REFERENCES
1. Woolf AD, Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81:646-56.
2. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. World population aging 2023: Challenges and opportunities of population ageing in the least developed countries. 2024. Available from https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/content/launch-World-Population-Ageing-2023 [accessed 26 June 2026].
3. Qiu K, Wang C, Mo X, et al. The global macroeconomic burden of musculoskeletal disorders. Int J Surg. 2025;111:7857-66.
4. Molina-Garcia P, Mora-Traverso M, Prieto-Moreno R, Díaz-Vásquez A, Antony B, Ariza-Vega P. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telerehabilitation for musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2024;67:101791.
5. Raleigh SM. Genetic and epigenetic factors that predispose to musculoskeletal disorders. Genes. 2024;15:1194.
6. Seixas-Lopes FA, Lopes C, Marques M, Agostinho C, Jardim-Goncalves R. Musculoskeletal disorder (MSD) health data collection, personalized management and exchange using Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR). Sensors. 2024;24:5175.
7. Macdonald WA, Oakman J. Changes needed to reduce risk of musculoskeletal disorders. Am J Ind Med. 2024;67:575-81.
8. Mosquera-Lopez C, Jacobs PG. Digital twins and artificial intelligence in metabolic disease research. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2024;35:549-57.
10. Katsoulakis E, Wang Q, Wu H, et al. Digital twins for health: a scoping review. NPJ Digit Med. 2024;7:77.
11. Reiche LT, Gundlach CS, Mewes GF, Fay A. The digital twin of a system: a structure for networks of digital twins. In: 2021 IEEE 26th International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA); 2021 Sep 7-10; Vasteras, Sweden. IEEE; 2021. pp. 1-8.
12. Zhang K, Zhou H, Baptista-Hon DT, et al. Concepts and applications of digital twins in healthcare and medicine. Patterns. 2024;5:101028.
13. Venkatesh KP, Raza MM, Kvedar JC. Health digital twins as tools for precision medicine: considerations for computation, implementation, and regulation. NPJ Digit Med. 2022;5:150.
14. Sun T, He X, Li Z. Digital twin in healthcare: recent updates and challenges. Digit Health. 2023;9:20552076221149651.
15. Shen S, Qi W, Liu X, et al. From virtual to reality: innovative practices of digital twins in tumor therapy. J Transl Med. 2025;23:348.
16. Gkintoni E, Halkiopoulos C. Digital twin cognition: AI-biomarker integration in biomimetic neuropsychology. Biomimetics. 2025;10:640.
17. Karakasis P, Antoniadis AP, Theofilis P, et al. Digital twin models in atrial fibrillation: charting the future of precision therapy? J Pers Med. 2025;15:256.
18. Olawade DB, Almarzook S, Ogunbona MA, Makanjuola BD, Olawuyi OF, Wada OZ. Digital twin applications in healthcare for people living with disability. Int J Med Inf. 2026;212:106359.
19. Bellman R. An introduction to artificial intelligence: can computers think? San Francisco: Boyd & Fraser Pub. Co.; 1978. Available from https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/2762753 [accessed 26 June 2026].
21. Aung YYM, Wong DCS, Ting DSW. The promise of artificial intelligence: a review of the opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence in healthcare. Br Med Bull. 2021;139:4-15.
22. Olawade DB, Wada OJ, David-olawade AC, Kunonga E, Abaire O, Ling J. Using artificial intelligence to improve public health: a narrative review. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1196397.
23. Sabanayagam C, Banu R, Lim C, et al. Artificial intelligence in chronic kidney disease management: a scoping review. Theranostics. 2025;15:4566-78.
24. Cho S, Kim H, Joh J. Digital twin and artificial intelligence technologies to assess the type IA endoleak. Bioengineering. 2025;13:1.
25. Mulder ST, Omidvari A, Rueten-budde AJ, et al. Dynamic digital twin: diagnosis, treatment, prediction, and prevention of disease during the life course. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24:e35675.
