REFERENCES

1. Pirro O, Mestak O, Vindigni V, et al. Comparison of patient-reported outcomes after implant versus autologous tissue breast reconstruction using the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5:e1217.

2. Toyserkani NM, Jørgensen MG, Tabatabaeifar S, Damsgaard T, Sørensen JA. Autologous versus implant-based breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of Breast-Q patient-reported outcomes. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020;73:278-85.

3. Eltahir Y, Krabbe-Timmerman IS, Sadok N, Werker PMN, de Bock GH. Outcome of quality of life for women undergoing autologous versus alloplastic breast reconstruction following mastectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145:1109-23.

4. Hamdi M, Kapila AK, Waked K. Current status of autologous breast reconstruction in Europe: how to reduce donor site morbidity. Gland Surg. 2023;12:1760.

5. Kapila AK, Iyer H, Mohanna P, et al. Enhancing abdominal donor site aesthetics: the double diamond drainless closure with barbed progressive tension sutures. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024;96:53-5.

6. Kapila AK, Kempny T, Knoz M, Holoubek J, Lipovy B, Hamdi M. An algorithm in managing deep inferior epigastric vessel interruption in free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023;11:e4938.

7. Boer VB, van Wingerden JJ, Wever CF, et al. Concordance between preoperative computed tomography angiographic mapping and intraoperative perforator selection for deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstructions. Gland Surg. 2017;6:620.

8. Mavioso C, Araújo RJ, Oliveira HP, et al. Automatic detection of perforators for microsurgical reconstruction. Breast. 2020;50:19-24.

9. Kapila AK, Iyer H, Mohanna P, Mughal M, Hamdi M, Rose V. The impact of physical activity on patient-reported outcomes following deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024;97:6-12.

10. Kapila AK, De Vleminck L, Hamdi M. Three key domains for optimizing preoperative preparedness in plastic surgery with AI. Plast Aesthet Res. 2025;12:11.

11. Kapila AK, Georgiou L, Hamdi M. Decoding the impact of AI on microsurgery: systematic review and classification of six subdomains for future development. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024;12:e6323.

12. Araújo RJ, Garrido V, Baraças CA, et al. Computer aided detection of deep inferior epigastric perforators in computed tomography angiography scans. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2019;77:101648.

13. Tetteh G, Efremov V, Forkert ND, et al. DeepVesselNet: vessel segmentation, centerline prediction, and bifurcation detection in 3-D angiographic volumes. Front Neurosci. 2020;14:592352.

14. Saxena E. Deep learning for personalized preoperative planning of microsurgical free tissue transfers. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence; 2022 Feb 22-Mar 1; Virtual. Washington, D.C.: AAAI.

15. Vandemeulebroucke J, Bernard O, Rit S, Kybic J, Clarysse P, Sarrut D. Automated segmentation of a motion mask to preserve sliding motion in deformable registration of thoracic CT. Med Phys. 2012;39:1006-15.

16. Setio AAA, Traverso A, de Bel T, et al. Validation, comparison, and combination of algorithms for automatic detection of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography images: the LUNA16 challenge. Med Image Anal. 2017;42:1-13.

17. Ceranka J, Wuts J, Chiabai O, Lecouvet F, Vandemeulebroucke J. Computer-aided diagnosis of skeletal metastases in multi-parametric whole-body MRI. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2023;242:107811.

18. Karunanithy N, Rose V, Lim AK, Mitchell A. CT angiography of inferior epigastric and gluteal perforating arteries before free flap breast reconstruction. Radiographics. 2011;31:1307-19.

19. Pieper S, Halle M, Kikinis R. 3D Slicer. In: 2004 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Macro to Nano; 2004 Apr 18-18; Arlington, VA, USA. New York: IEEE; 2004. pp. 632-5.

20. Wasserthal J, Breit HC, Meyer MT, et al. TotalSegmentator: robust segmentation of 104 anatomic structures in CT images. Radiol Artif Intell. 2023;5:e230024.

21. Hatamizadeh A, Nath V, Tang Y, Yang D, Roth HR, Xu D. Swin unetr: Swin transformers for semantic segmentation of brain tumors in MRI images. In: Crimi A, Bakas S, Editors. International MICCAI Brainlesion Workshop; 2021 Sep 27-27; Virtual. Cham: Springer; 2021; 272-84.

22. Tang Y, Yang D, Li W, et al. Self-supervised pre-training of swin transformers for 3D medical image analysis. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR); 2022 Jun 18-24; New Orleans, LA, USA. New York: IEEE; 2022. pp. 20698-708.

23. Yao Z, Gholami A, Shen S, Mustafa M, Keutzer K, Mahoney M. ADAHESSIAN: an adaptive second order optimizer for machine learning. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence; 2021 Feb 2-9; Virtual. Washington, D.C.: AAAI.

24. Cardoso MJ, Li W, Brown R, et al. MONAI: an open-source framework for deep learning in healthcare. arXiv 2022;arXiv:2211.02701. Available from https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.02701 [accessed 12 May 2026].

25. Maier-Hein L, Reinke A, Godau P, et al. Metrics reloaded: recommendations for image analysis validation. Nat Methods. 2024;21:195-212.

26. Chen Y, Gu H, Chen Y, et al. Automated muscle and fat segmentation in computed tomography for comprehensive body composition analysis. arXiv 2025;arXiv:2502.09779. Available from https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.09779 [accessed 12 May 2026].