REFERENCES
1. Chen T, Zhou H, Chen Q, et al. Effects of bracing combined with tele‐rehabilitation‐guided family physiotherapeutic scoliosis‐specific exercises on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Orthop Surg. 2026;18:511-22.
2. Kuang H, Chen L, Huang M, Chen J. Management of adolescent scoliosis: a comprehensive review of etiology and rehabilitation. Front Pediatr. 2025;13:1596400.
3. Miri O, Amellal O, Detrembleur C, Troussel S, Vandergugten S. Sagittal alignment correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using patient-specific rods. Eur Spine J. 2025;34:2701-13.
4. Wu Y, Namdar K, Chen C, et al. Automated adolescence scoliosis detection using augmented U-net with non-square kernels. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2023;74:667-75.
5. Silk ZM, Tishelman JC, Eaker L, Lonner B. Reducing uncertainty in anterior vertebral body tethering: predicting postoperative curvature with fulcrum bending radiographs. Global Spine J. 2024;14:219-24.
6. Galbusera F, Cina A, Panico M, Bassani T. The importance of curve severity, type and instrumentation strategy in the surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an in silico clinical trial on 64 cases. Sci Rep. 2021;11:1799.
7. Kita K, Kaito T. Artificial intelligence in spine research: a multimodal perspective beyond imaging. Spine Res. 2025;1:7-12.
8. Łajczak P, Ayesha A, Jabbar R, et al. Comparison of accuracy of pedicle screw placement for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using freehand fluoroscopic, navigation, and robotic-assisted techniques - a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev. 2025;48:257.
9. Sigurdarson H, Joshi A, Mohebi A, Hassanzadeh H. Applications and quality assurance of artificial intelligence in adult spinal deformity surgery. Art Int Surg. 2025;5:283-97.
10. Kang Z, Shi G, Zhu Y, Li F, Li X, Wang H. Development of a model for measuring sagittal plane parameters in 10-18-year old adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis based on RTMpose deep learning technology. J Orthop Surg. 2025;20:41.
11. Goldman SN, Hui AT, Choi S, et al. Applications of artificial intelligence for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: mapping the evidence. Spine Deform. 2024;12:1545-70.
12. Dong Y, Li J, Huang S, Wu L, Zhao H, Zhao Y. Artificial intelligence measurement of preoperative radiographs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis based on multiple-view semantic segmentation. Global Spine J. 2025;15:1924-31.
13. Tachi H, Kato K, Abe Y, et al. Surgical outcome prediction using a four-dimensional planning simulation system with finite element analysis incorporating pre-bent rods in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: simulation for spatiotemporal anatomical correction technique. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9:746902.
14. Jain A, Ahuja K, Roberts SB, Tsirikos AI. Techniques of deformity correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis - a narrative review of the existing literature. J Clin Med. 2025;14:2396.
15. Shi W, Giuste FO, Zhu Y, et al. Predicting pediatric patient rehabilitation outcomes after spinal deformity surgery with artificial intelligence. Commun Med. 2025;5:1.
16. Toossi N, Jerry O. Machine learning applications in adult spinal deformity corrective surgery: a narrative review. Art Int Surg. 2024;4:258-66.
17. Ngo J, Athreya K, Ehrlich B, et al. Use of machine learning predictive models in sagittal alignment planning in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Eur Spine J. 2026;35:23-31.
18. Constant C. Advanced surgical planning of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis instrumentation combining artificial intelligence and physics-based model simulation. Available from: https://publications.polymtl.ca/70987/. [Last accessed on 31 Aug 2026].
19. Du YX, Sun WX, Mai LQ, et al. Robot-assisted pedicle screw placement in spinal surgery: an updated systematic umbrella review and meta-meta-analysis of comparisons against freehand and navigation-guided techniques. EFORT Open Rev. 2026;11:57-69.
20. Salmingo RA, Tadano S, Abe Y, Ito M. Influence of implant rod curvature on sagittal correction of scoliosis deformity. Spine J. 2014;14:1432-9.
21. Jabbouri SS, Joo P, David WB, et al. Pre-contoured patient-specific rods result in superior immediate sagittal plane alignment than surgeon contoured rods in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Spine Surg. 2024;10:177-89.
22. Hughes J, Yaszay B, Bastrom TP, et al. Long-term patient perception following surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis if dissatisfied at 2-year follow-up. Spine. 2021;46:507-11.
23. Kovacevic D, Abbas A, Sahi G, et al. Using artificial intelligence to predict health-related quality of life for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2026; Epub ahead of print.
24. Mulford KL, Regan CM, Todderud JE, et al. Deep learning classification of pediatric spinal radiographs for use in large scale imaging registries. Spine Deform. 2024;12:1607-14.
25. Wei S, Wu Z. The application of wearable sensors and machine learning algorithms in rehabilitation training: a systematic review. Sensors. 2023;23:7667.
26. Dutta A, Singh M, Kumar K, et al. Accuracy of 3D printed spine models for pre-surgical planning of complex adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) in spinal surgeries: a case series. Ann 3D Print Med. 2023;11:100117.
27. Liu X, Cruz Rivera S, Moher D, et al. Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension. Lancet Digit Health. 2020;2:e537-48.
28. Rojas JC, Teran M, Umscheid CA. Clinician trust in artificial intelligence. Crit Care Clin. 2023;39:769-82.
29. Xie H, Dai X, Xie J, et al. Artificial intelligence adoption in surgery: cognition, usage patterns and implementation barriers of DeepSeek among healthcare professionals in China’s tertiary hospitals. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025;18:7719-37.
30. Lekadir K, Frangi AF, Porras AR, et al. FUTURE-AI: international consensus guideline for trustworthy and deployable artificial intelligence in healthcare. BMJ. 2025;388:e081554.
31. Avellanet M, Sanchez-raya J, Maccarone MC, Dionyssiotis Y. The role of artificial intelligence in advancing scoliosis care: a rapid review of current evidence and future opportunities. Front Med. 2026;13:1774697.
32. Nolan P, Matulionyte R. Artificial intelligence in medicine: issues when determining negligence. J Law Med. 2023;30:593-615.
33. Yang Y, Cui YU, Wang YT, Xue P, Zhai XM, Qiao YL. Interpretation of the WHO’s “Ethics and Governance of Artificial Intelligence for Health: Guidance on Large Multi-Modal Models” and its implications for China. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2025;59:960-9. (in Chinese).
34. Acosta JN, Falcone GJ, Rajpurkar P, Topol EJ. Multimodal biomedical AI. Nat Med. 2022;28:1773-84.
35. Selvaraju RR, Cogswell M, Das A, Vedantam R, Parikh D, Batra D. Grad-CAM: visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. Int J Comput Vis. 2019;128:336-59.
36. Oettl FC, Pruneski J, Zsidai B, et al. ; ESSKA Artificial Intelligence Working Group. Artificial intelligence agents in orthopaedics: concepts, capabilities and the road ahead. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025;33:4475-83.
37. Bartkowski J, Zerdka J, Brasse P, et al. Artificial intelligence in medicine with emphasis on orthopedic practice. Cureus. 2025;17:e98306.
