Download PDF
Original Article  |  Open Access  |  17 Oct 2018

Endolymphatic immunotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: an update of our experience

Views: 2967 |  Downloads: 773 |  Cited:   0
Hepatoma Res 2018;4:67.
10.20517/2394-5079.2018.88 |  © The Author(s) 2018.
Author Information
Article Notes
Cite This Article


Aim: We report an update of our experience on endolymphatic immunotherapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) not eligible for surgery.

Methods: From 2003 to 2009 we enrolled 39 patients with advanced HCC not suitable for surgery. Patients underwent monthly endolymphatic injections of 1.5 × 106-3.0 × 106 IL-2-activated peripheral autologous lymphocytes and 250U of IL-2. Blood biochemistry every 3 months and imaging studies every 6 months were performed. Evaluation of the results was done according to clinical and pathological characters mainly including etiology, Child-Pugh class, size and number of lesions, α-fetoprotein, lymphadenopathy, vascular invasion, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours criteria for tumour burden, biochemical parameters and survival rates.

Results: Ten patients completed 12 therapy cycles, 6 received 6 infusions, 10 only 3-4 injection and 13 patients received less than 3 injections and where considered not suitable for evaluation. No clinically significant adverse reactions occurred. Imaging studies showed no significant decrease in tumour mass. Survival of treated patients was significantly higher with respect to control group (P < 0.0001). The 1-year survival was 0% in the control group vs. 50% in the treated group. In addition survival of patients who completed 12 therapy cycles appeared higher with respect to patients who underwent less than 6 cycles without reaching statistical significance due to the small number of patients. All patients with 12 completed cycles showed an improvement of 9 parameters or more.

Conclusion: Endolymphatic administration of immunotherapy appeared safe, easy to perform and effective in terms of survival. This study should encourage future large scale studies in order to reach a firmer conclusion and define uniform inclusion criteria.


Hepatocellular carcinoma, endolymphatic, immunotherapy, survival


Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common malignancy globally and the third leading cause of malignancy - related mortality worldwide. The incidence of HCC is still higher in some African and Eastern Asian regions. This cancer represents 3%-6% of all solid tumours in the USA and Europe[1,2]. Hepatitis B virus (HBV)/hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and alcohol abuse seem to be the main causes of the spread of HCC in Western countries[3]. Despite the established efficacy of screening programs for at-risk individuals, the diagnosis is usually performed at later stages of disease, wherein the tumour characteristics or liver disease progressions do not allow for curative therapeutic approach[4,5]. Many criteria have been proposed for the staging of HCC, combining different prognostic factors. The current treatment of HCC is based on the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification[6,7] including stages of the disease, macroscopic features of the lesion and liver function parameters as identified by Child-Pugh scoring system. Curative surgical treatment appears suitable in 30%-35% of all diagnosed cases[8,9], therefore much effort is directed towards new therapeutic agents. Encouraged by the good results obtained from treating metastatic renal cell carcinoma with immunotherapy[10], we offered the same procedure, with palliative intent, to patients with advanced disease who were not eligible either for hepatic resection or for percutaneous ablation based on BCLC classification obtaining interesting preliminary results[11] before approval of a new drug for treatment of HCC[12]. Sorafenib® is the only approved drug for patients with advanced HCC but has shown limited activity[13]. It acts as a multikinase inhibitor suppressing cell proliferation and angiogenesis. Recently it has been reported that other oncogenic targets may contribute to the anti-proliferative activity of the drug[14,15]. Herein we report the results of our pilot study in a cohort of patients with HCC in the pre-terminal stage who were not suitable for any curative interventions, before Sorafenib® - period.


From January 2003 to March 2009, 39 patients with advanced HCC were enrolled in our study. Among these, 26 underwent at least 3 cycles of immunotherapy, but only 16 who completed at least 6 cycles were able to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment. In 13 patients the treatment was interrupted before the third cycle because of local skin reaction (n = 1), early death (n = 2) and worsened clinical conditions (n = 10). An historical control group is represented of 15 patients with similar characteristics of advanced HCC who underwent standard therapy without immunotherapy. The protocol of the immunotherapy which was already reported by our group[11] consisted in monthly endolymphatic infusions of 1.5 × 106-3.0 × 106 autologous activated lymphocytes (LAK) and 250IU of IL-2. Lymphocytes were obtained through the centrifugation of 30 mL of the patients’ peripheral blood on a Ficoll-Hypaque gradient. The lymphocytes were then suspended in Roswell Park Memorial Institute-1640 (Sigma Aldrich, Germany) 2 × 106/mL and incubated with 20 U/mL of IL-2 at 37 °C for 72 h. After the incubation the cells were washed with saline solution and suspended in 5-10 mL of saline solution containing 250IU of IL-2.

