REFERENCES
1. El-Serag HB, Sweet S, Winchester CC, Dent J. Update on the epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut. 2014;63:871-80.
3. Stål P, Lindberg G, Ost A, Iwarzon M, Seensalu R. Gastroesophageal reflux in healthy subjects. Significance of endoscopic findings, histology, age, and sex. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1999;34:121-8.
4. Gordon C, Kang JY, Neild PJ, Maxwell JD. The role of the hiatus hernia in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;20:719-32.
5. Khoudari G, Saleh MA, Sarmini MT, Parikh MP, Vega KJ, Sanaka MR. 463 The prevalence and epidemiology of achalasia in the USA: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019;114:S270-1.
6. Haisley KR, Preston JF, Dolan JP, Diggs BS, Hunter JG. Twenty-year trends in the utilization of Heller myotomy for achalasia in the United States. Am J Surg. 2017;214:299-302.
7. Salminen P, Hurme S, Ovaska J. Fifteen-year outcome of laparoscopic and open Nissen fundoplication: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93:228-33.
8. Lidor AO, Steele KE, Stem M, Fleming RM, Schweitzer MA, Marohn MR. Long-term quality of life and risk factors for recurrence after laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia. JAMA Surg. 2015;150:424-31.
9. Peters MJ, Mukhtar A, Yunus RM, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:1548-61.
10. Finlayson SR, Birkmeyer JD, Laycock WS. Trends in surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease: the effect of laparoscopic surgery on utilization. Surgery. 2003;133:147-53.
11. Awais O, Luketich JD, Schuchert MJ, et al. Reoperative antireflux surgery for failed fundoplication: an analysis of outcomes in 275 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92:1083-9; discussion 1089.
12. Smith CD, McClusky DA, Rajad MA, Lederman AB, Hunter JG. When fundoplication fails: redo? Ann Surg. 2005;241:861-9; discussion 869.
13. Hunter JG, Smith CD, Branum GD, et al. Laparoscopic fundoplication failures: patterns of failure and response to fundoplication revision. Ann Surg. 1999;230:595-604; discussion 604.
14. Dallemagne B, Weerts JM, Jehaes C, Markiewicz S. Causes of failures of laparoscopic antireflux operations. Surg Endosc. 1996;10:305-10.
15. Csendes A, Orellana O, Cuneo N, Martínez G, Figueroa M. Long-term (15-year) objective evaluation of 150 patients after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Surgery. 2019;166:886-94.
16. van Beek DB, Auyang ED, Soper NJ. A comprehensive review of laparoscopic redo fundoplication. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:706-12.
17. Robinson B, Dunst CM, Cassera MA, Reavis KM, Sharata A, Swanstrom LL. 20 years later: laparoscopic fundoplication durability. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:2520-4.
19. Pessaux P, Arnaud JP, Delattre JF, Meyer C, Baulieux J, Mosnier H. Laparoscopic antireflux surgery: five-year results and beyond in 1340 patients. Arch Surg. 2005;140:946-51.
20. Furnée EJ, Draaisma WA, Broeders IA, Gooszen HG. Surgical reintervention after failed antireflux surgery: a systematic review of the literature. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:1539-49.
21. Singhal S, Kirkpatrick DR, Masuda T, Gerhardt J, Mittal SK. Primary and redo antireflux surgery: outcomes and lessons learned. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018;22:177-86.
22. Witek TD, Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O. Management of recurrent paraesophageal hernia. Thorac Surg Clin. 2019;29:427-36.
23. Bathla L, Legner A, Tsuboi K, Mittal S. Efficacy and feasibility of laparoscopic redo fundoplication. World J Surg. 2011;35:2445-53.
24. Nandipati K, Bye M, Yamamoto SR, Pallati P, Lee T, Mittal SK. Reoperative intervention in patients with mesh at the hiatus is associated with high incidence of esophageal resection--a single-center experience. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17:2039-44.
25. Parker M, Bowers SP, Bray JM, et al. Hiatal mesh is associated with major resection at revisional operation. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:3095-101.
26. Zahiri HR, Weltz AS, Sibia US, et al. Primary versus redo paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair: a comparative analysis of operative and quality of life outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:5166-74.
27. Liu L, Lewis N, Mhaskar R, Sujka J, DuCoin C. Robotic-assisted foregut surgery is associated with lower rates of complication and shorter post-operative length of stay. Surg Endosc. 2023;37:2800-5.
