REFERENCES
1. GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392:1789-858.
2. Muelbauer EJ, Alvi MA, Kennedy DJ, Fehlings MG. The future is now: how AI is reshaping spine care. N Am Spine Soc J. 2025;24:100825.
3. Yahanda AT, Joseph K, Bui T, et al. Current applications and future implications of artificial intelligence in spine surgery and research: a narrative review and commentary. Global Spine J. 2025;15:1445-54.
4. Lee S, Jung JY, Mahatthanatrakul A, Kim JS. Artificial intelligence in spinal imaging and patient care: a review of recent advances. Neurospine. 2024;21:474-86.
5. Kumar R, Dougherty C, Sporn K, et al. Intelligence architectures and machine learning applications in contemporary spine care. Bioengineering. 2025;12:967.
6. Macleod JS, Compton T, Bakaes Y, et al. Artificial intelligence in spine surgery: imaging-based applications for diagnosis and surgical techniques. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2025;18:398-405.
7. Guo S, Yang Y, Wang M, et al. Effects of an exoskeleton robot on motor function in patients with spinal cord injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2025;14:218.
8. Li J, Chen T, Yan X, Luo L. The effect of device-based neuromodulation on the motor recovery of patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2025;63:621-32.
9. Wang X, Chen N, Du Z, et al. Bioinformatics analysis integrating metabolomics of m6A RNA microarray in intervertebral disc degeneration. Epigenomics. 2020;12:1419-41.
10. Jusoh AS, Remli MA, Mohamad MS, Cazenave T, Fong CS. How generative Artificial Intelligence can transform drug discovery? Eur J Med Chem. 2025;295:117825.
11. Zhang D, Li ZZ, Zhang ML, et al. From System 1 to System 2: a survey of reasoning large language models. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2026;48:3335-54.
12. Wang J, Redelmeier DA. Artificial intelligence chain-of-thought reasoning in nuanced medical scenarios: mitigation of cognitive biases through model intransigence. BMJ Qual Saf. 2026;35:456-63.
13. Duan Z, Huang X, Lu R, et al. Multi-center benchmarking of large language models for clinical decision support in lung cancer screening. Cell Rep Med. 2025;6:102465.
14. Vasey B, Nagendran M, Campbell B, et al. Reporting guideline for the early stage clinical evaluation of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence: DECIDE-AI. BMJ. 2022;377:e070904.
15. Lekadir K, Frangi AF, Porras AR, et al. FUTURE-AI: international consensus guideline for trustworthy and deployable artificial intelligence in healthcare. BMJ. 2025;388:e081554.
16. Yilihamu EE, Zeng FS, Shang J, Yang JT, Zhong H, Feng SQ. GPT4LFS (generative pretrained transformer 4 omni for lumbar foramina stenosis): enhancing lumbar foraminal stenosis image classification through large multimodal models. Spine J. 2025;25:2071-80.
17. Liu J, Zhu X, Shi Z, et al. Text-guided multimodal deep learning in magnetic resonance imaging for spinal structures segmentation and lumbar abnormalities identification. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025;15:9710-28.
18. Gan L, Ma M, Liu Y, et al. A clinical-radiomics model for predicting axillary pathologic complete response in breast cancer with axillary lymph node metastases. Front Oncol. 2021;11:786346.
19. Balza R, Palmer WE. Symptom-imaging correlation in lumbar spine pain. Skeletal Radiol. 2023;52:1901-9.
20. Bizzo BC, Dasegowda G, Bridge C, et al. Addressing the challenges of implementing artificial intelligence tools in clinical practice: principles from experience. J Am Coll Radiol. 2023;20:352-60.
21. Mcsweeney TP, Tiulpin A, Saarakkala S, et al. External validation of spinenet, an open-source deep learning model for grading lumbar disk degeneration MRI features, Using the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966. Spine. 2023;48:484-91.
22. Grob A, Loibl M, Jamaludin A, et al. External validation of the deep learning system “SpineNet” for grading radiological features of degeneration on MRIs of the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J. 2022;31:2137-48.