Surgical procedure consisted of three steps. Firstly, the lymphatic vessels on the back of the foot was identified using the standard lymphographic technique (subcutaneous injection of violet patent blue between two finger). Then the main lymphatic was isolated and cannulated with a needle catheter (27G). A syringe containing the cells suspended in 5 saline mL with 250U of IL-2 was connected to a pump for micro-injections (0.5 mL/min): the infusion lasted 10-20 min. The patients were also i.m. administered with chlorphenamine maleate (GSK, Brantford, UK) and ranitidine (GSK, Brantford, UK) 1 h before the treatment, in order to block H1 and H2 lymphocytes receptors and reduce possible side effects.

For evaluating the impact of the treatment on the tumour mass we adopted Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours criteria, a well known simple and pragmatic methodology to evaluate the activity and efficacy of therapies towards tumours[16]. In addition every three months we evaluated 12 biochemical parameters on the peripheral venous blood of the patients, i.e., alanine-amino-transferase (ALT), aspartate-amino-transferase, gamma-glutamil-transferase (GGT), bilirubin (BIL), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), α-fetoprotein (AFP), platelets, white blood cells, total plasmatic proteins, albumin, prothrombin time, creatinine (Cr). The minimal acceptable response to the therapy was defined as an improvement of at least 7 of these biochemical parameters. Finally we compared the survival rate of the treated patient to that of the non-treated patients (control group).

The present study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the Helsinki Declaration (1964, amended most recently in 2008) of the World Medical Association. The local Institutional Review Board approved the use of the database for this retrospective review of the case files. Each patient provided written consent, and all patient information, including illustrations, were anonymous.

Statistical analysis

Data are represented as mean (range) for continuous variables and as n (%) for categorical variables. The χ2 test or Fisher’s test and the Student’s t test were used to analyse categorical and continuous variables.

Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. P-values < 0.05 were considered significant. Data were analysed using SPSS (version 15.0) (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).


In Table 1 are reported and compared the main clinical and pathological characteristics of treated patients and control group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups. Among the 26 patients enrolled in our study, ten patients completed 12 therapy cycles, six received 6 infusions and ten patients underwent only 3 or 4 procedures.

Table 1

Clinical and pathological characteristics of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Parameter Treated group (n = 26)Control group (n = 15)P
AgeMean 69 years (49-76)Mean 67 years (52-75)0.648
 > 60 years20 (77%)11 (73%)
 < 60 years6 (23%)4 (27%)
 Male 22 (85%)12 (80%)
 Female4 (15%)3 (20%)
 HCV 5 (19%)3 (20%)
 HBV 7 (27%)5 (33%)
 HCV + HBV4 (15%)2 (14%)
 Other10 (39%)5 (33%)
Liver 1.000
 No cirrhosis8 (31%)4 (27%)
 Cirrhosis18 (69%)11 (73%)
Child-Pugh 0.992
 A19 (73%)11 (73%)
 B5 (19%)3 (20%)
 C2 (8%)1 (7%)
 Yes7 (27%)5 (33%)
 No19 (73%)11(77%)
 Yes16 (61, 5%)11 (77%)
 No10 (38, 5%)4 (23%)
 < 200 ng/mL13 (50%)8 (53%)
 > 200 ng/mL13 (50%)7 (47%)
N. of HCC lesions1.000
 Single 2 (8%)1 (7%)
 Multiple24 (92%)14 (93%)
Tumor size0.644
 Single nodule6.3 cm × 5.5 cm; 7cm × 6.5 cm
 Multiple nodules7 cm × 5.5 cm5 cm (1-8 cm )
 (median, range) 5 cm (2-9 cm)
Lymph node positive1.000
 Yes5 (19%)3 (20%)
 No21 (81%)12 (80%)
 Yes8 (31%)4 (27%)
 No18 (69%)11(73%)
Previous liver resection1.000
 Yes 17 (65%)10 (67%)
 No9 (35%)5 (33%)
Portal vein infiltration e/or thrombi 1.000
 Yes 8 (31%)4 (27%)
 No18 (69%)11 (73%)
Caval thrombi 1.000
 Yes2 (8%)1 (7%)
 No24 (92%)14 (93%)

Twelve patients showed a partial response to the therapy that is amelioration of at least 7 out of 12 biochemical parameters considered [Figure 1]. Moreover, all the patients who completed the 12 cycles showed an improvement in 9 or more of the analysed parameters [Figure 1].

