REFERENCES
2. Kourounis G, Elmahmudi AA, Thomson B, Hunter J, Ugail H, Wilson C. Computer image analysis with artificial intelligence: a practical introduction to convolutional neural networks for medical professionals. Postgrad Med J. 2023;99:1287-94.
3. Fernicola A, Palomba G, Capuano M, De Palma GD, Aprea G. Artificial intelligence applied to laparoscopic cholecystectomy: what is the next step? Updates Surg. 2024;76:1655-67.
4. Kankanamge D, Wijeweera C, Ong Z, et al. Artificial intelligence based assessment of minimally invasive surgical skills using standardised objective metrics - a narrative review. Am J Surg. 2025;241:116074.
5. Garrow CR, Kowalewski KF, Li L, et al. Machine learning for surgical phase recognition: a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2021;273:684-93.
6. Kehagias D, Lampropoulos C, Bellou A, Kehagias I. Detection of anatomic landmarks during laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the use of artificial intelligence - a systematic review of the literature. Updates Surg. 2026;78:229-40.
7. Mascagni P, Alapatt D, Sestini L, et al. Computer vision in surgery: from potential to clinical value. NPJ Digit Med. 2022;5:163.
8. Varghese C, Harrison EM, O’Grady G, Topol EJ. Artificial intelligence in surgery. Nat Med. 2024;30:1257-68.
9. Zhou R, Wang D, Zhang H, et al. Vision techniques for anatomical structures in laparoscopic surgery: a comprehensive review. Front Surg. 2025;12:1557153.
10. Reinke A, Tizabi MD, Baumgartner M, et al. Understanding metric-related pitfalls in image analysis validation. Nat Methods. 2024;21:182-94.
11. Miller C, Portlock T, Nyaga DM, O’Sullivan JM. A review of model evaluation metrics for machine learning in genetics and genomics. Front Bioinform. 2024;4:1457619.
12. Taha AA, Hanbury A. Metrics for evaluating 3D medical image segmentation: analysis, selection, and tool. BMC Med Imaging. 2015;15:29.
13. Müller D, Soto-Rey I, Kramer F. Towards a guideline for evaluation metrics in medical image segmentation. BMC Res Notes. 2022;15:210.
14. Khojah B, Enani G, Malibari A, Alhalabi W, Sabbagh A. Deep learning-based intraoperative guidance system for anatomical identification in laparoscopic surgery: a review. J Infrastruct Policy Dev. 2024;8:8939.
15. Ibrahim AM, Dimick JB. What metrics accurately reflect surgical quality? Annu Rev Med. 2018;69:481-91.
16. Maier-Hein L, Reinke A, Godau P, et al. Metrics reloaded: recommendations for image analysis validation. Nat Methods. 2024;21:195-212.
17. Kitaguchi D, Watanabe Y, Madani A, et al.; Computer Vision in Surgery International Collaborative. Artificial intelligence for computer vision in surgery: a call for developing reporting guidelines. Ann Surg. 2022;275:e609-11.
18. Aromataris E, Lockwood C, Porritt K, Pilla B, Jordan Z. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI; 2024. Available from https://synthesismanual.jbi.global [accessed 25 Feburary 2026].
19. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:467-73.
20. Pollock D, Peters MDJ, Khalil H, et al. Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2023;21:520-32.
21. Abbing JR, Voskens FJ, Gerats BGA, Egging RM, Milletari F, Broeders IAMJ. Towards an AI-based assessment model of surgical difficulty during early phase laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng Imaging Vis. 2023;11:1299-306.
22. Al Abbas AI, Namazi B, Radi I, et al. The development of a deep learning model for automated segmentation of the robotic pancreaticojejunostomy. Surg Endosc. 2024;38:2553-61.
23. Alkhamaiseh KN, Grantner JL, Shebrain S, Abdel-Qader I. Towards reliable hepatocytic anatomy segmentation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy using U-Net with Auto-Encoder. Surg Endosc. 2023;37:7358-69.
24. Aoyama Y, Matsunobu Y, Etoh T, et al. Artificial intelligence for surgical safety during laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: indication of anatomical landmarks related to postoperative pancreatic fistula using deep learning. Surg Endosc. 2024;38:5601-12.
25. Arpaia P, Bracale U, Corcione F, et al. Assessment of blood perfusion quality in laparoscopic colorectal surgery by means of Machine Learning. Sci Rep. 2022;12:14682.
