REFERENCES
1. McCarthy J. What is artificial intelligence? Available from: https://www.diochnos.com/about/McCarthyWhatisAI.pdf [Last accessed on 23 Mar 2023].
2. Hashimoto DA, Rosman G, Rus D, Meireles OR. Artificial intelligence in surgery: promises and perils. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/annalsofsurgery/Abstract/2018/07000/Artificial_Intelligence_in_Surgery__Promises_and.13.aspx [Last accessed on 23 Mar 2023].
3. Gumbs AA, Alexander F, Karcz K, et al. White paper: definitions of artificial intelligence and autonomous actions in clinical surgery. Art Int Surg 2022;2:93-100.
4. Gumbs AA, Perretta S, d’Allemagne B, Chouillard E. What is Artificial Intelligence Surgery? Art Int Surg 2021;1:1-10.
5. Elyan E, Vuttipittayamongkol P, Johnston P, et al. Computer vision and machine learning for medical image analysis: recent advances, challenges, and way forward. Art Int Surg ;2022:2.
6. Bari H, Wadhwani S, Dasari BVM. Role of artificial intelligence in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021;13:7-18.
8. Vedula SS, Hager GD. Surgical data science: The new knowledge domain. Innov Surg Sci 2017;2:109-21.
9. NHS England. 2022/23 priorities and operational planning guidance. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/20211223-B1160-2022-23-priorities-and-operational-planning-guidance-v3.2.pdf [Last accessed on 23 Mar 2023].
10. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018;169:467-73.
11. Knight SR, Ots R, Maimbo M, Drake TM, Fairfield CJ, Harrison EM. Systematic review of the use of big data to improve surgery in low- and middle-income countries. Br J Surg 2019;106:e62-72.
12. Covidence. Veritas health innovation, Melbourne, Australia. Available from: https://www.covidence.org/ [Last accessed on 23 Mar 2023].
13. Săftoiu A, Vilmann P, Gorunescu F, et al. Efficacy of an artificial neural network-based approach to endoscopic ultrasound elastography in diagnosis of focal pancreatic masses. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;10:84-90.e1.
14. Wu K, Chen X, Ding M. Deep learning based classification of focal liver lesions with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Optik 2014;125:4057-63.
15. Gatos I, Tsantis S, Karamesini M, Skouroliakou A, Kagadis G. Development of a support vector machine - based image analysis system for focal liver lesions classification in magnetic resonance images. J Phys Conf Ser 2015;633:012116.
16. Roch AM, Mehrabi S, Krishnan A, et al. Automated pancreatic cyst screening using natural language processing: a new tool in the early detection of pancreatic cancer. HPB 2015;17:447-53.
17. Sada Y, Hou J, Richardson P, El-Serag H, Davila J. Validation of case finding algorithms for hepatocellular cancer from administrative data and electronic health records using natural language processing. Med Care 2016;54:e9-14.
18. Kondo S, Takagi K, Nishida M, et al. Computer-aided diagnosis of focal liver lesions using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with perflubutane microbubbles. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2017;36:1427-37.
19. Yang H, Zhang X, Cai XY, et al. From big data to diagnosis and prognosis: gene expression signatures in liver hepatocellular carcinoma. PeerJ 2017;5:e3089.
20. Kuwahara T, Hara K, Mizuno N, et al. Usefulness of deep learning analysis for the diagnosis of malignancy in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2019;10:1-8.
21. Shen X, Yang F, Yang P, et al. Non-invasive diagnosis model for pancreatic cystic tumors based on machine learning-radiomics using contrast-enhanced CT. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3294088 [Last accessed on 27 Mar 2023].
22. Xu L, Yang P, Liang W, et al. A radiomics approach based on support vector machine using MR images for preoperative lymph node status evaluation in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Theranostics 2019;9:5374-85.
23. Brown AD, Kachura JR. Natural language processing of radiology reports in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma to predict radiology resource utilization. J Am Coll Radiol 2019;16:840-4.
24. Watson MD, Lyman WB, Passeri MJ, et al. Use of artificial intelligence deep learning to determine the malignant potential of pancreatic cystic neoplasms with preoperative computed tomography imaging. Am Surg 2021;87:602-7.