23. Zhu Z, Li Q, Wei Y, Song R. Hierarchical multi-level dynamic hyperparameter deformable image registration with convolutional neural network. Phys Med Biol. 2024;69:175007.
24. Zhang K, Li Z, Cai C, et al. Semi‐supervised graph convolutional networks for the domain adaptive recognition of thyroid nodules in cross‐device ultrasound images. Med Phys. 2023;50:7806-21.
25. Kuang Z, Yan Z, Abayazeed A, Wagner F, Yu L, Reyes M. ROXSI: robust cross-sequence semantic interaction for brain tumor segmentation on multi-sequence MR images. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2025;29:2899-910.
26. Amjad A, Xu J, Thill D, et al. Deep learning auto-segmentation on multi-sequence magnetic resonance images for upper abdominal organs. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1209558.
27. Isensee F, Jaeger PF, Kohl SAA, Petersen J, Maier-Hein KH. nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation. Nat Methods. 2020;18:203-11.
28. Nauroth-Kreß AC, Weiner S, Hölzli L, et al. Automated segmentation of the dorsal root ganglia in MRI. Neuroimage. 2025;311:121189.
29. Xia Y, Li J, Deng B, et al. Knowledge graph-enhanced deep learning model (H-SYSTEM) for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage: model development and validation. J Med Internet Res. 2025;27:e66055.
30. Yousefzadeh N, Tran C, Ramirez-Zamora A, Chen J, Fang R, Thai MT. Neuron-level explainable AI for Alzheimer’s Disease assessment from fundus images. Sci Rep. 2024;14:7710.
31. Huang W, Cao G, Xia J, Chen J, Wang H, Zhang J. H-calibration: rethinking classifier recalibration with probabilistic error-bounded objective. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2025;47:9023-42.
32. Huang Y, Yang G, Shen Y, et al. Application of large language models in complex clinical cases: cross-sectional evaluation study. JMIR Med Inform. 2025;13:e73941.
33. Khan R, Alzaben N, Daradkeh YI, Lee MY, Ullah I. Bilateral collaborative streams with multi-modal attention network for accurate polyp segmentation. Sci Rep. 2025;15:34182.
34. Abugabah A, Shukla PK, Shukla PK, Pandey A. An intelligent healthcare system for rare disease diagnosis utilizing electronic health records based on a knowledge-guided multimodal transformer framework. BioData Min. 2025;18:70.
35. Li Y, Fredrickson V, Resnick DK. How should we grade lumbar disc herniation and nerve root compression? A systematic review. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2015;473:1896-902.
36. Su ZH, Liu J, Yang MS, et al. Automatic grading of disc herniation, central canal stenosis and nerve roots compression in lumbar magnetic resonance image diagnosis. Front Endocrinol. 2022;13:890371.
37. Zhang W, Chen Z, Su Z, et al. Deep learning‐based detection and classification of lumbar disc herniation on magnetic resonance images. JOR Spine. 2023;6:e1276.
38. Xu Y, Zheng S, Tian Q, et al. Deep learning model for grading and localization of lumbar disc herniation on magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024;61:364-75.
39. Baur D, Bieck R, Berger J, et al. Automated three-dimensional imaging and pfirrmann classification of intervertebral disc using a graphical neural network in sagittal magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine. J Imaging Inform Med. 2025;38:979-87.
40. Wang D, Yang Z, Huang Z, Gu L. Spine segmentation with multi-view GCN and boundary constraint. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2022;2022:2136-9.
41. Ghobrial G, Roth C. Deep learning-based automated segmentation and quantification of the dural sac cross-sectional area in lumbar spine MRI. Front Radiol. 2025;5:1503625.
42. Wáng YXJ, Diacinti D, Aparisi Gómez MP, et al. Radiological diagnosis of prevalent osteoporotic vertebral fracture on radiographs: an interim consensus from a group of experts of the ESSR osteoporosis and metabolism subcommittee. Skeletal Radiol. 2024;53:2563-74.
43. Tian J, Wang K, Wu P, Li J, Zhang X, Wang X. Development of a deep learning model for detecting lumbar vertebral fractures on CT images: an external validation. Eur J Radiol. 2024;180:111685.