26. Aspart F, Bolmgren JL, Lavanchy JL, et al. ClipAssistNet: bringing real-time safety feedback to operating rooms. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2022;17:5-13.
27. Bamba Y, Ogawa S, Itabashi M, Kameoka S, Okamoto T, Yamamoto M. Automated recognition of objects and types of forceps in surgical images using deep learning. Sci Rep. 2021;11:22571.
28. Bamba Y, Ogawa S, Itabashi M, et al. Object and anatomical feature recognition in surgical video images based on a convolutional neural network. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2021;16:2045-54.
29. Bamba Y, Ogawa S, Itabashi M, et al. Automated bleeding identification in surgical videos using deep learning. Tokyo Women Med Univ J. 2022;6:117-25.
30. Ban Y, Rosman G, Eckhoff JA, et al. SUPR-GAN: SUrgical PRediction GAN for event anticipation in laparoscopic and robotic surgery. IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 2022;7:5741-8.
31. Beyersdorffer P, Kunert W, Jansen K, et al. Detection of adverse events leading to inadvertent injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy using convolutional neural networks. Biomed Tech. 2021;66:413-21.
32. Chen G, Xie Y, Yang B, et al. Artificial intelligence model for perigastric blood vessel recognition during laparoscopic radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy in locally advanced gastric cancer. BJS Open. 2024:9.
33. Chen H, Gou L, Fang Z, et al. Artificial intelligence assisted real-time recognition of intra-abdominal metastasis during laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery. NPJ Digit Med. 2025;8:9.
34. Cheng K, You J, Wu S, et al. Artificial intelligence-based automated laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgical phase recognition and analysis. Surg Endosc. 2022;36:3160-8.
35. den Boer RB, Jaspers TJM, de Jongh C, et al. Deep learning-based recognition of key anatomical structures during robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy. Surg Endosc. 2023;37:5164-75.
36. Derathé A, Reche F, Moreau-Gaudry A, Jannin P, Gibaud B, Voros S. Predicting the quality of surgical exposure using spatial and procedural features from laparoscopic videos. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2020;15:59-67.
37. Endo Y, Tokuyasu T, Mori Y, et al. Impact of AI system on recognition for anatomical landmarks related to reducing bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2023;37:5752-9.
38. Fer D, Zhang B, Abukhalil R, et al. An artificial intelligence model that automatically labels roux-en-Y gastric bypasses, a comparison to trained surgeon annotators. Surg Endosc. 2023;37:5665-72.
39. Fujinaga A, Endo Y, Etoh T, et al. Development of a cross-artificial intelligence system for identifying intraoperative anatomical landmarks and surgical phases during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2023;37:6118-28.
40. Furube T, Takeuchi M, Kawakubo H, et al. Usefulness of an artificial intelligence model in recognizing recurrent laryngeal nerves during robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024;31:9344-51.
41. Ghobadi V, Ismail LI, Wan Hasan WZ, et al. Real-time robust liver and gallbladder segmentation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy using convolutional neural networks: an analysis. Art Int Surg. 2024;4:278-87.
42. Golany T, Aides A, Freedman D, et al. Artificial intelligence for phase recognition in complex laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2022;36:9215-23.
43. Guédon ACP, Meij SEP, Osman KNMMH, et al. Deep learning for surgical phase recognition using endoscopic videos. Surg Endosc. 2021;35:6150-7.
44. Han F, Zhong G, Zhi S, et al. Artificial intelligence recognition system of pelvic autonomic nerve during total mesorectal excision. Dis Colon Rectum. 2025;68:308-15.
45. Hashimoto DA, Rosman G, Witkowski ER, et al. Computer vision analysis of intraoperative video: automated recognition of operative steps in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Ann Surg. 2019;270:414-21.
46. Hegde SR, Namazi B, Iyengar N, et al. Automated segmentation of phases, steps, and tasks in laparoscopic cholecystectomy using deep learning. Surg Endosc. 2024;38:158-70.
47. Honda R, Kitaguchi D, Ishikawa Y, et al. Deep learning-based surgical step recognition for laparoscopic right-sided colectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024;409:309.
48. Horita K, Hida K, Itatani Y, et al. Real-time detection of active bleeding in laparoscopic colectomy using artificial intelligence. Surg Endosc. 2024;38:3461-9.
