REFERENCES
1. Zargar H, Zargar-Shoshtari K, Laydner H, Autorino R. Anatomy of contemporary partial nephrectomy: a dissection of the available evidence. Eur Urol 2015;68:993-5.
2. Autorino R, Porpiglia F, Dasgupta P, et al. Precision surgery and genitourinary cancers. Eur J Surg Oncol 2017;43:893-908.
3. Ficarra V, Caloggero S, Rossanese M, et al. Computed tomography features predicting aggressiveness of malignant parenchymal renal tumors suitable for partial nephrectomy. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2021;73:17-31.
4. Porpiglia F, Bertolo R, Checcucci E, Amparore D, Autorino R, Dasgupta P, et al. Development and validation of 3D printed virtual models for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy: urologists’ and patients’ perception. World J Urol 2018;36:201-7.
5. Veneziano D, Amparore D, Cacciamani G, Porpiglia F. Uro-technology; SoMe Working Group of the Young Academic Urologists Working Party of the European Association of Urology; European Section of Uro-technology. Climbing over the barriers of current imaging technology in urology. Eur Urol 2020;77:142-3.
6. Ukimura O, Aron M, Nakamoto M, et al. Three-dimensional surgical navigation model with TilePro display during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 2014;28:625-30.
7. Antonelli A, Veccia A, Palumbo C, et al. Holographic reconstructions for preoperative planning before partial nephrectomy: a head-to-head comparison with standard CT scan. Urol Int 2019;102:212-7.
8. Tang SL, Kwoh CK, Teo MY, Sing NW, Ling KV. Augmented reality systems for medical applications. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 1998;17:49-58.
9. Ukimura O, Gill IS. Augmented reality for computer- assisted image-guided minimally invasive urology. Interv Ultrason Urol ;2009:179-184.
10. Thompson S, Penney G, Billia M, Challacombe B, Hawkes D, Dasgupta P. Design and evaluation of an image-guidance system for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2013;111:1081-90.
11. Porpiglia F, Fiori C, Checcucci E, Amparore D, Bertolo R. Augmented reality robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: preliminary experience. Urology 2018;115:184.
12. Porpiglia F, Checcucci E, Amparore D, et al. Augmented-reality robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using hyper-accuracy three-dimensional reconstruction (HA3D™) technology: a radiological and pathological study. BJU Int 2019;123:834-45.
13. Porpiglia F, Checcucci E, Amparore D, Manfredi M, Massa F, Piazzolla P, et al. Three-dimensional elastic augmented-reality robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using hyperaccuracy three-dimensional reconstruction technology: a step further in the identification of capsular involvement. Eur Urol 2019;76:505-14.
14. Schiavina R, Bianchi L, Lodi S, et al. Real-time augmented reality three-dimensional guided robotic radical prostatectomy: preliminary experience and evaluation of the impact on surgical planning. Eur Urol Focus 2021;7:1260-7.
15. Wake N, Bjurlin MA, Rostami P, Chandarana H, Huang WC. Three-dimensional printing and augmented reality: enhanced precision for robotic assisted partial nephrectomy. Urology 2018;116:227-8.
16. Porpiglia F, Checcucci E, Amparore D, et al. Three-dimensional augmented reality robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in case of complex tumours (PADUA ≥10): a new intraoperative tool overcoming the ultrasound guidance. Eur Urol 2020;78:229-38.
17. Schiavina R, Bianchi L, Chessa F, et al. Augmented reality to guide selective clamping and tumor dissection during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a preliminary experience. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2021;19:e149-55.
18. Kobayashi S, Cho B, Huaulmé A, et al. Assessment of surgical skills by using surgical navigation in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2019;14:1449-59.
19. Kobayashi S, Cho B, Mutaguchi J, et al. Surgical navigation improves renal parenchyma volume preservation in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a propensity score matched comparative analysis. J Urol 2020;204:149-56.
20. Michiels C, Khene ZE, Prudhomme T, et al. 3D-Image guided robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional propensity score-matched analysis (UroCCR study 51). World J Urol 2021; doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03645-1.
21. Kavoussi NL, Pitt B, Ferguson JM, et al. Accuracy of touch-based registration during robotic image-guided partial nephrectomy before and after tumor resection in validated phantoms. J Endourol 2021;35:362-8.
22. Amparore D, Checcucci E, Piazzolla P, et al. Indocyanine green drives computer vision based 3d augmented reality robot assisted partial nephrectomy: the beginning of “automatic” overlapping era. Urology 2022;164:e312-6.
23. Checcucci E, Autorino R, Cacciamani GE, et al. Uro-technology and SoMe Working Group of the Young Academic Urologists Working Party of the European Association of Urology. Artificial intelligence and neural networks in urology: current clinical applications. Minerva Urol Nefrol 2020;72:49-57.
24. Houshyar R, Glavis-Bloom J, Bui TL, et al. Outcomes of artificial intelligence volumetric assessment of kidneys and renal tumors for preoperative assessment of nephron-sparing interventions. J Endourol 2021;35:1411-8.
25. Vezzetti E, Marcolin F, Tornincasa S, Ulrich L, Dagnes N. 3D geometry-based automatic landmark localization in presence of facial occlusions. Multimed Tools Appl 2018;77:14177-205.
26. Bertolo R, Hung A, Porpiglia F, Bove P, Schleicher M, Dasgupta P. Systematic review of augmented reality in urological interventions: the evidences of an impact on surgical outcomes are yet to come. World J Urol 2020;38:2167-76.