29. Müller-Stich BP, Reiter MA, Mehrabi A, et al. No relevant difference in quality of life and functional outcome at 12 months’ follow-up-a randomised controlled trial comparing robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2009;394:441-6.
30. Owen B, Simorov A, Siref A, Shostrom V, Oleynikov D. How does robotic anti-reflux surgery compare with traditional open and laparoscopic techniques: a cost and outcomes analysis. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:1686-90.
31. Tolboom RC, Draaisma WA, Broeders IA. Evaluation of conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic redo hiatal hernia and antireflux surgery: a cohort study. J Robot Surg. 2016;10:33-9.
32. Rudiman R. Minimally invasive gastrointestinal surgery: from past to the future. Ann Med Surg. 2021;71:102922.
33. Lang F, Huber A, Kowalewski KF, et al. Randomized controlled trial of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic fundoplication: 12 years follow-up. Surg Endosc. 2022;36:5627-34.
34. Müller-Stich BP, Reiter MA, Wente MN, et al. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic fundoplication: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1800-5.
35. Schraibman V, de Vasconcellos Macedo AL, Okazaki S, et al. Surgical treatment of hiatus hernia and gastroesophageal reflux disease in complex cases using robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery: a prospective study/consistent experience in a single institution. J Robot Surg. 2011;5:29-33.
36. Boal M, Di Girasole CG, Tesfai F, et al. Evaluation status of current and emerging minimally invasive robotic surgical platforms. Surg Endosc. 2024;38:554-85.
37. Quijano Y, Vicente E, Ferri V, Naldini C, Pizzuti G, Caruso R. Robot-assisted Nissen fundoplication with the new HUGO™ Robotic assisted system: First worldwide report with system description, docking settings and video. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2023;106:108178.
38. Menke V, Kottmann T, Willeke F, Hansen O. Learning curves and procedural times in Senhance®-robotic assisted fundoplication: results from 237 consecutive patients undergoing robotic fundoplication in a single center as part of the European TRUST Robotic Surgery Registry Study. Surg Endosc. 2023;37:8254-62.
39. Salem SA, Marom G, Shein GS, et al. Robotic Heller’s myotomy using the new Hugo™ RAS system: first worldwide report. Surg Endosc. 2024;38:1180-90.
40. Patti MG. An evidence-based approach to the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. JAMA Surg. 2016;151:73-8.
41. Slater BJ, Dirks RC, McKinley SK, et al. SAGES guidelines for the surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux (GERD). Surg Endosc. 2021;35:4903-17.
42. Rickenbacher N, Kötter T, Kochen MM, Scherer M, Blozik E. Fundoplication versus medical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:143-55.
43. Wileman SM, McCann S, Grant AM, Krukowski ZH, Bruce J. Medical versus surgical management for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. ;2010:CD003243.
44. Morgenthal CB, Lin E, Shane MD, Hunter JG, Smith CD. Who will fail laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication? Preoperative prediction of long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1978-84.
45. Priego P, Perez de Oteyza J, Galindo J, et al. Long-term results and complications related to Crurasoft® mesh repair for paraesophageal hiatal hernias. Hernia. 2017;21:291-8.
46. Salvador R, Vittori A, Capovilla G, et al. Antireflux surgery’s lifespan: 20 years after laparoscopic fundoplication. J Gastrointest Surg. 2023;27:2325-35.
47. Draaisma WA, Ruurda JP, Scheffer RCH, et al. Randomized clinical trial of standard laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Br J Surg. 2006;93:1351-9.
48. Frazzoni M, Conigliaro R, Colli G, Melotti G. Conventional versus robot-assisted laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: a comparison of postoperative acid reflux parameters. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1675-81.
49. Huttman MM, Robertson HF, Smith AN, et al; RoboSurg collaborative group. A systematic review of robot-assisted anti-reflux surgery to examine reporting standards. J Robot Surg 2023;17:313-24.
50. Bonavina L, Saino GI, Bona D, et al. Magnetic augmentation of the lower esophageal sphincter: results of a feasibility clinical trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:2133-40.
51. Zadeh J, Andreoni A, Treitl D, Ben-David K. Spotlight on the Linx™ Reflux Management System for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: evidence and research. Med Devices. 2018;11:291-300.
52. Bonavina L, Saino G, Bona D, Sironi A, Lazzari V. One hundred consecutive patients treated with magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: 6 years of clinical experience from a single center. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217:577-85.