44. Glessgen C, Cyriac J, Yang S, et al. A deep learning pipeline for systematic and accurate vertebral fracture reporting in computed tomography. Clin Radiol. 2025;83:106827.
45. Won D, Lee HJ, Lee SJ, Park SH. Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Grading in Multiple Level Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. Global Spine J. 2025;15:2309-17.
46. Wang T, Chen R, Fan N, et al. Machine learning and deep learning for diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2024;26:e54676.
47. Muiño-Mosquera L, Cervi E, De Groote K, et al. Management of aortic disease in children with FBN1-related Marfan syndrome. Eur Heart J. 2024;45:4156-69.
48. Le Huu A, Olive JK, Cekmecelioglu D, et al. Endovascular therapy for patients with heritable thoracic aortic disease. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2022;11:31-6.
49. Lin M, Liu Z, Liu G, et al. ; Deciphering Disorders Involving Scoliosis and COmorbidities (DISCO) study. Genetic and molecular mechanism for distinct clinical phenotypes conveyed by allelic truncating mutations implicated in FBN1. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2020;8:e1023.
50. Bradley‐Watson J, Glatzel H, Turner HE, Orchard E. Elective aortic surgery for prevention of aortic dissection in turner syndrome: the potential impact of updated european society of cardiology and international turner syndrome consensus group guidelines on referrals to the heart team. Clin Endocrinol. 2025;102:559-64.
51. Xu D, Descovich M, Liu H, Sheng K. Robust localization of poorly visible tumor in fiducial free stereotactic body radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol. 2024;200:110514.
52. Beaufort Q, Lefevre V, Carsuzaa T. Imaging of spinal metastases: modality performance, complications, and differential diagnosis. Neurochirurgie. 2026;72:101804.
53. Bahouth SM, Yeboa DN, Ghia AJ, et al. Multidisciplinary management of spinal metastases: what the radiologist needs to know. Br J Radiol. 2022;95:20220266.
54. Huang Y, Jiao J, Yu J, Zheng Y, Wang Y. Anatomy-inspired model for critical landmark localization in 3D spinal ultrasound volume data. Med Image Anal. 2025;103:103610.
55. Zhao S, Zhao H, Zhao L, et al. ; Deciphering disorders Involving Scoliosis and COmorbidities (DISCO) study. Unraveling the genetic architecture of congenital vertebral malformation with reference to the developing spine. Nat Commun. 2024;15:1125.
56. Wan HS, Wong DLL, To CS, Meng N, Zhang T, Cheung JPY. 3D prediction of curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis based on biplanar radio logical reconstruction: a systematic review. Bone Jt Open. 2024;5:243-51.
57. Tiede-Lewis LM, Dallas SL. Changes in the osteocyte lacunocanalicular network with aging. Bone. 2019;122:101-13.
58. Wang H, Zhang T, Zhang C, et al. An intelligent composite model incorporating global/regional X-rays and clinical parameters to predict progressive adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curvatures and facilitate population screening. EBioMedicine. 2023;95:104768.
59. Cortellini A, Santo V, Brunetti L, et al. Transformer-based AI approach to unravel long-term, time-dependent prognostic complexity in patients with advanced NSCLC and PD-L1 ≥ 50%: insights from the pembrolizumab 5-year global registry. J Immunother Cancer. 2025;13:e012423.
60. Wang Y, Hao R, Guo L, Zhou X. Biomechanical optimization study of posterior tilt extension stems in the repair of tibial plateau bone defects. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025;13:1688915.
61. Ahmadi M, Zhang X, Lin M, et al. Automated finite element modeling of the lumbar spine: a biomechanical and clinical approach to spinal load distribution and stress analysis. World Neurosurg. 2025;201:124236.
62. Silveira JT, S G, Kundapur PP. Automated lumbar spine segmentation in MRI using an enhanced U-Net with inception module and dual-output mechanism. Sci Rep. 2025;15:39215.
63. Caprara S, Carrillo F, Snedeker JG, Farshad M, Senteler M. Automated pipeline to generate anatomically accurate patient-specific biomechanical models of healthy and pathological FSUs. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9:636953.
