REFERENCES
2. Ogunbode CA, Doran R, Böhm G. Exposure to the IPCC special report on 1.5 °C global warming is linked to perceived threat and increased concern about climate change. Clim Change. 2020;158:361-75.
3. Lin J, Tong D, Davis S, et al. Global climate forcing of aerosols embodied in international trade. Nat Geosci. 2016;9:790-4.
4. Zhang Q, Jiang X, Tong D, et al. Transboundary health impacts of transported global air pollution and international trade. Nature. 2017;543:705-9.
5. Hinnells M. Technologies to achieve demand reduction and microgeneration in buildings. Energy Policy. 2008;36:4427-33.
6. Nejat P, Jomehzadeh F, Taheri MM, Gohari M, Abd Majid MZ. A global review of energy consumption, CO2 emissions and policy in the residential sector (with an overview of the top ten CO2 emitting countries). Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2015;43:843-62.
7. Zhang M, Kafy A-A, Xiao P, et al. Impact of urban expansion on land surface temperature and carbon emissions using machine learning algorithms in Wuhan, China. Urban Clim. 2023;47:101347.
8. Wang X, Chen S. Urban-rural carbon footprint disparity across China from essential household expenditure: survey-based analysis, 2010-2014. J Environ Manag. 2020;267:110570.
9. Zhang M, Zhang Z, Tong B, Ren B, Zhang L, Lin X. Analysis of the coupling characteristics of land transfer and carbon emissions and its influencing factors: a case study of China. Front Environ Sci. 2023;10:1105552.
10. Song C, Zhang Z, Xu W, Elshkaki A. The spatial effect of industrial transfer on carbon emissions under firm location decision: a carbon neutrality perspective. J Environ Manag. 2023;330:117139.
11. Li X. Pathways to mitigate household carbon emissions in Chinese cities: intentions, actions, and environments. Urban Clim. 2024;55:101953.
12. Gifford R. Psychology’s essential role in alleviating the impacts of climate change. Can J Psychol. 2008;49:273-80.
13. Steg L, Vlek C. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: an integrative review and research agenda. J Environ Psychol. 2009;29:309-17.
15. Rees WE. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environ Urban. 1992;4:121-30.
16. Wackernagel M, Lewan L, Hansson CB. Evaluating the use of natural capital with the ecological footprint: applications in Sweden and subregions. Ambio. 1999;28:604-12. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4314966 [Last accessed on 20 Jun 2024]
17. Weidema BP, Thrane M, Christensen P, Schmidt J, Løkke S. Carbon footprint: a catalyst for life cycle assessment? J Ind Ecol. 2008;12:3-6.
18. Wiedmann T. Editorial: carbon footprint and input-output analysis - an introduction. Econ Syst Res. 2009;21:175-86.
19. Wood R, Garnett S. Regional sustainability in Northern Australia - a quantitative assessment of social, economic and environmental impacts. Ecol Econ. 2010;69:1877-82.
20. Ivanova D, Wood R. The unequal distribution of household carbon footprints in Europe and its link to sustainability. Glob Sustain. 2020;3:e18.
21. Wiedenhofer D, Guan D, Liu Z, Meng J, Zhang N, Wei Y. Unequal household carbon footprints in China. Nat Clim Change. 2017;7:75-80.
22. Osorio P, Tobarra MÁ, Tomás M. Are there gender differences in household carbon footprints? Evidence from Spain. Ecol Econ. 2024;219:108130.
23. Pang M, Meirelles J, Moreau V, Binder C. Urban carbon footprints: a consumption-based approach for Swiss households. Environ Res Commun. 2020;2:011003.
24. Schleich J, Dütschke E, Kanberger E, Ziegler A. On the relationship between individual carbon literacy and carbon footprint components. Ecol Econ. 2024;218:108100.
25. Ottelin J, Heinonen J, Nässén J, Junnila S. Household carbon footprint patterns by the degree of urbanisation in Europe. Environ Res Lett. 2019;14:114016.
