REFERENCES

1. GLOBOCAN 2020. Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/cancers/30-Bladder-fact-sheet.pdf. [Last accessed on 9 Jun 2021].

2. Mossanen M, Gore JL. The burden of bladder cancer care: direct and indirect costs. Curr Opin Urol 2014;24:487-91.

3. Leal J, Luengo-Fernandez R, Sullivan R, Witjes AJ. Economic burden of bladder cancer across the European Union. Eur Urol 2016;69:438-47.

4. Richters A, Aben KKH, Kiemeney LALM. The global burden of urinary bladder cancer: an update. World J Urol 2020;38:1895-904.

5. Marshall VF, Whitmore WF Jr. A technique for the extension of radical surgery in the treatment of vesical cancer. Cancer 1949;2:424-8.

6. Guru KA, Perlmutter AE, Butt ZM, et al. The learning curve for robot-assisted radical cystectomy. JSLS 2009;13:509-14.

7. Yuh B, Wilson T, Bochner B, et al. Systematic review and cumulative analysis of oncologic and functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy. Eur Urol 2015;67:402-22.

8. Rai BP, Bondad J, Vasdev N, et al. Robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;4:CD011903.

9. Walsh PC, Donker PJ. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol 1982;128:492-7.

10. Dovey ZS, Tewari AK. Anatomical robotic prostatectomy: technical factors to achieve superb continence and erectile function. Transl Androl Urol 2020;9:887-97.

11. Tewari AK, Srivastava A, Huang MW, et al. Anatomical grades of nerve sparing: a risk-stratified approach to neural-hammock sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). BJU Int 2011;108:984-92.

12. Collins JW, Tyritzis S, Nyberg T, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: description of an evolved approach to radical cystectomy. Eur Urol 2013;64:654-63.

13. Kessler TM, Burkhard FC, Perimenis P. Attempted nerve sparing surgery and age have a significant effect on urinary continence and erectile function after radical cystoprostatectomy and ileal orthotopic bladder substitution. J Urol 2004;172:1323-7.

14. Dotan ZA, Kavanagh K, Yossepowitch O, et al. Positive surgical margins in soft tissue following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer and cancer specific survival. J Urol 2007;178:2308-12.

15. Huang J, Fan X, Dong W. Current status of laparoscopic and robot-assisted nerve-sparing radical cystectomy in male patients. Asian J Urol 2016;3:150-5.

16. Qu LG, Lawrentschuk N. Orthotopic neobladder reconstruction: patient selection and perspectives. Res Rep Urol 2019;11:333-41.

17. Asimakopoulos AD, Campagna A, Gakis G, et al. Nerve sparing, robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal bladder substitution in the male. J Urol 2016;196:1549-57.

18. Colombo R, Pellucchi F, Moschini M, et al. Fifteen-year single-centre experience with three different surgical procedures of nerve-sparing cystectomy in selected organ-confined bladder cancer patients. World J Urol 2015;33:1389-95.

19. Jacobs BL, Daignault S, Lee CT, et al. Prostate capsule sparing versus nerve sparing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: results of a randomized, controlled trial. J Urol 2015;193:64-70.

20. Ong CH, Schmitt M, Thalmann GN, Studer UE. Individualized seminal vesicle sparing cystoprostatectomy combined with ileal orthotopic bladder substitution achieves good functional results. J Urol 2010;183:1337-41.

21. Balbay MD, Canda AE, Kiremit MC, Koseoglu E. Intracorporeal studer pouch formation with Balbay's technique following robotic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: experience with 22 cases with oncologic and functional outcomes. J Endourol 2020;34:273-80.

22. Gok B, Atmaca AF, Canda AE, et al. Robotic radical cystectomy with intracorporeal studer pouch formation for bladder cancer: experience in ninety-eight cases. J Endourol 2019;33:375-82.

23. Liu XJ, Liu TY, Xie SX, et al. Nerve-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: clinical application and effect. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 2019;25:797-801.

24. Zarranz JE, Busto L, Crespo I, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic nerve sparing cystectomy. J Urol 2019;201:e675.

25. Kwon SY, Ha Y, Kim T, Kwon TG. Erectile function and long-term oncologic outcomes of nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical cystectomy: comparison with open radical cystectomy. Korean J Urol Oncol 2018;16:32-7.

26. Nyame YA, Zargar H, Ramirez D, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic bilateral nerve sparing and apex preserving cystoprostatectomy in young men with bladder cancer. Urology 2016;94:259-64.

27. Haberman K, Wittig K, Yuh B, et al. The effect of nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy on erectile function in a preoperatively potent population. J Endourol 2014;28:1352-6.

28. Menon M, Hemal AK, Tewari A, et al. Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion. BJU Int 2003;92:232-6.

29. Schwentner C, Sim A, Balbay MD, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy and intracorporeal neobladder formation: on the way to a standardized procedure. World J Surg Oncol 2015;13:3.