49. Igaki T, Kitaguchi D, Kojima S, et al. Artificial intelligence-based total mesorectal excision plane navigation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2022;65:e329-33.
50. Igaki T, Kitaguchi D, Matsuzaki H, et al. Automatic surgical skill assessment system based on concordance of standardized surgical field development using artificial intelligence. JAMA Surg. 2023;158:e231131.
51. Jin Y, Long Y, Chen C, Zhao Z, Dou Q, Heng PA. Temporal memory relation network for workflow recognition from surgical video. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2021;40:1911-23.
52. Kawamura M, Endo Y, Fujinaga A, et al. Development of an artificial intelligence system for real-time intraoperative assessment of the Critical View of Safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2023;37:8755-63.
53. Khalid MU, Laplante S, Masino C, et al. Use of artificial intelligence for decision-support to avoid high-risk behaviors during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2023;37:9467-75.
54. Khojah B, Enani G, Saleem A, et al. Deep learning-based intraoperative visual guidance model for ureter identification in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy. Surg Endosc. 2025;39:3610-23.
55. Kinoshita K, Maruyama T, Kobayashi N, et al. An artificial intelligence-based nerve recognition model is useful as surgical support technology and as an educational tool in laparoscopic and robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery. Surg Endosc. 2024;38:5394-404.
56. Kirtac K, Aydin N, Lavanchy JL, et al. Surgical phase recognition: from public datasets to real-world data. Appl Sci. 2022;12:8746.
57. Kitaguchi D, Takeshita N, Matsuzaki H, et al. Automated laparoscopic colorectal surgery workflow recognition using artificial intelligence: experimental research. Int J Surg. 2020;79:88-94.
58. Kitaguchi D, Takeshita N, Matsuzaki H, et al. Real-time automatic surgical phase recognition in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy using the convolutional neural network-based deep learning approach. Surg Endosc. 2020;34:4924-31.
59. Kitaguchi D, Takeshita N, Matsuzaki H, Igaki T, Hasegawa H, Ito M. Development and validation of a 3-dimensional convolutional neural network for automatic surgical skill assessment based on spatiotemporal video analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4:e2120786.
60. Kitaguchi D, Lee Y, Hayashi K, et al. Development and validation of a model for laparoscopic colorectal surgical instrument recognition using convolutional neural network-based instance segmentation and videos of laparoscopic procedures. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5:e2226265.
61. Kitaguchi D, Takeshita N, Matsuzaki H, et al. Real-time vascular anatomical image navigation for laparoscopic surgery: experimental study. Surg Endosc. 2022;36:6105-12.
62. Kitaguchi D, Harai Y, Kosugi N, et al. Artificial intelligence for the recognition of key anatomical structures in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2023;110:1355-8.
63. Kojima S, Kitaguchi D, Igaki T, et al. Deep-learning-based semantic segmentation of autonomic nerves from laparoscopic images of colorectal surgery: an experimental pilot study. Int J Surg. 2023;109:813-20.
64. Kolbinger FR, Rinner FM, Jenke AC, et al. Anatomy segmentation in laparoscopic surgery: comparison of machine learning and human expertise - an experimental study. Int J Surg. 2023;109:2962-74.
65. Kolbinger FR, Bodenstedt S, Carstens M, et al. Artificial Intelligence for context-aware surgical guidance in complex robot-assisted oncological procedures: an exploratory feasibility study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024;50:106996.
66. Komatsu M, Kitaguchi D, Yura M, et al. Automatic surgical phase recognition-based skill assessment in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy using multicenter videos. Gastric Cancer. 2024;27:187-96.
67. Korndorffer JR Jr, Hawn MT, Spain DA, et al. Situating artificial intelligence in surgery: a focus on disease severity. Ann Surg. 2020;272:523-8.
68. Kumazu Y, Kobayashi N, Kitamura N, et al. Automated segmentation by deep learning of loose connective tissue fibers to define safe dissection planes in robot-assisted gastrectomy. Sci Rep. 2021;11:21198.
69. Kumazu Y, Kobayashi N, Senya S, et al. AI-based visualization of loose connective tissue as a dissectable layer in gastrointestinal surgery. Sci Rep. 2025;15:152.
70. Laplante S, Namazi B, Kiani P, et al. Validation of an artificial intelligence platform for the guidance of safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2023;37:2260-8.