25. Liu H, Xu Y, Zhang Z, et al. A natural language processing pipeline of chinese free-text radiology reports for liver cancer diagnosis. IEEE Access 2020;8:159110-9.
26. Mao B, Ma J, Duan S, Xia Y, Tao Y, Zhang L. Preoperative classification of primary and metastatic liver cancer via machine learning-based ultrasound radiomics. Eur Radiol 2021;31:4576-86.
27. Jang SI, Kim YJ, Kim EJ, et al. Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-artificial intelligence using deep learning analysis of gallbladder polypoid lesions. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021;36:3548-55.
28. Li D, Du B, Shen Y, Ge L, Lv H. Artificial intelligence-assisted visual sensing technology under duodenoscopy of gallbladder stones. J Sensors 2021;2021:1-13.
29. Kim T, Choi YH, Choi JH, Lee SH, Lee S, Lee IS. Gallbladder polyp classification in ultrasound images using an ensemble convolutional neural network model. J Clin Med 2021;10:3585.
30. Yamashita R, Bird K, Cheung PY, et al. Automated identification and measurement extraction of pancreatic cystic lesions from free-text radiology reports using natural language processing. Radiol Artif Intell 2022;4:e210092.
31. Chong H, Gong Y, Zhang Y, Dai Y, Sheng R, Zeng M. Radiomics on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced mri: non-invasively identifying glypican 3-positive hepatocellular carcinoma and postoperative recurrence. Acad Radiol 2023;30:49-63.
32. Liu Y, Liu YZ, Sun L, Zen Y, Inomoto C, Yeh MM. Subtyping of hepatocellular adenoma: a machine learning-based approach. Virchows Arch 2022;481:49-61.
33. Schuessler M, Saner F, Al-Rashid F, Schlosser T. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) in patients before liver transplantation using CT-FFR machine learning algorithm. Eur Radiol 2022;32:8761-8.
34. Chang Y, Wu Q, Chi L, Huo H, Li Q. Adoption of combined detection technology of tumor markers via deep learning algorithm in diagnosis and prognosis of gallbladder carcinoma. J Supercomput 2022;78:3955-75.
35. Kooragayala K, Crudeli C, Kalola A, et al. Utilization of natural language processing software to identify worrisome pancreatic lesions. Ann Surg Oncol 2022;29:8513-9.
36. Singal AG, Mukherjee A, Elmunzer BJ, et al. Machine learning algorithms outperform conventional regression models in predicting development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol 2013;108:1723-30.
37. Banerjee S, Wang DS, Kim HJ, et al. A computed tomography radiogenomic biomarker predicts microvascular invasion and clinical outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2015;62:792-800.
38. Walczak S, Velanovich V. An evaluation of artificial neural networks in predicting pancreatic cancer survival. J Gastrointest Surg 2017;21:1606-12.
39. Zhou Y, He L, Huang Y, et al. CT-based radiomics signature: a potential biomarker for preoperative prediction of early recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Radiol 2017;42:1695-704.
40. Zheng BH, Liu LZ, Zhang ZZ, et al. Radiomics score: a potential prognostic imaging feature for postoperative survival of solitary HCC patients. BMC Cancer 2018;18:1148.
41. Ivanics T, Nelson W, Patel MS, et al. The toronto postliver transplantation hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence calculator: a machine learning approach. Liver Transpl 2022;28:593-602.
42. Sala Elarre P, Oyaga-Iriarte E, Yu KH, et al. Use of machine-learning algorithms in intensified preoperative therapy of pancreatic cancer to predict individual risk of relapse. Cancers 2019;11:606.
43. Marinelli B, Kang M, Martini M, et al. Combination of active transfer learning and natural language processing to improve liver volumetry using surrogate metrics with deep learning. Radiol Artif Intell 2019;1:e180019.
44. Nasief H, Zheng C, Schott D, et al. A machine learning based delta-radiomics process for early prediction of treatment response of pancreatic cancer. NPJ Precis Oncol 2019;3:25.
45. Shan QY, Hu HT, Feng ST, et al. CT-based peritumoral radiomics signatures to predict early recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma after curative tumor resection or ablation. Cancer Imaging 2019;19:11.
46. Chen Y, Liu Z, Mo Y, et al. Prediction of post-hepatectomy liver failure in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma based on radiomics using Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI: the liver failure model. Front Oncol 2021;11:605296.
