REFERENCES

1. Van Riel N, Auwerx K, Debbaut P, Van Hees S, Schoenmakers B. The effect of Dr Google on doctor-patient encounters in primary care: a quantitative, observational, cross-sectional study. BJGP Open 2017;1:bjgpopen17X100833.

2. Cocco AM, Zordan R, Taylor DM, et al. Dr Google in the ED: searching for online health information by adult emergency department patients. Med J Aust 2018;209:342-7.

3. Fraval A, Ming Chong Y, Holcdorf D, Plunkett V, Tran P. Internet use by orthopaedic outpatients - current trends and practices. Australas Med J 2012;5:633-8.

4. Kasthuri V, Homer A, Alsoof D, et al. Modern internet search analytics and spine: what are patients asking and reading online? N Am Spine Soc J 2023;14:100214.

5. Dave T, Athaluri SA, Singh S. ChatGPT in medicine: an overview of its applications, advantages, limitations, future prospects, and ethical considerations. Front Artif Intell 2023;6:1169595.

6. Sallam M. ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. Healthcare 2023;11:887.

7. Cascella M, Montomoli J, Bellini V, Bignami E. Evaluating the feasibility of ChatGPT in healthcare: an analysis of multiple clinical and research scenarios. J Med Syst 2023;47:33.

8. OpenAI. Introducing ChatGPT. 2022. Available from: https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt. [Last accessed on 27 Aug 2024].

9. Lock S. What is AI chatbot phenomenon ChatGPT and could it replace humans? 2022. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/dec/05/what-is-ai-chatbot-phenomenon-chatgpt-and-could-it-replace-humans. [Last accessed on 27 Aug 2024].

10. Gilson A, Safranek CW, Huang T, et al. How does ChatGPT perform on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE)? The implications of large language models for medical education and knowledge assessment. JMIR Med Educ 2023;9:e45312.

11. Kaarre J, Feldt R, Keeling LE, et al. Exploring the potential of ChatGPT as a supplementary tool for providing orthopaedic information. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2023;31:5190-8.

12. Dubin JA, Bains SS, Chen Z, et al. Using a Google web search analysis to assess the utility of ChatGPT in total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2023;38:1195-202.

13. Duey AH, Nietsch KS, Zaidat B, et al. Thromboembolic prophylaxis in spine surgery: an analysis of ChatGPT recommendations. Spine J 2023;23:1684-91.

14. Fayed AM, Mansur NSB, de Carvalho KA, Behrens A, D’Hooghe P, de Cesar Netto C. Artificial intelligence and ChatGPT in orthopaedics and sports medicine. J Exp Orthop 2023;10:74.

15. Hodakowski AJ, McCormick JR, Damodar D, et al. Rotator cuff repair: what questions are patients asking online and where are they getting their answers? Clin Shoulder Elb 2023;26:25-31.

16. Hurley ET, Crook BS, Lorentz SG, et al. Evaluation high-quality of information from ChatGPT (artificial intelligence-large language model) artificial intelligence on shoulder stabilization surgery. Arthroscopy 2024;40:726-31.e6.

17. Mika AP, Martin JR, Engstrom SM, Polkowski GG, Wilson JM. Assessing ChatGPT responses to common patient questions regarding total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2023;105:1519-26.

18. Subramanian T, Shahi P, Araghi K, et al. Using artificial intelligence to answer common patient-focused questions in minimally invasive spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2023;105:1649-53.

19. Lattig F, Fekete TF, OʼRiordan D, et al. A comparison of patient and surgeon preoperative expectations of spinal surgery. Spine 2013;38:1040-8.

20. Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI, Kreuter W, Goodman DC, Jarvik JG. Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. JAMA 2010;303:1259-65.

21. O’Lynnger TM, Zuckerman SL, Morone PJ, Dewan MC, Vasquez-Castellanos RA, Cheng JS. Trends for spine surgery for the elderly: implications for access to healthcare in North America. Neurosurgery 2015;77 Suppl 4:S136-41.

22. Bernard A, Langille M, Hughes S, Rose C, Leddin D, Veldhuyzen van Zanten S. A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the World Wide Web. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:2070-7.

23. Kreiner DS, Hwang SW, Easa JE, et al; North American Spine Society. An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy. Spine J 2014;14:180-91.

24. Zaina F, Tomkins-Lane C, Carragee E, Negrini S. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;2016:CD010264.

25. Katz JN, Zimmerman ZE, Mass H, Makhni MC. Diagnosis and management of lumbar spinal stenosis: a review. JAMA 2022;327:1688-99.

26. Kuris EO, McDonald CL, Palumbo MA, Daniels AH. Evaluation and management of cauda equina syndrome. Am J Med 2021;134:1483-9.

27. Bulloch L, Thompson K, Spector L. Cauda equina syndrome. Orthop Clin North Am 2022;53:247-54.

28. Issack PS, Cunningham ME, Pumberger M, Hughes AP, Cammisa FP Jr. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2012;20:527-35.

29. Fritz JM, Delitto A, Welch WC, Erhard RE. Lumbar spinal stenosis: a review of current concepts in evaluation, management, and outcome measurements. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:700-8.

30. Goacher E, Sanders MI, Ivanov M. Safety and feasibility of same-day discharge following lumbar decompression surgery: a systematic review. Brain Spine 2022;2:100888.

31. Degen T, Fischer K, Theiler R, et al. Outcomes after spinal stenosis surgery by type of surgery in adults aged 60 years and older. Swiss Med Wkly 2020;150:w20325.

32. Matsumoto K, Shah A, Kelkar A, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of a novel decompression surgery: transforaminal full-endoscopic lateral recess decompression (TE-LRD). N Am Spine Soc J 2021;5:100045.

33. Hathi K, Bigney E, Richardson E, et al. Minimally invasive vs. open surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with diabetes - a Canadian spine outcomes and research network study. Global Spine J 2023;13:1602-11.

34. Goldstein CL, Macwan K, Sundararajan K, Rampersaud YR. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine 2016;24:416-27.

35. Skovrlj B, Belton P, Zarzour H, Qureshi SA. Perioperative outcomes in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery: a systematic review. World J Orthop 2015;6:996-1005.

36. Chalhoub R, Mouawad A, Aoun M, et al. Will ChatGPT be able to replace a spine surgeon in the clinical setting? World Neurosurg 2024;185:e648-52.

37. Mejia MR, Arroyave JS, Saturno M, et al. Use of ChatGPT for determining clinical and surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy: a North American spine society guideline comparison. Neurospine 2024;21:149-58.

38. Rajjoub R, Arroyave JS, Zaidat B, et al. ChatGPT and its role in the decision-making for the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative analysis and narrative review. Global Spine J 2024;14:998-1017.