71. Lavanchy JL, Zindel J, Kirtac K, et al. Automation of surgical skill assessment using a three-stage machine learning algorithm. Sci Rep. 2021;11:5197.
72. Lavanchy JL, Ramesh S, Dall’Alba D, et al. Challenges in multi-centric generalization: phase and step recognition in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2024;19:2249-57.
73. Leifman G, Golany T, Rivlin E, Khoury W, Assalia A, Reissman P. Real-time artificial intelligence validation of critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Intell-Based Med. 2024;10:100153.
74. Liu K, Zhao Z, Shi P, Li F, Song H. Real-time surgical tool detection in computer-aided surgery based on enhanced feature-fusion convolutional neural network. J Comput Des Eng. 2022;9:1123-34.
75. Liu R, An J, Wang Z, Guan J, Liu J, et al. Artificial intelligence in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: does computer vision outperform human vision? Art Int Surg. 2022;2:80-92.
76. Liu Z, Zhou Y, Zheng L, Zhang G. SINet: a hybrid deep CNN model for real-time detection and segmentation of surgical instruments. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2024;88:105670.
77. Loukas C, Frountzas M, Schizas D. Patch-based classification of gallbladder wall vascularity from laparoscopic images using deep learning. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2021;16:103-13.
78. Madani A, Namazi B, Altieri MS, et al. Artificial intelligence for intraoperative guidance: using semantic segmentation to identify surgical anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 2022;276:363-9.
79. Mascagni P, Alapatt D, Urade T, et al. A computer vision platform to automatically locate critical events in surgical videos: documenting safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 2021;274:e93-5.
80. Mascagni P, Alapatt D, Laracca GG, et al. Multicentric validation of EndoDigest: a computer vision platform for video documentation of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2022;36:8379-86.
81. Mascagni P, Vardazaryan A, Alapatt D, et al. Artificial intelligence for surgical safety: automatic assessment of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy using deep learning. Ann Surg. 2022;275:955-61.
82. Mascagni P, Alapatt D, Lapergola A, et al. Early-stage clinical evaluation of real-time artificial intelligence assistance for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2024;111:znad353.
83. Mita K, Kobayashi N, Takahashi K, et al. Anatomical recognition of dissection layers, nerves, vas deferens, and microvessels using artificial intelligence during transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Hernia. 2024;29:52.
84. Nakajima K, Kitaguchi D, Takenaka S, et al. Automated surgical skill assessment in colorectal surgery using a deep learning-based surgical phase recognition model. Surg Endosc. 2024;38:6347-55.
85. Nakajima K, Takenaka S, Kitaguchi D, et al. Artificial intelligence assessment of tissue-dissection efficiency in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025;410:80.
86. Nakanuma H, Endo Y, Fujinaga A, et al. An intraoperative artificial intelligence system identifying anatomical landmarks for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective clinical feasibility trial (J-SUMMIT-C-01). Surg Endosc. 2023;37:1933-42.
87. Nakamura T, Kobayashi N, Kumazu Y, et al. Precise highlighting of the pancreas by semantic segmentation during robot-assisted gastrectomy: visual assistance with artificial intelligence for surgeons. Gastric Cancer. 2024;27:869-75.
88. Narihiro S, Kitaguchi D, Hasegawa H, Takeshita N, Ito M. Deep learning-based real-time ureter identification in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2024;67:e1596-9.
89. Oh N, Kim B, Kim T, Rhu J, Kim J, Choi GS. Real-time segmentation of biliary structure in pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy. Sci Rep. 2024;14:22508.
90. Orimoto H, Hirashita T, Ikeda S, et al. Development of an artificial intelligence system to indicate intraoperative findings of scarring in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystitis. Surg Endosc. 2025;39:1379-87.
91. Ortenzi M, Rapoport Ferman J, Antolin A, et al. A novel high accuracy model for automatic surgical workflow recognition using artificial intelligence in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP). Surg Endosc. 2023;37:8818-28.
92. Owen D, Grammatikopoulou M, Luengo I, Stoyanov D. Automated identification of critical structures in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2022;17:2173-81.
93. Petracchi EJ, Olivieri SE, Varela J, et al. Use of artificial intelligence in the detection of the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2024;28:877-9.
