REFERENCES
1. Sheetz KH, Claflin J, Dimick JB. Trends in the adoption of robotic surgery for common surgical procedures. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3:e1918911.
2. Intuitive announces preliminary fourth quarter and full year 2022 results. Available from: https://isrg.intuitive.com/news-releases/news-release-details/intuitive-announces-preliminary-fourth-quarter-and-full-year-2. [Last accessed on 15 Nov 2023].
3. Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, et al. Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2017;318:1569-80.
4. Kim MJ, Park SC, Park JW, et al. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a phase II open label prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2018;267:243-51.
5. Crippa J, Grass F, Dozois EJ, et al. Robotic surgery for rectal cancer provides advantageous outcomes over laparoscopic approach: results from a large retrospective cohort. Ann Surg 2021;274:e1218-22.
6. Kim CW, Kim CH, Baik SH. Outcomes of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic and open surgery: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 2014;18:816-30.
7. Vilsan J, Maddineni SA, Ahsan N, et al. Open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches to treat colorectal cancer: a comprehensive review of literature. Cureus 2023;15:e38956.
8. Anderson JE, Chang DC, Parsons JK, Talamini MA. The first national examination of outcomes and trends in robotic surgery in the United States. J Am Coll Surg 2012;215:107-14.
9. Maeso S, Reza M, Mayol JA, et al. Efficacy of the da Vinci surgical system in abdominal surgery compared with that of laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2010;252:254-62.
10. Fung AKY, Aly EH. Robotic colonic surgery: is it advisable to commence a new learning curve? Dis Colon Rectum 2013;56:786-96.
11. Zhang J, Qi X, Yi F, Cao R, Gao G, Zhang C. Comparison of clinical efficacy and safety between da Vinci robotic and laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Front Surg 2021;8:752009.
12. Baik SH, Ko YT, Kang CM, et al. Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial. Surg Endosc 2008;22:1601-8.
13. Huang CW, Wei PL, Chen CC, Kuo LJ, Wang JY. Clinical safety and effectiveness of robotic-assisted surgery in patients with rectal cancer: real-world experience over 8 years of multiple institutions with high-volume robotic-assisted surgery. Cancers 2022;14:4175.
14. Konstantinidis IT, Ituarte P, Woo Y, et al. Trends and outcomes of robotic surgery for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers in the USA: maintaining perioperative and oncologic safety. Surg Endosc 2020;34:4932-42.
15. Huang Z, Li T, Zhang G, et al. Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic left colectomy for radical treatment of colon cancer: a retrospective analysis in a consecutive series of 211 patients. World J Surg Oncol 2022;20:345.
16. Bao X, Wang H, Song W, Chen Y, Luo Y. Meta-analysis on current status, efficacy, and safety of laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse treatment: can robotic surgery become the gold standard? Int J Colorectal Dis 2021;36:1685-94.
17. Allaix ME, Furnée EJB, Mistrangelo M, Arezzo A, Morino M. Conversion of laparoscopic colorectal resection for cancer: what is the impact on short-term outcomes and survival? World J Gastroenterol 2016;22:8304-13.
18. Fleming CA, Celarier S, Fernandez B, Cauvin T, Célérier B, Denost Q. An analysis of feasibility of robotic colectomy: post hoc analysis of a phase III randomised controlled trial. J Robot Surg 2023;17:1057-63.
19. Keller DS, Flores-Gonzalez JR, Ibarra S, Haas EM. Review of 500 single incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery cases - Lessons learned. World J Gastroenterol 2016;22:659-67.
20. Scarpinata R, Aly EH. Does robotic rectal cancer surgery offer improved early postoperative outcomes? Dis Colon Rectum 2013;56:253-62.
21. Panin SI, Nechay TV, Sazhin AV, et al. Should we encourage the use of robotic technologies in complicated diverticulitis? Results of systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Robot AI 2023;10:1208611.
22. Feng Q, Yuan W, Li T, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (REAL): short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022;7:991-1004.
23. Waters PS, Cheung FP, Peacock O, et al. Successful patient-oriented surgical outcomes in robotic vs laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer - a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 2020;22:488-99.
