REFERENCES
1. Schwab F, Dubey A, Gamez L, et al. Adult scoliosis: prevalence, SF-36, and nutritional parameters in an elderly volunteer population. Spine 2005;30:1082-5.
2. Pellisé F, Vila-Casademunt A, Núñez-Pereira S, et al; European Spine Study Group, International Spine Study Group. Surgeons’ risk perception in ASD surgery: the value of objective risk assessment on decision making and patient counselling. Eur Spine J 2022;31:1174-83.
3. Joshi RS, Lau D, Scheer JK, et al. State-of-the-art reviews predictive modeling in adult spinal deformity: applications of advanced analytics. Spine Deform 2021;9:1223-39.
4. Akosman I, Lovecchio F, Lyons K, et al. The emerging role of artificial intelligence in adult spinal deformity. Semin Spine Surg 2022;34:100986.
5. Haselhuhn JJ, Soriano PBO, Grover P, et al. Spine surgeon versus AI algorithm full-length radiographic measurements: a validation study of complex adult spinal deformity patients. Spine Deform 2024;12:755-61.
6. Harake ES, Linzey JR, Jiang C, et al. Development and validation of an artificial intelligence model to accurately predict spinopelvic parameters. J Neurosurg Spine 2024;41:88-96.
7. Suri A, Tang S, Kargilis D, et al. Conquering the cobb angle: a deep learning algorithm for automated, hardware-invariant measurement of cobb angle on radiographs in patients with scoliosis. Radiol Artif Intell 2023;5:e220158.
8. Galbusera F, Niemeyer F, Wilke HJ, et al. Fully automated radiological analysis of spinal disorders and deformities: a deep learning approach. Eur Spine J 2019;28:951-60.
9. Faulks CR, Biddau DT, Munday NR, McKenzie DP, Malham GM. Patient-specific spinal rods in adult spinal deformity surgery reduce proximal junctional failure: a review of patient outcomes and surgical technique in a prospective observational cohort. J Spine Surg 2023;9:409-21.
10. Picton B, Stone LE, Liang J, et al. Patient-specific rods in adult spinal deformity: a systematic review. Spine Deform 2024;12:577-85.
11. Lee NJ, Sardar ZM, Boddapati V, et al. Can machine learning accurately predict postoperative compensation for the uninstrumented thoracic spine and pelvis after fusion from the lower thoracic spine to the sacrum? Global Spine J 2022;12:559-66.
12. Arora A, Demb J, Cummins DD, Callahan M, Clark AJ, Theologis AA. Predictive models to assess risk of extended length of stay in adults with spinal deformity and lumbar degenerative pathology: development and internal validation. Spine J 2023;23:457-66.
13. Li W, Zhang Y, Zhou X, et al. Ensemble learning-assisted prediction of prolonged hospital length of stay after spine correction surgery: a multi-center cohort study. J Orthop Surg Res 2024;19:112.
14. Arora A, Lituiev D, Jain D, et al. Predictive models for length of stay and discharge disposition in elective spine surgery: development, validation, and comparison to the ACS NSQIP risk calculator. Spine 2023;48:E1-13.
15. Lafage R, Ang B, Alshabab BS, et al. Predictive model for selection of upper treated vertebra using a machine learning approach. World Neurosurg 2021;146:e225-32.
16. Mohanty S, Hassan FM, Lenke LG, et al; International Spine Study Group. Machine learning clustering of adult spinal deformity patients identifies four prognostic phenotypes: a multicenter prospective cohort analysis with single surgeon external validation. Spine J 2024;24:1095-108.
17. Ames CP, Smith JS, Pellisé F, et al; European Spine Study Group; International Spine Study Group. Development of predictive models for all individual questions of SRS-22R after adult spinal deformity surgery: a step toward individualized medicine. Eur Spine J 2019;28:1998-2011.
18. Mekhael E, El Rachkidi R, Saliby RM, et al. Functional assessment using 3D movement analysis can better predict health-related quality of life outcomes in patients with adult spinal deformity: a machine learning approach. Front Surg 2023;10:1166734.
19. Nassim N, Mekhael E, Rachkidi RE, et al. Global Sagittal Angle and T9-tilt seem to be the most clinically and functionally relevant global alignment parameters in patients with Adult Spinal Deformity. Brain Spine 2024;4:102805.
20. Diebo BG, Oren JH, Challier V, et al. Global sagittal axis: a step toward full-body assessment of sagittal plane deformity in the human body. J Neurosurg Spine 2016;25:494-9.
21. Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G. Sagittal plane alignment of the spine and gravity: a radiological and clinical evaluation. Acta Orthop Belg 2005;71:213-20.
22. Williamson TK, Krol O, Tretiakov P, et al. Crossing the bridge from degeneration to deformity: when does sagittal correction impact outcomes in adult spinal deformity surgery? Spine 2023;48:E25-32.
23. Johnson GW, Chanbour H, Ali MA, et al. Artificial intelligence to preoperatively predict proximal junction kyphosis following adult spinal deformity surgery: soft tissue imaging may be necessary for accurate models. Spine 2023;48:1688-95.
24. Scheer JK, Oh T, Smith JS, et al; International Spine Study Group. Development of a validated computer-based preoperative predictive model for pseudarthrosis with 91% accuracy in 336 adult spinal deformity patients. Neurosurg Focus 2018;45:E11.