26. Jiang F, Jiang Y, Zhi H, et al. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017;2:230-43.
27. Li H, Zhang J, Zhang N, Zhu B. Advancing emergency care with digital twins. JMIR Aging. 2025;8:e71777.
28. Lee YK, Yoon E, Kim TH, Kim J, Kim J. Musculoskeletal digital therapeutics and digital health rehabilitation: a global paradigm shift in orthopedic care. J Clin Med. 2025;14:8467.
29. Shen M, Chen S, Ding X. The effectiveness of digital twins in promoting precision health across the entire population: a systematic review. NPJ Digit Med. 2024;7:145.
30. Prunella M, Altini N, D’alessandro R, et al. Pharmacometric and Digital Twin modeling for adaptive scheduling of combination therapy in advanced gastric cancer. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2025;270:108919.
31. Lei Z, Zhou H, Dai X, Hu W, Liu G. Digital twin based monitoring and control for DC-DC converters. Nat Commun. 2023;14:5604.
32. Guo Y, Liu Y, Sun W, et al. Digital twin-driven dynamic monitoring system of the upper limb force. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2023;27:1691-703.
33. Dihan MS, Akash AI, Tasneem Z, et al. Digital twin: data exploration, architecture, implementation and future. Heliyon. 2024;10:e26503.
34. Thangaraj PM, Benson SH, Oikonomou EK, Asselbergs FW, Khera R. Cardiovascular care with digital twin technology in the era of generative artificial intelligence. Eur Heart J. 2024;45:4808-21.
35. Avanzato R, Beritelli F, Lombardo A, Ricci C. Lung-DT: an AI-powered digital twin framework for thoracic health monitoring and diagnosis. Sensors. 2024;24:958.
36. Andres A, Roland M, Wickert K, et al. Advantages of digital twin technology in orthopedic trauma surgery - exploring different clinical use cases. Sci Rep. 2025;15:19987.
38. Hashimoto DA, Witkowski E, Gao L, Meireles O, Rosman G. Artificial intelligence in anesthesiology: current techniques, clinical applications, and limitations. Anesthesiology. 2020;132:379-94.
39. Saratkar SY, Langote M, Kumar P, Gote P, Weerarathna IN, Mishra GV. Digital twin for personalized medicine development. Front Digit Health. 2025;7:1583466.
40. Bordukova M, Makarov N, Rodriguez-esteban R, Schmich F, Menden MP. Generative artificial intelligence empowers digital twins in drug discovery and clinical trials. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2023;19:33-42.
41. Meijer C, Uh H, El Bouhaddani S. Digital twins in healthcare: methodological challenges and opportunities. J Pers Med. 2023;13:1522.
42. Arksey H, O’malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8:19-32.
43. Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5:69.
44. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:467-73.
45. Guo Q, Jiang G, Zhao Q, et al. Rapid review: a review of methods and recommendations based on current evidence. J Evid Based Med. 2024;17:434-53.
46. Nørgaard B, Briel M, Chrysostomou S, et al. A systematic review of meta-research studies finds substantial methodological heterogeneity in citation analyses to monitor evidence-based research. J Clin Epidemiol. 2022;150:126-41.
47. Hernigou P, Olejnik R, Safar A, Martinov S, Hernigou J, Ferre B. Digital twins, artificial intelligence, and machine learning technology to identify a real personalized motion axis of the tibiotalar joint for robotics in total ankle arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2021;45:2209-17.
48. Farhadiyadkuri F, Zhang X. A Five‐dimensional three‐layer digital twin to train a reinforcement learning agent for interaction control of a robotic exoskeleton in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis rehabilitation. Int J Mech Sys Dyn. 2025;5:385-400.
49. Hoyer G, Gao KT, Gassert FG, et al. Foundations of a knee joint digital twin from qMRI biomarkers for osteoarthritis and knee replacement. NPJ Digit Med. 2025;8:118.
50. Ahmadian H, Mageswaran P, Walter BA, et al. Toward an artificial intelligence‐assisted framework for reconstructing the digital twin of vertebra and predicting its fracture response. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2022;38:e3601.
