REFERENCES
1. NIHR open research. Available from: https://openresearch.nihr.ac.uk/ [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023].
2. NIHR. What is patient and public involvement and public engagement? Available from: https://www.spcr.nihr.ac.uk/PPI/what-is-patient-and-public-involvement-and-engagement [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023].
3. Shippee ND, Domecq Garces JP, Prutsky Lopez GJ, et al. Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework. Health Expect 2015;18:1151-66.
4. Hoekstra F, Mrklas KJ, Khan M, et al. A review of reviews on principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts of research partnerships approaches: a first step in synthesising the research partnership literature. Health Res Policy Syst 2020;18:51.
5. Greenhalgh T, Hinton L, Finlay T, et al. Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research: systematic review and co-design pilot. Health Expect 2019;22:785-801.
6. Baines RL, Regan de Bere S. Optimizing patient and public involvement (PPI): identifying its “essential” and “desirable” principles using a systematic review and modified Delphi methodology. Health Expect 2018;21:327-35.
7. Staniszewska S, Brett J, Simera I, et al. GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research. BMJ 2017;358:j3453.
8. Knowles SE, Walkington P, Flynn J, Darley S, Boaden R, Kislov R. Contributors are representative, as long as they agree: how confirmation logic overrides effort to achieve synthesis in applied health research. Health Expect 2022;25:2405-15.
9. Hanley B, Amjad A, Ratcliffe N, Smith AL, Yu R. Workshop report. Patient and public involvement in laboratory based research: reflections on six studies. Available from: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Vejrg9Oa3dURUrI4fHydQSsZGSdmBNG2/view [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023].
10. Crocker JC, Ricci-Cabello I, Parker A, et al. Impact of patient and public involvement on enrolment and retention in clinical trials: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2018;363:k4738.
11. Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, et al. A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities. Patient 2014;7:387-95.
13. Russell J, Fudge N, Greenhalgh T. The impact of public involvement in health research: what are we measuring? Res Involv Engagem 2020;6:63.
14. NHS Health Research Authority public involvement web resource. Available from: https://www.hra.nhs.uk/planning-and-improving-research/best-practice/public-involvement/ [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023].
15. National Institute for Health and Care Research public involvement web resource. UK standards for public involvement. Available from: https://sites.google.com/nihr.ac.uk/pi-standards/home [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023].
16. Parkinson’s disease UK public involvement web resources. patient and public involvement in research. Available from: https://www.parkinsons.org.uk/research/patient-and-public-involvement-research [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023].
17. Brett J, Staniszewska S, Simera I, et al. Reaching consensus on reporting patient and public involvement (PPI) in research: methods and lessons learned from the development of reporting guidelines. BMJ Open 2017;7:e016948.
18. National Institute for Health and Care Research public involvement opportunities web resource. Opportunities for public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. Available from: https://www.peopleinresearch.org/ [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023].
19. National Institute for Health and Care Research INVOLVE directory. Charity Involvement Directory. Available from: https://www.invo.org.uk/charity-involvement-directory/ [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023].
20. National Institute for Health and Care Research web guide for applicants. A brief guide to public involvement in funding applications. Available from: https://www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/a-brief-guide-to-public-involvement-in-funding-applications/24162 [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023].
21. Great Ormond Street Hospital Charity grant funding web resource. GOSH charity and sparks national funding call 2022/23 FAQs. Available form: https://www.gosh.org/what-we-do/grant-funding/apply-grant-funding/joint-national-funding-call-supporting-information/ [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023].
22. Wellcome grant funding web resource. Research involving human participants policy. Available from: https://wellcome.org/grant-funding/guidance/research-involving-human-participants-policy [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023].
23. UK Research and Innovation, Medical Research Council applicant guidance. Guidance for Applicants 2022. Available from: https://www.ukri.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/MRC-15082022-Guidance-for-Applicants-22.3-FINAL.pdf [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023].
24. UK Research and Innovation, Economic and Social Research Council applicant guidance. ESRC Research Funding Guide August 2022. Available from: https://www.ukri.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/ESRC-150822-ResearchFundingGuide.pdf [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023].