47. Han IW, Cho K, Ryu Y, et al. Risk prediction platform for pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy using artificial intelligence. World J Gastroenterol 2020;26:4453-64.
48. Kambakamba P, Mannil M, Herrera P, et al. Machine learning based texture analysis predicts postoperative pancreatic fistula in preoperative non-contrast enhanced computed tomography. HPB 2020;22:S384.
49. Merath K, Hyer JM, Mehta R, et al. Use of machine learning for prediction of patient risk of postoperative complications after liver, pancreatic, and colorectal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2020;24:1843-51.
50. Saillard C, Schmauch B, Laifa O, et al. Predicting survival after hepatocellular carcinoma resection using deep learning on histological slides. Hepatology 2020;72:2000-13.
51. Cesaretti M, Brustia R, Goumard C, et al. Use of artificial intelligence as an innovative method for liver graft macrosteatosis assessment. Liver Transpl 2020;26:1224-32.
52. Mai RY, Lu HZ, Bai T, et al. Artificial neural network model for preoperative prediction of severe liver failure after hemihepatectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Surgery 2020;168:643-52.
53. Liu CL, Soong RS, Lee WC, Jiang GW, Lin YC. Predicting short-term survival after liver transplantation using machine learning. Sci Rep 2020;10:5654.
54. Schoenberg MB, Bucher JN, Koch D, et al. A novel machine learning algorithm to predict disease free survival after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Transl Med 2020;8:434.
55. Szpakowski JL, Tucker LY. Outcomes of gallbladder polyps and their association with gallbladder cancer in a 20-year cohort. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3:e205143.
56. Capretti G, Bonifacio C, De Palma C, et al. A machine learning risk model based on preoperative computed tomography scan to predict postoperative outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy. Updates Surg 2022;74:235-43.
57. Sun LY, Ouyang Q, Cen WJ, Wang F, Tang WT, Shao JY. A model based on artificial intelligence algorithm for monitoring recurrence of HCC after hepatectomy. Am Surg 2021;11:31348211063549.
58. Xie F, Chen Q, Zhou Y, et al. Characterization of patients with advanced chronic pancreatitis using natural language processing of radiology reports. PLoS One 2020;15:e0236817.
59. Hayashi K, Ono Y, Takamatsu M, et al. Prediction of recurrence pattern of pancreatic cancer post-pancreatic surgery using histology-based supervised machine learning algorithms: a single-center retrospective study. Ann Surg Oncol ;2022:4624-34.
60. Li X, Wan Y, Lou J, et al. Preoperative recurrence prediction in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after radical resection using radiomics of diagnostic computed tomography. EClinicalMedicine 2022;43:101215.
61. Noh B, Park YM, Kwon Y, et al. Machine learning-based survival rate prediction of Korean hepatocellular carcinoma patients using multi-center data. BMC Gastroenterol 2022;22:85.
62. Morris-Stiff G, Sarvepalli S, Hu B, et al. The natural history of asymptomatic gallstones: a longitudinal study and prediction model. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023;21:319-327.e4.
63. Narayan RR, Abadilla N, Yang L, et al. Artificial intelligence for prediction of donor liver allograft steatosis and early post-transplantation graft failure. HPB 2022;24:764-71.
64. Cotter G, Beal EW, Poultsides GA, et al. Using machine learning to preoperatively stratify prognosis among patients with gallbladder cancer: a multi-institutional analysis. HPB 2022;24:1980-8.
65. Spinczyk D, Karwan A, Rudnicki J, Wróblewski T. Stereoscopic liver surface reconstruction. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 2012;7:181-7.
66. Okamoto T, Onda S, Matsumoto M, et al. Utility of augmented reality system in hepatobiliary surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2013;20:249-53.
67. Fang CH, Liu J, Fan YF, Yang J, Xiang N, Zeng N. Outcomes of hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis based on 3-dimensional reconstruction technique. J Am Coll Surg 2013;217:280-8.
68. Zein NN, Hanouneh IA, Bishop PD, et al. Three-dimensional print of a liver for preoperative planning in living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2013;19:1304-10.
69. Shahin O, Beširević A, Kleemann M, Schlaefer A. Ultrasound-based tumor movement compensation during navigated laparoscopic liver interventions. Surg Endosc 2014;28:1734-41.