64. Zaidi Q, Danisa OA, Cheng W. Measurement techniques and utility of hounsfield unit values for assessment of bone quality prior to spinal instrumentation: a review of current literature. Spine. 2019;44:E239-44.
65. McLean KA, Sgrò A, Brown LR, et al. ; TWIST Collaborators. Multimodal machine learning to predict surgical site infection with healthcare workload impact assessment. NPJ Digit Med. 2025;8:121.
66. Chang G, Rajapakse CS, Philipp TC, Madi R, Sheth NP, Protopsaltis TS. Preoperative CT-based finite element vertebral modulus analysis predicts bone quality-related complications after lumbar spine fusion. Spine. 2026; Epub ahead of print.
67. Franceschini C, Ahmadi M, Zhang X, et al. Revolutionizing spine surgery with emerging AI-FEA integration. J Robot Surg. 2025;19:615.
68. Fritzell P, Mesterton J, Hagg O. Prediction of outcome after spinal surgery - using The Dialogue Support based on the Swedish national quality register. Eur Spine J. 2021;31:889-900.
69. Nguyen D, Beauséjour MH, Solorzano Barrera C, Qiao N, Villemure I, Aubin CÉ. Finite element modeling of pedicle screw fixation considering patient-specific bone density. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2025:1-11.
70. Sensale M, Vendeuvre T, Schilling C, Grupp T, Rochette M, Dall’Ara E. Patient-specific finite element models of posterior pedicle screw fixation: effect of screw’s size and geometry. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9:643154.
71. Wu H, Tang X, Wang W, Li R. The AI-powered orthopedic digital twin: a new paradigm for personalized diagnosis, surgical simulation, and prognostic management - a scoping review. Art Int Surg. 2026;6:320-39.
72. Lungu AJ, Swinkels W, Claesen L, Tu P, Egger J, Chen X. A review on the applications of virtual reality, augmented reality and mixed reality in surgical simulation: an extension to different kinds of surgery. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2021;18:47-62.
73. Ghaednia H, Fourman MS, Lans A, et al. Augmented and virtual reality in spine surgery, current applications and future potentials. Spine J. 2021;21:1617-25.
74. Jung Y, Muddaluru V, Gandhi P, Pahuta M, Guha D. The development and applications of augmented and virtual reality technology in spine surgery training: a systematic review. Can J Neurol Sci. 2024;51:255-64.
75. Bui T, Ruiz-Cardozo MA, Dave HS, et al. Virtual, augmented, and mixed reality applications for surgical rehearsal, operative execution, and patient education in spine surgery: a scoping review. Medicina. 2024;60:332.
76. Weiss MY, Melnyk R, Mix D, Ghazi A, Vates GE, Stone JJ. Design and validation of a cervical laminectomy simulator using 3d printing and hydrogel phantoms. Oper Surg. 2020;18:202-8.
77. Adermann J, Geissler N, Bernal LE, Kotzsch S, Korb W. Development and validation of an artificial wetlab training system for the lumbar discectomy. Eur Spine J. 2014;23:1978-83.
78. Luciano CJ, Banerjee PP, Bellotte B, et al. Learning retention of thoracic pedicle screw placement using a high-resolution augmented reality simulator with haptic feedback. Neurosurgery. 2011;69:ons14-9.
79. Pfandler M, Lazarovici M, Stefan P, Wucherer P, Weigl M. Virtual reality-based simulators for spine surgery: a systematic review. Spine J. 2017;17:1352-63.
80. Sumdani H, Aguilar-Salinas P, Avila MJ, Barber SR, Dumont T. Utility of augmented reality and virtual reality in spine surgery: a systematic review of the literature. World Neurosurg. 2022;161:e8-17.
81. Li HM, Zhang RJ, Shen CL. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement and clinical outcomes of robot-assisted technique versus conventional freehand technique in spine surgery from nine randomized controlled trials: a meta-analysis. Spine. 2020;45:E111-9.
82. Riewruja K, Tanasansomboon T, Yingsakmongkol W, et al. A network meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of pedicle screw placement techniques using intraoperative conventional, navigation, robot-assisted, and augmented reality guiding systems. Int J Spine Surg. 2024;18:551-70.
