REFERENCES
1. Sohn, J.; Kalbar, P.; Goldstein, B.; Birkved, M. Defining Temporally Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment: A Review. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 2020, 16, 314-23.
2. Benoist, A. Eléments d’adaptation de la méthodologie d’analyse de cycle de vie aux carburants végétaux : cas de la première génération - Adapting life-cycle assessment to biofuels: some elements from the first generation case. Theses. École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris, 2009. https://pastel.hal.science/pastel-00005919 (accessed 2026-04-09).
3. Kendall, A.; Chang, B.; Sharpe, B. Accounting for time-dependent effects in biofuel life cycle greenhouse gas emissions calculations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 7142-7.
4. Lang‐quantzendorff, L.; Beermann, M. Time‐differentiating methods for life cycle assessment of the industry transition toward climate neutrality: a review. J. Ind. Ecol. 2025, 29, 1523-50.
5. Breton, C.; Blanchet, P.; Amor, B.; Beauregard, R.; Chang, W. Assessing the climate change impacts of biogenic carbon in buildings: a critical review of two main dynamic approaches. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2020.
6. Tiruta-barna, L.; Pigné, Y.; Navarrete Gutiérrez, T.; Benetto, E. Framework and computational tool for the consideration of time dependency in Life Cycle Inventory: proof of concept. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 116, 198-206.
7. Beloin-saint-pierre, D.; Heijungs, R.; Blanc, I. The ESPA (enhanced structural path analysis) method: a solution to an implementation challenge for dynamic life cycle assessment studies. Int. J. Life. Cycle. Assess. 2014, 19, 861-71.
8. Cardellini, G.; Mutel, C. L.; Vial, E.; Muys, B. Temporalis, a generic method and tool for dynamic life cycle assessment. Sci. Total. Environ. 2018, 645, 585-95.
9. Cardellini, G.; Mutel, C. Temporalis: an open source software for dynamic LCA. JOSS. 2018, 3, 612.
10. Müller, A.; Diepers, T.; Jakobs, A.; et al. Time-explicit life cycle assessment: a flexible framework for coherent consideration of temporal dynamics. Int. J. Life. Cycle. Assess. 2025, 30, 3052-71.
11. JORF. Décret n° 2021-1004 du 29 juillet 2021 relatif aux exigences de performance énergétique et environnementale des constructions de bâtiments en France métropolitaine - Légifrance. 2021. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/id/JORFSCTA000043877244 (accessed 2026-04-09).
12. CIRAIG. dynCO2: Dynamic carbon footprinter 2010. https://ciraig.org/index.php/project/dynco2-dynamic-carbon-footprinter/ (accessed 2026-04-09).
13. Levasseur, A.; Lesage, P.; Margni, M.; Deschênes, L.; Samson, R. Considering time in LCA: dynamic LCA and its application to global warming impact assessments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 3169-74.
14. Shimako, A. H.; Tiruta-Barna, L.; Bisinella de Faria, A. B.; Ahmadi, A.; Spérandio, M. Sensitivity analysis of temporal parameters in a dynamic LCA framework. Sci. Total. Environ. 2018, 624, 1250-62.
15. Resch, E.; Andresen, I.; Cherubini, F.; Brattebø, H. Estimating dynamic climate change effects of material use in buildings-timing, uncertainty, and emission sources. Build. Environ. 2021, 187, 107399.
16. Füchsl, S.; Huber, J.; Fröhling, M.; Röder, H. Balancing the green carbon cycle - biogenic carbon within life cycle assessment. Int. J. Life. Cycle. Assess. 2025, 30, 2300-13.
17. Lueddeckens, S.; Saling, P.; Guenther, E. Temporal issues in life cycle assessment - a systematic review. Int. J. Life. Cycle. Assess. 2020, 25, 1385-401.
18. Collins, F. Inclusion of carbonation during the life cycle of built and recycled concrete: influence on their carbon footprint. Int. J. Life. Cycle. Assess. 2010, 15, 549-56.
19. Abernethy, S.; Jackson, R. B. Global temperature goals should determine the time horizons for greenhouse gas emission metrics. Environ. Res. Lett. 2022, 17, 024019.
20. Tiruta-barna, L. A climate goal-based, multicriteria method for system evaluation in life cycle assessment. Int. J. Life. Cycle. Assess. 2021, 26, 1913-31.
21. Zieger, V.; Lecompte, T.; Guihéneuf, S.; et al. Climate change metrics: bridging IPCC AR6 updates and dynamic life cycle assessments. Earth. Syst. Dynam. 2025, 16, 2003-19.
22. Francois, C.; Batot, G.; Ventura, A. Université Gustave Eiffel. Dynamic global warming potential (GWP) and Global Temperature Potential (GTP) indicators calculation workbook. https://doi.org/10.57745/LVMVIU (accessed 2026-04-15).
23. Levasseur, A.; de Schryver, A.; Hauschild, M.; et al. Greenhouse gas emissions and climate change impacts. In Global Guidance for Life Cycle Impact Assessment Indicators, Vol. 1; United Nations Environment Programme, 2016; p. 60-79. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319402340_Greenhouse_gas_emissions_and_climate_change_impacts (accessed 2026-04-15).
24. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The earth’s energy budget, climate feedbacks and climate sensitivity. In Climate Change 2021 - The Physical Science Basis; Cambridge University Press, 2023; pp 923-1054.
25. Joos, F.; Roth, R.; Fuglestvedt, J. S.; et al. Carbon dioxide and climate impulse response functions for the computation of greenhouse gas metrics: a multi-model analysis. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2013, 13, 2793-825.
26. Hodnebrog, Ø.; Aamaas, B.; Fuglestvedt, J. S.; et al. Updated global warming potentials and radiative efficiencies of halocarbons and other weak atmospheric absorbers. Rev. Geophys. 2020, 58, e2019RG000691.
27. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate Change 2021 – The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press, 2023.
28. Boucher, O.; Reddy, M. Climate trade-off between black carbon and carbon dioxide emissions. Energy. Policy. 2008, 36, 193-200.
29. Ventura, A. Conceptual issue of the dynamic GWP indicator and solution. Int. J. Life. Cycle. Assess. 2022, 28, 788-99.
30. Cabassud, N. Guide RE2020 réglementation environnementale. Ministère de la Transition Ecologique; 2024. https://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/documents/guide_re2020_version_janvier_2024.pdf (accessed 2026-04-09).
31. BS EN 15804:2012+A2:2019 - Sustainability of construction works. Environmental product declarations. Core rules for the product category of construction products. https://knowledge.bsigroup.com/products/sustainability-of-construction-works-environmental-product-declarations-core-rules-for-the-product-category-of-construction-products-2 (accessed 2026-04-15).
32. INIES. INIES | Les données environnementales et sanitaires de référence pour le bâtiment n.d. https://www.base-inies.fr (accessed 2026-04-09).
33. Gasser, T.; Peters, G. P.; Fuglestvedt, J. S.; Collins, W. J.; Shindell, D. T.; Ciais, P. Accounting for the climate–carbon feedback in emission metrics. Earth. Syst. Dynam. 2017, 8, 235-53.
34. Brunner, C.; Hausfather, Z.; Knutti, R. Durability of carbon dioxide removal is critical for Paris climate goals. Commun. Earth. Environ. 2024, 5, 645.