51. Yu H, Huang Z, Liu Q, Carlucho I, Erden MS. Replication of impedance identification experiments on a reinforcement-learning-controlled digital twin of human elbows. In: 2024 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN); 2024 Jun 30-Jul 5; Yokohama, Japan. IEEE; 2024. pp. 1-8.
52. Jayakumar P, Rathouz PJ, Lin E, et al. Shared decision making using digital twins in knee osteoarthritis care: a randomized clinical trial of an AI-enabled decision aid versus education alone on decision quality, physical function, and user experience. eClinicalMedicine. 2025;89:103545.
53. Merzak L, Ott C, Saoutieff E, Gasnier P, Elhorga V, Boisseau S. Malalignment detection in TKA: a digital twin framework using instrumented tibial trays. IEEE Sens Lett. 2025;9:1-4.
54. Hernigou P, Safar A, Hernigou J, Ferre B. Subtalar axis determined by combining digital twins and artificial intelligence: influence of the orientation of this axis for hindfoot compensation of varus and valgus knees. Int Orthop. 2022;46:999-1007.
55. Stauffer T, Reber M, Fellmann L, Babst R, Meboldt M, Lohmeyer Q. Automated integration of surgical implants into digital twins for trauma surgery. In: Gee JC, Alexander DC, Hong J, Iglesias JE, Sudre CH, Venkataraman A, Golland P, Kim JH, Park J, Editors. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2025; 2025 Sep 23-27, Daejeon, South Korea. Cham: Springer; 2025. pp. 55-64.
56. Song X, He X, Li K, Lai X, Li Z. Construction method and application of human skeleton digital twin. Chin J Mech Eng. 2022;58:218-28. (in Chinese).
57. Wu H, Ji P, Ma H, Xing L. A comprehensive review of digital twin from the perspective of total process: data, models, networks and applications. Sensors. 2023;23:8306.
58. De Koning K, Broekhuijsen J, Kühn I, et al. Digital twins: dynamic model-data fusion for ecology. Trends Ecol Evol. 2023;38:916-26.
59. Saiz-vivó M, Mill J, Iriart X, et al. Digital twin integrating clinical, morphological and hemodynamic data to identify stroke risk factors. NPJ Digit Med. 2025;8:369.
60. Ren Y, Pieper AA, Cheng F. Utilization of precision medicine digital twins for drug discovery in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurotherapeutics. 2025;22:e00553.
61. Diniz P, Grimm B, Garcia F, et al. Digital twin systems for musculoskeletal applications: a current concepts review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025;33:1892-910.
62. Laubenbacher R, Adler F, An G, et al. Toward mechanistic medical digital twins: some use cases in immunology. Front Digit Health. 2024;6:1349595.
63. Moser A, Appl C, Brüning S, Hass VC. Mechanistic mathematical models as a basis for digital twins. In: Herwig C, Pörtner R, Möller J, Editors. Digital Twins. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. pp. 133-80.
64. Eminaga O, Abbas M, Kunder C, et al. Critical evaluation of artificial intelligence as a digital twin of pathologists for prostate cancer pathology. Sci Rep. 2024;14:5284.
65. Yao J, Yang Y, Wang X, Zhang X. Systematic review of digital twin technology and applications. Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art. 2023;6:10.
66. Ye X, Jamonnak S, Van Zandt S, Newman G, Suermann P. Developing campus digital twin using interactive visual analytics approach. Front Urban Rural Plan. 2024;2:9.
67. Vallée A. Digital twins for personalized medicine require epidemiological data and mathematical modeling: viewpoint. J Med Internet Res. 2025;27:e72411.
68. Rajaram A, Li H, Holodinsky JK, et al. Opening the black box: challenges and opportunities regarding interpretability of artificial intelligence in emergency medicine. CJEM. 2025;27:83-6.
69. Safavi S, Abdulnabi MSH, Rana ME, Alizadeh S. From black box to trustworthy AI: a secure framework for explainable cybersecurity decision-making. In: 2025 International Conference on Advancements in Smart, Secure and Intelligent Computing (ASSIC); 2025 May 16-18; Bhubaneswar, India. IEEE; 2025. pp. 1-4.