24. Bianchi PP, Salaj A, Giuliani G, Ferraro L, Formisano G. Feasibility of robotic right colectomy with complete mesocolic excision and intracorporeal anastomosis: short-term outcomes of 161 consecutive patients. Updates Surg 2021;73:1065-72.
25. Zhang T, Sun Y, Mao W. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in minimally invasive right hemicolectomy: upgrading the level of evidence. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023;38:147.
26. Akram WM, Al-Natour RH, Albright J, et al. A propensity score-matched comparison of intracorporeal and extracorporeal techniques for robotic-assisted right colectomy in an Enhanced Recovery Pathway. Am J Surg 2018;216:1095-100.
27. Al Natour RH, Obias V, Albright J, et al. A propensity score matched comparison of intracorporeal and extracorporeal techniques for robotic-assisted sigmoidectomy in an enhanced recovery pathway. J Robot Surg 2019;13:649-56.
28. Cleary RK, Silviera M, Reidy TJ, et al. Intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis for robotic-assisted and laparoscopic right colectomy: short-term outcomes of a multi-center prospective trial. Surg Endosc 2022;36:4349-58.
29. Kim JC, Lee JL, Alotaibi AM, Yoon YS, Kim CW, Park IJ. Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection facilitates an efficient sphincter-saving in patients with low rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2017;32:1137-45.
30. Piozzi GN, Kim SH. Robotic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: technical controversies and a systematic review on the perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes. Ann Coloproctol 2021;37:351-67.
31. Yang Y, Wang F, Zhang P, et al. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease, focusing on rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19:3727-36.
32. Compton CC, Fielding LP, Burgart LJ, et al. Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer: College of American Pathologists consensus statement 1999. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000;124:979-94.
33. Kim NK, Baik SH, Seong JS, et al. Oncologic outcomes after neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by curative resection with tumor-specific mesorectal excision for fixed locally advanced rectal cancer: impact of postirradiated pathologic downstaging on local recurrence and survival. Ann Surg 2006;244:1024-30.
34. Trastulli S, Farinella E, Cirocchi R, et al. Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome. Colorectal Dis 2012;14:e134-56.
35. Zheng J, Zhao S, Chen W, Zhang M, Wu J. Comparison of robotic right colectomy and laparoscopic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 2023;27:521-35.
36. van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2013;14:210-8.
37. Stevenson ARL, Solomon MJ, Lumley JW, et al. Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer: the ALaCaRT randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015;314:1356-63.
38. Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent DJ, et al. Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes: the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015;314:1346-55.
39. Park JS, Lee SM, Choi GS, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancers: the COLRAR randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2023;278:31-8.
40. Guo Y, Guo Y, Luo Y, Song X, Zhao H, Li L. Comparison of pathologic outcomes of robotic and open resections for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2021;16:e0245154.
41. Feroci F, Vannucchi A, Bianchi PP, et al. Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: laparoscopic vs robotic surgery. World J Gastroenterol 2016;22:3602-10.
42. Cho MS, Baek SJ, Hur H, et al. Short and long-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a case-matched retrospective study. Medicine 2015;94:e522.
43. Kim J, Baek SJ, Kang DW, et al. Robotic resection is a good prognostic factor in rectal cancer compared with laparoscopic resection: long-term survival analysis using propensity score matching. Dis Colon Rectum 2017;60:266-73.
44. Spinoglio G, Bianchi PP, Marano A, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy with complete mesocolic excision for the treatment of colon cancer: perioperative outcomes and 5-year survival in a consecutive series of 202 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2018;25:3580-6.
45. Mirkin KA, Kulaylat AS, Hollenbeak CS, Messaris E. Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy for stage I-III colon cancer: oncologic and long-term survival outcomes. Surg Endosc 2018;32:2894-901.
46. Xu M, Zhao Z, Jia B, Liu R, Liu H. Perioperative and long-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus laparoscopy-assisted hemicolectomy for left-sided colon cancers: a retrospective study. Updates Surg 2021;73:1049-56.