25. Tan VY, Timpson NJ. The UK BioBank: a shining example of genome-wide association study science with the power to detect the murky complications of real-world epidemiology. Ann Rev Genom Genet :569-589.
26. Turnbull C, Scott RH, Thomas E, et al. The 100,000 genomes project: bringing whole genome sequencing to the NHS. BMJ 2018;361:k1687.
27. NIHR BioResource website. Rare Diseases BioResource. Available from: https://bioresource.nihr.ac.uk/rare-diseases/rare-diseases/ [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023].
28. Biobank UK publication list. Available from: https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/enable-your-research/publications [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023].
29. National Institute for Health and Care Research, BioResource publications list. Available from: https://bioresource.nihr.ac.uk/publications/ [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023].
30. Genomics England publications list. Available from: https://www.genomicsengland.co.uk/research/publications?ged=1 [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023].
31. NHS service guidance. Rapid exome sequencing service guidance: fetal anomalies testing. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/B0179_Guidance-rapid-exome-sequencing-service-for-fetal-anomalies_July21.pdf [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023].
32. Stark Z, Ellard S. Rapid genomic testing for critically ill children: time to become standard of care? Eur J Hum Genet 2022;30:142-9.
33. Genomics England newborn genomes web resource. Newborn Genomes Programme. Available from: https://www.genomicsengland.co.uk/initiatives/newborns [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023].
34. Murtagh MJ, Machirori M, Gaff CL, et al. Engaged genomic science produces better and fairer outcomes: an engagement framework for engaging and involving participants, patients and publics in genomics research and healthcare implementation. Wellcome Open Res 2021;6:311.
35. Burke K, Clarke A. The challenge of consent in clinical genome-wide testing. Arch Dis Child 2016;101:1048-52.
36. Sharif SM, Blyth M, Ahmed M, et al. Enhancing inclusion of diverse populations in genomics: A competence framework. J Genet Couns 2020;29:282-92.
37. Fatumo S, Chikowore T, Choudhury A, Ayub M, Martin AR, Kuchenbaecker K. A roadmap to increase diversity in genomic studies. Nat Med 2022;28:243-50.
38. Lewis C, Buchanan J, Clarke A, et al. Mixed-methods evaluation of the NHS Genomic Medicine Service for paediatric rare diseases: study protocol [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. NIHR Open Res 2022;1:23.
39. Genetic Alliance UK. Available from: https://geneticalliance.org.uk/ [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023].
40. Unique. Available from: https://rarechromo.org/ [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023].
41. SWAN UK. Available form: https://www.undiagnosed.org.uk/ [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023].
42. Video summary explaining our research. Available from: https://vimeo.com/718758712 [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023].
43. Alstrom Syndrome UK. Available from: https://www.alstrom.org.uk/ [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023].
44. Hill M, Ellard S, Fisher J, et al. Optimising exome prenatal sequencing services (EXPRESS): a study protocol to evaluate rapid prenatal exome sequencing in the NHS Genomic Medicine Service [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. NIHR Open Res 2022;2:10.
45. Antenatal Results and Choices (ARC) website. Available from: https://www.arc-uk.org/ [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023].
46. Hastings Ward J, Middleton R, McCormick D, et al. Research participants: critical friends, agents for change. Eur J Hum Genet 2022;30:1309-13.
47. Involve. Available from: https://involve.org.uk/ [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023].
48. Ormondroyd E, Harper AR, Thomson KL, et al. Secondary findings in inherited heart conditions: a genotype-first feasibility study to assess phenotype, behavioural and psychosocial outcomes. Eur J Hum Genet 2020;28:1486-96.
49. Green RC, Berg JS, Grody WW, et al. ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genet Med 2013;15:565-74.
50. Beskow LM, Fullerton SM, Namey EE, Nelson DK, Davis AM, Wilfond BS. Recommendations for ethical approaches to genotype-driven research recruitment. Hum Genet 2012;131:1423-31.
