REFERENCES
1. Antonelli A, Cindolo L, Sandri M, et al; AGILE Group (Italian Group for Advanced Laparo-Endoscopic Surgery). Safety of on- vs off-clamp robotic partial nephrectomy: per-protocol analysis from the data of the CLOCK randomized trial. World J Urol 2020;38:1101-8.
2. Bertolo R, Simone G, Garisto J, et al. Off-clamp vs on-clamp robotic partial nephrectomy: perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes from a propensity-score matching between two high-volume centers. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019;45:1232-7.
3. Brassetti A, Cacciamani GE, Mari A, et al. On-clamp vs. off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for cT2 renal tumors: retrospective propensity-score-matched multicenter outcome analysis. Cancers 2022;14:4431.
4. Antonelli A, Veccia A, Francavilla S, et al. On-clamp versus off-clamp robotic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urologia 2019;86:52-62.
5. Shrivastava N, Sharma G, Ahluwalia P, et al; European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists Renal Cancer Study Group. Off-clamp versus on-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and quantitative synthesis by the european association of urology young academic urologists renal cancer study group. Eur Urol Open Sci 2023;58:10-8.
6. Bertolo R, Pecoraro A, Carbonara U, et al; European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists Renal Cancer Working Group. Resection techniques during robotic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review. Eur Urol Open Sci 2023;52:7-21.
7. Bertolo R, Vittori M, Carilli M, Di Dio M, Bove P. Off-clamp robotic partial nephrectomy: points of technique. Urol Video J 2023;20:100257.
8. Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 2009;182:844-53.
9. Levey AS, Coresh J, Greene T, et al; Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration. Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 2006;145:247-54.
10. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-13.
11. Tsivian M, Moreira DM, Caso JR, et al. Predicting occult multifocality of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2010;58:118-26.
12. Klatte T, Patard JJ, Wunderlich H, et al. Metachronous bilateral renal cell carcinoma: risk assessment, prognosis and relevance of the primary-free interval. J Urol 2007;177:2081-7.
13. Blute M, Thibault GP, Leibovich BC, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Zincke H. Multiple ipsilateral renal tumors discovered at planned nephron sparing surgery: importance of tumor histology and risk of metachronous recurrence. J Urol 2003;170:760-3.
14. Rogers CG, Singh A, Blatt AM, Linehan WM, Pinto PA. Robotic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: surgical technique. Eur Urol 2008;53:514-21.
15. Yang J, Xia JD, Xue JX, et al. Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy with sequential clamping of segmental renal arteries for multiple ipsilateral renal tumors: initial outcomes. BMC Urol 2019;19:31.
16. Buffi N, Uleri A, Paciotti M, et al. Techniques and outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for the treatment of multiple ipsilateral renal masses. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2023;75:223-30.
17. Biebel MG, Hill H, Patel B, et al. A multi-institutional matched-pair analysis of robotic partial nephrectomy for single vs multiple ipsilateral renal masses. J Endourol 2023;37:781-5.
18. Antonelli A, Mari A, Longo N, et al; Collaborators. Role of clinical and surgical factors for the prediction of immediate, early and late functional results, and its relationship with cardiovascular outcome after partial nephrectomy: results from the prospective multicenter RECORd 1 project. J Urol 2018;199:927-32.
19. Gill IS, Eisenberg MS, Aron M, et al. “Zero ischemia” partial nephrectomy: novel laparoscopic and robotic technique. Eur Urol 2011;59:128-34.
20. Anderson BG, Potretzke AM, Du K, et al. Comparing off-clamp and on-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Urology 2019;126:102-9.
21. Antonelli A, Cindolo L, Sandri M, et al; AGILE Group (Italian Group for Advanced Laparo-Endoscopic Surgery). Is off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy beneficial for renal function? Data from the CLOCK trial. BJU Int 2022;129:217-24.
22. Campbell SC, Campbell JA, Munoz-Lopez C, Rathi N, Yasuda Y, Attawettayanon W. Every decade counts: a narrative review of functional recovery after partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 2023;131:165-72.
23. Bove P, Bertolo R, Sandri M, et al. Deviation from the protocol of a randomized clinical trial comparing on-clamp versus off-clamp laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (CLOCK II laparoscopic study): a real-life analysis. J Urol 2021;205:678-85.
24. Bertolo R, Bove P, Sandri M, et al; AGILE Group (Italian Group for Advanced Laparoendoscopic Surgery). Randomized clinical trial comparing on-clamp versus off-clamp laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for small renal masses (CLOCK II laparoscopic study): a intention-to-treat analysis of perioperative outcomes. Eur Urol Open Sci 2022;46:75-81.
25. Autorino R, Khalifeh A, Laydner H, et al. Repeat robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN): feasibility and early outcomes. BJU Int 2013;111:767-72.
26. Bertolo R, Campi R, Mir MC, et al; Young Academic Urologists Kidney Cancer Working Group of the European Urological Association. Systematic review and pooled analysis of the impact of renorrhaphy techniques on renal functional outcome after partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol Oncol 2019;2:572-5.
27. Giulioni C, Di Biase M, Marconi A, et al. Clampless laparoscopic tumor enucleation for exophytic masses greater than 4 cm: is renorrhaphy necessary? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2022;32:931-7.