Endolymphatic immunotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: an update of our experience

Figure 1. Trend of biochemical parameters in treated patients with endolymphatic immunotherapy according with number of therapy cycles. Patients who completed 12 therapy cycles (red color) vs. patients with less than 6 cycles (blue colour)

All parameters, but ALP and GGT, either improved or remained stable in more than 50% of the cases [Figure 2].

Endolymphatic immunotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: an update of our experience

Figure 2. Percentage of improvement (green), stability (blue) o worsening (red) of biochemical parameters. AST: aspartate-amino-transferase; ALT: alanine-amino-transferase; ALP: alkaline phosphatase; GGT: gamma-glutamil-transferase; AFP: α-fetoprotein; WBC: white blood cells; PT: prothrombin time

The regression of the neoplastic mass was not evident at the imaging studies in neither group, but in the treated group we observed 34% of patients with stability after 12 cycles and 0% of stability in the other patients treated with ≤ 6 cycles of immunotherapy.

The survival rate was measured from the beginning of the therapy, and analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier curve. The difference between the treated group and the control group was calculated with log-rank test and found to be statistically significant (P < 0.0001). The 1-year survival was 0% in the control group vs. 50% in the treated group [Figure 3].

Endolymphatic immunotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: an update of our experience

Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (endolympahtic immunotherapy vs. control group) (P < 0.0001)

A striking difference (even though not statistically significant due to small numbers of the groups) can be noted between the group of patients who completed the 12 cycles and those with < 6 cycles; 1-year survival was 100% in the group that completed 12 cycles vs. 20% in patients with < 6 cycles of therapy [Figure 4].

Endolymphatic immunotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: an update of our experience

Figure 4. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma according to cycles of immunotherapy therapy and compared to control group (P = ns)

We compared the characteristics of patients on the basis of the therapy cycles (12 cycles or < 6 cycles) and observed that all ten patients who completed the 12 cycles were Child A and without vascular infiltration of portal vein and seven of them had a value of AFP < 200 ng/mL. However, we have to remark that hepatic reserve and tumor burden of HCC could be affecting the survival of the patients.

Among the remaining 16 patients (group ≤ 6 cycles), 11 were Child B and C, 8 showed vascular infiltration, 10 had a value of AFP > 200 ng/mL and 1 patient had bone metastases. These factors (Child B or C, AFP > 200 ng/mL, portal infiltration and the presence of extrahepatic malignancy) may be considered as poor prognostic factors but are necessary larger studies to define the exclusion criteria of the patients for endolymphatic immunotherapy.


HCC is a complex and heterogeneous tumor with multiple genetic aberrations. Several molecular pathways involved in the regulation of proliferation and cell death are implicated in the hepatocarcinogenesis in addition to major etiological factors, i.e., HBV and HCV virus infections. Continuous oxidative stress also due environmental factors or cellular mitochondrial dysfunction, have recently been associated with hepatocarcinogenesis[17,18]. At present time Sorafenib®, a multikinase inhibitor, represents the most promising therapeutic agent which has undergone extensive investigation up to phase III clinical trials in patients with advanced HCC. The combination with other target-based agents[14,15] could potentiate the clinical benefits obtained by Sorafenib®. Recently it has been reported that fasting had synergized with Sorafenib® in hampering HCC cell growth and glucose uptake[19]. Moreover, fasting could appear to normalize the expression levels of genes which are commonly altered by Sorafenib® in HCC cells. Thus, fasting or fasting-mimicking diet should be evaluated in preclinical studies for potentiating the activity of Sorafenib® in clinical use.

HCC patients are frequently cirrhotic with an associated deficiency of liver function that increases the toxicity of conventional chemotherapy, so immunotherapy could be considered a promising treatment option. Recent papers reporting clinical trials on immunotherapy for patients with advanced HCC mainly outlined the safety and feasibility of such therapeutic approach although the results were inconstant and not comparable[20,21]. The clinical results obtained by Onishi et al.[20] are very close to our own. Ten patients with HCC, three of whom had pulmonary metastasis, were treated with adoptive immunotherapy using autologous LAK cells plus recombinant IL-2. Patients received 15 μg per day of recombinant IL-2 consecutively (for 14 to 64 days), from day 7 prior to the first leukapheresis, and received 109 to 1010 LAK cells once or twice per week intravenously; the LAK cells had been generated from mononuclear cells obtained through leukapheresis. Previous administration of recombinant IL-2 prior to the first leukapheresis resulted in a remarkable increase of LAK activity in seven of nine cases in whom LAK activity had been poorly inducible even at high concentrations of recombinant IL-2. At the end of the treatment, liver tumor regression (34% and 63%, respectively, of two‐dimensional size) was observed in two of two patients with a solitary tumor; no increase of liver tumor size was observed in seven patients with massive or multiple tumors, and no changes in the size or number of pulmonary metastatic tumors in any patients were observed. A decrease of more than 35% in serum α‐fetoprotein level was noted in four of nine α‐fetoprotein‐positive patients. However, child’s grades, performance status and LAK activity on entry into the study could not be used as parameters to predict therapy responsiveness. Neither serious side effects, significant changes of serum BIL, ALT nore Cr were noted. Thus, this treatment seems to be well tolerated even in advanced HCC with poor liver function reserve, and tumour regression could be expected in small‐burden HCC.

