-29.
61. Peters, G.; Svanström, M.; Roos, S.; Sandin, G.; Zamani, B. 1 - Carbon footprints in the textile industry. In: Handbook of life cycle assessment (LCA) of textiles and clothing, Elsevier. 2015, pp. 3-30.
62. Leal Filho, W.; Dinis, M. A. P.; Liakh, O.; et al. Reducing the carbon footprint of the textile sector: an overview of impacts and solutions. Text. Res. J. 2024, 94, 1798-814.
63. Grishanov, S. 2 - Structure and properties of textile materials. In: Handbook of textile and industrial dyeing. Elsevier; 2011, pp. 28-63.
64. Hrouzková, S.; Szarka, A. Development of a modified QuEChERS procedure for the isolation of pesticide residues from textile samples, followed by GC-MS determination. Separations 2021, 8, 106.
65. Tariq, G.; Sun, H.; Ali, S. Environmental footprint impacts of green energies, green energy finance and green governance in G7 countries. Carbon. Footprints. 2024, 3, 5.
66. Hong, J.; Shen, G. Q.; Feng, Y.; Lau, W. S.; Mao, C. Greenhouse gas emissions during the construction phase of a building: a case study in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 103, 249-59.
67. Latombe, G.; Hui, C.; McGeoch, M. A. Beyond the continuum: a multi-dimensional phase space for neutral-niche community assembly. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2015, 282, 20152417.
68. Zhang, Y.; Wang, L.; Guo, Z.; et al. Revealing the underlying molecular basis of phosphorus recycling in the green manure crop Astragalus sinicus. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 341, 130924.