25. Burström G, Buerger C, Hoppenbrouwers J, et al. Machine learning for automated 3-dimensional segmentation of the spine and suggested placement of pedicle screws based on intraoperative cone-beam computer tomography. J Neurosurg Spine 2019;31:147-54.
26. Siemionow KB, Forsthoefel CW, Foy MP, Gawel D, Luciano CJ. Autonomous lumbar spine pedicle screw planning using machine learning: A validation study. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 2021;12:223-7.
27. Wilson JP Jr, Kumbhare D, Kandregula S, Oderhowho A, Guthikonda B, Hoang S. Proposed applications of machine learning to intraoperative neuromonitoring during spine surgeries. Neurosci Inf 2023;3:100143.
28. Pierce KE, Kapadia BH, Naessig S, et al. Validation of the ACS-NSQIP risk calculator: a machine-learning risk tool for predicting complications and mortality following adult spinal deformity corrective surgery. Int J Spine Surg 2021;15:1210-6.
29. Kim JS, Arvind V, Oermann EK, et al. Predicting surgical complications in patients undergoing elective adult spinal deformity procedures using machine learning. Spine Deform 2018;6:762-70.
30. Raman T, Vasquez-Montes D, Varlotta C, Passias PG, Errico TJ. Decision tree-based modelling for identification of predictors of blood loss and transfusion requirement after adult spinal deformity surgery. Int J Spine Surg 2020;14:87-95.
31. De la Garza Ramos R, Hamad MK, Ryvlin J, et al. An artificial neural network model for the prediction of perioperative blood transfusion in adult spinal deformity surgery. J Clin Med 2022;11:4436.
32. Durand WM, DePasse JM, Daniels AH. Predictive modeling for blood transfusion after adult spinal deformity surgery: a tree-based machine learning approach. Spine 2018;43:1058-66.
33. Ames CP, Smith JS, Pellisé F, et al; European Spine Study Group, International Spine Study Group. Development of deployable predictive models for minimal clinically important difference achievement across the commonly used health-related quality of life instruments in adult spinal deformity surgery. Spine 2019;44:1144-53.
34. Patel AV, White CA, Schwartz JT, et al. Emerging technologies in the treatment of adult spinal deformity. Neurospine 2021;18:417-27.
35. Löchel J, Putzier M, Dreischarf M, et al. Deep learning algorithm for fully automated measurement of sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Eur Spine J 2024;Online ahead of print.
36. Hopkins BS, Mazmudar A, Driscoll C, et al. Using artificial intelligence (AI) to predict postoperative surgical site infection: a retrospective cohort of 4046 posterior spinal fusions. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2020;192:105718.
37. Schonfeld E, Pant A, Shah A, et al. Evaluating computer vision, large language, and genome-wide association models in a limited sized patient cohort for pre-operative risk stratification in adult spinal deformity surgery. J Clin Med 2024;13:656.
38. Jain D, Durand W, Burch S, Daniels A, Berven S. Machine learning for predictive modeling of 90-day readmission, major medical complication, and discharge to a facility in patients undergoing long segment posterior lumbar spine fusion. Spine 2020;45:1151-60.
39. Arora A, Demb J, Cummins DD, et al. Development and internal validation of predictive models to assess risk of post-acute care facility discharge in adults undergoing multi-level instrumented fusions for lumbar degenerative pathology and spinal deformity. Spine Deform 2023;11:163-73.
40. Lee CH, Jo DJ, Oh JK, et al. Development and validation of an online calculator to predict proximal junctional kyphosis after adult spinal deformity surgery using machine learning. Neurospine 2023;20:1272-80.
41. Noh SH, Lee HS, Park GE, et al. Predicting mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity operation using a machine learning based on modified global alignment and proportion scoring with body mass index and bone mineral density. Neurospine 2023;20:265-74.
42. Balaban B, Yilgor C, Yucekul A, et al. Building clinically actionable models for predicting mechanical complications in postoperatively well-aligned adult spinal deformity patients using XGBoost algorithm. Inform Med Unlocked 2023;37:101191.
43. Lovecchio F, Lafage R, Sheikh Alshabab B, et al. Can discharge radiographs predict junctional complications? A decision tree analysis. Global Spine J 2024;14:970-7.
44. Ryu SJ, So JY, Ha Y, et al. Risk factors for unplanned reoperation after corrective surgery for adult spinal deformity. Bone Joint Res 2023;12:245-55.
45. Ames CP, Smith JS, Gum JL, et al. Utilization of predictive modeling to determine episode of care costs and to accurately identify catastrophic cost nonwarranty outlier patients in adult spinal deformity surgery: a step toward bundled payments and risk sharing. Spine 2020;45:E252-65.
46. Wondra JP 2nd, Kelly MP, Greenberg J, et al. Validation of adult spinal deformity surgical outcome prediction tools in adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis. Spine 2023;48:21-8.
47. Yagi M, Yamanouchi K, Fujita N, Funao H, Ebata S. Revolutionizing spinal care: current applications and future directions of artificial intelligence and machine learning. J Clin Med 2023;12:4188.
48. Haddad S, Pizones J, Raganato R, et al. Future data points to implement in adult spinal deformity assessment for artificial intelligence modeling prediction: the importance of the biological dimension. Int J Spine Surg 2023;17:S34-44.
49. Choy W, Azad TD, Scheer JK, Safaee MM, Ames CP. Biomarkers in adult spinal deformity surgery. Semin Spine Surg 2023;35:101058.
