REFERENCES

1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:209-49.

2. Szczepkowski M, Banasiewicz T, Krokowicz P, et al. Polish consensus statement on the protective stoma. Pol Przegl Chir 2014;86:391-404.

3. Wang S, Li AJ, Jiang HH, Lin Y, Ding HB. Sphincter-preserving surgical techniques in low rectal cancer management: a systematic review of contemporary evidence. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025;17:107525.

4. Rouanet P, Rivoire M, Gourgou S, et al. Sphincter-saving surgery after neoadjuvant therapy for ultra-low rectal cancer where abdominoperineal resection was indicated: 10-year results of the GRECCAR 1 trial. Br J Surg 2020;108:10-3.

5. Chitul A, Ciofic E, Burcoş T, Cristian D, Grama F. Functional outcomes and patient satisfaction after abdominoperineal resection versus sphincter-preserving techniques for low rectal cancer: a retrospective single-centre study. Chirurgia 2025;120:409-15.

6. Messias BA, Botelho RV, Saad SS, Mocchetti ER, Turke KC, Waisberg J. Serum C-reactive protein is a useful marker to exclude anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery. Sci Rep 2020;10:1687.

7. Park JS, Choi GS, Kim SH, et al. Multicenter analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal cancer excision: the Korean laparoscopic colorectal surgery study group. Ann Surg 2013;257:665-71.

8. Lindgren R, Hallböök O, Rutegård J, Sjödahl R, Matthiessen P. What is the risk for a permanent stoma after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer? A six-year follow-up of a multicenter trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2011;54:41-7.

9. Monzón-Abad A, Gracia-Roche C, Martínez-Germán A, Barranco-Domínguez I, Sánchez-Fuentes N. A preliminary study of transcaecal ileostomy as an alternative to defunctioning ostomies. Colorectal Dis 2014;16:130-3.

10. Clark DA, Stephensen B, Edmundson A, Steffens D, Solomon M. Geographical variation in the use of diverting loop ileostomy in Australia and New Zealand colorectal surgeons. Ann Coloproctol 2021;37:337-45.

11. Hanna M, Vinci A, Pigazzi A. Diverting ileostomy in colorectal surgery: when is it necessary? Langenbecks Arch Surg 2015;400:145-52.

12. Kawai M, Sakamoto K, Honjo K, et al. Benefits and risks of diverting stoma creation during rectal cancer surgery. Ann Coloproctol 2022;40:467-73.

13. Zhou X, Lin C, Chen W, Lin J, Xu J. Completely diverted tube ileostomy compared with loop ileostomy for protection of low colorectal anastomosis: a pilot study. Colorectal Dis 2014;16:O327-31.

14. Tan J, Ryan ÉJ, Davey MG, et al. Mechanical bowel preparation and antibiotics in elective colorectal surgery: network meta-analysis. BJS Open 2023;7:zrad040.

15. Shiomi A, Ito M, Maeda K, et al. Effects of a diverting stoma on symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of 1,014 consecutive patients. J Am Coll Surg 2015;220:186-94.

16. Cai L, Qiu G, Jiang Z, et al. Linea alba support method of prophylactic loop ileostomy via lower abdominal midline incision for rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 2025;39:1351-61.

17. Kisielewski M, Pisarska-Adamczyk M, Dowgiałło-Gornowicz N, et al. Timing of loop ileostomy closure does not play a pivotal role in terms of complications - results of the liquidation of iLEOstomy (LILEO) study. J Pers Med 2024;14:934.

18. van Helsdingen CP, Jongen AC, de Jonge WJ, Bouvy ND, Derikx JP. Consensus on the definition of colorectal anastomotic leakage: a modified Delphi study. World J Gastroenterol 2020;26:3293-303.

19. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 2009;250:187-96.

20. Negro S, Bergamo F, Dell’Atti L, et al. Quality of life in rectal cancer treatments: an updated systematic review of randomized controlled trials (2013-2023). Cancers 2025;17:2310.

21. Sun G, Zang Y, Ding H, et al. Comparison of anal function and quality of life after conformal sphincter preservation operation and intersphincteric resection of very low rectal cancer: a multicenter, retrospective, case-control analysis. Tech Coloproctol 2023;27:1275-87.

22. Lu ZR, Rajendran N, Lynch AC, Heriot AG, Warrier SK. Anastomotic leaks after restorative resections for rectal cancer compromise cancer outcomes and survival. Dis Colon Rectum 2016;59:236-44.

23. Hammond J, Lim S, Wan Y, Gao X, Patkar A. The burden of gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks: an evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg 2014;18:1176-85.

24. Turrentine FE, Denlinger CE, Simpson VB, et al. Morbidity, mortality, cost, and survival estimates of gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks. J Am Coll Surg 2015;220:195-206.

25. Li SY, Chen G, Bai X, et al. Anus-preserving rectectomy via telescopic colorectal mucosal anastomosis for low rectal cancer: experience from a Chinese cohort. World J Gastroenterol 2013;19:3841-6.

26. Sheng QS, Hua HJ, Cheng XB, et al. A modified spontaneously closed defunctioning tube ileostomy after anterior resection of the rectum for rectal cancer with a low colorectal anastomosis. Indian J Surg 2016;78:125-9.

27. Lin L, Wang Z, Zhang Q, Wang C, Zhang Z. Application of transumbilical laparoscopic surgery on low/ultralow rectal cancer for anal sphincter preservation. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2022;32:740-6.

28. Murken DR, Bleier JIS. Ostomy-related complications. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2019;32:176-82.

29. Wang H, Chen W, Zhou X, Ye T, Gong L, Cai Y. Application of the intestine diversion tube with a double-balloon without ileostomy in low rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 2023;14:213-9.

30. Patil V, Vijayakumar A, Ajitha MB, Kumar LS. Comparison between tube ileostomy and loop ileostomy as a diversion procedure. ISRN Surg 2012;2012:547523.

31. Morks AN, Havenga K, Ploeg RJ. Can intraluminal devices prevent or reduce colorectal anastomotic leakage: a review. World J Gastroenterol 2011;17:4461-9.

32. Song L, Han X, Zhang J, Tang L. Body image mediates the effect of stoma status on psychological distress and quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer. Psychooncology 2020;29:796-802.

33. Sarah L, Greta N, Viviana M, Massimo V, Alfredo R, Agostino B. Resilience and mindful attention as determinants of psychological distress among patients with a stoma: the mediating role of body image. J Health Psychol 2025;30:3668-80.

Mini-invasive Surgery
ISSN 2574-1225 (Online)

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/