REFERENCES
1. Makuuchi M, Hasegawa H, Yamazaki S. Ultrasonically guided subsegmentectomy. Surg Obstet Gynecol 1985;161:346-50.
2. Hasegawa K, Kokudo N, Imamura H, et al. Prognostic impact of anatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg 2005;242:252-9.
3. Shindoh J, Makuuchi M, Matsuyama Y, et al. Complete removal of the tumor-bearing portal territory decreases local tumor recurrence and improves disease-specific survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2016;64:594-600.
4. Takasaki K, Kobayashi S, Tanaka S, Saito A, Yamamoto M, Hanyu F. Highly anatomically systematized hepatic resection with Glissonean sheath code transection at the hepatic hilus. Int Surg 1990;75:73-7.
5. Liau KH, Blumgart LH, DeMatteo RP. Segment-oriented approach to liver resection. Surg Clin North Am 2004;84:543-61.
6. Kishi Y, Hasegawa K, Kaneko J, et al. Resection of segment VIII for hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg 2012;99:1105-12.
7. Mazziotti A, Maeda A, Ercolani G, Cescon M, Grazi GL, Pierangeli F. Isolated resection of segment 8 for liver tumors: a new approach for anatomical segmentectomy. Arch Surg 2000;135:1224-9.
8. Ome Y, Honda G, Doi M, Muto J, Seyama Y. Laparoscopic anatomic liver resection of segment 8 using intrahepatic glissonean approach. J Am Coll Surg 2020;230:e13-e20.
9. Kato Y, Sugioka A, Kojima M, et al. Laparoscopic isolated liver segmentectomy 8 for malignant tumors:techniques and comparison of surgical results with the open approach using a propensity score-matched study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022;407:2881-92.
10. Berardi G, Igarashi K, Li CJ, et al. Parenchymal sparing anatomical liver resections with full laparoscopic approach: description of technique and short-term results. Ann Surg 2021;273:785-91.
11. Otsuka Y, Matsumoto Y, Ito Y, et al. Intraoperative guidance using ICG fluorescence imaging system for safe and precise laparoscopic liver resection. Minerva Surg 2021;76:211-9.
12. Sugioka A, Kato Y, Tanahashi Y, et al. Standardization of anatomic liver resection based on Laennec’s capsule. Surg Gastroenterol Oncol 2020;25:57-66.
13. Kato Y, Sugioka A, Uyama I. Robotic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma:a focus on anatomic resection. Hepatoma Res 2021;7:10.
14. Lee JH, Han DH, Jang DS, Choi GH, Choi JS. Robotic extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle approach for anatomic liver resection in the right liver: techniques and perioperative outcomes. Surg Endosc 2016;30:3882-8.
15. Kato Y, Sugioka A, Kojima M, et al. Initial experience with robotic liver resection: audit of 120 consecutive cases at a single center and comparison with open and laparoscopic approaches. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2023;30:72-90.
16. Makuuchi M, Kosuge T, Takayama T, et al. Surgery for small liver cancers. Semin Surg Oncol 1993;9:298-304.
17. Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. The general rules for the clinical and pathological study of primary liver cancer. Jan J Surg 1989;19:98-129.
18. Strasberg SM, Belghetti J, Clavien PA, et al. The Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB 2000;2:333-9.
19. Couinaud C. Le foie: etudes anatomiques et chirurgicales. Paris: Masson; 1957.
20. Sugioka A, Kato Y, Tanahashi Y. Systematic extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle isolation for anatomical liver resection based on Laennec’s capsule: proposal of a novel comprehensive surgical anatomy of the liver. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2017;24:17-23.
21. Kato Y, Sugioka A, Tanahashi Y, et al. Standardization of isolated caudate lobectomy by extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle isolation and HV root-at first one-way resection based on Laennec’s capsule:open and laparoscopic approaches. Surg Gastroenterol Oncol 2020;25:89-92.
22. Wakabayashi G. What has changed after the Morioka consensus conference 2014 on laparoscopic liver resection? Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2016;5:281-9.
23. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-13.
24. Takahara T, Wakabayashi G, Beppu T, et al. Long-term and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with propensity score matching:a multi-institutional Japanese study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2015;22:721-7.
25. Tozzi F, Berardi G, Vierstraete M, et al. Laparoscopic versus open approach for formal right and left hepatectomy: a propensity score matching analysis. World J Surg 2018;42:2627-34.
26. Untereiner X, Cagniet A, Memeo R, et al. Laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparative study using a propensity score matching. World J Surg 2019;43:615-25.
27. Tsung A, Geller DA, Sukato DC, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison. Ann Surg 2014;259:549-55.
28. Fruscione M, Pickens R, Baker EH, et al. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic major liver resection:analysis of outcomes from a single center. HPB 2019;21:906-11.
29. Lim C, Salloum C, Tudisco A, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes after robotic and laparoscopic liver resection for malignancies: a propensity score-matched study. World J Surg 2019;43:1594-1603.
30. Kadam P, Sutcliffe RP, Scatton O, et al. An international multicenter propensity-score matched and coarsened-exact matched analysis comparing robotic versus laparoscopic partial liver resections of the anterolateral segments. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2022;29:843-54.
31. Sucandy I, Rayman S, Lai EC, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic left and extended left hepatectomy: an international multicenter study propensity score-matched analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2022;29:8398-406.
32. Chong CC, Fuks D, Lee KF, et al. Propensity score-matched analysis comparing robotic and laparoscopic right and extended right hepatectomy. JAMA Surg 2022;157:436-44.