83. Girgis M, Kelliher A, Pheasant MS, Tang A, Badve S, Chen T. Artificial intelligence in intraoperative imaging and navigation for spine surgery: a narrative review. J Clin Med. 2026;15:2779.
84. Liebmann F, von Atzigen M, Stütz D, et al. Automatic registration with continuous pose updates for marker-less surgical navigation in spine surgery. Med Image Anal. 2024;91:103027.
85. Lu H, Liu M, Yu K, Fang Y, Zhao J, Shi Y. A deep learning-based fully automated vertebra segmentation and labeling workflow. Br J Hosp Med. 2025;86:1-22.
86. Ao Y, Esfandiari H, Carrillo F, et al. SafeRPlan: safe deep reinforcement learning for intraoperative planning of pedicle screw placement. Med Image Anal. 2025;99:103345.
87. Hao L, Liu D, Du S, et al. An improved path planning algorithm based on artificial potential field and primal-dual neural network for surgical robot. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022;227:107202.
88. Klitzner F, Inigo Romillo B, Killeen BD, et al. Investigating robot control policy learning for autonomous x-ray-guided spine procedures. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2026;21:1387-96.
89. Ahmadi M, Chen H, Lin M, et al. Streamlined and efficient patient-specific modeling for lumbar spine segmentation and finite element analysis. Sci Rep. 2025;15:35619.
90. Götschi T, Maranta G, Cornaz F, Abel F, Farshad M, Widmer J. Automated multi-objective pedicle screw planning. J Spine Surg. 2026;15:51.
91. Luchmann D, Jecklin S, Cavalcanti NA, et al. Spinal navigation with AI-driven 3D-reconstruction of fluoroscopy images: an ex-vivo feasibility study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024;25:925.
92. Mesinovic M, Watkinson P, Zhu T. DySurv: dynamic deep learning model for survival analysis with conditional variational inference. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2026;33:112-22.
93. Kim KB, Kim GB, Kim JH, Lee SM. Artificial intelligence in total knee arthroplasty: clinical applications and implications. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2025;37:44.
94. Wang T, Chen R, Liang M, et al. Comparative performance of LLMs and machine learning in predicting complications after percutaneous kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. NPJ Digit Med. 2026;9:401.
95. Hoare D, Kingsmore D, Holsgrove M, et al. Realtime monitoring of thrombus formation in vivo using a self-reporting vascular access graft. Commun Med. 2024;4:15.
96. Sun Y, Meng K, Lang S, Li P, Wang W, Yang J. Multi-classification model for PPG signal arrhythmia based on time-frequency dual-domain attention fusion. Sensors. 2025;25:5985.
97. Shickel B, Loftus TJ, Ruppert M, et al. Dynamic predictions of postoperative complications from explainable, uncertainty-aware, and multi-task deep neural networks. Sci Rep. 2023;13:1224.
98. Sumner J, Lim HW, Chong LS, Bundele A, Mukhopadhyay A, Kayambu G. Artificial intelligence in physical rehabilitation: a systematic review. Artif Intell Med. 2023;146:102693.
99. Lanotte F, O’brien MK, Jayaraman A. AI in rehabilitation medicine: opportunities and challenges. Ann Rehabil Med. 2023;47:444-58.
100. Khalid UB, Naeem M, Stasolla F, Syed MH, Abbas M, Coronato A. Impact of AI-powered solutions in rehabilitation process: recent improvements and future trends. Int J Gen Med. 2024;17:943-69.
101. Zhu A, Liu Y, Liu Y. Identification of key genes and regulatory mechanisms in adult degenerative scoliosis. J Clin Neurosci. 2024;119:170-9.
102. Wang W, Liu C, He D, et al. CircRNA CDR1as affects functional repair after spinal cord injury and regulates fibrosis through the SMAD pathway. Pharmacol Res. 2024;204:107189.
103. Mirza B, Wang W, Wang J, Choi H, Chung NC, Ping P. Machine learning and integrative analysis of biomedical big data. Genes. 2019;10:87.
104. Morello G, La Cognata V, Guarnaccia M, Gentile G, Cavallaro S. Artificial intelligence-driven multi-omics approaches in glioblastoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26:9362.