30. Krishnan J, Ganeshan V, Autorino R, et al. The role of robotic cysto-prostatectomy with bilateral nerve and apex preservation in young patients with bladder cancer. J Urol 2014;191:e909.

31. Rey D, Helou E, Oderda M, Lopez L, Piechaud PT. Robotic cystoprostatectomy with nerve-sparing approach and intracorporeal construction of Hautmann neobladder: Saint Augustin technique. Eur Urol Suppl 2013;12:eV26.

32. Boc A, Pop CD, Crisan N, Mihaly ZA, Coman I. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal ileal neobladder-initial experience. Eur Urol Suppl 2013;12:e1179.

33. Jonsson MN, Adding LC, Hosseini A, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder Eur Urol 2011;60:1066-73.

34. Akbulut Z, Canda AE, Ozcan MF, Atmaca AF, Ozdemir AT, Balbay MD. Robot-assisted laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical cystoprostatectomy with bilateral extended lymph node dissection and intracorporeal Studer pouch construction: outcomes of first 12 cases. J Endourol 2011;25:1469-79.

35. Palou J, Gaya JM, Gausa L, et al. Robotic assisted bilateral nerve sparing cystoprostatectomy combined with ileal orthotopic bladder substitution achieves good functional results. Eur Urol 2010;9:511.

36. Murphy DG, Challacombe BJ, Elhage O, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy with extracorporeal urinary diversion: initial experience. Eur Urol 2008;54:570-80.

37. Mottrie A, Carpentier P, Schatteman P, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: initial experience on 27 consecutive patients. J Robot Surg 2007;1:197-201.

38. Tyritzis SI, Hosseini A, Collins J, et al. Oncologic, functional, and complications outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with totally intracorporeal neobladder diversion. Eur Urol 2013;64:734-41.

39. Palou J, Magana JD, Gausa L, et al. Robotic assisted bilateral nerve sparing cystoprostatectomy. Eur Urol 2017;16:e2401.

40. Canda AE, Atmaca AF, Altinova S, Akbulut Z, Balbay MD. Robot-assisted nerve-sparing radical cystectomy with bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) and intracorporeal urinary diversion for bladder cancer: initial experience in 27 cases. BJU Int 2012;110:434-44.

41. Smith AB, Raynor M, Amling CL, et al. Multi-institutional analysis of robotic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative outcomes and complications in 227 patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2012;22:17-21.

42. Elsayed AS, Gibson S, Jing Z, et al. Rates and patterns of recurrences and survival outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the international robotic cystectomy consortium. J Urol 2021;205:407-13.

43. Chessa F, Möller A, Collins J, et al. Oncologic outcomes of patients with incidental prostate cancer who underwent RARC: a comparison between nerve sparing and non-nerve sparing approach. J Robot Surg 2021;15:105-14.

44. Thomsen T, Villebro N, Møller AM. Interventions for preoperative smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014:CD002294.

45. Minnella EM, Awasthi R, Bousquet-Dion G, et al. Multimodal prehabilitation to enhance functional capacity following radical cystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Urol Focus 2021;7:132-8.

46. Aoun F, Peltier A, van Velthoven R. Penile rehabilitation after pelvic cancer surgery. ScientificWorldJournal 2015;2015:876046.

47. Guercio C, Mehta A. Predictors of patient and partner satisfaction following radical prostatectomy. Sex Med Rev 2018;6:295-301.

48. Masri S, Sassone-Corsi P. The emerging link between cancer, metabolism, and circadian rhythms. Nat Med 2018;24:1795-803.

49. Muñoz-rodríguez J, Hannaoui N, Domínguez A, et al. Impact of the baseline study with penile doppler ultrasound in patients with prostate cancer before radical prostatectomy. Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) 2019;43:84-90.

50. Zhang YG, Song QX, Song B, Zhang DL, Zhang W, Wang JY. Diagnosis and treatment of urinary incontinence after orthotopic ileal neobladder in China. Chin Med J (Engl) 2017;130:231-5.

51. Rogers CG, Trock BP, Walsh PC. Preservation of accessory pudendal arteries during radical retropubic prostatectomy: surgical technique and results. Urology 2004;64:148-51.

52. Patel VR, Samavedi S, Bates AS, et al. Dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane allograft nerve wrap around the prostatic neurovascular bundle accelerates early return to continence and potency following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: propensity score-matched analysis. Eur Urol 2015;67:977-80.

53. Reece JC, Dangerfield DC, Coombs CJ. End-to-side somatic-to-autonomic nerve grafting to restore erectile function and improve quality of life after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2019;76:189-96.

Mini-invasive Surgery
ISSN 2574-1225 (Online)
Follow Us

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/