47. Ozben V, de Muijnck C, Sengun B, et al. Robotic complete mesocolic excision for transverse colon cancer can be performed with a morbidity profile similar to that of conventional laparoscopic colectomy. Tech Coloproctol 2020;24:1035-42.
48. Ceccarelli G, Costa G, Ferraro V, De Rosa M, Rondelli F, Bugiantella W. Robotic or three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy for right colectomy with complete mesocolic excision (CME) and intracorporeal anastomosis? A propensity score-matching study comparison. Surg Endosc 2021;35:2039-48.
49. Shah J, Vyas A, Vyas D. The history of robotics in surgical specialties. Am J Robot Surg 2014;1:12-20.
50. Cain P, Kazanzides P, Zuhars J, Mittelstadt B, Paul H. Safety considerations in a surgical robot. Biomed Sci Instrum 1993;29:291-4.
51. Sackier JM, Wooters C, Jacobs L, Halverson A, Uecker D, Wang Y. Voice activation of a surgical robotic assistant. Am J Surg 1997;174:406-9.
52. Falcone T, Goldberg J, Garcia-Ruiz A, Margossian H, Stevens L. Full robotic assistance for laparoscopic tubal anastomosis: a case report. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 1999;9:107-13.
53. Melzer A, Schurr MO, Kunert W, Buess G, Voges U, Meyer JU. Intelligent surgical instrument system ISIS. Concept and preliminary experimental application of components and prototypes. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 1993;1:165-70.
54. Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewski A, Ballantyne GH. Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:1689-96.
55. Morelli L, Guadagni S, Di Franco G, et al. Use of the new da Vinci Xi® during robotic rectal resection for cancer: a pilot matched-case comparison with the da Vinci Si®. Int J Med Robot 2017;13:e1728.
56. Baek SJ, Kim CH, Cho MS, et al. Robotic surgery for rectal cancer can overcome difficulties associated with pelvic anatomy. Surg Endosc 2015;29:1419-24.
57. Luca F, Valvo M, Ghezzi TL, et al. Impact of robotic surgery on sexual and urinary functions after fully robotic nerve-sparing total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 2013;257:672-8.
58. Ozben V, Cengiz TB, Atasoy D, et al. Is da Vinci Xi better than da Vinci Si in robotic rectal cancer surgery? Comparison of the 2 generations of da Vinci systems. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2016;26:417-23.
59. Protyniak B, Jorden J, Farmer R. Multiquadrant robotic colorectal surgery: the da Vinci Xi vs Si comparison. J Robot Surg 2018;12:67-74.
60. Piozzi GN, Khan JS. Dual console operating in robotic surgery - a show off or a real necessity? Colorectal Dis 2023;25:1327-9.
61. Palmeri M, Gianardi D, Guadagni S, et al. Robotic colorectal resection with and without the use of the new Da Vinci table motion: a case-matched study. Surg Innov 2018;25:251-7.
62. Morelli L, Palmeri M, Simoncini T, et al. A prospective, single-arm study on the use of the da Vinci® table motion with the Trumpf TS7000dV operating table. Surg Endosc 2018;32:4165-72.
63. Bae SU, Jeong WK, Bae OS, Baek SK. Reduced-port robotic anterior resection for left-sided colon cancer using the Da Vinci single-site® platform. Int J Med Robot 2016;12:517-23.
64. Hamzaoglu I, Karahasanoglu T, Baca B, Karatas A, Aytac E, Kahya AS. Single-port laparoscopic sphincter-saving mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: report of the first 4 human cases. Arch Surg 2011;146:75-81.
65. Morelli L, Guadagni S, Caprili G, Di Candio G, Boggi U, Mosca F. Robotic right colectomy using the Da Vinci Single-Site® platform: case report. Int J Med Robot 2013;9:258-61.
66. Ostrowitz MB, Eschete D, Zemon H, DeNoto G. Robotic-assisted single-incision right colectomy: early experience. Int J Med Robot 2009;5:465-70.
67. Sun N, Zhang J, Zhang C, Shi Y. Single-site robotic cholecystectomy versus multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 2018;216:1205-11.
68. Haber GP, White MA, Autorino R, et al. Novel robotic da Vinci instruments for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Urology 2010;76:1279-82.
