REFERENCES
1. Wolf J, Wu Y, Hayek J, Zhang Q, Alagkiozidis I. Trends in early-stage cervical cancer management in the US: a national cancer database analysis. Curr Oncol 2024;31:2836-45.
2. Arbyn M, Weiderpass E, Bruni L, et al. Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2020;8:e191-203.
3. Ferrari FA, Magni F, Bosco M, et al. The role of micronutrients in human papillomavirus infection, cervical dysplasia, and neoplasm. Healthcare 2023;11:1652.
4. Van Damme A, Tummers P, De Visschere P, et al. Exclusion of non-Involved uterus from the target volume (EXIT-trial): an individualized treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer using modern radiotherapy and imaging techniques followed by completion surgery. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024;47:100793.
5. Giannini A, D’Oria O, Chiantera V, et al. Minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer: should we look beyond squamous cell carcinoma? J Invest Surg 2022;35:1602-3.
6. Michalas S, Rodolakis A, Voulgaris Z, Vlachos G, Giannakoulis N, Diakomanolis E. Management of early-stage cervical carcinoma by modified (Type II) radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol 2002;85:415-22.
7. Vázquez-Vicente D, Boria F, Castellanos T, et al; SUCCOR Study Group. SUCCOR morbidity: complications in minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024;34:203-8.
8. Kennedy AW, Peterson G, Tuason LJ, Belinson JL, Webster KD. Radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: the effect of shorter length of stay on outcome. Cleve Clin J Med 1995;62:193-7.
9. Sevin B, Method MW, Nadji M, Lu Y, Averette HA. Efficacy of radical hysterectomy as treatment for patients with small cell carcinoma of the cervix. Cancer 1996;77:1489-93.
10. Ferrari FA, Crestani B, Torroni L, et al. Wound infiltration with local anesthetics versus transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative pain management in gynecological surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2024:S1553-4650(24)01505-X.
11. Kay AH, Levy R, Hills N, et al. Evidence-based prescribing of opioids after laparotomy: a quality-improvement initiative in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2024;53:101396.
12. Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, et al. Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 2018;379:1895-904.
13. Bizzarri N, Obermair A, Hsu HC, et al. Consensus on surgical technique for sentinel lymph node dissection in cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024;34:504-9.
14. Abu-Rustum NR, Yashar CM, Arend R, et al. NCCN guidelines® insights: cervical cancer, version 1.2024. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2023;21:1224-33.
15. Cibula D, Raspollini MR, Planchamp F, et al. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancer - Update 2023. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023;33:649-66.
16. Ceccaroni M, Roviglione G, Farulla A, et al. Minimally invasive treatment of diaphragmatic endometriosis: a 15-year single referral center’s experience on 215 patients. Surg Endosc 2021;35:6807-17.
17. Ghezzi F, Fanfani F, Malzoni M, et al. Minilaparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: multi-institutional experience in comparison with conventional laparoscopy. Eur J Surg Oncol 2013;39:1094-100.
18. Marchand G, Masoud AT, Abdelsattar A, et al. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, excluding robotic assisted versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Sci Rep 2023;13:273.
19. Akdemir A, Zeybek B, Ozgurel B, Oztekin MK, Sendag F. Learning curve analysis of intracorporeal cuff suturing during robotic single-site total hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015;22:384-9.
20. Bogani G, Borghi C, Leone Roberti Maggiore U, et al. Minimally invasive surgical staging in early-stage ovarian carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2017;24:552-62.
21. Majd H, Ferrari F, Gubbala K, Campanile RG, Tozzi R. Latest developments and techniques in gynaecological oncology surgery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2015;27:291-6.
22. Guerrisi R, Smyth SL, Ismail L, Horne A, Ferrari F, Soleymani Majd H. Approach to radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer in pregnancy: surgical pathway and ethical considerations. J Clin Med 2022;11:7352.
23. Hwang JH. Urologic complication in laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: meta-analysis of 20 studies. Eur J Cancer 2012;48:3177-85.
24. Matsuo K, Shimada M, Yamaguchi S, et al. Association of radical hysterectomy surgical volume and survival for early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2019;133:1086-98.
25. Zhang F, Song X. Laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Clin Oncol 2022;45:465-74.
26. Ferrandina G, Corrado G, Scambia G. Minimally invasive surgery and quality of life in cervical cancer. Lancet Oncol 2020;21:746-8.
27. Kim S, Min KJ, Lee S, et al. Learning curve could affect oncologic outcome of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Asian J Surg 2021;44:174-80.
28. Chong GO, Park NY, Hong DG, Cho YL, Park IS, Lee YS. Learning curve of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the early and locally advanced cervical cancer: comparison of the first 50 and second 50 cases. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009;19:1459-64.
29. Chiva L, Zanagnolo V, Querleu D, et al; SUCCOR study Group. SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020;30:1269-77.
30. Pecorino B, D'Agate MG, Scibilia G, et al. Evaluation of surgical outcomes of abdominal radical hysterectomy and total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a retrospective analysis of data collected before the LACC trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19:13176.
31. Kampers J, Gerhardt E, Sibbertsen P, et al. Perioperative morbidity of different operative approaches in early cervical carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2022;306:295-314.
32. Li Y, Kong Q, Wei H, Wang Y. Comparison of the complications between minimally invasive surgery and open surgical treatments for early-stage cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2021;16:e0253143.
33. der Voort M, Heijnsdijk EA, Gouma DJ. Bowel injury as a complication of laparoscopy. Br J Surg 2004;91:1253-8.
34. Llarena NC, Shah AB, Milad MP. Bowel injury in gynecologic laparoscopy: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2015;125:1407-17.
36. Zorzato PC, Ferrari FA, Garzon S, et al. Advanced bipolar vessel sealing devices vs conventional bipolar energy in minimally invasive hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2024;309:1165-74.
37. Yun Z, Li X, Zhu D, Li L, Jiang S. A meta-analysis examining the impact of open surgical therapy versus minimally invasive surgery on wound infection in females with cervical cancer. Int Wound J 2024;21:e14535.
38. Corrado G, Anchora LP, Bruni S, et al. Patterns of recurrence in FIGO stage IB1-IB2 cervical cancer: comparison between minimally invasive and abdominal radical hysterectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol 2023;49:107047.
39. Steed H, Rosen B, Murphy J, Laframboise S, De Petrillo D, Covens A. A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2004;93:588-93.
40. Wang H, Li D, Wang C, et al. Efficacy evaluation of vaginal-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a single-center retrospective case series study. Ann Transl Med 2022;10:124.
41. Nam JH, Park JY, Kim DY, Kim JH, Kim YM, Kim YT. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: long-term survival outcomes in a matched cohort study. Ann Oncol 2012;23:903-11.
42. Xiao M, Gao H, Bai H, Zhang Z. Quality of life and sexuality in disease-free survivors of cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy alone: a comparison between total laparoscopy and laparotomy. Medicine 2016;95:e4787.
43. Bogani G, Serati M, Nappi R, Cromi A, di Naro E, Ghezzi F. Nerve-sparing approach reduces sexual dysfunction in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy. J Sex Med 2014;11:3012-20.
44. Marchand G, Taher Masoud A, Abdelsattar A, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy vs. robotic assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2023;289:190-202.