53. Bell R, Lipham J, Louie BE, et al. Magnetic sphincter augmentation superior to proton pump inhibitors for regurgitation in a 1-year randomized trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18:1736-43.e2.
54. Riegler M, Schoppman SF, Bonavina L, Ashton D, Horbach T, Kemen M. Magnetic sphincter augmentation and fundoplication for GERD in clinical practice: one-year results of a multicenter, prospective observational study. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:1123-9.
55. Asti E, Siboni S, Lazzari V, Bonitta G, Sironi A, Bonavina L. Removal of the magnetic sphincter augmentation device: surgical technique and results of a single-center cohort study. Ann Surg. 2017;265:941-5.
56. Emengo P, Nicastri D, Jacob J. Robotic magnetic sphincter augmentation device removal. Innovations. 2024;19:306-9.
57. Tatum JM, Alicuben E, Bildzukewicz N, Samakar K, Houghton CC, Lipham JC. Removing the magnetic sphincter augmentation device: operative management and outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2019;33:2663-9.
58. Poola AS, Gatta P. Reoperative surgery after magnetic sphincter augmentation. Dis Esophagus. 2023;36:doad024.
59. Fuchs KH, Breithaupt W, Varga G, Babic B, Eckhoff J, Meining A. How effective is laparoscopic redo-antireflux surgery? Dis Esophagus. 2022;35:doab091.
60. Dallemagne B, Arenas Sanchez M, Francart D, et al. Long-term results after laparoscopic reoperation for failed antireflux procedures. Br J Surg. 2011;98:1581-7.
61. Elmously A, Gray KD, Ullmann TM, Fahey TJ 3rd, Afaneh C, Zarnegar R. Robotic reoperative anti-reflux surgery: low perioperative morbidity and high symptom resolution. World J Surg. 2018;42:4014-21.
62. Skinner DB. Surgical management after failed antireflux operations. World J Surg. 1992;16:359-63.
63. Oude Nijhuis RAB, Hoek MV, Schuitenmaker JM, et al. The natural course of giant paraesophageal hernia and long-term outcomes following conservative management. United European Gastroenterol J. 2020;8:1163-73.
64. Stylopoulos N, Gazelle GS, Rattner DW. Paraesophageal hernias: operation or observation? Ann Surg. 2002;236:492-500; discussion 500.
65. Massie P, Auyang ED. Short and long term outcomes of paraesophageal hernia repair. Foregut. 2022;2:68-74.
66. Gerull WD, Cho D, Kuo I, Arefanian S, Kushner BS, Awad MM. Robotic approach to paraesophageal hernia repair results in low long-term recurrence rate and beneficial patient-centered outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2020;231:520-6.
67. Bawahab M, Mitchell P, Church N, Debru E. Management of acute paraesophageal hernia. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:255-9.
68. Hashemi M, Peters JH, DeMeester TR, et al. Laparoscopic repair of large type III hiatal hernia: objective followup reveals high recurrence rate. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;190:553-60; discussion 560.
69. Hietaniemi H, Ilonen I, Järvinen T, et al. Health-related quality of life after laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernia: how does recurrence in CT scan compare to clinical success? BMC Surg. 2020;20:109.
70. Sudarshan M, Raja S. Re-operative surgery after paraesophageal hernia repair: narrative review. Video Assist Thorac Surg. 2022;7:9.
71. Horvath KD, Swanstrom LL, Jobe BA. The short esophagus: pathophysiology, incidence, presentation, and treatment in the era of laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Ann Surg. 2000;232:630-40.
72. Mattioli S, Lugaresi ML, Costantini M, et al. The short esophagus: intraoperative assessment of esophageal length. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136:834-41.
73. Johnson AB, Oddsdottir M, Hunter JG. Laparoscopic Collis gastroplasty and Nissen fundoplication. A new technique for the management of esophageal foreshortening. Surg Endosc. 1998;12:1055-60.
74. Zehetner J, DeMeester SR, Ayazi S, Kilday P, Alicuben ET, DeMeester TR. Laparoscopic wedge fundectomy for collis gastroplasty creation in patients with a foreshortened esophagus. Ann Surg. 2014;260:1030-3.
75. Montcusí B, Jaume-Bottcher S, Álvarez I, et al. 5-year Collis-Nissen gastroplasty outcomes for type III-IV hiatal hernia with short esophagus: a prospective observational study. J Am Coll Surg. 2023;237:596-604.