69. Kim HJ, Choi GS, Song SH, et al. An initial experience with a novel technique of single-port robotic resection for rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 2021;25:857-64.
70. Piozzi GN, Kim JS, Choo JM, et al. Da Vinci SP robotic approach to colorectal surgery: two specific indications and short-term results. Tech Coloproctol 2022;26:461-70.
71. Song SH, Kim HJ, Choi GS, et al. Initial experience with a suprapubic single-port robotic right hemicolectomy in patients with colon cancer. Tech Coloproctol 2021;25:1065-71.
72. Baek SJ, Piozzi GN, Kim SH. Optimizing outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery with robotic platforms. Surg Oncol 2021;37:101559.
73. Piozzi GN, Lee DY, Kim JS, Kim SH. Da Vinci Single-Port (SP) robotic transverse colectomy for mid-transverse colon cancer. Tech Coloproctol 2022;26:681-2.
74. Noh GT, Oh BY, Han M, Chung SS, Lee RA, Kim KH. Initial clinical experience of single-incision robotic colorectal surgery with da Vinci SP platform. Int J Med Robot 2020;16:e2091.
75. Cheong JY, Choo JM, Kim JS, Rusli SM, Kim J, Kim SH. Da Vinci SP system optimized for intersphincteric resection of very low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2022;65:e174.
76. Marks JH, Perez RE, Salem JF. Robotic transanal surgery for rectal cancer. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2021;34:317-24.
77. Marks JH, Kunkel E, Salem JF, Martin C, Anderson B, Agarwal S. First clinical experience with single-port robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (SP rTAMIS) for benign rectal neoplasms. Tech Coloproctol 2021;25:117-24.
78. Emrich Accioly JP, Zhao H, Ozgur I, Lee GC, Gorgun E, Wood HM. Single-port, robot-assisted transanal harvest of rectal mucosa grafts for substitution urethroplasty. Urology 2022;166:1-5.
79. Schleer P, Drobinsky S, de la Fuente M, Radermacher K. Toward versatile cooperative surgical robotics: a review and future challenges. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2019;14:1673-86.
80. Chang KD, Abdel Raheem A, Choi YD, Chung BH, Rha KH. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the Revo-i robotic surgical system: surgical technique and results of the first human trial. BJU Int 2018;122:441-8.
81. Ku G, Kang I, Lee WJ, Kang CM. Revo-i assisted robotic central pancreatectomy. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2020;24:547-50.
82. Alip S, Koukourikis P, Han WK, Rha KH, Na JC. Comparing revo-i and da Vinci in retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a preliminary propensity score analysis of outcomes. J Endourol 2022;36:104-10.
83. Abdel Raheem A, Troya IS, Kim DK, et al. Robot-assisted Fallopian tube transection and anastomosis using the new REVO-I robotic surgical system: feasibility in a chronic porcine model. BJU Int 2016;118:604-9.
84. Rassweiler JJ, Autorino R, Klein J, et al. Future of robotic surgery in urology. BJU Int 2017;120:822-41.
85. Gkeka K, Tsaturyan A, Faitatziadis S, et al. Robot-assisted radical nephrectomy using the novel avatera robotic surgical system: a feasibility study in a porcine model. J Endourol 2023;37:273-8.
86. Nakauchi M, Suda K, Nakamura K, et al. Establishment of a new practical telesurgical platform using the hinotoriTM surgical robot system: a pre-clinical study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022;407:3783-91.
87. Takahashi Y, Hakamada K, Morohashi H, et al. Verification of delay time and image compression thresholds for telesurgery. Asian J Endosc Surg 2023;16:255-61.
88. Spinelli A, David G, Gidaro S, et al. First experience in colorectal surgery with a new robotic platform with haptic feedback. Colorectal Dis 2018;20:228-35.
89. McKechnie T, Khamar J, Daniel R, et al. The senhance surgical system in colorectal surgery: a systematic review. J Robot Surg 2023;17:325-34.
90. Samalavicius NE, Dulskas A, Janusonis V, et al. Robotic colorectal surgery using the Senhance® robotic system: a single center experience. Tech Coloproctol 2022;26:437-42.