94. Pradeep CS, Sinha N. Surgical phase classification and operative skill assessment through spatial context aware CNNs and time-invariant feature extracting autoencoders. Biocybern Biomed Eng. 2023;43:700-24.
95. Ramesh S, Dall’Alba D, Gonzalez C, et al. Multi-task temporal convolutional networks for joint recognition of surgical phases and steps in gastric bypass procedures. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2021;16:1111-9.
96. Ryu S, Goto K, Kitagawa T, et al. Real-time artificial intelligence navigation-assisted anatomical recognition in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2023;27:3080-2.
97. Ryu K, Kitaguchi D, Nakajima K, et al. Deep learning-based vessel automatic recognition for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Surg Endosc. 2024;38:171-8.
98. Ryu S, Imaizumi Y, Goto K, et al. Feasibility of simultaneous artificial intelligence-assisted and nir fluorescence navigation for anatomical recognition in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. J Fluoresc. 2025;35:6755-61.
99. Ryu S, Imaizumi Y, Goto K, et al. Artificial intelligence-enhanced navigation for nerve recognition and surgical education in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc. 2025;39:1388-96.
100. Sasaki K, Ito M, Kobayashi S, et al. Automated surgical workflow identification by artificial intelligence in laparoscopic hepatectomy: experimental research. Int J Surg. 2022;105:106856.
101. Sasaki S, Kitaguchi D, Takenaka S, et al. Machine learning-based automatic evaluation of tissue handling skills in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a retrospective experimental study. Ann Surg. 2023;278:e250-5.
102. Sato K, Fujita T, Matsuzaki H, et al. Real-time detection of the recurrent laryngeal nerve in thoracoscopic esophagectomy using artificial intelligence. Surg Endosc. 2022;36:5531-9.
103. Sengun B, Iscan Y, Tataroglu Ozbulak GA, et al. Artificial intelligence in minimally invasive adrenalectomy: using deep learning to identify the left adrenal vein. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2023;33:327-31.
104. Sengun B, Iscan Y, Yazici ZA, et al. Utilization of artificial intelligence in minimally invasive right adrenalectomy: recognition of anatomical landmarks with deep learning. Acta Chir Belg. 2024;124:492-8.
105. Sharma S, Vannucci M, Pestana Legori L, et al. Early operative difficulty assessment in laparoscopic cholecystectomy via snapshot-centric video analysis. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2025;20:1185-93.
106. Shi P, Zhao Z, Liu K, Li F. Attention-based spatial-temporal neural network for accurate phase recognition in minimally invasive surgery: feasibility and efficiency verification. J Comput Des Eng. 2022;9:406-16.
107. Shi J, Cui R, Wang Z, et al. Deep learning HRNet FCN for blood vessel identification in laparoscopic pancreatic surgery. NPJ Digit Med. 2025;8:235.
108. Shinozuka K, Turuda S, Fujinaga A, et al. Artificial intelligence software available for medical devices: surgical phase recognition in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2022;36:7444-52.
109. Smithmaitrie P, Khaonualsri M, Sae-Lim W, Wangkulangkul P, Jearanai S, Cheewatanakornkul S. Development of deep learning framework for anatomical landmark detection and guided dissection line during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Heliyon. 2024;10:e25210.
110. Strong JS, Furube T, Takeuchi M, et al. Evaluating surgical expertise with AI-based automated instrument recognition for robotic distal gastrectomy. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2024;8:611-9.
111. Strong JS, Yura M, Takeuchi M, et al. External validation of an automated surgical step recognition model for robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG) using a multicenter dataset. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2025;9:1155-62.
112. Sunakawa T, Kitaguchi D, Kobayashi S, et al. Deep learning-based automatic bleeding recognition during liver resection in laparoscopic hepatectomy. Surg Endosc. 2024;38:7656-62.
113. Takeuchi M, Collins T, Ndagijimana A, et al. Automatic surgical phase recognition in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with artificial intelligence. Hernia. 2022;26:1669-78.
114. Takeuchi M, Kawakubo H, Saito K, et al. Automated surgical-phase recognition for robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy using artificial intelligence. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022;29:6847-55.
115. Takeuchi M, Collins T, Lipps C, et al. Towards automatic verification of the critical view of the myopectineal orifice with artificial intelligence. Surg Endosc. 2023;37:4525-34.
