REFERENCES
1. Marrero JA, Kulik LM, Sirlin CB, et al. Diagnosis, staging, and management of hepatocellular carcinoma: 2018 practice guidance by the american association for the study of liver diseases. Hepatology 2018;68:723-50.
2. American College of Radiology Committee on LI-RADS® (Liver). The LI-RADS® v2018 Manual.Available from: https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Clinical-Resources/LIRADS/LI-RADS-2018-Manual-5Dec18.pdf [Last accessed on 24 May 2023].
3. Chaudhry M, McGinty KA, Mervak B, et al. The LI-RADS version 2018 MRI treatment response algorithm: evaluation of ablated hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology 2020;294:320-6.
4. Shropshire EL, Chaudhry M, Miller CM, et al. LI-RADS treatment response algorithm: performance and diagnostic accuracy. Radiology 2019;292:226-34.
5. Seo N, Kim MS, Park MS, et al. Evaluation of treatment response in hepatocellular carcinoma in the explanted liver with liver imaging reporting and data system version 2017. Eur Radiol 2020;30:261-71.
6. Cools KS, Moon AM, Burke LMB, et al. Validation of the liver imaging reporting and data system treatment response criteria after thermal ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Transpl 2020;26:203-14.
7. Aslam A, Do R, Chernyak V, Mendiratta-Lala M. LI-RADS imaging criteria for HCC diagnosis and treatment: emerging evidence. Current Hepatology Reports 2020;19:437-47.
8. Goldberg SN, Gazelle GS, Compton CC, Mueller PR, Tanabe KK. Treatment of intrahepatic malignancy with radiofrequency ablation: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Cancer 2000;88:2452-63.
9. Aslam A, Do RKG, Kambadakone A, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma liver imaging reporting and data systems treatment response assessment: lessons learned and future directions. World J Hepatol 2020;12:738-53.
10. Voizard N, Cerny M, Assad A, et al. Assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma treatment response with LI-RADS: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging 2019;10:121.
11. Tian G, Yang S, Yuan J, et al. Comparative efficacy of treatment strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2018;8:e021269.
12. Brook OR, Thornton E, Mendiratta-Lala M, et al. CT imaging findings after stereotactic radiotherapy for liver tumors. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2015;2015:126245.
13. Riaz A, Kulik L, Lewandowski RJ, et al. Radiologic-pathologic correlation of hepatocellular carcinoma treated with internal radiation using yttrium-90 microspheres. Hepatology 2009;49:1185-93.
14. Zhang Y, Wang J, Li H, et al. Performance of LI-RADS version 2018 CT treatment response algorithm in tumor response evaluation and survival prediction of patients with single hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation. Ann Transl Med 2020;8:388.
15. Ormiston WEL, Yarmohammadi H, Lobaugh S, et al. Post-treatment CT LI-RADS categories: predictors of overall survival in hepatocellular carcinoma post bland transarterial embolization. Abdom Radiol 2021;46:3738-47.
16. Bartnik K, Podgórska J, Rosiak G, et al. Performance of initial LI-RADS 2018 treatment response in predicting survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma following TACE: a retrospective, single-center cohort study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2021;147:3673-83.
17. Bartnik K, Podgórska J, Rosiak G, Korzeniowski K, Rowiński O. Inter-observer agreement using the LI-RADS version 2018 CT treatment response algorithm in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with conventional transarterial chemoembolization. Abdom Radiol 2022;47:115-22.
18. Gupta P, Bansal A, Das GC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of liver imaging reporting and data system locoregional treatment response criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2021;31:7725-33.
19. Kierans AS, Najjar M, Dutruel SP, et al. Evaluation of the LI-RADS treatment response algorithm in hepatocellular carcinoma after trans-arterial chemoembolization. Clin Imaging 2021;80:117-22.
20. Park S, Joo I, Lee DH, et al. Diagnostic performance of LI-RADS treatment response algorithm for hepatocellular carcinoma: adding ancillary features to MRI Compared with enhancement patterns at CT and MRI. Radiology 2020;296:554-61.
21. Huh YJ, Kim DH, Kim B, Choi JI, Rha SE. Per-feature accuracy of liver imaging reporting and data system locoregional treatment response algorithm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancers 2021;13:4432.