In our study we aimed to demonstrate the efficacy of immunotherapy administered by means of endolymphatic injections while in the literature few studies on advanced HCC treated with different procedures[20,21] are available. In this first phase of our study we evaluated the safety and efficacy of the endolymphatic infusions of LAK and of IL-2 alone. Despite the small number of patients enrolled, the results obtained seems encouraging in terms of survival rate and improvement of biochemical parameters. We calculated the survival rate of the treated patient compared to historical control group of 15 patients with similar characteristics of advanced HCC who were not treated with endolymphatic immunotherapy (control group). The 1-year survival was 0% in the control group vs. 50% in the treated group.

Moreover concerning the survival a striking but not significant difference was observed between the group of patients who completed the 12 cycles and those who did not; 1-year survival was 100% in the group that completed 12 cycles vs. 20% in patients with that did not complete 12 cycles of therapy ( ≤ 6 cycles). The immunological basis for the clinical effect on survival, mainly the changes in circulating lymphocytes, was not investigated yet. We observed that patients who underwent 12 cycles had no signs of vascular infiltration, levels of AFP lower than 200 ng/mL, no metastases and a Child-Pugh score of A. Since hepatic reserve and tumour burden of HCC could be the critical factors affecting the survival of the patients, further investigation in a large population of patients is mandatory. However, this analysis may allow us to consider these features as parameters for inclusion in future studies as this category of HCC patients may have the largest benefit from endolymphatic immunotherapy as a palliative strategy. The regression of the neoplastic mass, however, was not evident at the imaging studies in neither group. The low dosage of IL-2 is responsible for two other important advantages of this treatment: the virtual absence of major side effects and the low costs of the treatment. In conclusion we firmly consider immunotherapy a good prospective for the treatment of HCC both for its efficacy and for the low systemic toxicity in comparison to chemotherapy, which is often unacceptable in patients with a such compromised liver level. On the other hand, the detection of molecular factors predictive of response to anti-cancer agents such as Sorafenib® and the identification of mechanisms of resistance to anti-cancer agents[22] may probably represent another direction to improve the treatment of HCC.


Authors’ contributions

Concept and design, data acquisition, data analysis, manuscript preparation: Lugaresi M, Katz Y, Bertelli R, Ruhrman N, Puviani L, Cavallari G, De Vinci C, Pizza G, Nardo B

Critical revision and finalizing of the manuscript: Lugaresi M, Pizza G, Nardo B

Availability of data and materials

The data were strictly obtained from medical records according to the privacy policy and ethics code of our institute.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The local Institutional Review Board approved the use of the database for this retrospective review of the case files.

Consent for publication

Consents from all of the patients were established prior to submission and all records were confidential.


© The Author(s) 2018.


1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 0. Available from: [Last accessed on Oct 208].

2. Gomaa AI, Khan SA, Toledano MB, Waked I, Taylor-Robinson SD. Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology, risk factors and pathogenesis. World J Gastroenterol 2008;14:4300-8.

3. Welzel TM, Graubard BI, Quraishi S, Zeuzem S, Davila JA, et al. Population-attributable fractions of risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol 2013;108:1314-21.

4. Attwa MH, El-Etreby SA. Guide for diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Hepatol 2015;7:1632-51.

5. Villanueva A, Hernandez-Gea V, Llovet JM. Medical therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma: a critical view of the evidence. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013;10:34-42.

6. Llovet JM, Fuster J, Bruix J; Barcelona-Clínic Liver Cancer Group. The Barcelona approach: diagnosis, staging, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Transpl 2004;10:S115-20.