116. Takeuchi M, Kawakubo H, Tsuji T, et al. Evaluation of surgical complexity by automated surgical process recognition in robotic distal gastrectomy using artificial intelligence. Surg Endosc. 2023;37:4517-24.
117. Tao H, Li B, Zeng X, et al. Artificial intelligence-based anatomy recognition in laparoscopic hepatectomy: multicentre study. Br J Surg. 2024;111:znae254.
118. Tashiro Y, Aoki T, Kobayashi N, et al. Novel navigation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy fusing artificial intelligence and indocyanine green fluorescent imaging. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2024;31:305-7.
119. Tokuyasu T, Iwashita Y, Matsunobu Y, et al. Development of an artificial intelligence system using deep learning to indicate anatomical landmarks during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2021;35:1651-8.
120. Tomioka K, Aoki T, Kobayashi N, et al. Development of a novel artificial intelligence system for laparoscopic hepatectomy. Anticancer Res. 2023;43:5235-43.
121. Twinanda AP, Shehata S, Mutter D, Marescaux J, de Mathelin M, Padoy N. EndoNet: a deep architecture for recognition tasks on laparoscopic videos. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2017;36:86-97.
122. Wagner M, Müller-Stich BP, Kisilenko A, et al. Comparative validation of machine learning algorithms for surgical workflow and skill analysis with the HeiChole benchmark. Med Image Anal. 2023;86:102770.
123. Ward TM, Hashimoto DA, Ban Y, Rosman G, Meireles OR. Artificial intelligence prediction of cholecystectomy operative course from automated identification of gallbladder inflammation. Surg Endosc. 2022;36:6832-40.
124. Wu S, Chen Z, Liu R, et al.; Youth Committee of Pancreatic Disease of Sichuan Doctor Association (YCPD). SurgSmart: an artificial intelligent system for quality control in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an observational study. Int J Surg. 2023;109:1105-14.
125. Yamazaki Y, Kanaji S, Matsuda T, et al. Automated surgical instrument detection from laparoscopic gastrectomy video images using an open source convolutional neural network platform. J Am Coll Surg. 2020;230:725-732e1.
126. Yang HY, Hong SS, Yoon J, et al. Deep learning-based surgical phase recognition in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2024;28:466-73.
127. Yen HH, Hsiao YH, Yang MH, et al. Automated surgical action recognition and competency assessment in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a proof-of-concept study. Surg Endosc. 2025;39:3006-16.
128. Yin SM, Lien JJ, Chiu IM. Deep learning implementation for extrahepatic bile duct detection during indocyanine green fluorescence-guided laparoscopic cholecystectomy: pilot study. BJS Open. 2025:9.
129. Yoshida M, Kitaguchi D, Takeshita N, et al. Surgical step recognition in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy using artificial intelligence: a proof-of-concept study. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024;409:213.
130. You J, Cai H, Wang Y, et al. Artificial intelligence automated surgical phases recognition in intraoperative videos of laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc. 2024;38:4894-905.
131. Zang C, Turkcan MK, Narasimhan S, et al. Surgical phase recognition in inguinal hernia repair-ai-based confirmatory baseline and exploration of competitive models. Bioengineering. 2023:10.
132. Zhai Y, Chen Z, Zheng Z, et al. Artificial intelligence for automatic surgical phase recognition of laparoscopic gastrectomy in gastric cancer. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2024;19:345-53.
133. Zygomalas A, Kalles D, Katsiakis N, Anastasopoulos A, Skroubis G. Artificial intelligence assisted recognition of anatomical landmarks and laparoscopic instruments in transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Surg Innov. 2024;31:178-84.
134. Meireles OR, Rosman G, Altieri MS, et al.; SAGES Video Annotation for AI Working Groups. SAGES consensus recommendations on an annotation framework for surgical video. Surg Endosc. 2021;35:4918-29.
135. Maier-Hein L, Reinke A, Kozubek M, et al. BIAS: transparent reporting of biomedical image analysis challenges. Med Image Anal. 2020;66:101796.
136. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al.; STARD Group. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ. 2015;351:h5527.
137. Sounderajah V, Ashrafian H, Golub RM, et al.; STARD-AI Steering Committee. Developing a reporting guideline for artificial intelligence-centred diagnostic test accuracy studies: the STARD-AI protocol. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e047709.
138. Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007;335:806-8.
139. Ogrinc G, Davies L, Goodman D, Batalden P, Davidoff F, Stevens D. SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25:986-92.