26. Yu F, Dong H, Geng Y, Fang AS, Li H. Uncovering the differences of household carbon footprints and driving forces between China and Japan. Energy Policy. 2022;165:112990.
27. Zhang X, Wang Y. How to reduce household carbon emissions: a review of experience and policy design considerations. Energy Policy. 2017;102:116-24.
28. Fang K, Song S, Heijungs R, et al. The footprint’s fingerprint: on the classification of the footprint family. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 2016;23:54-62.
29. Fang K, Heijungs R, de Snoo GR. Theoretical exploration for the combination of the ecological, energy, carbon, and water footprints: overview of a footprint family. Ecol Indic. 2014;36:508-18.
30. Wackernagel M, Rees W. Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth. 1997. Available from: https://escholarship.org/content/qt7730w81q/qt7730w81q.pdf?t=q9ns62 [Last accessed on 20 Jun 2024].
31. Finkbeiner M. Carbon footprinting-opportunities and threats. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2009;14:91-4.
33. Matthews HS, Hendrickson CT, Weber CL. The importance of carbon footprint estimation boundaries. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42:5839-42.
34. Wiedmann T, Minx J. A definition of ‘carbon footprint’. In: Ecological economics research trends. New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2008. pp 1-11.
35. Peters GP. Carbon footprints and embodied carbon at multiple scales. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 2010;2:245-50.
36. Wiedmann TO, Lenzen M, Barrett JR. Companies on the scale: comparing and benchmarking the sustainability performance of businesses. J Ind Ecol. 2009;13:361-83.
37. Huang YA, Lenzen M, Weber CL, Murray J, Matthews HS. The role of input-output analysis for the screening of corporate carbon footprints. Econ Syst Res. 2009;21:217-42.
38. Shang W, Chen Y, Yu Q, et al. Spatio-temporal analysis of carbon footprints for urban public transport systems based on smart card data. Appl Energy. 2023;352:121859.
39. Kanemoto K, Moran D, Hertwich EG. Mapping the carbon footprint of nations. Environ Sci Technol. 2016;50:10512-7.
40. Tukker A, Pollitt H, Henkemans M. Consumption-based carbon accounting: sense and sensibility. Climate Policy. 2020;20:S1-13.
41. Pottier A. Expenditure elasticity and income elasticity of GHG emissions: a survey of literature on household carbon footprint. Ecol Econ. 2022;192:107251.
42. Wiedmann TO, Chen G, Barrett J. The concept of city carbon maps: a case study of Melbourne, Australia. J Ind Ecol. 2016;20:676-91.
43. Perobelli FS, Faria WR, Vale VDA. The increase in Brazilian household income and its impact on CO2 emissions: evidence for 2003 and 2009 from input-output tables. Energy Econ. 2015;52:228-39.
44. Seriño MNV, Klasen S. Estimation and determinants of the Philippines' household carbon footprint. Dev Econ. 2015;53:44-62.
45. Steen-Olsen K, Wood R, Hertwich EG. The carbon footprint of norwegian household consumption 1999-2012. J Ind Ecol. 2016;20:582-92.
46. Druckman A, Jackson T. The carbon footprint of UK households 1990-2004: a socio-economically disaggregated, quasi-multi-regional input-output model. Ecol Econ. 2009;68:2066-77.
47. Starr J, Nicolson C, Ash M, Markowitz EM, Moran D. Assessing U.S. consumers' carbon footprints reveals outsized impact of the top 1%. Ecol Econ. 2023;205:107698.
48. Ma X, Du J, Zhang M, Ye Y. Indirect carbon emissions from household consumption between China and the USA: based on an input-output model. Nat Hazards. 2016;84:399-410.
49. Choi T. Understanding environmental responsibility of cities and emissions embodied in trade. Econ Syst Res. 2015;27:133-53.
50. Bachmann C, Kennedy C, Roorda MJ. Applications of random-utility-based multi-region input-output models of transport and the spatial economy. Transport Rev. 2014;34:418-40.
