REFERENCES

1. Sarsam MA, Yacoub M. Remodeling of the aortic valve anulus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;105:435-8.

2. David TE, Feindel CM. An aortic valve-sparing operation for patients with aortic incompetence and aneurysm of the ascending aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992;103:617-21.

3. Bierbach BO, Aicher D, Issa OA, et al. Aortic root and cusp configuration determine aortic valve function. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;38:400-6.

4. Holubec T, Žáček P, Tuna M, et al. Aortic valve repair in patients with aortic regurgitation: experience with the first 100 cases. Cor Vasa. 2013;55:e479-86.

5. Oechtering TH, Hons CF, Sieren M, et al. Time-resolved 3-dimensional magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging (4D Flow MRI) analysis of hemodynamics in valve-sparing aortic root repair with an anatomically shaped sinus prosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152:418-427.e1.

6. Robicsek F. Leonardo da Vinci and the sinuses of Valsalva. Ann Thorac Surg. 1991;52:328-35.

7. Thubrikar M, Piepgrass WC, Shaner TW, Nolan SP. The design of the normal aortic valve. Am J Physiol. 1981;241:H795-801.

8. Kunzelman KS, Grande K, David TE, Cochran R, Verrier ED. Aortic root and valve relationships: impact on surgical repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;107:162-70.

9. Robicsek F, Thubrikar MJ, Fokin AA. Cause of degenerative disease of the trileaflet aortic valve: review of subject and presentation of a new theory. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:1346-54.

10. Robicsek F, Thubrikar MJ, Cook JW, Fowler B. The congenitally bicuspid aortic valve: how does it function? Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:177-85.

11. Robicsek F, Thubrikar MJ. Mechanical stress as cause of aortic valve disease. Presentation of a new aortic root prosthesis. Acta Chir Belg. 2002;102:1-6.

12. Thubrikar M, Bosher LP, Nolan SP. The mechanism of opening of the aortic valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1979;77:863-70.

13. El-Nashar H, Sabry M, Tseng YT, et al. Multiscale structure and function of the aortic valve apparatus. Physiol Rev. 2024;104:1487-532.

14. Rizzi S, Ragazzini S, Pesce M. Engineering efforts to refine compatibility and duration of aortic valve replacements: an overview of previous expectations and new promises. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:863136.

15. Ho SY. Structure and anatomy of the aortic root. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009;10:i3-10.

16. Vesely I. The role of elastin in aortic valve mechanics. J Biomech. 1998;31:115-23.

17. Choo SJ, McRae G, Olomon JP, et al. Aortic root geometry: pattern of differences between leaflets and sinuses of Valsalva. J Heart Valve Dis. 1999;8:407-15.

18. Charitos EI, Sievers HH. Anatomy of the aortic root: implications for valve-sparing surgery. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;2:53-6.

19. Sievers HH, Hemmer W, Beyersdorf F, et al.; Working Group for Aortic Valve Surgery of German Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. The everyday used nomenclature of the aortic root components: the tower of Babel? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;41:478-82.

20. Giebels C, Ehrlich T, Schäfers HJ. Aortic root remodeling. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2023;12:369-76.

21. Boodhwani M, El Khoury G. Aortic valve repair. Oper Tech Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;14:266-80.

22. Van Dyck M, Glineur D, de Kerchove L, El Khoury G. Complications after aortic valve repair and valve-sparing procedures. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;2:130-9.

23. le Polain de Waroux JB, Pouleur AC, Robert A, et al. Mechanisms of recurrent aortic regurgitation after aortic valve repair: predictive value of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:931-9.

24. Schäfers HJ, Bierbach B, Aicher D. A new approach to the assessment of aortic cusp geometry. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;132:436-8.

25. Kunihara T, Aicher D, Rodionycheva S, et al. Preoperative aortic root geometry and postoperative cusp configuration primarily determine long-term outcome after valve-preserving aortic root repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143:1389-95.e1.

26. Marom G, Haj-Ali R, Rosenfeld M, Schäfers HJ, Raanani E. Aortic root numeric model: correlation between intraoperative effective height and diastolic coaptation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145:303-4.

27. Grande-Allen KJ, Cochran RP, Reinhall PG, Kunzelman KS. Mechanisms of aortic valve incompetence: finite-element modeling of Marfan syndrome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122:946-54.

28. Weltert L, de Tullio MD, Afferrante L, et al. Annular dilatation and loss of sino-tubular junction in aneurysmatic aorta: implications on leaflet quality at the time of surgery. A finite element study. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013;17:8-12.

29. Marom G, Weltert LP, Raanani E, et al. Systematic adjustment of root dimensions to cusp size in aortic valve repair: a computer simulation. Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2024;38:ivae024.

30. Jahanyar J, Tsai PI, Arabkhani B, et al. Functional and pathomorphological anatomy of the aortic valve and root for aortic valve sparing surgery in tricuspid and bicuspid aortic valves. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2023;12:179-93.

31. Salica A, Pisani G, Morbiducci U, et al. The combined role of sinuses of Valsalva and flow pulsatility improves energy loss of the aortic valve. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;49:1222-7.

32. Pisani G, Scaffa R, Ieropoli O, et al. Role of the sinuses of Valsalva on the opening of the aortic valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145:999-1003.

33. Reul H, Vahlbruch A, Giersiepen M, Schmitz-Rode T, Hirtz V, Effert S. The geometry of the aortic root in health, at valve disease and after valve replacement. J Biomech. 1990;23:181-91.

34. Soncini M, Votta E, Zinicchino S, et al. Finite element simulations of the physiological aortic root and valve sparing corrections. J Mech Med Biol. 2006;6:91-9.

35. Weinberg EJ, Kaazempur Mofrad MR. Transient, three-dimensional, multiscale simulations of the human aortic valve. Cardiovasc Eng. 2007;7:140-55.

36. Chandra S, Rajamannan NM, Sucosky P. Computational assessment of bicuspid aortic valve wall-shear stress: implications for calcific aortic valve disease. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2012;11:1085-96.

37. Kaiser AD, Shad R, Schiavone N, Hiesinger W, Marsden AL. Controlled comparison of simulated hemodynamics across tricuspid and bicuspid aortic valves. Ann Biomed Eng. 2022;50:1053-72.

38. Guo Z, Dong NJ, Litt H, et al. Towards patient-specific surgical planning for bicuspid aortic valve repair: fully automated segmentation of the aortic valve in 4D CT. In: 2025 IEEE 22nd International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI); 2025 April 14-17; Houston, TX, USA. IEEE; 2025. pp. 1-5.

39. Boodhwani M, El Khoury G. Aortic valve repair: indications and outcomes. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014;16:490.

40. Zeeshan A, Idrees JJ, Johnston DR, et al. Durability of aortic valve cusp repair with and without annular support. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;105:739-48.

41. Ehrlich T, de Kerchove L, Vojacek J, et al. State-of-the art bicuspid aortic valve repair in 2020. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2020;63:457-64.

42. De Paulis R, Chirichilli I, de Kerchove L, et al. Current status of aortic valve repair surgery. Eur Heart J. 2025;46:1394-411.

43. Mastrobuoni S, Govers PJ, Veen KM, et al. Valve-sparing aortic root replacement using the reimplantation (David) technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis on survival and clinical outcome. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2023;12:149-58.