REFERENCES

1. Nakamoto S. Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Available from: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf. [Last accessed on 15 Dec 2023].

2. Nasir MH, Arshad J, Khan MM, Fatima M, Salah K, Jayaraman R. Scalable blockchains - a systematic review. Future Gener Comput Syst 2022;126:136-62.

3. Qasse IA, Abu Talib M, Nasir Q. Inter blockchain communication: a survey. In: Proceedings of the ArabWIC 6th Annual International Conference Research Track. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 2019. p. 1-6.

4. Mišić VB, Mišić J, Chang X. On forks and fork characteristics in a Bitcoin-like distribution network. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain (Blockchain); 2019 Jul 14-17; Atlanta, USA. IEEE; 2019. pp. 212-9.

5. Saad M, Spaulding J, Njilla L, et al. Exploring the attack surface of blockchain: a comprehensive survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 2020;22:1977-2008.

6. Ghimire S, Selvaraj H. A survey on Bitcoin cryptocurrency and its mining. In: 2018 26th International Conference on Systems Engineering (ICSEng); 2018 Dec 18-20l; Sydney, Australia. IEEE; 2018. pp. 1-6.

7. Tovanich N, Soulié N, Heulot N, et al. The evolution of mining pools and miners’ behaviors in the Bitcoin blockchain. IEEE Trans Netw Service Manag 2022;19:3633-44.

8. Fullmer D, Morse A S. Analysis of difficulty control in Bitcoin and proof-of-work blockchains. In: 2018 IEEE conference on decision and control (CDC); 2018 Dec 17-19; Miami, USA. IEEE; 2018. pp. 5988-992.

9. Tapsell J, Akram RN, Markantonakis K. An evaluation of the security of the Bitcoin peer-to-peer network. In: 2018 IEEE international conference on internet of things (IThings) and IEEE green computing and communications (GreenCom) and IEEE cyber, physical and social computing (CPSCom) and IEEE smart data (SmartData); 2018 Jul 30 - Aug 3; Halifax, Canada. IEEE; 2018. pp. 1057-62.

10. Kumari P, Jain AK. A comprehensive study of DDoS attacks over IoT network and their countermeasures. Comput Secur 2023;127:103096.

11. de Asís López-Fuentes F, Eugui-De-Alba I, Ortíz-Ruiz OM. Evaluating P2P networks against eclipse attacks. Proc Technol 2012;3:61-8.

12. Zheng H, Tran T, Arden O. Total Eclipse of the enclave: detecting Eclipse attacks from inside TEEs. In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency (ICBC); 2021 May 3-6; Sydney, Australia. IEEE, 2021. pp. 1-5.

13. Alangot B, Reijsbergen D, Venugopalan S, Szalachowski P, Yeo KS. Decentralized and lightweight approach to detect eclipse attacks on proof of work blockchains. IEEE Trans Netw Service Manag 2021;18:1659-72.

14. Ch R, Kumari DJ, Gadekallu TR, Iwendi C. Distributed-ledger-based blockchain technology for reliable electronic voting system with statistical analysis. Electronics 2022;11:3308.

15. Eyal I, Sirer EG. Majority is not enough: Bitcoin mining is vulnerable. Commun ACM 2018;61:95-102.

16. Rosenfeld M. Analysis of Bitcoin pooled mining reward systems. arXiv. [Preprint. ] Dec 21, 2011. [accessed 2023 Dec 14]. Available from: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:15548076.

17. Courtois N, Bahack L. On subversive miner strategies and block withholding attack in Bitcoin digital currency. arXiv. [Preprint. ] Jan 28, 2014. [accessed 2023 Dec 14]. Available from: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:16387130. [Last accessed on 15 Dec 2023].

18. Luu L, Saha R, Parameshwaran I, Saxena P, Hobor A. On power splitting games in distributed computation: the case of Bitcoin pooled mining. In: 2015 IEEE 28th Computer Security Foundations Symposium; 2015 Jul 13-17; Verona, Italy. IEEE; 2015. pp. 397-411.

19. Bag S, Ruj S, Sakurai K. Bitcoin block withholding attack: analysis and mitigation. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 2016;12:1967-78.

20. Eyal I. The miner’s dilemma. In: IEEE symposium on security and privacy; 2015 May 17-21; San Jose, USA. IEEE; 2015. pp. 89-103.

21. Kwon Y, Kim D, Son Y, Vasserman EY, Kim Y. Be selfish and avoid dilemmas: fork after withholding (faw) attacks on Bitcoin. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security. Association for Computing Machinery; 2017. pp. 195-209.

22. Li W, Cao M, Wang Y, Tang C, Lin F. Mining pool game model and nash equilibrium analysis for pow-based blockchain networks. IEEE Access 2020;8:101049-60.

23. Toda K, Kuze N, Ushio T. Game-theoretic approach to a decision-making problem for blockchain mining. IEEE Control Syst Lett 2020;5:1783-8.

24. Nayak K, Kumar S, Miller A, Shi E. Stubborn mining: generalizing selfish mining and combining with an eclipse attack. In: 2016 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P); 2016 Mar 21-24; Saarbruecken, Germany. IEEE; 2016. pp. 305-20.

25. Dong X, Wu F, Faree A, Guo D, Shen Y, Ma J. Selfholding: a combined attack model using selfish mining with block withholding attack. Comput Secur 2019;87:101584.

26. Dong X, Gao S. GenSelfHolding: fusing selfish mining and block withholding attacks on Bitcoin revisited. J Netw Netw Appl 2022;2:23-35.

27. Feng Y, Torlak E, Bodik R. Precise attack synthesis for smart contracts. arXiv. [Preprint. ] Feb 16, 2019[accessed 2023 Dec 18]. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.06067.

28. Sapirshtein A, Sompolinsky Y, Zohar A. Optimal selfish mining strategies in Bitcoin. In: Grossklags J, Preneel B, editors. Financial Cryptography and Data Security: FC 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin, Springer; 2017. pp. 515-32.

29. Motlagh SG, Mišić J, Mišić VB. The impact of selfish mining on Bitcoin network performance. IEEE Trans Netw Sci Eng 2021;8:724-35.

30. Gao S, Li Z, Peng Z, et al. Power adjusting and bribery racing: novel mining attacks in the Bitcoin system. In: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. Association for Computing Machinery; 2019. pp. 833-50.

31. Buterin V. A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. Available from: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:19568665. [Last accessed on 15 Dec 2023].

32. Miller AK, Litton J, Pachulski A, et al. Discovering Bitcoin’s public topology and influential nodes. Available from: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:15600193. [Last accessed on 15 Dec 2023].

33. Eligius: 0% fee BTC, 105% PPS NMC, no registration, CPPSRB. Available from: https://bitcointalk.org/?topic=441465.msg7282674. [Last accessed on 15 Dec 2023].