51. Sommer M, Kratena K. The carbon footprint of European households and income distribution. Ecol Econ. 2017;136:62-72.
52. Yao L, Liu JR, Wang RS. Comparison and analysis of carbon emissions embodied in household consumption between urban and rural area of China. Chin J Popul Resour. 2011;21:25-9. Available from: http://www.zgrz.cbpt.cnki.net/WKC/WebPublication/paperDigest.aspx?paperID=efdc19a9-77db-4640-a623-b265728137c0 [Last accessed on 21 Jun 2024]
53. Trainer T. A critical analysis of the 2014 IPCC report on capital cost of mitigation and of renewable energy. Energy Policy. 2017;104:214-20.
54. ISO 14040:2006. Environmental management - life cycle assessment - principles and framework. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/37456.html [Last accessed on 20 Jun 2024].
55. Specification PA. Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. Bsi Br Stand Isbn. 2008;978:580.
56. Bin S, Dowlatabadi H. Consumer lifestyle approach to US energy use and the related CO2 emissions. Energy Policy. 2005;33:197-208.
57. Chen C, Liu G, Meng F, Hao Y, Zhang Y, Casazza M. Energy consumption and carbon footprint accounting of urban and rural residents in Beijing through consumer lifestyle approach. Ecol Indic. 2019;98:575-86.
58. Liu Z, Guan D, Wei W, et al. Reduced carbon emission estimates from fossil fuel combustion and cement production in China. Nature. 2015;524:335-8.
59. Gao X, Chen X, Liu L. Exploring the determinants of the evolution of urban and rural household carbon footprints inequality in China. Energy Policy. 2024;185:113955.
60. Lv J, Liu B, Chai L. Comparing the determinants of household carbon footprints between rural and urban: evidence from China household survey data. China Agr Econ Rev. 2024;16:154-80.
61. Zhang Z, Cui Y, Zhang Z. Unequal age-based household carbon footprint in China. Clim Policy. 2023;23:577-92.
62. An N, Huang C, Shen Y, et al. Efficient data-driven prediction of household carbon footprint in China with limited features. Energy Policy. 2024;185:113926.
63. Liu L, Xu L, Wang S, Tian X. The transition patterns of rural household carbon footprint in China. Resour Environ Sustain. 2023;13:100122.
64. Kanemoto K, Moran D, Shigetomi Y, Reynolds C, Kondo Y. Meat consumption does not explain differences in household food carbon footprints in Japan. One Earth. 2019;1:464-71.
65. Zen IS, Al-Amin AQ, Alam M, Doberstein B. Magnitudes of households’ carbon footprint in Iskandar Malaysia: policy implications for sustainable development. J Clean Prod. 2021;315:128042.
66. Seriño MNV. Rising carbon footprint inequality in the Philippines. Environ Econ Policy Stud. 2020;22:173-95.
67. Mi Z, Zheng J, Meng J, et al. Economic development and converging household carbon footprints in China. Nat Sustain. 2020;3:529-37.
68. Dreyer LC, Niemann AL, Hauschild MZ. Comparison of three different LCIA methods: EDIP97, CML2001 and eco-indicator 99: does it matter which one you choose? Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2003;8:191-200.
69. Steen B. A Systematic approach to environmental priority strategies in product development (Eps). Version 2000 - General system characteristics. 1994. Available from: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=e5fb278678a8e84984e384bf5929dafc74e7adeb [Last accessed on 21 Jun 2024]
70. Toffoletto L, Bulle C, Godin J, Reid C, Deschênes L. LUCAS - a new LCIA method used for a Canadian-specific context. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2007;12:93-102.
71. Bare JC. Traci: the tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts. J Ind Ecol. 2002;6:49-78.
72. Jolliet O, Margni M, Charles R, et al. IMPACT 2002+: a new life cycle impact assessment methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2003;8:324-30.
73. Owsianiak M, Laurent A, Bjørn A, Hauschild MZ. IMPACT 2002+, ReCiPe 2008 and ILCD’s recommended practice for characterization modelling in life cycle impact assessment: a case study-based comparison. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2014;19:1007-21.