70. Ting DSW, Pasquale LR, Peng L, et al. Artificial intelligence and deep learning in ophthalmology. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019;103:167-75.
71. Laubenbacher R, Mehrad B, Shmulevich I, Trayanova N. Digital twins in medicine. Nat Comput Sci. 2024;4:184-91.
72. Lu R, She C, He D, et al. AI enhanced diagnostic accuracy and workload reduction in hepatocellular carcinoma screening. NPJ Digit Med. 2025;8:500.
73. Hong EK, Ham J, Roh B, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and clinical value of a domain-specific multimodal generative AI model for chest radiograph report generation. Radiology. 2025;314:e241476.
74. Ashrafi S, Ahmadieh H, Bayat K, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of AI models in detecting different inherited retinal diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trans Vis Sci Tech. 2025;14:22.
75. Zsidai B, Hilkert AS, Kaarre J, et al. ; ESSKA Artificial Intelligence Working Group. A practical guide to the implementation of AI in orthopaedic research - part 1: opportunities in clinical application and overcoming existing challenges. J Exp Orthop. 2023;10:117.
76. Tiwari RG, Vimal V, Agarwal AK. Opening the black box: explainable AI insights into obesity prediction using SMOTE-balanced stacking ensembles. In: 2024 IEEE 16th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (CICN); 2024 Dec 22-23; Indore, India. IEEE; 2024. pp. 1127-31.
77. Tosun AB, Pullara F, Becich MJ, Taylor DL, Fine JL, Chennubhotla SC. Explainable AI (xAI) for anatomic pathology. Adv Anat Pathol. 2020;27:241-50.
78. Karim MR, Islam T, Shajalal M, et al. Explainable AI for bioinformatics: methods, tools and applications. Brief Bioinform. 2023;24:bbad236.
79. Sanjan S, Kumar GDP, Suraj P, Rohan UA, Srinivas R, Thanush V. Bridging the black box: interpreting transformer attention in high-stakes medical and legal AI. In: 2024 Third International Conference on Trends in Electrical, Electronics, and Computer Engineering (TEECCON); 2024 Nov 7-8; Bangalore, India. IEEE; 2024. pp. 35-40.
80. Liu JJ, Borsari B, Li Y, et al. Digital phenotyping from wearables using AI characterizes psychiatric disorders and identifies genetic associations. Cell. 2025;188:515-529.e15.
81. Famularo S, Boldrini L, Donadon M, Morise Z. Interpretable and OpenAI models: a mandate for the future of HCC diagnostics. Liver Int. 2025;45:e16229.
82. Wen B, Wu Y, Daqqaq T, Chaddad A. Towards a transparent and interpretable AI model for medical image classifications. Cogn Neurodyn. 2025;19:149.
83. Hiraoka A, Swinnen B, Vandeputte A, Franssen W, Leirs G. Optimizing operating room efficiency in robotic‐assisted total knee arthroplasty through manufacturing efficiency principles. J Exp Orthop. 2025;12:e70283.
84. Albertini J, Derycke L, Millon A, Soler R. Digital twin and artificial intelligence technologies for predictive planning of endovascular procedures. Semin Vasc Surg. 2024;37:306-13.
85. Kludt C, Wang Y, Ahmad W, et al. Next-generation lung cancer pathology: development and validation of diagnostic and prognostic algorithms. Cell Rep Med. 2024;5:101697.
86. Misir A, Yuce A. AI in orthopedic research: a comprehensive review. J Orthop Res. 2025;43:1508-27.
87. Shu H, Liang R, Li Z, et al. Twin-S: a digital twin for skull base surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2023;18:1077-84.
88. Silfvergren O, Simonsson C, Ekstedt M, Lundberg P, Gennemark P, Cedersund G. Digital twin predicting diet response before and after long-term fasting. PLoS Comput Biol. 2022;18:e1010469.
89. Rowan NJ. Digital technologies to unlock safe and sustainable opportunities for medical device and healthcare sectors with a focus on the combined use of digital twin and extended reality applications: a review. Sci Total Environ. 2024;926:171672.