140. Mongan J, Moy L, Kahn CE Jr. Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM): a guide for authors and reviewers. Radiol Artif Intell. 2020;2:e200029.
141. Tejani AS, Klontzas ME, Gatti AA, et al.; CLAIM 2024 Update Panel. Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM): 2024 Update. Radiol Artif Intell. 2024;6:e240300.
142. Norgeot B, Quer G, Beaulieu-Jones BK, et al. Minimum information about clinical artificial intelligence modeling: the MI-CLAIM checklist. Nat Med. 2020;26:1320-4.
143. Vasey B, Nagendran M, Campbell B, et al.; DECIDE-AI expert group. Reporting guideline for the early stage clinical evaluation of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence: DECIDE-AI. BMJ. 2022;377:e070904.
144. Rivera S, Liu X, Chan AW, Denniston AK, Calvert MJ; SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI Working Group. Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI extension. Lancet Digit Health. 2020;2:e549-60.
145. Liu X, Rivera SC, Moher D, Calvert MJ, Denniston AK; SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI Working Group. Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension. BMJ. 2020;370:m3164.
146. Collins GS, Moons KGM, Dhiman P, et al. TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods. BMJ. 2024;385:e078378.
147. Lekadir K, Frangi AF, Porras AR, et al.; FUTURE-AI Consortium. FUTURE-AI: international consensus guideline for trustworthy and deployable artificial intelligence in healthcare. BMJ. 2025;388:e081554.
148. Park SH, Han K, Jang HY, et al. Methods for clinical evaluation of artificial intelligence algorithms for medical diagnosis. Radiology. 2023;306:20-31.
149. Rex DK, Kahi C, O’Brien M, et al. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy PIVI (Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations) on real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:419-22.
150. Mascagni P, Alapatt D, Sestini L, et al. Applications of artificial intelligence in surgery: clinical, technical, and governance considerations. Cir Esp. 2024;102 Suppl 1:S66-71.
151. Kitaguchi D, Takeshita N, Hasegawa H, Ito M. Artificial intelligence-based computer vision in surgery: recent advances and future perspectives. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2022;6:29-36.
152. Mascagni P, Padoy N. OR black box and surgical control tower: recording and streaming data and analytics to improve surgical care. J Visc Surg. 2021;158:S18-25.
153. McGivern KG, Drake TM, Knight SR, et al. Applying artificial intelligence to big data in hepatopancreatic and biliary surgery: a scoping review. Art Int Surg. 2023;3:27-47.
154. Adegbesan A, Akingbola A, Aremu O, Adewole O, Amamdikwa JC, Shagaya U. From scalpels to algorithms: the risk of dependence on artificial intelligence in surgery. J Med Surg Public Health. 2024;3:100140.
155. Hwang N, Chao PP, Kirkpatrick J, Srinivasa K, Koea JB, Srinivasa S. Educational quality of Robotic Whipple videos on YouTube. HPB. 2024;26:826-32.
156. Byrd IV TF, Tignanelli CJ. Artificial intelligence in surgery - a narrative review. J Med Artif Intell. 2024;7:29.
157. Ergina PL, Barkun JS, McCulloch P, Cook JA, Altman DG; IDEAL Group. IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 2: observational studies in the exploration and assessment stages. BMJ. 2013;346:f3011.
158. McCulloch P, Cook JA, Altman DG, Heneghan C, Diener MK; IDEAL Group. IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 1: the idea and development stages. BMJ. 2013;346:f3012.
159. Marcus HJ, Ramirez PT, Khan DZ, et al.; IDEAL Robotics Colloquium. The IDEAL framework for surgical robotics: development, comparative evaluation and long-term monitoring. Nat Med. 2024;30:61-75.
160. Roodbeen SX, Lo Conte A, Hirst A, et al. Evolution of transanal total mesorectal excision according to the IDEAL framework. BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2019;1:e000004.
161. Cook JA, McCulloch P, Blazeby JM, Beard DJ, Marinac-Dabic D, Sedrakyan A; IDEAL Group. IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 3: randomised controlled trials in the assessment stage and evaluations in the long term study stage. BMJ. 2013;346:f2820.
162. Li X, Li L, Jiang Y, et al. Vision-Language Models in medical image analysis: from simple fusion to general large models. Inform Fusion. 2025;118:102995.
