REFERENCES

1. Park JW, Kang JM, Yoo K, Woo KJ. Perfusion area versus volume of the DIEP flap: a multivariable analysis of perforator and flap characteristics for estimation of perfusion area and volume. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024;96:215-22.

2. Suhail D, Faderani R, Mosahebi A, Akali A. Perforator-related risk factors for perfusion-related complications in DIEP Flap breast reconstruction. JPRAS Open. 2025;44:390-401.

3. Saint-Cyr M, Wong C, Schaverien M, Mojallal A, Rohrich RJ. The perforasome theory: vascular anatomy and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1529-44.

4. Taylor GI, Corlett RJ, Ashton MW. The functional angiosome: clinical implications of the anatomical concept. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140:721-33.

5. Schaverien M, Saint-Cyr M, Arbique G, Brown SA. Arterial and venous anatomies of the deep inferior epigastric perforator and superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:1909-19.

6. Sowa Y, Kodama T, Fujikawa K, Morita D, Numajiri T, Sakaguchi K. The influence of venous system patterns on DIEP flap viability for breast reconstruction. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2021;55:361-7.

7. Paganini F, Matarazzo S, Corsini B, et al. Superficial vs. deep venous system in DIEP flaps: lessons from 25 years of CTA-guided planning. J Clin Med. 2025;14:5972.

8. Varnava C, Wiebringhaus P, Kampshoff D, Hirsch T, Kueckelhaus M. Use of the superficial inferior epigastric vein in breast reconstruction with a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap. Front Surg. 2023;10:1050172.

9. Zhu Y, Yoo H, Min S, Chang H. Efficacy of superficial inferior epigastric vein superdrainage in free TRAM and DIEP flap: an indocyanine green angiography study of 68 cases. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023;84:385-91.

10. Kramer A, Lava CX, Li KR, Berger LE, Khayat E, Song DH. Indocyanine green angiography for detecting quantitative perfusion changes in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction with second venous drainage. Ann Plast Surg. 2024;93:215-20.

11. Kleiss SF, Michi M, Schuurman SN, de Vries JPPM, Werker PMN, de Jongh SJ. Tissue perfusion in DIEP flaps using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography, Hyperspectral imaging, and Thermal imaging. JPRAS Open. 2024;41:61-74.

12. Zötterman J, Tesselaar E, Elawa S, Elmasry M, Farnebo S. Perfusion mapping of flaps using indocyanine green fluorescence angiography and laser speckle contrast imaging. last Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024;12:e5964.

13. Fiedler M. Algebraic connectivity of graphs. Czech Math J. 1973;23:298-305.

14. Dorfler F, Bullo F. Kron reduction of graphs with applications to electrical networks. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I. 2013;60:150-63.

15. Tyree MT, Sperry JS. Do woody plants operate near the point of catastrophic xylem dysfunction caused by dynamic water stress?: answers from a model. Plant Physiol. 1988;88:574-80.

16. Shapley LS. 17. A value for n-person games. In: Kuhn HW, Tucker AW, Editors. Contributions to the Theory of Games, Volume II. Princeton University Press; 1953. pp. 307-17.

17. Ford LR, Fulkerson DR. Maximal flow through a network. Can J Math. 1956;8:399-404.

18. Tange FP, Peul RC, van den Hoven P, et al. Establishing reference curves for vital tissue perfusion using quantitative near-infrared fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025;410:28.

19. Kapila AK, Lamtenzan Marcos D, Ceranka J, et al. Automated CTA-based perforator mapping for DIEP flap planning in breast cancer reconstruction. Art Int Surg. 2026;6:255-67.