REFERENCES
1. Anteby R, Horesh N, Soffer S, et al. Deep learning visual analysis in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2021;35:1521-33.
2. Hashimoto DA, Rosman G, Witkowski ER, et al. Computer vision analysis of intraoperative video: automated recognition of operative steps in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Ann Surg. 2019;270:414-21.
3. Hashimoto DA, Rosman G, Rus D, Meireles OR. Artificial intelligence in surgery: promises and perils. Ann Surg. 2018;268:70-6.
4. Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med. 2019;25:44-56.
5. Haenssle H, Fink C, Toberer F, et al. Man against machine reloaded: performance of a market-approved convolutional neural network in classifying a broad spectrum of skin lesions in comparison with 96 dermatologists working under less artificial conditions. Ann Oncol. 2020;31:137-43.
6. Haenssle HA, Fink C, Schneiderbauer R, et al. Man against machine: diagnostic performance of a deep learning convolutional neural network for dermoscopic melanoma recognition in comparison to 58 dermatologists. Ann Oncol. 2018;29:1836-42.
7. Haenssle HA, Winkler JK, Fink C, et al. Skin lesions of face and scalp - classification by a market-approved convolutional neural network in comparison with 64 dermatologists. Eur J Cancer. 2021;144:192-9.
8. Li M, Huang Z, Shan Q, et al. Performance and comparison of artificial intelligence and human experts in the detection and classification of colonic polyps. BMC Gastroenterol. 2022;22:517.
9. Loftus TJ, Vlaar AP, Hung AJ, et al. Executive summary of the artificial intelligence in surgery series. Surgery. 2022;171:1435-9.
10. De Backer P, Eckhoff JA, Simoens J, et al. Multicentric exploration of tool annotation in robotic surgery: lessons learned when starting a surgical artificial intelligence project. Surg Endosc. 2022;36:8533-48.
11. Madad Zadeh S, Francois T, Calvet L, et al. SurgAI: deep learning for computerized laparoscopic image understanding in gynaecology. Surg Endosc. 2020;34:5377-83.
12. Ryu K, Kitaguchi D, Nakajima K, et al. Deep learning-based vessel automatic recognition for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Surg Endosc. 2023;38:171-8.
13. Den Boer RB, De Jongh C, Huijbers WTE, et al. Computer-aided anatomy recognition in intrathoracic and -abdominal surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2022;36:8737-52.
14. Zygomalas A, Kalles D, Katsiakis N, Anastasopoulos A, Skroubis G. Artificial intelligence assisted recognition of anatomical landmarks and laparoscopic instruments in transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Surg Innov. 2024;31:178-84.
15. Zhou R, Wang D, Zhang H, et al. Vision techniques for anatomical structures in laparoscopic surgery: a comprehensive review. Front. Surg. 2025;12:1557153.
16. Igaki T, Kitaguchi D, Kojima S, et al. Artificial intelligence-based total mesorectal excision plane navigation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2022;65:e329-e33.
17. Wang Z, Lu B, Long Y, et al. Autolaparo: a new dataset of integrated multi-tasks for image-guided surgical automation in laparoscopic hysterectomy. In: Wang L, Dou Q, Fletcher PT, Speidel S, Shuo Li S, Editors. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention; 2022 Sep 18-22; Singapore. Cham: Springer; 2022.
18. Narihiro S, Kitaguchi D, Hasegawa H, Takeshita N, Ito M. Deep learning-based real-time ureter identification in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2024;67:e1596-9.
19. Carstens M, Rinner FM, Bodenstedt S, et al. The dresden surgical anatomy dataset for abdominal organ segmentation in surgical data science. Sci Data. 2023;10:3.
20. Kamtam DN, Shrager JB, Malla SD, et al. Deep learning approaches to surgical video segmentation and object detection: a scoping review. Comput Biol Med. 2025;194:110482.
21. Salort-Benejam L, Agudo A. NeRFscopy: neural radiance fields for in-vivo time-varying tissues from endoscopy. arXiv 2026;arXiv:2602.15775. Available from https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.00044 [accessed 27 May 2026].
22. Chen H, Gou L, Fang Z, et al. Artificial intelligence assisted real-time recognition of intra-abdominal metastasis during laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery. npj Digit. Med. 2025;8:9.
23. Wang S, Li C, Wang R, et al. Annotation-efficient deep learning for automatic medical image segmentation. Nat Commun. 2021;12:5915.
24. Mascagni P, Alapatt D, Sestini L, et al. Computer vision in surgery: from potential to clinical value. npj Digit. Med. 2022;5:163.
25. Carstens M, Vasisht S, Zhang Z, et al. Artificial intelligence for surgical scene understanding: a systematic review and reporting quality meta-analysis. NPJ Digit Med. 2025;9:59.
26. Meireles OR, Rosman G, Altieri MS, et al. ; SAGES Video Annotation for AI Working Groups. SAGES consensus recommendations on an annotation framework for surgical video. Surg Endosc. 2021;35:4918-29.
27. Rädsch T, Reinke A, Weru V, et al. Labelling instructions matter in biomedical image analysis. Nat Mach Intell. 2023;5:273-83.
28. Sener O, Savarese S. Active learning for convolutional neural networks: a core-set approach. arXiv 2017;arXiv:1708.00489. Available from https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1708.00489 [accessed 27 May 2026].
29. Wang CY, Yeh IH, Mark Liao HY. Yolov9: learning what you want to learn using programmable gradient information. In: Leonardis A, Ricci E, Roth S, Russakovsky O, Sattler T, Varol G, Editors. European Conference on Computer Vision 2024; 2024 Sep 29-Oct 4; Milan, Italy. Cham: Springer, 2024. pp. 1-21.
30. Zong Z, Song G, Liu Y. DETRs with collaborative hybrid assignments training. arXiv 2022;arXiv:2211.12860. Available from https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.12860 [accessed 27 May 2026].
31. Xie E, Wang W, Yu Z, Anandkumar A, Alvarez JM, Luo P. SegFormer: simple and efficient design for semantic segmentation with transformers. arXiv 2021;arXiv:2105.15203. Available from https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2105.15203 [accessed 27 May 2026].
32. Cheng B, Misra I, Schwing AG, Kirillov A, Girdhar R. Masked-attention mask transformer for universal image segmentation. In: 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR); 2022 Jun 18-24; New Orleans, LA, USA. IEEE; 2022. pp. 1280-9.
33. van der Maaten L, Hinton G. Visualizing data using t-SNE. JMLR. 2008;9:2579-605. Available from: https://jmlr.org/papers/v9/vandermaaten08a.html. [Last accessed on 27 May 2026].
34. Tan YZ, Cheng H, Ng KW, Ngiam KY, Gao Y, Khoo ET. Evaluating image matching with robust estimators: Bridging natural and surgical domains to enhance scene understanding. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2025;29:8847-54.
35. Yang Z, Dai J, Pan J. 3D reconstruction from endoscopy images: a survey. Comput Biol Med. 2024;175:108546.
36. Zhao L, Wang T, Chen Y, et al. A novel framework for segmentation of small targets in medical images. Sci Rep. 2025;15:9924.
37. Yengera G, Mutter D, Marescaux J, Padoy N. Less is more: surgical phase recognition with less annotations through self-supervised pre-training of CNN-LSTM networks. arXiv 2018;arXiv:180508569. Available from https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1805.08569 [accessed 27 May 2026].
38. Raja MA, Loughran R, Mc Caffery F. NeuroEvolution of capsule networks for computer-aided laparoscopy. TechRxiv 2023. Available from https://www.techrxiv.org/doi/pdf/10.36227/techrxiv.24648231.v1 [accessed 27 May 2026].
39. Cui R, Zhang J, Pei J, Wang K, Heng PA, Qin J. Topology-constrained learning for efficient laparoscopic liver landmark detection. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2025; 2025 Sep 23-25; Daejeon, Republic of Korea. Cham: Springer; 2026. pp 585–94.
40. Peng Z, Wang Z, Yan Y, et al. Development of an AI-driven digital assistance system for real-time safety evaluation and quality control in laparoscopic liver surgery. Front. Oncol. 2025;15:1678525.
