REFERENCES
2. EAU Guidelines. EAU annual congress Amsterdam 2020. EAU Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands. Available from: http://uroweb.org/guidelines/compilations-of-all-guidelines/ [Last accessed on 30 Jun 2021].
3. Abufaraj M, Foerster B, Schernhammer E, et al. Micropapillary urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of disease characteristics and treatment outcomes. Eur Urol 2019;75:649-58.
4. Mungan N, Aben KK, Schoenberg MP, et al. Gender differences in stage-adjusted bladder cancer survival. Urology 2000;55:876-80.
5. Sadighian M, Porten S. Gender differences in oncologic and functional outcomes in patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy with urinary diversion. Curr Opin Urol 2019;29:542-7.
6. Faba OR, Tyson MD, Artibani W, et al. Update of the ICUD-SIU international consultation on bladder cancer 2018: urinary diversion. World J Urol 2019;37:85-93.
7. Hussein AA, Elsayed AS, Aldhaam NA, et al. A comparative propensity score-matched analysis of perioperative outcomes of intracorporeal vs extracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. BJU Int 2020;126:265-72.
8. Cacciamani GE, Rajarubendra N, Artibani W, Gill IS. Robotic intracorporeal urinary diversion: state of the art. Curr Opin Urol 2019;29:293-300.
9. Bochner BH, Dalbagni G, Marzouk KH, et al. Randomized trial comparing open radical cystectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: oncologic outcomes. Eur Urol 2018;74:465-71.
10. Parekh DJ, Reis IM, Castle EP, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer (RAZOR): an open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2018;391:2525-36.
11. Ahmed K, Khan SA, Hayn MH, et al. Analysis of intracorporeal compared with extracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. Eur Urol 2014;65:340-7.
12. Benamran D, Phé V, Drouin SJ, et al. Functional outcomes obtained with intracorporeal neobladder after robotic radical cystectomy for cancer: a narrative review. J Robot Surg 2020;14:813-20.
13. Tuderti G, Mastroianni R, Flammia S, et al. Sex-sparing robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal padua ileal neobladder in female: surgical technique, perioperative, oncologic and functional outcomes. J Clin Med 2020;9:577.
14. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:e1-34.
15. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 2009;250:187-96.
16. Kang SG, Kang SH, Lee YG, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: a multi-institutional study from Korea. J Endourol 2010;24:1435-40.
17. Whittum M, Hussein AA, Ahmed YE, et al. Gynecological organ involvement at robot-assisted radical cystectomy in females: is anterior exenteration necessary? Can Urol Assoc J ;2018:E398-402.
18. Narayan VM, Seif MA, Lim AH, et al. Radical cystectomy in women: Impact of the robot-assisted versus open approach on surgical outcomes. Urol Oncol 2020;38:247-54.
19. Pruthi RS, Stefaniak H, Hubbard JS, Wallen EM. Robotic anterior pelvic exenteration for bladder cancer in the female: outcomes and comparisons to their male counterparts. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2009;19:23-7.
20. Kaufmann OG, Young JL, Sountoulides P, Kaplan AG, Dash A, Ornstein DK. Robotic radical anterior pelvic exenteration: the UCI experience. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2011;20:240-6.
21. Canda AE, Atmaca AF, Altinova S, Akbulut Z, Balbay MD. Robot-assisted nerve-sparing radical cystectomy with bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) and intracorporeal urinary diversion for bladder cancer: initial experience in 27 cases. BJU Int 2012;110:434-44.
22. Tyritzis SI, Hosseini A, Collins J, et al. Oncologic, functional, and complications outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with totally intracorporeal neobladder diversion. Eur Urol 2013;64:734-41.
23. Uhlig A, Seif Amir Hosseini A, Simon J, et al. Gender specific differences in disease-free, cancer specific and overall survival after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol 2018;200:48-60.
24. Hanna N, Leow JJ, Sun M, et al. Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted vs. open radical cystectomy. Urol Oncol 2018;36:88.e1-9.
25. Borza T, Jacobs BL, Montgomery JS, et al. No differences in population-based readmissions after open and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy: implications for post-discharge care. Urology 2017;104:77-83.
26. Sharma P, Zargar-Shoshtari K, Poch MA, et al. Surgical control and margin status after robotic and open cystectomy in high-risk cases: caution or equivalence? World J Urol 2017;35:657-63.
27. Matulewicz RS, DeLancey JO, Manjunath A, Tse J, Kundu SD, Meeks JJ. National comparison of oncologic quality indicators between open and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy. Urol Oncol 2016;34:431.e9-431.e15.
28. Hu JC, Chughtai B, O'Malley P, et al. Perioperative outcomes, health care costs, and survival after robotic-assisted versus open radical cystectomy: a national comparative effectiveness study. Eur Urol 2016;70:195-202.
29. Yu HY, Hevelone ND, Lipsitz SR, et al. Comparative analysis of outcomes and costs following open radical cystectomy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: results from the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Eur Urol 2012;61:1239-44.
30. Soria F, Moschini M, D'andrea D, et al. Comparative effectiveness in perioperative outcomes of robotic versus open radical cystectomy: results from a multicenter contemporary retrospective cohort study. Eur Urol Focus 2020;6:1233-9.