70. Yang X, Yu HC, Choi Y, et al. Development and usability testing of Dr. LiverTM: a user-centered 3D virtual liver surgery planning system. HFES 2014;58:698-702.
71. Fang CH, Kong D, Wang X, et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the peripancreatic vascular system based on computed tomographic angiography images and its clinical application in the surgical management of pancreatic tumors. Pancreas 2014;43:389-95.
72. Bégin A, Martel G, Lapointe R, et al. Accuracy of preoperative automatic measurement of the liver volume by CT-scan combined to a 3D virtual surgical planning software (3DVSP). Surg Endosc 2014;28:3408-12.
73. Bliznakova K, Kolev N, Buliev I, et al. Computer aided preoperative evaluation of the residual liver volume using computed tomography images. J Digit Imaging 2015;28:231-9.
74. Katić D, Julliard C, Wekerle AL, et al. LapOntoSPM: an ontology for laparoscopic surgeries and its application to surgical phase recognition. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2015;10:1427-34.
75. Song Y, Totz J, Thompson S, et al. Locally rigid, vessel-based registration for laparoscopic liver surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2015;10:1951-61.
76. Wang G, Zhang S, Xie H, Metaxas DN, Gu L. A homotopy-based sparse representation for fast and accurate shape prior modeling in liver surgical planning. Med Image Anal 2015;19:176-86.
77. Fang CH, Tao HS, Yang J, et al. Impact of three-dimensional reconstruction technique in the operation planning of centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 2015;220:28-37.
78. Zhang J, Qiao QL, Guo XC, Zhao JX. Application of three-dimensional visualization technique in preoperative planning of progressive hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Am J Transl Res 2018;10:1730-5.
79. Okuda Y, Taura K, Seo S, et al. Usefulness of operative planning based on 3-dimensional CT cholangiography for biliary malignancies. Surgery 2015;158:1261-71.
80. Okamoto T, Onda S, Yasuda J, Yanaga K, Suzuki N, Hattori A. Navigation surgery using an augmented reality for pancreatectomy. Dig Surg 2015;32:117-23.
81. Fortmeier D, Mastmeyer A, Schröder J, Handels H. A virtual reality system for PTCD simulation using direct visuo-haptic rendering of partially segmented image data. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2016;20:355-66.
82. Fusaglia M, Hess H, Schwalbe M, et al. A clinically applicable laser-based image-guided system for laparoscopic liver procedures. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2016;11:1499-513.
83. Ntourakis D, Memeo R, Soler L, Marescaux J, Mutter D, Pessaux P. Augmented reality guidance for the resection of missing colorectal liver metastases: an initial experience. World J Surg 2016;40:419-26.
84. Mastmeyer A, Fortmeier D, Handels H. Evaluation of direct haptic 4D volume rendering of partially segmented data for liver puncture simulation. Sci Rep 2017;7:671.
85. Sauer IM, Queisner M, Tang P, et al. Mixed reality in visceral surgery: development of a suitable workflow and evaluation of intraoperative use-cases. Ann Surg 2017;266:706-12.
86. Cai W, Fan Y, Hu H, Xiang N, Fang C, Jia F. Postoperative liver volume was accurately predicted by a medical image three dimensional visualization system in hepatectomy for liver cancer. Surg Oncol 2017;26:188-94.
87. Miyamoto R, Oshiro Y, Nakayama K, et al. Three-dimensional simulation of pancreatic surgery showing the size and location of the main pancreatic duct. Surg Today 2017;47:357-64.
88. Hu M, Hu H, Cai W, et al. The safety and feasibility of three-dimensional visualization technology assisted right posterior lobe allied with part of V and VIII sectionectomy for right hepatic malignancy therapy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2018;28:586-94.
89. Mise Y, Hasegawa K, Satou S, et al. How has virtual hepatectomy changed the practice of liver surgery? Ann Surg 2018;268:127-33.
90. Mascagni P, Fiorillo C, Urade T, et al. Formalizing video documentation of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a step towards artificial intelligence assistance to improve surgical safety. Surg Endosc 2020;34:2709-14.
91. Teatini A, Pelanis E, Aghayan DL, et al. The effect of intraoperative imaging on surgical navigation for laparoscopic liver resection surgery. Sci Rep 2019;9:18687.