7. Llovet JM. Updated treatment approach to hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol 2005;40:225-35.

8. Sotiropoulos GC, Lang H, Frilling A, Molmenti EP, Paul A, et al. Resectability of hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation of 333 consecutive cases at a single hepatobiliary specialty center and systematic review of the literature. Hepatogastroenterology 2006;53:322-9.

9. Cannistrà M, Grande R, Ruggiero M, Novello M, Zullo A, et al. Resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients and the role of energy balance. Int J Surg 2016;33:S119-25.

10. Pizza G, De Vinci C, Lo Conte G, Maver P, Dragoni E, et al. Immunotherapy of metastatic kidney cancer. Int J Cancer 2001;94:109-20.

11. Bertelli R, Neri F, Tsivian M, Ruhrman N, Cavallari G, et al. Endolymphatic immunotherapy in inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma. Transplant Proc 2008;40:1913-5.

12. Chan SL, Mok T, Ma BB. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: beyond Sorafenib. Curr Oncol Rep 2012;14:257-66.

13. Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, Hilgard P, Gane E, et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2008;359:378-90.

14. Potenza N, Mosca N, Zappavigna S, Castiello F, Panella M, et al. MicroRNA-125a-5p is a downstream effector of Sorafenib in its antiproliferative activity toward human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. J Cell Physiol 2017;232:1907-13.

15. Stiuso P, Potenza N, Lombardi A, Ferrandino I, Monaco A, et al. MicroRNA-423-5p promotes autophagy in cancer cells and is increased in serum from hepatocarcinoma patients treated with Sorafenib. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids 2015;4:e233.

16. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009;45:228-47.

17. Marra M, Sordelli IM, Lombardi A, Lamberti M, Tarantino L, et al. Molecular targets and oxidative stress biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma: an overview. J Transl Med 2011;9:171.

18. Cannistrà M, Ruggiero M, Zullo A, Gallelli G, Serafini S, et al. Hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury: a systematic review of literature and the role of current drugs and biomarkers. Int J Surg 2016;33:S57-70.

19. Lo Re O, Panebianco C, Porto S, Cervi C, Rappa F, et al. Fasting inhibits hepatic stellate cells activation and potentiates anti-cancer activity of Sorafenib in hepatocellular cancer cells. J Cell Physiol 2018;233:1202-12.

20. Onishi S, Saibara T, Fujikawa M, Sakaeda H, Matsuura Y, et al. Adoptive immunotherapy with lymphokine activated killer cells plus recombined interleukin 2 in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 1989;10:349-53.

21. Lai CL, Lau JY, Wu PC, Ngan H, Chung HT, et al. Recombinant interferon-alpha in inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial. Hepatology 1993;17:389-94.

22. Berretta M, Di Francia R. The real impact of target therapy in cancer patients: between hope and reality. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 2018;18:402-4.

Cite This Article

OAE Style

Lugaresi M, Katz Y, Bertelli R, Ruhrman N, Puviani L, Cavallari G, Vinci CD, Pizza G, Nardo B. Endolymphatic immunotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: an update of our experience. Hepatoma Res 2018;4:67.

AMA Style

Lugaresi M, Katz Y, Bertelli R, Ruhrman N, Puviani L, Cavallari G, Vinci CD, Pizza G, Nardo B. Endolymphatic immunotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: an update of our experience. Hepatoma Research. 2018; 4: 67.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lugaresi, Marialuisa, Yuval Katz, Riccardo Bertelli, Noa Ruhrman, Lorenza Puviani, Giuseppe Cavallari, Caterina De Vinci, Giancarlo Pizza, Bruno Nardo. 2018. "Endolymphatic immunotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: an update of our experience" Hepatoma Research. 4: 67.

ACS Style

Lugaresi, M.; Katz Y.; Bertelli R.; Ruhrman N.; Puviani L.; Cavallari G.; Vinci CD.; Pizza G.; Nardo B. Endolymphatic immunotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: an update of our experience. Hepatoma. Res. 2018, 4, 67.

About This Article

Special Issue

This article belongs to the Special Issue Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
© The Author(s) 2018. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Data & Comments




Comments must be written in English. Spam, offensive content, impersonation, and private information will not be permitted. If any comment is reported and identified as inappropriate content by OAE staff, the comment will be removed without notice. If you have any queries or need any help, please contact us at

Download PDF
Cite This Article 1 clicks
Like This Article 14 likes
Share This Article
Scan the QR code for reading!
See Updates
Hepatoma Research
ISSN 2454-2520 (Online) 2394-5079 (Print)


All published articles are preserved here permanently:


All published articles are preserved here permanently: