REFERENCES
1. Omurtag A, Sunderland C, Mansfield NJ, Zakeri Z. EEG connectivity and BDNF correlates of fast motor learning in laparoscopic surgery. Sci Rep. 2025;15:7399.
2. Bonrath EM, Dedy NJ, Zevin B, Grantcharov TP. Defining technical errors in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:2678-91.
3. Buia A, Stockhausen F, Hanisch E. Laparoscopic surgery: a qualified systematic review. World J Methodol. 2015;5:238-54.
4. Birkmeyer JD, Finks JF, O’Reilly A, et al.; Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative. Surgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1434-42.
5. Keles HO, Cengiz C, Demiral I, Ozmen MM, Omurtag A. High density optical neuroimaging predicts surgeons’s subjective experience and skill levels. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0247117.
6. Healey MA, Shackford SR, Osler TM, Rogers FB, Burns E. Complications in surgical patients. Arch Surg. 2002;137:611-7.
7. Soangra R, Sivakumar R, Anirudh ER, Reddy Y SV, John EB. Evaluation of surgical skill using machine learning with optimal wearable sensor locations. PLoS ONE. 2022;17:e0267936.
8. Shafiei SB, Shadpour S, Mohler JL, et al. Developing surgical skill level classification model using visual metrics and a gradient boosting algorithm. Ann Surg Open. 2023;4:e292.
9. Zakeri Z, Mansfield N, Sunderland C, Omurtag A. Physiological correlates of cognitive load in laparoscopic surgery. Sci Rep. 2020;10:12927.
10. Darzi A, Datta V, Mackay S. The challenge of objective assessment of surgical skill. Am J Surg. 2001;181:484-6.
11. Farah E, Desir A, Marques C, et al. Heart rate variability: an objective measure of mental stress in surgical simulation. Global Surg Educ. 2024;3:25.
12. The AF, Reijmerink I, van der Laan M, Cnossen F. Heart rate variability as a measure of mental stress in surgery: a systematic review. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2020;93:805-21.
13. Huaulmé A, Tronchot A, Thomazeau H, Jannin P. Automated assessment of non-technical skills by heart-rate data. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2025;20:561-8.
14. Soangra R, Jiang P, Haik D, et al. Beyond efficiency: surface electromyography enables further insights into the surgical movements of urologists. J Endourol. 2022;36:1355-61.
15. Soto Rodriguez NA, Arroyo Kuribreña C, Porras Hernández JD, et al. Objective evaluation of laparoscopic experience based on muscle electromyography and accelerometry performing circular pattern cutting tasks: a pilot study. Surg Innov. 2023;30:493-500.
16. Manabe T, Rahul FNU, Fu Y, et al. Distinguishing laparoscopic surgery experts from novices using EEG topographic features. Brain Sci. 2023;13:1706.
17. Nemani A, Yücel MA, Kruger U, et al. Assessing bimanual motor skills with optical neuroimaging. Sci Adv. 2018;4:eaat3807.
18. Nemani A, Kruger U, Cooper CA, Schwaitzberg SD, Intes X, De S. Objective assessment of surgical skill transfer using non-invasive brain imaging. Surg Endosc. 2019;33:2485-94.
19. Gao Y, Yan P, Kruger U, et al. Functional brain imaging reliably predicts bimanual motor skill performance in a standardized surgical task. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2021;68:2058-66.
20. Zia A, Sharma Y, Bettadapura V, Sarin EL, Essa I. Video and accelerometer-based motion analysis for automated surgical skills assessment. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018;13:443-55.
21. Franco-gonzález IT, Lappalainen N, Bednarik R. Tracking 3D motion of instruments in microsurgery: a comparative study of stereoscopic marker-based vs. deep learning method for objective analysis of surgical skills. Inform Med Unlocked. 2024;51:101593.
22. Tien T, Pucher PH, Sodergren MH, Sriskandarajah K, Yang GZ, Darzi A. Eye tracking for skills assessment and training: a systematic review. J Surg Res. 2014;191:169-78.
23. Oh J, Lau N. Quantitative analysis of eye-gaze metrics in differentiating surgical expertise. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2024;68:624-6.
24. Alleblas CC, Vleugels MP, Nieboer TE. Ergonomics of laparoscopic graspers and the importance of haptic feedback: the surgeons’ perspective. Gynecol Surg. 2016;13:379-84.
25. Araki A, Makiyama K, Yamanaka H, et al. Comparison of the performance of experienced and novice surgeons: measurement of gripping force during laparoscopic surgery performed on pigs using forceps with pressure sensors. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:1999-2005.
26. Sugiyama T, Lama S, Gan LS. Forces of tool-tissue interaction to assess surgical skill level. JAMA Surg. 2018;153:234-42.
27. Brown JD, O Brien CE, Leung SC, Dumon KR, Lee DI, Kuchenbecker KJ. Using contact forces and robot arm accelerations to automatically rate surgeon skill at peg transfer. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2017;64:2263-75.
28. Rafii-Tari H, Payne CJ, Bicknell C, et al. Objective assessment of endovascular navigation skills with force sensing. Ann Biomed Eng. 2017;45:1315-27.
29. Golahmadi AK, Khan DZ, Mylonas GP, Marcus HJ. Tool-tissue forces in surgery: a systematic review. Ann Med Surg. 2021;65:102268.
30. Dockter RL, Lendvay TS, Sweet RM, Kowalewski TM. The minimally acceptable classification criterion for surgical skill: intent vectors and separability of raw motion data. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2017;12:1151-9.
31. Gao Y, Kruger U, Intes X, Schwaitzberg S, De S. A machine learning approach to predict surgical learning curves. Surgery. 2020;167:321-7.
32. Ebina K, Abe T, Yan L, et al. Development of machine learning-based assessment system for laparoscopic surgical skills using motion-capture. In: Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII); 2024 Jan 8-11; Ha Long, Vietnam. New York: IEEE; 2024. pp. 1-6.
33. Power D, Burke C, Madden MG, Ullah I. Automated assessment of simulated laparoscopic surgical skill performance using deep learning. Sci Rep. 2025;15:13591.
34. Natheir S, Christie S, Yilmaz R, et al. Utilizing artificial intelligence and electroencephalography to assess expertise on a simulated neurosurgical task. Comput Biol Med. 2023;152:106286.
35. Yin S, Xiang Z. Multi-objective collaborative path planning for heterogeneous autonomous underwater vehicles in cluttered environments. Swarm Evol Comput. 2026;100:102251.
36. Yin S, Xiang Z. Adaptive collision avoidance strategy for USVs in perception-limited environments using dynamic priority guidance. Adv Eng Inform. 2025;65:103355.
37. Omurtag A, Roy RN, Dehais F, Chatty L, Garbey M. Tracking mental workload by multimodal measurements in the operating room. Neuroergonomics. Elsevier; 2019. pp. 99-103.
38. Muthukumaraswamy SD. High-frequency brain activity and muscle artifacts in MEG/EEG: a review and recommendations. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:138.
39. Vinck M, Oostenveld R, van Wingerden M, Battaglia F, Pennartz CM. An improved index of phase-synchronization for electrophysiological data in the presence of volume-conduction, noise and sample-size bias. Neuroimage. 2011;55:1548-65.
40. Kim HJ, Choi GS, Park JS, Park SY. Comparison of surgical skills in laparoscopic and robotic tasks between experienced surgeons and novices in laparoscopic surgery: an experimental study. Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30:71-6.
41. Dias RD, Ngo-Howard MC, Boskovski MT, Zenati MA, Yule SJ. Systematic review of measurement tools to assess surgeons’ intraoperative cognitive workload. Br J Surg. 2018;105:491-501.
42. Hannah TC, Turner D, Kellner R, Bederson J, Putrino D, Kellner CP. Neuromonitoring correlates of expertise level in surgical performers: a systematic review. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022;16:705238.
43. Howie EE, Dharanikota H, Gunn E, et al. Cognitive load management: an invaluable tool for safe and effective surgical training. J Surg Educ. 2023;80:311-22.
44. Balkhoyor AM, Awais M, Biyani S, et al. Frontal theta brain activity varies as a function of surgical experience and task error. BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2020;2:e000040.
45. Akkad H, Dupont-Hadwen J, Kane E, et al. Increasing human motor skill acquisition by driving theta-gamma coupling. Elife. 2021;10:e67355.