22. Jiao Y, Cao F, Liu H. Radiation-induced cell death and its mechanisms. Health Phys 2022;123:376-86.
23. Salem R, Johnson GE, Kim E, et al. Yttrium-90 radioembolization for the treatment of solitary, unresectable HCC: the LEGACY study. Hepatology 2021;74:2342-52.
24. Mathew AS, Atenafu EG, Owen D, et al. Long term outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma without macrovascular invasion. Eur J Cancer 2020;134:41-51.
25. Schaub SK, Hartvigson PE, Lock MI, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: current trends and controversies. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2018;17:1533033818790217.
26. Mastrocostas K, Fischer S, Munoz-Schuffenegger P, et al. Radiological tumor response and histopathological correlation of hepatocellular carcinoma treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy as a bridge to liver transplantation. Abdom Radiol 2021;46:1572-85.
27. Reig M, Forner A, Rimola J, et al. BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendation: the 2022 update. J Hepatol 2022;76:681-93.
28. Mendiratta-Lala M, Masch W, Owen D, et al. Natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma after stereotactic body radiation therapy. Abdom Radiol 2020;45:3698-708.
29. Mendiratta-Lala M, Aslam A, Maturen KE, et al. LI-RADS treatment response algorithm: performance and diagnostic accuracy with radiologic-pathologic explant correlation in patients with SBRT-treated hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022;112:704-14.
30. Keppke AL, Salem R, Reddy D, et al. Imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma after treatment with yttrium-90 microspheres. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:768-75.
31. King MJ, Tong A, Dane B, Huang C, Zhan C, Shanbhogue K. Response assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma treated with yttrium-90 radioembolization: inter-reader variability, comparison with 3D quantitative approach, and role in the prediction of clinical outcomes. Eur J Radiol 2020;133:109351.
32. Vietti Violi N, Gnerre J, Law A, et al. Assessment of HCC response to Yttrium-90 radioembolization with gadoxetate disodium MRI: correlation with histopathology. Eur Radiol 2022;32:6493-503.
33. Kim SW, Joo I, Kim HC, et al. LI-RADS treatment response categorization on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI: diagnostic performance compared to mRECIST and added value of ancillary features. Eur Radiol 2020;30:2861-70.
34. Kim YY, Kim MJ, Yoon JK, Shin J, Roh YH. Incorporation of ancillary mri features into the LI-RADS treatment response algorithm: impact on diagnostic performance after locoregional treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2022;218:484-93.
35. Yu JS, Kim JH, Chung JJ, Kim KW. Added value of diffusion-weighted imaging in the MRI assessment of perilesional tumor recurrence after chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;30:153-60.
36. Meloni MF, Goldberg SN, Livraghi T, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma treated with radiofrequency ablation: comparison of pulse inversion contrast-enhanced harmonic sonography, contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography, and helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:375-80.
37. Choi D, Lim HK, Lee WJ, et al. Early assessment of the therapeutic response to radio frequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: utility of gray scale harmonic ultrasonography with a microbubble contrast agent. J Ultrasound Med 2003;22:1163-72.
38. Kim CK, Choi D, Lim HK, et al. Therapeutic response assessment of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: utility of contrast-enhanced agent detection imaging. Eur J Radiol 2005;56:66-73.
39. Hai Y, Savsani E, Chong W, Eisenbrey J, Lyshchik A. Meta-analysis and systematic review of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in evaluating the treatment response after locoregional therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Radiol 2021;46:5162-79.
40. Salvaggio G, Campisi A, Lo Greco V, et al. Evaluation of posttreatment response of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of ultrasonography with second-generation ultrasound contrast agent and multidetector CT. Abdom Imaging 2010;35:447-53.
41. Liu M, Lin MX, Lu MD, et al. Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced computed tomography in evaluating the treatment response to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma using modified RECIST. Eur Radiol 2015;25:2502-11.
42. Pregler B, Beyer LP, Wiesinger I, et al. Microwave ablation of large HCC lesions: added value of CEUS examinations for ablation success control. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2016;64:483-90.
43. Qu P, Yu X, Liang P, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the characterization of hepatocellular carcinomas treated by ablation: comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 2013;39:1571-9.
44. Dioguardi Burgio M, Sartoris R, Libotean C, et al. Lipiodol retention pattern after TACE for HCC is a predictor for local progression in lesions with complete response. Cancer Imaging 2019;19:75.
45. Kim DY, Ryu HJ, Choi JY, et al. Radiological response predicts survival following transarterial chemoembolisation in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012;35:1343-50.
