REFERENCES
1. Vidal-Jove J, Serres X, Vlaisavljevich E, et al. First-in-man histotripsy of hepatic tumors: the THERESA trial, a feasibility study. Int J Hyperthermia. 2022;39:1115-23.
2. Mendiratta-Lala M, Wiggermann P, Pech M, et al. The #HOPE4LIVER single-arm pivotal trial for histotripsy of primary and metastatic liver tumors. Radiology. 2024;312:e233051.
4. Fukuzawa M, Gotoda T. History of endoscopic submucosal dissection and role for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a Japanese perspective. Gastroint Interv. 2012;1:30-5.
5. Diana M, Chung H, Liu KH, et al. Endoluminal surgical triangulation: overcoming challenges of colonic endoscopic submucosal dissections using a novel flexible endoscopic surgical platform: feasibility study in a porcine model. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:4130-5.
6. Légner A, Diana M, Halvax P, et al. Endoluminal surgical triangulation 2.0: a new flexible surgical robot. Preliminary pre-clinical results with colonic submucosal dissection. Int J Med Robot. 2017;13:e1819.
8. Marescaux J, Diana M. Next step in minimally invasive surgery: hybrid image-guided surgery. J Pediatr Surg. 2015;50:30-6.
9. Gumbs AA, Gayet B. Why artificial intelligence surgery (AIS) is better than current robotic-assisted surgery (RAS). Art Int Surg. 2022;2:207-13.
10. Xue R, Liu R. Statistical analysis of da Vinci procedure volumes of 2021 in the Chinese Mainland. Intell Surg. 2022;4:18-22.
11. Coughlin GD, Yaxley JW, Chambers SK, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:1051-60.
12. Stolzenburg JU, Holze S, Neuhaus P, et al. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery: outcomes from the first multicentre, randomised, patient-blinded controlled trial in radical prostatectomy (LAP-01). Eur Urol. 2021;79:750-9.
13. Kapadia S, Shellito A, Tom CM, et al. Should robotic surgery training be prioritized in general surgery residency? A survey of fellowship program director perspectives. J Surg Educ. 2020;77:e245-50.
14. Meara JG, Leather AJM, Hagander L, et al. Global surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Lancet. 2015;386:569-624.
15. Dube A, Patel R. The 12 trillion dollar question: is global surgery cost effective? Bulletin. 2019;101:186-8.
16. Chao TE, Sharma K, Mandigo, et al. Cost-effectiveness of surgery and its policy implications for global health: a systematic review and analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2:e334-45.
17. Gumbs AA, Abu-Hilal M, Tsai TJ, Starker L, Chouillard E, Croner R. Keeping surgeons in the loop: are handheld robotics the best path towards more autonomous actions? (A comparison of complete handheld robotic hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases). Art Int Surg. 2021;1:38-51.
18. De Cremer D, Kasparov G. AI should augment human intelligence, not replace it. 2021. Available from: https://www.daviddecremer.com/wp-content/uploads/HBR2021_AI-Should-Augment-Human-Intelligence-Not-Replace-It.pdf. [Last accessed on 17 Dec 2024].
