REFERENCES
1. Asbun HJ, Moekotte AL, Vissers FL, et al. The Miami international evidence-based guidelines on minimally invasive pancreas resection. Ann Surg 2020;271:1-14.
2. van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Klompmaker S, et al. European consortium on minimally invasive pancreatic surgery (E-MIPS). minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma (DIPLOMA): a pan-european propensity score matched study. Ann Surg 2019;269:10-7.
3. Nakata K, Shikata S, Ohtsuka T, et al. Minimally invasive preservation versus splenectomy during distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2018;25:476-88.
4. Moekotte AL, Lof S, White SA, et al. Minimally invasive liver and pancreatic surgery study group-UK (MI-LAPS UK). splenic preservation versus splenectomy in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a propensity score-matched study. Surg Endosc 2020;34:1301-9.
5. Lee W, Hwang DW, Han HS, et al. Comparison of infectious complications after spleen preservation versus splenectomy during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for benign or low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors: a multicenter, propensity score-matched analysis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2023;30:252-62.
6. Choi SH, Seo MA, Hwang HK, Kang CM, Lee WJ. Is it worthwhile to preserve adult spleen in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy? Perioperative and patient-reported outcome analysis. Surg Endosc 2012;26:3149-56.
7. Dai MH, Shi N, Xing C, et al. Splenic preservation in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Br J Surg 2017;104:452-62.
8. Shi N, Liu SL, Li YT, You L, Dai MH, Zhao YP. Splenic preservation versus splenectomy during distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23:365-74.
9. Kimura W, Yano M, Sugawara S, et al. Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with conservation of the splenic artery and vein: techniques and its significance. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2010;17:813-23.
11. Zerbi A, Capretti G, Napoli N, et al. The italian national registry for minimally invasive pancreatic surgery: an initiative of the italian group of minimally invasive pancreas surgery (IGoMIPS). Updates Surg 2020;72:379-85.
12. Capretti G, Boggi U, Salvia R, et al. Application of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery: an Italian survey. Updates Surg 2019;71:97-103.
13. Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, et al. International study group on pancreatic surgery (ISGPS). the 2016 update of the international study group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 2017;161:584-91.
14. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-13.
15. Holdsworth RJ, Irving AD, Cuschieri A. Postsplenectomy sepsis and its mortality rate: actual versus perceived risks. Br J Surg 1991;78:1031-8.
16. Chong J, Jones P, Spelman D, Leder K, Cheng AC. Overwhelming post-splenectomy sepsis in patients with asplenia and hyposplenia: a retrospective cohort study. Epidemiol Infect 2017;145:397-400.
17. Long B, Koyfman A, Gottlieb M. Complications in the adult asplenic patient: a review for the emergency clinician. Am J Emerg Med 2021;44:452-7.
18. Buzelé R, Barbier L, Sauvanet A, Fantin B. Medical complications following splenectomy. J Visc Surg 2016;153:277-86.
19. Hassenpflug M, Tjaden C, Hinz U, et al. Hypercoagulability after distal pancreatectomy: Just meaningless alterations? Pancreatology 2017;17:478-83.
20. Crary SE, Buchanan GR. Vascular complications after splenectomy for hematologic disorders. Blood 2009;114:2861-8.
21. Turner VM, Mabbott NA. Influence of ageing on the microarchitecture of the spleen and lymph nodes. Biogerontology 2017;18:723-38.
22. Panda N, Bansal NK, Narsimhan M, Ardhanari R, Bronson JR. Spleen-preserving versus spleen-sacrificing distal pancreatectomy in laparoscopy and open method-perioperative outcome analysis-14 years experience. Indian J Surg 2016;78:90-5.
23. Halfdanarson TR, Rabe KG, Rubin J, Petersen GM. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs): incidence, prognosis and recent trend toward improved survival. Ann Oncol 2008;19:1727-33.
24. Dababneh Y, Mousa OY. Pancreatic serous cystadenoma. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557432/ [Last accessed on 22 Mar 2023] .
25. Babiker HM, Hoilat GJ, Mukkamalla SKR. Mucinous cystic pancreatic neoplasms. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK448105/ [Last accessed on 22 Mar 2023].
26. Pendola F, Gadde R, Ripat C, et al. Distal pancreatectomy for benign and low grade malignant tumors: short-term postoperative outcomes of spleen preservation-a systematic review and update meta-analysis. J Surg Oncol 2017;115:137-43.
27. Kwon W, Jang JY, Kim JH, et al. An analysis of complications, quality of life, and nutritional index after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with regard to spleen preservation. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2016;26:335-42.
28. Zhao YP, Du X, Dai MH, et al. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with or without splenectomy: spleen-preservation does not increase morbidity. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2012;11:536-41.
29. Lof S, Korrel M, van Hilst J, et al. Outcomes of elective and emergency conversion in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: an international multicenter propensity score-matched study. Ann Surg 2021;274:e1001-7.
30. Kawaguchi Y, Fuks D, Nomi T, Levard H, Gayet B. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy employing radical en bloc procedure for adenocarcinoma: technical details and outcomes. Surgery 2015;157:1106-12.
31. Seo S, Uemura K, Sumiyoshi T, et al. Optimal lymph-node dissection for pancreatic tail cancer. Surg Today 2022;52:1307-12.
32. Ramia JM, Del Rio Martín J, Blanco-Fernández G, et al. Pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasms located in the distal pancreas: a multicenter study. Gland Surg 2022;11:795-804.
33. Chen S, Zhan Q, Chen JZ, et al. Robotic approach improves spleen-preserving rate and shortens postoperative hospital stay of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a matched cohort study. Surg Endosc 2015;29:3507-18.
34. Chen P, Zhou B, Wang T, Hu X, Ye Y, Guo W. Comparative efficacy of robot-assisted and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a single-center comparative study. J Healthc Eng 2022;2022:7302222.
35. Kang CM, Kim DH, Lee WJ, Chi HS. Conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted spleen-preserving pancreatectomy: does da Vinci have clinical advantages? Surg Endosc 2011;25:2004-9.
36. Yang SJ, Hwang HK, Kang CM, Lee WJ. Revisiting the potential advantage of robotic surgical system in spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy over conventional laparoscopic approach. Ann Transl Med 2020;8:188.
37. Eckhardt S, Schicker C, Maurer E, Fendrich V, Bartsch DK. Robotic-assisted approach improves vessel preservation in spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy. Dig Surg 2016;33:406-13.
38. Hang K, Zhou L, Liu H, et al. Splenic vessels preserving versus Warshaw technique in spleen preserving distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2022;103:106686.
39. Lee LS, Hwang HK, Kang CM, Lee WJ. Minimally invasive approach for spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: a comparative analysis of postoperative complication between splenic vessel conserving and Warshaw's technique. J Gastrointest Surg 2016;20:1464-70.