91. Dixon F, O’Hara R, Ghuman N, Strachan J, Khanna A, Keeler BD. Major colorectal resection is feasible using a new robotic surgical platform: the first report of a case series. Tech Coloproctol 2021;25:285-9.
92. Bianchi PP, Salaj A, Rocco B, Formisano G. First worldwide report on Hugo RASTM surgical platform in right and left colectomy. Updates Surg 2023;75:775-80.
93. Böhlen D, Gerber R. First ever radical prostatectomy performed with the new dexter robotic systemTM. Eur Urol 2023;83:479-80.
94. Virtual Incision. World’s first surgery using virtual incision’s MIRA miniature robotic system performed at bryan medical center in Lincoln, Nebraska. Available from: https://virtualincision.com/worlds-first-surgery-using-mira/. [Last accessed on 15 Nov 2023].
95. Prendergast JM, Rentschler ME. Towards autonomous motion control in minimally invasive robotic surgery. Expert Rev Med Devices 2016;13:741-8.
96. Zorn L, Nageotte F, Zanne P, et al. A novel telemanipulated robotic assistant for surgical endoscopy: preclinical application to ESD. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2018;65:797-808.
97. Atallah S, Sanchez A, Bianchi E, Larach SW. Envisioning the future of colorectal surgery: preclinical assessment and detailed description of an endoluminal robotic system (ColubrisMX ELS). Tech Coloproctol 2021;25:1199-207.
98. Johnson CS, Kassir A, Marx DS, Soliman MK. Performance of da Vinci Stapler during robotic-assisted right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis. J Robot Surg 2019;13:115-9.
99. Ohi M, Toiyama Y, Ichikawa T, et al. Billroth-I reconstruction with overlap anastomosis using an EndoWrist linear stapler after robotic distal gastrectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2020;30:1117-21.
100. Teo NZ, Ngu JCY. A comparison between the da Vinci Xi EndoWrist Stapler and a conventional laparoscopic stapler in rectal transection: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Med Robot 2023;19:e2501.
101. Guadagni S, Di Franco G, Gianardi D, et al. Control comparison of the new endowrist and traditional laparoscopic staplers for anterior rectal resection with the da Vinci Xi: a case study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2018;28:1422-7.
102. Tejedor P, Sagias F, Flashman K, Kandala NL, Khan J. The use of robotic or laparoscopic stapler in rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Robot Surg 2020;14:829-33.
103. Tejedor P, Sagias F, Nock D, Flashman K, Naqvi S, Kandala NL, Khan JS. Advantages of using a robotic stapler in rectal cancer surgery. J Robot Surg 2020;14:365-70.
104. Schols RM, Bouvy ND, Van Dam RM, Stassen LPS. Advanced intraoperative imaging methods for laparoscopic anatomy navigation: an overview. Surg Endosc 2013;27:1851-9.
105. Takahashi H, Yanagita TE, Suzuki T, et al. Accurate localization of rectal cancer using near infrared ray-guided surgery with intra-operative colonoscopy and da Vinci Firefly technology. Surg Today 2020;50:205-8.
106. Spinoglio G, Petz W, Borin S, Piccioli AN, Bertani E. Robotic right colectomy with complete mesocolic excision and indocyanine green guidance. Minerva Chir 2019;74:165-9.
107. Al-Taher M, van den Bos J, Terink I, et al. Near-infrared fluorescence imaging for the intraoperative detection of endometriosis: a pilot study. Life 2022;12:15.
108. Giannini A, Bianchi M, Doria D, et al. Wearable haptic interfaces for applications in gynecologic robotic surgery: a proof of concept in robotic myomectomy. J Robot Surg 2019;13:585-8.
109. Bae SU, Baek SJ, Hur H, Baik SH, Kim NK, Min BS. Intraoperative near infrared fluorescence imaging in robotic low anterior resection: three case reports. Yonsei Med J 2013;54:1066-9.
110. Saeidi H, Opfermann JD, Kam M, et al. Autonomous robotic laparoscopic surgery for intestinal anastomosis. Sci Robot 2022;7:eabj2908.
