REFERENCES
1. Stolarski A, He K, Sell N, et al. Mentoring experience of new surgeons during their transition to independent practice: a nationwide survey. Surgery. 2021;169:1354-60.
2. Apramian T, Cristancho S, Sener A, Lingard L. How do thresholds of principle and preference influence surgeon assessments of learner performance? Ann Surg. 2018;268:385-90.
3. Ahmed K, Miskovic D, Darzi A, Athanasiou T, Hanna GB. Observational tools for assessment of procedural skills: a systematic review. Am J Surg. 2011;202:469-80.e6.
4. Gawad N, Fowler A, Mimeault R, Raiche I. The inter-rater reliability of technical skills assessment and retention of rater training. J Surg Educ. 2019;76:1088-93.
5. Kramp KH, van Det MJ, Hoff C, Lamme B, Veeger NJ, Pierie JP. Validity and reliability of global operative assessment of laparoscopic skills (GOALS) in novice trainees performing a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Surg Educ. 2015;72:351-8.
6. Grüter AAJ, van Lieshout AS, van Oostendorp SE, et al. Video-based tools for surgical quality assessment of technical skills in laparoscopic procedures: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2023;37:4279-97.
7. Alibhai KM, Fowler A, Gawad N, Wood TJ, Raîche I. Assessment of laparoscopic skills: comparing the reliability of global rating and entrustability tools. Can Med Educ J. 2022;13:36-45.
8. Claus C, Furtado M, Malcher F, Cavazzola LT, Felix E. Ten golden rules for a safe MIS inguinal hernia repair using a new anatomical concept as a guide. Surg Endosc. 2020;34:1458-64.
9. Adrales G, Ardito F, Chowbey P, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy critical view of safety (LC-CVS): a multi-national validation study of an objective, procedure-specific assessment using video-based assessment (VBA). Surg Endosc. 2024;38:922-30.
11. Kowalewski KF, Garrow CR, Schmidt MW, Benner L, Müller-Stich BP, Nickel F. Sensor-based machine learning for workflow detection and as key to detect expert level in laparoscopic suturing and knot-tying. Surg Endosc. 2019;33:3732-40.
12. Baghdadi A, Hussein AA, Ahmed Y, Cavuoto LA, Guru KA. A computer vision technique for automated assessment of surgical performance using surgeons’ console-feed videos. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2019;14:697-707.
13. Ganni S, Botden SMBI, Chmarra M, Li M, Goossens RHM, Jakimowicz JJ. Validation of motion tracking software for evaluation of surgical performance in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Med Syst. 2020;44:56.
14. Bar O, Neimark D, Zohar M, et al. Impact of data on generalization of AI for surgical intelligence applications. Sci Rep. 2020;10:22208.
15. Korndorffer JR Jr, Hawn MT, Spain DA, et al. Situating artificial intelligence in surgery: a focus on disease severity. Ann Surg. 2020;272:523-8.
16. Ortenzi M, Rapoport Ferman J, Antolin A, et al. A novel high accuracy model for automatic surgical workflow recognition using artificial intelligence in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP). Surg Endosc. 2023;37:8818-28.
17. Khanna A, Antolin A, Bar O, et al. Automated identification of key steps in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy using artificial intelligence. J Urol. 2024;211:575-84.
18. Deol ES, Tollefson MK, Antolin A, et al. Automated surgical step recognition in transurethral bladder tumor resection using artificial intelligence: transfer learning across surgical modalities. Front Artif Intell. 2024;7:1375482.
19. Levin I, Rapoport Ferman J, Bar O, Ben Ayoun D, Cohen A, Wolf T. Introducing surgical intelligence in gynecology: automated identification of key steps in hysterectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024;166:1273-8.
20. Fried GM, Ortenzi M, Dayan D, et al. Surgical intelligence can lead to higher adoption of best practices in minimally invasive surgery. Ann Surg. 2024;280:525-34.
21. Chou E, Abboudi H, Shamim Khan M, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K. Should surgical outcomes be published? J R Soc Med. 2015;108:127-35.
22. Bresnick SD. Highly publicized litigation against doctors: how plastic surgeons should protect themselves and their patients. Aesthet Surg J. 2023;43:NP297-9.
