REFERENCES

1. Streck LE, Hanreich C, Cororaton AD, Boettner CS, Boettner F. Predictors for activity following total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023;143:6815-20.

2. Koster A, Stevens M, van Keeken H, Westerveld S, Seeber GH. Effectiveness and therapeutic validity of physiotherapeutic exercise starting within one year following total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act 2023;20:8.

3. Li J, Jia G, Dong W, et al. Incidence and risk factors of delayed wound healing in patients who underwent unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Int Wound J 2023;20:508-15.

4. Appleyard T, Avery P, Baker P, Clement ND, Mason J, Deehan DJ. Hinge prostheses in the revision of unicompartmental knee replacement: a descriptive analysis of data from the national joint registry for England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2024;144:23-30.

5. De Berardinis L, Senarighi M, Ciccullo C, Forte F, Spezia M, Gigante AP. Fast-track surgery and telerehabilitation protocol in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty leads to superior outcomes when compared with the standard protocol: a propensity-matched pilot study. Knee Surg Relat Res 2022;34:44.

6. Heckmann ND, Antonios JK, Chen XT, et al. Midterm survivorship of robotic-assisted lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2022;37:831-6.

7. Mannan A, Pilling RWD, Mason K, Stirling P, Duffy D, London N. Excellent survival and outcomes with fixed-bearing medial UKA in young patients (≤ 60 years) at minimum 10-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2020;28:3865-70.

8. Du G, Qiu H, Zhu J, et al. No difference unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medial knee osteoarthritis with or without anterior cruciate ligament deficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 2023;38:586-93.e1.

9. Plancher KD, Voigt C, Bernstein DN, Briggs KK, Petterson SC. Return to sport in middle-aged and older athletes after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a mean 10-year follow-up: radiographic and clinical outcomes. Am J Sports Med 2023;51:1799-807.

10. Salman LA, Abudalou A, Khatkar H, et al. Impact of age on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2023;31:986-97.

11. Schopper C, Proier P, Luger M, Gotterbarm T, Klasan A. The learning curve in robotic assisted knee arthroplasty is flattened by the presence of a surgeon experienced with robotic assisted surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2023;31:760-7.

12. Vermue H, Lambrechts J, Tampere T, Arnout N, Auvinet E, Victor J. How should we evaluate robotics in the operating theatre? Bone Joint J 2020;102-B:407-13.

13. Rahman TM, Hansen L, Blackmond N, Sandhu A, Shaw JH, Davis JJ. Impact of alignment and alignment correction on outcomes following robotic medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2023;38:2282-7.

14. Schrednitzki D, Horn CE, Lampe UA, Halder AM. Imageless robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty is accurate in vivo: a retrospective study to measure the postoperative bone resection and alignment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023;143:3471-9.

15. Bayoumi T, Kleeblad LJ, Borus TA, et al. Ten-year survivorship and patient satisfaction following robotic-arm-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective multicenter study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2023;105:933-42.

16. Negrín R, Ferrer G, Iñiguez M, et al. Robotic-assisted surgery in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: does it improve the precision of the surgery and its clinical outcomes? Systematic review. J Robot Surg 2021;15:165-77.

17. St Mart JP, de Steiger RN, Cuthbert A, Donnelly W. The three-year survivorship of robotically assisted versus non-robotically assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2020;102-B:319-28.

18. Wright JG, Swiontkowski MF, Heckman JD. Introducing levels of evidence to the journal. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85:1-3.

19. van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2010;84:523-38.

20. Aria M, Cuccurullo C. bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetr 2017;11:959-75.

21. Foissey C, Batailler C, Vahabi A, Fontalis A, Servien E, Lustig S. Better accuracy and implant survival in medial imageless robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared to conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: two- to eleven-year follow-up of three hundred fifty-six consecutive knees. Int Orthop 2023;47:533-41.

22. Wang JC, Piple AS, Hill WJ, et al. Computer-navigated and robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: increasing in popularity without increasing complications. J Arthroplasty 2022;37:2358-64.

23. Sun Y, Liu W, Hou J, Hu X, Zhang W. Does robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty have lower complication and revision rates than the conventional procedure? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2021;11:e044778.

24. Zhang J, Ng N, Scott CEH, et al. Robotic arm-assisted versus manual unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the MAKO robotic system. Bone Joint J 2022;104-B:541-8.

25. Mergenthaler G, Batailler C, Lording T, Servien E, Lustig S. Is robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty a safe procedure? A case control study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2021;29:931-8.

26. Kim SE, Han HS. Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: historical perspectives and current innovations. Biomed Eng Lett 2023;13:543-52.

27. Favroul C, Batailler C, Canetti R, et al. Image-based robotic unicompartmental knee arthroplasty allowed to match the rotation of the tibial implant with the native kinematic knee alignment. Int Orthop 2023;47:519-26.

28. Lonner JH, John TK, Conditt MA. Robotic arm-assisted UKA improves tibial component alignment: a pilot study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:141-6.

29. Wu C, Fukui N, Lin YK, et al. Comparison of robotic and conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty outcomes in patients with osteoarthritis: a retrospective cohort study. J Clin Med 2021;11:220.

30. Banger M, Doonan J, Rowe P, Jones B, MacLean A, Blyth MJB. Robotic arm-assisted versus conventional medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: five-year clinical outcomes of a randomized controlled trial. Bone Joint J 2021;103-B:1088-95.

31. Kayani B, Konan S, Tahmassebi J, Rowan FE, Haddad FS. An assessment of early functional rehabilitation and hospital discharge in conventional versus robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:24-33.

32. Wong J, Murtaugh T, Lakra A, Cooper HJ, Shah RP, Geller JA. Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee replacement offers no early advantage over conventional unicompartmental knee replacement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019;27:2303-8.

Artificial Intelligence Surgery
ISSN 2771-0408 (Online)
Follow Us

Portico

All published articles will be preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/

Portico

All published articles will be preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/