REFERENCES

1. Dreyfus HL. . What computers can’t do: the limits of artificial intelligence. New York: Harper & Row; 1972.

2. Yu KH, Beam AL, Kohane IS. Artificial intelligence in healthcare. Nat Biomed Eng 2018;2:719-31.

3. Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa RA, et al. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature 2017;542:115-8.

4. Madani A, Namazi B, Altieri MS, et al. Artificial intelligence for intraoperative guidance: using semantic segmentation to identify surgical anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 2020; doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004594.

5. Birkhoff DC, van Dalen ASHM, Schijven MP. A review on the current applications of artificial intelligence in the operating room. Surg Innov 2021;28:611-9.

6. Grote T, Berens P. On the ethics of algorithmic decision-making in healthcare. J Med Ethics 2020;46:205-11.

7. Beil M, Proft I, van Heerden D, Sviri S, van Heerden PV. Ethical considerations about artificial intelligence for prognostication in intensive care. Intensive Care Med Exp 2019;7:70.

8. Donaldson CM. Using Kantian ethics in medical ethics education. Med Sci Educ 2017;27:841-5.

9. Barkun JS, Aronson JK, Feldman LS, Maddern GJ, Strasberg SM. Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations. Lancet 2009;374:1089-96.

10. Mcculloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, et al. No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 2009;374:1105-12.

11. Hirst A, Philippou Y, Blazeby J, et al. No surgical innovation without evaluation: evolution and further development of the IDEAL framework and recommendations. Ann Surg 2019;269:211-20.

12. Robertson RL, Karimuddin A, Phang T, Raval M, Brown C. Transanal versus conventional total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer using the IDEAL framework for implementation. BJS Open 2021;5:zrab002.

13. LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature 2015;521:436-44.

14. High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. Available from: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/d3988569-0434-11ea-8c1f-01aa75ed71a1S [Last accessed on 17 Mar 2022].

15. Winfield AF, Michael K, Pitt J, Evers V. Machine ethics: the design and governance of ethical AI and autonomous systems [Scanning the Issue]. Proc IEEE 2019;107:509-17.

16. Kessel R. British Medical Association: 1988, Philosophy & Practice of Medical Ethics, B.M.A., London, 94 pp. plus appendices, etc., £9.50 (paper). J Med Philos 1989;14:709-10.

17. Holm S. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th edn. J Med Ethics 2002;28:332.

18. Hopewell S, Loudon K, Clarke MJ, Oxman AD, Dickersin K. Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;2009:MR000006.

19. Jüni P, Altman DG, Egger M. Systematic reviews in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ 2001;323:42-6.

20. Murphy K, Di Ruggiero E, Upshur R, et al. Artificial intelligence for good health: a scoping review of the ethics literature. BMC Med Ethics 2021;22:14.

21. Boulton G, Rawlins M, Vallance P, Walport M. Science as a public enterprise: the case for open data. Lancet 2011;377:1633-5.

22. Meireles OR, Rosman G, Altieri MS, et al. SAGES Video Annotation for AI Working Groups. SAGES consensus recommendations on an annotation framework for surgical video. Surg Endosc 2021;35:4918-29.

23. Kaissis GA, Makowski MR, Rückert D, Braren RF. Secure, privacy-preserving and federated machine learning in medical imaging. Nat Mach Intell 2020;2:305-11.

24. Avraam D, Jones E, Burton P. A deterministic approach for protecting privacy in sensitive personal data. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2022;22:24.

25. Hashimoto DA, Rosman G, Rus D, Meireles OR. Artificial intelligence in surgery: promises and perils. Ann Surg 2018;268:70-6.

26. Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Available from: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eur/2017/745/contents [Last accessed on 17 Mar 2022].

27. Proposal for a Regulation laying down harmonised rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union legislative acts. Available from: https://www.europeansources.info/record/proposal-for-a-regulation-laying-down-harmonised-rules-on-artificial-intelligence-artificial-intelligence-act-and-amending-certain-union-legislative-acts/ [Last accessed on 17 Mar 2022].

28. Statement from FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, M.D. on steps toward a new, tailored review framework for artificial intelligence-based medical devices. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/statement-fda-commissioner-scott-gottlieb-md-steps-toward-new-tailored-review-framework-artificial [Last accessed on 17 Mar 2022].

29. Amann J, Blasimme A, Vayena E, Frey D, Madai VI. Precise4Q consortium. Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: a multidisciplinary perspective. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2020;20:310.