92. Ho H, Yu HB, Bartlett A, Hunter P. An in silico pipeline for subject-specific hemodynamics analysis in liver surgery planning. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2020;23:138-42.
93. Prevost GA, Eigl B, Paolucci I, et al. Efficiency, accuracy and clinical applicability of a new image-guided surgery system in 3D laparoscopic liver surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2020;24:2251-8.
94. Sandal B, Hacioglu Y, Salihoglu Z, Yagiz N. Fuzzy logic preanesthetic risk evaluation of laparoscopic cholecystectomy operations. Am Surg 2023;89:414-23.
95. Cervantes-sanchez F, Maktabi M, Köhler H, et al. Automatic tissue segmentation of hyperspectral images in liver and head neck surgeries using machine learning. Art Int Surg 2021;1:22-37.
96. Tokuyasu T, Iwashita Y, Matsunobu Y, et al. Development of an artificial intelligence system using deep learning to indicate anatomical landmarks during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2021;35:1651-8.
97. Guzmán-García C, Gómez-Tome M, Sánchez-González P, Oropesa I, Gómez EJ. Speech-based surgical phase recognition for non-intrusive surgical skills' assessment in educational contexts. Sensors 2021;21:1330.
98. Imler TD, Sherman S, Imperiale TF, et al. Provider-specific quality measurement for ERCP using natural language processing. Gastrointest Endosc 2018;87:164-173.e2.
99. Ruzzenente A, Bagante F, Poletto E, et al. A machine learning analysis of difficulty scoring systems for laparoscopic liver surgery. Surg Endosc 2022;36:8869-80.
100. Mascagni P, Alapatt D, Laracca GG, et al. Multicentric validation of EndoDigest: a computer vision platform for video documentation of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2022;36:8379-86.
101. Mascagni P, Vardazaryan A, Alapatt D, et al. Artificial intelligence for surgical safety: automatic assessment of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy using deep learning. Ann Surg 2022;275:955-61.
102. Tranter-entwistle I, Eglinton T, Connor S, Hugh TJ. Operative difficulty in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: considering the role of machine learning platforms in clinical practice. Art Int Surg 2022;2:46-56.
103. Liu R, An J, Wang Z, et al. Artificial intelligence in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: does computer vision outperform human vision? Art Int Surg 2022;2:80-92.
104. Ugail H, Abubakar A, Elmahmudi A, Wilson C, Thomson B. The use of pre-trained deep learning models for the photographic assessment of donor livers for transplantation. Art Int Surg 2022;2:101-19.
105. Mojtahed A, Núñez L, Connell J, et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of deep-learning-based liver volume and Couinaud segment volume measurement tool. Abdom Radiol 2022;47:143-51.
106. Han X, Wu X, Wang S, et al. Automated segmentation of liver segment on portal venous phase MR images using a 3D convolutional neural network. Insights Imaging 2022;13:26.
107. Ward TM, Hashimoto DA, Ban Y, Rosman G, Meireles OR. Artificial intelligence prediction of cholecystectomy operative course from automated identification of gallbladder inflammation. Surg Endosc 2022;36:6832-40.
108. Madani A, Namazi B, Altieri MS, et al. Artificial intelligence for intraoperative guidance: using semantic segmentation to identify surgical anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 2022;276:363-9.
109. Loukas C, Gazis A, Schizas D. Multiple instance convolutional neural network for gallbladder assessment from laparoscopic images. Int J Med Robot 2022;18:e2445.
110. Golany T, Aides A, Freedman D, et al. Artificial intelligence for phase recognition in complex laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2022;36:9215-23.
111. 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 2020;396:1204-22.
113. Reddy S. Explainability and artificial intelligence in medicine. Lancet Digit Health 2022;4:e214-5.
114. Ghassemi M, Oakden-Rayner L, Beam AL. The false hope of current approaches to explainable artificial intelligence in health care. Lancet Digit Health 2021;3:e745-50.
115. Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med 2019;25:44-56.
116. He J, Baxter SL, Xu J, Xu J, Zhou X, Zhang K. The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine. Nat Med 2019;25:30-6.
117. Rivera SC, Liu X, Chan AW, et al. Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI extension. Lancet Digit Health 2020;2:e549-60.