105. Yang X, Mann KK, Wu H, Ding J. scCross: a deep generative model for unifying single-cell multi-omics with seamless integration, cross-modal generation, and in silico exploration. Genome Biol. 2024;25:198.
106. Wang R, Zheng Y, Zhang Z, et al. MATES: a deep learning-based model for locus-specific quantification of transposable elements in single cell. Nat Commun. 2024;15:8798.
107. Long W, Liu T, Xue L, Zhao H. spVelo: RNA velocity inference for multi-batch spatial transcriptomics data. Genome Biol. 2025;26:239.
108. Peng H, Chen P, Liu R, Chen L. Spatiotemporal information conversion machine for time-series forecasting. Fundam Res. 2024;4:1674-87.
109. Ramakrishnan S, Cortes-Gomez E, Athans SR, et al. Race-specific coregulatory and transcriptomic profiles associated with DNA methylation and androgen receptor in prostate cancer. Genome Med. 2024;16:52.
110. Qiu W, Dincer AB, Janizek JD, et al. Deep profiling of gene expression across 18 human cancers. Nat Biomed Eng. 2025;9:333-55.
111. Pan W, Hathi D, Xu Z, Zhang Q, Li Y, Wang F. Identification of predictive subphenotypes for clinical outcomes using real world data and machine learning. Nat Commun. 2025;16:3797.
112. Luttens A, Cabeza de Vaca I, Sparring L, et al. Rapid traversal of vast chemical space using machine learning-guided docking screens. Nat Comput Sci. 2025;5:301-12.
113. Liu Z, Huang D, Zheng S, et al. Deep learning enables discovery of highly potent anti-osteoporosis natural products. Eur J Med Chem. 2021;210:112982.
114. Sevgen E, Moller J, Lange A, et al. ProT-VAE: Protein Transformer Variational AutoEncoder for functional protein design. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025;122:e2408737122.
115. Hostaš J, Ghaemi MS, Hu H, Lin J, Hu A, Ooi HK. VNFlow: integration of variational autoencoders and normalizing flows for novel molecular design. J Cheminform. 2025;17:161.
116. Li S, Fan J, He H, Zhou R, Liao J. MolP-PC: a multi-view fusion and multi-task learning framework for drug ADMET property prediction. Chin J Nat Med. 2025;23:1293-300.
117. Yang Y, Zhou H, Wang Y, et al. Phillygenin improves the focal adhesion kinase/glycogen synthase kinase 3β/β‐catenin axis to promote mesenchymal stem cell osteogenic differentiation. Phytother Res. 2025;39:4991-5005.
118. Li J, Chen J, Bai H, et al. An Overview of Organs-on-Chips Based on Deep Learning. Research. 2022;2022:9869518.
119. Xiao RR, Jing B, Yan L, Li J, Tu P, Ai X. Constant-rate perfused array chip for high-throughput screening of drug permeability through brain endothelium. Lab Chip. 2022;22:4481-92.
120. Zhou L, Li G, Yao J, et al. Emulation and evaluation of tumor cell combined chemotherapy in isotropic/anisotropic collagen fiber microenvironments. Lab Chip. 2024;24:2999-3014.
121. Lorach H, Galvez A, Spagnolo V, et al. Walking naturally after spinal cord injury using a brain-spine interface. Nature. 2023;618:126-33.
122. Hankov N, Caban M, Demesmaeker R, et al. Augmenting rehabilitation robotics with spinal cord neuromodulation: a proof of concept. Sci Robot. 2025;10:eadn5564.
123. Yao Y, Hasan WZW, Jiao W, et al. ChatGPT and BCI-VR: a new integrated diagnostic and therapeutic perspective for the accurate diagnosis and personalized treatment of mild cognitive impairment. Front Hum Neurosci. 2024;18:1426055.
124. Awuah WA, Ahluwalia A, Darko K, et al. Bridging minds and machines: the recent advances of brain-computer interfaces in neurological and neurosurgical applications. World Neurosurg. 2024;189:138-53.
125. Xu D, Tang F, Li Y, Zhang Q, Feng X. An analysis of deep learning models in SSVEP-based BCI: a survey. Brain Sciences. 2023;13:483.