31. Cusano A, Haddock P Jr, Jackson M, Staff I, Wagner J, Meraney A. A comparison of preliminary oncologic outcome and postoperative complications between patients undergoing either open or robotic radical cystectomy. Int Braz J Urol 2016;42:663-70.
32. Bak DJ, Lee YJ, Woo MJ, et al. Complications and oncologic outcomes following robot-assisted radical cystectomy: what is the real benefit? Investig Clin Urol 2016;57:260-7.
33. Gandaglia G, Karl A, Novara G, et al. Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted vs. open radical cystectomy in bladder cancer patients: a comparison of two high-volume referral centers. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016;42:1736-43.
34. Tan WS, Sridhar A, Ellis G, et al. Analysis of open and intracorporeal robotic assisted radical cystectomy shows no significant difference in recurrence patterns and oncological outcomes. Urol Oncol 2016;34:257.e1-9.
35. Wang MS, He QB, Yang FY, Ping H, Xing NZ. A retrospective study comparing surgical and early oncological outcomes between intracorporeal and extracorporeal ileal conduit after laparoscopic radical cystectomy from a single center. Chin Med J (Engl) 2018;131:784-9.
36. Pyun JH, Kim HK, Cho S, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with total intracorporeal urinary diversion: comparative analysis with extracorporeal urinary diversion. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2016;26:349-55.
37. Guru K, Seixas-Mikelus SA, Hussain A, et al. Robot-assisted intracorporeal ileal conduit: marionette technique and initial experience at Roswell park cancer institute. Urology 2010;76:866-71.
38. Lenfant L, Verhoest G, Campi R, et al. Perioperative outcomes and complications of intracorporeal vs extracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a real-life, multi-institutional french study. World J Urol 2018;36:1711-8.
39. Mancini M, Righetto M, Baggio G. Spotlight on gender-specific disparities in bladder cancer. Urologia 2020;87:103-14.
40. Tan WS, Lamb BW, Tan MY, et al. In-depth critical analysis of complications following robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion. Eur Urol Focus 2017;3:273-9.
41. Hussein AA, Hashmi Z, Dibaj S, et al. Reoperations following robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a decade of experience. J Urol 2016;195:1368-76.
42. Al-Daghmin A, Aboumohamed A, Din R, et al. Readmission after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: outcomes and predictors at 90-day follow-up. Urology 2014;83:350-6.
43. Leow JJ, Reese SW, Jiang W, et al. Propensity-matched comparison of morbidity and costs of open and robot-assisted radical cystectomies: a contemporary population-based analysis in the United States. Eur Urol 2014;66:569-76.
44. Kanno T, Ito K, Sawada A, et al. Complications and reoperations after laparoscopic radical cystectomy in a Japanese multicenter cohort. Int J Urol 2019;26:493-8.
45. Cronin B, Sung VW, Matteson KA. Vaginal cuff dehiscence: risk factors and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:284-8.
46. Lin FC, Medendorp A, Van Kuiken M, Mills SA, Tarnay CM. Vaginal dehiscence and evisceration after robotic-assisted radical cystectomy: a case series and review of the literature. Urology 2019;134:90-6.
47. Smith AB, Crowell K, Woods ME, et al. Functional outcomes following radical cystectomy in women with bladder cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol Focus 2017;3:136-43.
48. Zahran MH, Fahmy O, El-Hefnawy AS, Ali-El-Dein B. Female sexual dysfunction post radical cystectomy and urinary diversion. Climacteric 2016;19:546-50.
49. Veskimäe E, Neuzillet Y, Rouanne M, et al. Systematic review of the oncological and functional outcomes of pelvic organ-preserving radical cystectomy (RC) compared with standard RC in women who undergo curative surgery and orthotopic neobladder substitution for bladder cancer. BJU Int 2017;120:12-24.
50. Quesada-Olarte J, Álvarez-Maestro M, Gómez-Rivas J, Toribio-Vázquez C, Aguilera Bazán A, Martínez-Piñeiro L. Organ-sparing cystectomy techniques: functional and oncological outcomes, review and current recommendations. Arch Esp Urol 2020;73:961-70.
51. Gross T, Furrer M, Schorno P, et al. Reproductive organ-sparing cystectomy significantly improves continence in women after orthotopic bladder substitution without affecting oncological outcome. BJU Int 2018;122:227-35.
52. Wishahi M, Ismail MA, Elganzoury H, et al. Genital-sparing cystectomy versus standard urethral-sparing cystectomy followed with orthotopic neobladder in women with bladder cancer: incidence and causes of hypercontinence with an ultrastructure study of urethral smooth muscles. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2019;7:978-81.
53. Bhatt A, Nandipati K, Dhar N, et al. Neurovascular preservation in orthotopic cystectomy: impact on female sexual function. Urology 2006;67:742-5.
54. Siracusano S, D'Elia C, Cerruto MA, et al. Quality of life in patients with bladder cancer undergoing ileal conduit: a comparison of women versus men. In Vivo 2018;32:139-43.
