REFERENCES
1. de Rooij T, van Hilst J, Bosscha K, et al. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy (LEOPARD-2): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2018;19:1-10.
2. Yates DR, Vaessen C, Roupret M. From Leonardo to da Vinci: the history of robot-assisted surgery in urology. BJU Int 2011;108:1708-13; discussion 14.
3. Yu HY, Hevelone ND, Lipsitz SR, Kowalczyk KJ, Hu JC. Use, costs and comparative effectiveness of robotic assisted, laparoscopic and open urological surgery. J Urol 2012;187:1392-8.
4. Midura EF, Hanseman DJ, Hoehn RS, et al. The effect of surgical approach on short-term oncologic outcomes in rectal cancer surgery. Surgery 2015;158:453-9.
7. Diodato MD Jr, Damiano RJ Jr. Robotic cardiac surgery: overview. Surg Clin North Am 2003;83:1351-67.
8. Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Bianco FM, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc 2010;24:1646-57.
10. Boggi U, Signori S, De Lio N, et al. Feasibility of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 2013;100:917-25.
11. Gall TMH, Alrawashdeh W, Soomro N, White S, Jiao LR. Shortening surgical training through robotics: randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus robotic surgical learning curves. BJS Open 2020;4:1100-8.
12. Liu R, Zhang T, Zhao ZM, et al. The surgical outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy versus laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasms: a comparative study of a single center. Surg Endosc 2017;31:2380-6.
13. Klompmaker S, van Hilst J, Wellner UF, et al. Outcomes after minimally-invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: a pan-European propensity score matched study. Ann Surg 2020;271:356-63.
14. Inoue Y, Sato T, Kato T, et al. Reproduction of modified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy in a robotic environment: a simple clipless technique. Surg Endosc 2022;36:8684-9.
15. Jiao LR. Robotic Whipple procedure-pancreaticogastrostomy for normal pancreas with a non -visible pancreatic duct. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHiXJvb9R4I [Last accessed on 6 May 2023].
16. Peng L, Lin S, Li Y, Xiao W. Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 2017;31:3085-97.
17. Gall TMH, Pencavel TD, Cunningham D, Nicol D, Jiao LR. Transition from open and laparoscopic to robotic pancreatoduodenectomy in a UK tertiary referral hepatobiliary and pancreatic center - early experience of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy. HPB 2020;22:1637-164.
18. Prete A, Yan Q, Al-Tarrah K, et al. The cortisol stress response induced by surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Endocrinol 2018;89:554-67.
19. Pedziwiatr M, Malczak P, Pisarska M, et al. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy-systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2017;402:841-51.
20. Shin SH, Kim YJ, Song KB, et al. Totally laparoscopic or robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy versus open surgery for periampullary neoplasms: separate systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Surg Endosc 2017;31:3459-74.
21. Ducreux M, Cuhna AS, Caramella C, et al. Cancer of the pancreas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2015;26 Suppl 5:v56-68.
22. Gumbs AA, Frigerio I, Spolverato G, et al. Artificial intelligence surgery: how do we get to autonomous actions in surgery? Sensors 2021;21:5526.
23. Gumbs AA, Alexander F, Karcz K, et al. White paper: definitions of artificial intelligence and autonomous actions in clinical surgery. Art Int Surg 2022;2:93-100.
24. Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E, et al. Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study. Ann Surg 2005;242:767-71, discussion 771.