76. Jobe BA, Horvath KD, Swanstrom LL. Postoperative function following laparoscopic collis gastroplasty for shortened esophagus. Arch Surg. 1998;133:867-74.
77. Luketich JD, Grondin SC, Pearson FG. Minimally invasive approaches to acquired shortening of the esophagus: laparoscopic Collis-Nissen gastroplasty. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;12:173-8.
78. Till BM, Okusanya OT. The robotic collis gastroplasty for paraesophageal hernia repair. Innovations. 2021;16:115-6.
79. Khajanchee YS, O’Rourke R, Cassera MA, Gatta P, Hansen PD, Swanström LL. Laparoscopic reintervention for failed antireflux surgery: subjective and objective outcomes in 176 consecutive patients. Arch Surg. 2007;142:785-901; discussion 791.
80. Bhatt H, Wei B. Comparison of laparoscopic vs. robotic paraesophageal hernia repair: a systematic review. J Thorac Dis. 2023;15:1494-502.
81. Parmar AD, Perry KA. Laparoscopic antireflux surgery: reoperations at the hiatus. In: Grams J, Perry KA, Tavakkoli A, editors. The SAGES manual of foregut surgery. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. pp. 215-23.
82. Oelschlager BK, Petersen RP, Brunt LM, et al. Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: defining long-term clinical and anatomic outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:453-9.
83. Jobe BA, Richter JE, Hoppo T, et al. Preoperative diagnostic workup before antireflux surgery: an evidence and experience-based consensus of the Esophageal Diagnostic Advisory Panel. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217:586-97.
84. Levine MS, Carucci LR, DiSantis DJ, et al. Consensus statement of society of abdominal radiology disease-focused panel on barium esophagography in gastroesophageal reflux disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;207:1009-15.
85. Gyawali CP, Kahrilas PJ, Savarino E, et al. Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus. Gut. 2018;67:1351-62.
86. Leishman DJ, Bakare D, Rao M. Technical considerations and approach to redo foregut surgery. J Vis Exp 2023.
87. Pandolfino JE, Kwiatek MA, Nealis T, Bulsiewicz W, Post J, Kahrilas PJ. Achalasia: a new clinically relevant classification by high-resolution manometry. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:1526-33.
88. Vaezi MF, Pandolfino JE, Yadlapati RH, Greer KB, Kavitt RT. ACG clinical guidelines: diagnosis and management of achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020;115:1393-411.
90. Schlottmann F, Herbella F, Allaix ME, Patti MG. Modern management of esophageal achalasia: from pathophysiology to treatment. Curr Probl Surg. 2018;55:10-37.
91. Campos GM, Vittinghoff E, Rabl C, et al. Endoscopic and surgical treatments for achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2009;249:45-57.
92. Schoenberg MB, Marx S, Kersten JF, et al. Laparoscopic Heller myotomy versus endoscopic balloon dilatation for the treatment of achalasia: a network meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2013;258:943-52.
93. Csendes A, Orellana O, Figueroa M, Lanzarini E, Panza B. Long-term (17 years) subjective and objective evaluation of the durability of laparoscopic Heller esophagomyotomy in patients with achalasia of the esophagus (90% of follow-up): a real challenge to POEM. Surg Endosc. 2022;36:282-91.
94. Rosemurgy AS, Morton CA, Rosas M, Albrink M, Ross SB. A single institution’s experience with more than 500 laparoscopic Heller myotomies for achalasia. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210:637-45.
95. Leeds SG, Burdick JS, Ogola GO, Ontiveros E. Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic Heller myotomy versus per-oral endoscopic myotomy for management of achalasia. Proc. 2017;30:419-23.
96. Schlottmann F, Luckett DJ, Fine J, Shaheen NJ, Patti MG. Laparoscopic Heller myotomy versus peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2018;267:451-60.
97. Bhayani NH, Kurian AA, Dunst CM, Sharata AM, Rieder E, Swanstrom LL. A comparative study on comprehensive, objective outcomes of laparoscopic Heller myotomy with per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia. Ann Surg. 2014;259:1098-103.
98. Raja S, Schraufnagel DP, Blackstone EH, et al. Reintervention after Heller myotomy for achalasia: is it inevitable? Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;107:860-7.
99. Ieong K, Brown A, Yang J, et al. The incidence of reintervention and reoperation following Heller myotomy across multiple indications. Surg Endosc. 2022;36:1619-26.