90. Mo D, Tien C, Yeh Y, et al. Design of digital-twin human-machine interface sensor with intelligent finger gesture recognition. Sensors. 2023;23:3509.
91. Seth I, Lim B, Lu PYJ, et al. Digital twins use in plastic surgery: a systematic review. J Clin Med. 2024;13:7861.
92. Asciak L, Kyeremeh J, Luo X, et al. Digital twin assisted surgery, concept, opportunities, and challenges. NPJ Digit Med. 2025;8:32.
93. Tang X, Wang D, Mou P, et al. Addition of infiltration between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee (IPACK) to local infiltration analgesia for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplasty. 2023;38:1484-92.
94. Tang X, Yang Y, Zheng F, Ma L, Li P. A commentary on ‘Duloxetine for rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis’. Int J Surg. 2023;109:3683-6.
95. Wang W, Li J, Liu L, et al. Role of circular RNA expression in the pathological progression after spinal cord injury. Neural Regen Res. 2021;16:2048-55.
96. Xiang L, Gu Y, Deng K, et al. Integrating personalized shape prediction, biomechanical modeling, and wearables for bone stress prediction in runners. NPJ Digit Med. 2025;8:276.
97. Skalidis I, Maurizi N, Salihu A, et al. Artificial intelligence and advanced digital health for hypertension: evolving tools for precision cardiovascular care. Medicina. 2025;61:1597.
98. Magyar P, Hegedűs-kuti J, Szőlősi J, Farkas G. Real-time data visualization of welding robot data and preparation for future of digital twin system. Sci Rep. 2024;14:10229.
99. He W, Wu X, Jin Z, et al. Generative artificial intelligence in medical imaging: current landscape, challenges, and future directions. Interdiscip Med. 2025;3:e20250024.
100. Cong S, Wang H, Zhou Y, Wang Z, Yao X, Yang C. Comprehensive review of Transformer‐based models in neuroscience, neurology, and psychiatry. Brain-X. 2024;2:e57.
101. Bofill J, Abisado M, Villaverde J, Sampedro GA. Exploring digital twin-based fault monitoring: challenges and opportunities. Sensors. 2023;23:7087.
102. Javed AR, Khan HU, Alomari MKB, et al. Toward explainable AI-empowered cognitive health assessment. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1024195.
103. Ghassemi M, Oakden-rayner L, Beam AL. The false hope of current approaches to explainable artificial intelligence in health care. Lancet Digit Health. 2021;3:e745-50.
104. Van Der Velden BH, Kuijf HJ, Gilhuijs KG, Viergever MA. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in deep learning-based medical image analysis. Med Image Anal. 2022;79:102470.
105. Gunning D, Stefik M, Choi J, Miller T, Stumpf S, Yang G. XAI-explainable artificial intelligence. Sci Robot. 2019;4:eaay7120.
106. Räz T, Pahud De Mortanges A, Reyes M. Explainable AI in medicine: challenges of integrating XAI into the future clinical routine. Front Radiol. 2025;5:1627169.
107. Hernigou P, Scarlat MM. Ankle and foot surgery: from arthrodesis to arthroplasty, three dimensional printing, sensors, artificial intelligence, machine learning technology, digital twins, and cell therapy. Int Orthop. 2021;45:2173-6.
108. Leal MOC, Díaz DM, Romo CO, et al. Biomechanics digital twin: markerless joint acceleration prediction using machine learning and computer vision. In: 2023 Future of Educational Innovation-Workshop Series Data in Action: Digital Ecosystem and Emerging Tools for Education; 2023 Jan 16-18; Monterrey, Mexico. IEEE; 2023. pp. 1-8.
109. Wang W, Su Y, Tang S, et al. Identification of noncoding RNA expression profiles and regulatory interaction networks following traumatic spinal cord injury by sequence analysis. Aging. 2019;11:2352-68.
110. Wang W, Liu C, He D, et al. CircRNA CDR1as affects functional repair after spinal cord injury and regulates fibrosis through the SMAD pathway. Pharmacol Res. 2024;204:107189.