126. Moreno-Castelblanco SR, Vélez-Guerrero MA, Callejas-Cuervo M. Artificial intelligence approaches for EEG signal acquisition and processing in lower-limb motor imagery: a systematic review. Sensors. 2025;25:5030.
127. Cha JM, Hong J, Yoo J, Rha DW. Wearable robots for rehabilitation and assistance of gait: a narrative review. Ann Rehabil Med. 2025;49:187-95.
128. Moriarty B, Jacob T, Sadlowski M, et al. The use of exoskeleton robotic training on lower extremity function in spinal cord injuries: a systematic review. J Orthop. 2025;65:1-7.
129. Kim RY, Biller OM, Mulcahey MJ. Evaluating therapeutic effects of exoskeletons and FES in SCI: integrative review of the literature. Spinal Cord. 2025;63:323-32.
130. White C, Doherty O, Smith E, et al. Exoskeleton training for spinal cord injury neuropathic pain (ExSCIP): protocol for a phase 2 feasibility randomised trial. HRB Open Res. 2024;7:55.
131. Onate D, Hogan C, Fitzgerald K, White KT, Tansey K. Recommendations for clinical decision-making when offering exoskeletons for community use in individuals with spinal cord injury. Front Rehabil Sci. 2024;5:1428708.
132. Hasson CJ, Manczurowsky J, Collins EC, Yarossi M. Neurorehabilitation robotics: how much control should therapists have? Front Hum Neurosci. 2023;17:1179418.
133. Collins GS, Dhiman P, Ma J, et al. Evaluation of clinical prediction models (part 1): from development to external validation. BMJ. 2024;384:e074819.
134. Collins GS, Moons KGM, Dhiman P, et al. TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods. BMJ. 2024;385:e078378.
135. Moons KGM, Damen JAA, Kaul T, et al. PROBAST+AI: an updated quality, risk of bias, and applicability assessment tool for prediction models using regression or artificial intelligence methods. BMJ. 2025;388:e082505.
136. Tejani AS, Klontzas ME, Gatti AA, et al. ; CLAIM 2024 Update Panel. Checklist for artificial intelligence in medical imaging (CLAIM): 2024 update. Radiol Artif Intell. 2024;6:e240300.
137. Cruz Rivera S, Liu X, Chan AW, et al. ; SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI Consensus Group. Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI extension. Nat Med. 2020;26:1351-63.
138. Liu X, Cruz Rivera S, Moher D, et al. ; SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI Working Group. Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension. Nat Med. 2020;26:1364-74.
139. Acosta JN, Falcone GJ, Rajpurkar P, Topol EJ. Multimodal biomedical AI. Nat Med. 2022;28:1773-84.
140. Diniz P, Grimm B, Garcia F, et al. Digital twin systems for musculoskeletal applications: a current concepts review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025;33:1892-910.
141. Ahmed MM, Okesanya OJ, Oweidat M, Othman ZK, Musa SS, Lucero-Prisno Iii DE. The ethics of data mining in healthcare: challenges, frameworks, and future directions. BioData Min. 2025;18:47.
142. Lim M, Labaran L, Vengsarkar VA, Jin L, Li X. The devil is in the details-near-miss wrong-level thoracic spine surgery despite robotic navigation: a case report. JBJS Case Connect. 2025;15.
143. Giouroukou K, Marias K, Tsiknakis M, Klontzas ME. Rethinking privacy in medical imaging AI: from metadata and pixel-level identification risks to federated learning and synthetic data challenges. Radiol Artif Intell. 2026;8:e250273.
144. Bhavani Sowndharya B, Mathan Muthu CM, Vickram AS, Saravanan A. Bio-ethical considerations in the application of artificial intelligence in spinal surgery. Brain Spine. 2025;5:104161.
145. Lawson McLean A. Towards precision medicine in spinal surgery: leveraging AI technologies. Ann Biomed Eng. 2024;52:735-7.
146. Hu L, Li D, Liu H, et al. Enhancing fairness in AI-enabled medical systems with the attribute neutral framework. Nat Commun. 2024;15:8767.