100. Costantini M, Salvador R, Capovilla G, et al. A thousand and one laparoscopic Heller myotomies for esophageal achalasia: a 25-year experience at a single tertiary center. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019;23:23-35.
101. Zaninotto G, Costantini M, Portale G, et al. Etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of failures after laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia. Ann Surg. 2002;235:186-92.
102. Capovilla G, Salvador R, Provenzano L, et al. Laparoscopic revisional surgery after failed Heller myotomy for esophageal achalasia: long-term outcome at a single tertiary center. J Gastrointest Surg. 2021;25:2208-17.
103. Duffy PE, Awad ZT, Filipi CJ. The laparoscopic reoperation of failed Heller myotomy. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1046-9.
104. Rakita S, Villadolid D, Kalipersad C, Thometz D, Rosemurgy A. Outcomes promote reoperative Heller myotomy for symptoms of achalasia. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1709-14.
105. Veenstra BR, Goldberg RF, Bowers SP, Thomas M, Hinder RA, Smith CD. Revisional surgery after failed esophagogastric myotomy for achalasia: successful esophageal preservation. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:1754-61.
106. Fernandez-Ananin S, Fernández AF, Balagué C, Sacoto D, Targarona EM. What to do when Heller’s myotomy fails? Pneumatic dilatation, laparoscopic remyotomy or peroral endoscopic myotomy: a systematic review. J Minim Access Surg. 2018;14:177-84.
107. El-Magd EA, Elgeidie A, Elmahdy Y, Abbas A, Elyamany MA, Abulazm IL. Pre-operative endoscopic balloon dilatation and its impact on outcome of laparoscopic Heller cardiomyotomy for patients with achalasia: does the frequency and interval matter? Surg Endosc. 2023;37:7667-75.
108. Souma Y, Nakajima K, Taniguchi E, et al. Mucosal perforation during laparoscopic surgery for achalasia: impact of preoperative pneumatic balloon dilation. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:1427-35.
109. Morino M, Rebecchi F, Festa V, Garrone C. Preoperative pneumatic dilatation represents a risk factor for laparoscopic Heller myotomy. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:359-61.
110. Patti MG, Feo CV, Arcerito M, et al. Effects of previous treatment on results of laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia. Dig Dis Sci. 1999;44:2270-6.
111. Portale G, Costantini M, Rizzetto C, et al. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery for esophageal achalasia: possible detrimental role of previous endoscopic treatment. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9:1332-9.
112. Smith CD, Stival A, Howell DL, Swafford V. Endoscopic therapy for achalasia before Heller myotomy results in worse outcomes than heller myotomy alone. Ann Surg. 2006;243:579-84; discussion 584.
113. Maeso S, Reza M, Mayol JA, et al. Efficacy of the Da Vinci surgical system in abdominal surgery compared with that of laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2010;252:254-62.
114. Raja S, Adhikari S, Blackstone EH, et al; Cleveland Clinic Esophageal Research Group. A comparative study of robotic and laparoscopic approaches to Heller myotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022;164:1639-49.e7.
115. Perry KA, Kanji A, Drosdeck JM, et al. Efficacy and durability of robotic Heller myotomy for achalasia: patient symptoms and satisfaction at long-term follow-up. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:3162-7.
116. Horgan S, Galvani C, Gorodner MV, et al. Robotic-assisted Heller myotomy versus laparoscopic Heller myotomy for the treatment of esophageal achalasia: multicenter study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9:1020-9; discussion 1029.
117. Ali AB, Khan NA, Nguyen DT, et al. Robotic and per-oral endoscopic myotomy have fewer technical complications compared to laparoscopic Heller myotomy. Surg Endosc. 2020;34:3191-6.
118. Kim SS, Guillen-Rodriguez J, Little AG. Optimal surgical intervention for achalasia: laparoscopic or robotic approach. J Robot Surg. 2019;13:397-400.
119. Xie J, Vatsan MS, Gangemi A. Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted Heller myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Int J Med Robot. 2021;17:e2253.
120. Engwall-Gill AJ, Soleimani T, Engwall SS. Heller myotomy perforation: robotic visualization decreases perforation rate and revisional surgery is a perforation risk. J Robot Surg. 2022;16:867-73.
121. Milone M, Manigrasso M, Vertaldi S, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic approach to treat symptomatic achalasia: systematic review with meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus. 2019;32:1-8.
