REFERENCES
1. Huang Z, Xue Z, Wang Y. Current situation and prospects of sustainable fashion design. J Silk 2019;56:50-5. Available from: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/33.1122.TS.20190917.1009.004.html. [Last accessed on 8 Sep 2023] (in Chinese)
2. Chen L, Yan X, Ding X, Gao C. Evaluation of sustainable competitiveness of textile and costume industry based on analytic network process theory. Text Res J 2018;39:162-7. (in Chinese).
3. Ho W, Xu X, Dey PK. Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Eur J Oper Res 2010;202:16-24.
4. Wang CN, Pan CF, Tinh Nguyen V, Tam Husain S. Sustainable supplier selection model in supply chains during the COVID-19 pandemic. Comput Mater Contin 2022;70:3005-19.
5. Gao Q, Li G. Research on supplier selection model based on improved TOPSIS method. Hebei J Ind Sci Technol 2020;37:388-93. (in Chinese).
6. Baskaran V, Nachiappan S, Rahman S. Indian textile suppliers’ sustainability evaluation using the grey approach. Int J Prod Econ 2012;135:647-58.
7. Zeng X, Rabenasolo B. Developing a sustainable textile/clothing supply chain by selecting relevant materials and suppliers. Res J Text Appar 2013;17:101-14.
8. Jia P, Govindan K, Choi TM, Rajendran S. Supplier selection problems in fashion business operations with sustainability considerations. Sustainability 2015;7:1603-19.
9. Winter S, Lasch R. Environmental and social criteria in supplier evaluation - lessons from the fashion and apparel industry. J Clean Prod 2016;139:175-90.
10. Amindoust A, Saghafinia A. Textile supplier selection in sustainable supply chain using a modular fuzzy inference system model. J Text Inst 2017;108:1250-8.
11. Yadlapalli A, Rahman S, Gunasekaran A. Socially responsible governance mechanisms for manufacturing firms in apparel supply chains. Int J Prod Econs 2018;196:135-49.
12. Kannan D. Role of multiple stakeholders and the critical success factor theory for the sustainable supplier selection process. Int J Prod Econ 2018;195:391-418.
13. Guarnieri P, Trojan F. Decision making on supplier selection based on social, ethical, and environmental criteria: a study in the textile industry. Resour Conserv Recycl 2019;141:347-61.
14. Darvishi F, Ghasemy Yaghin R, Sadeghi A. Integrated fabric procurement and multi-site apparel production planning with cross-docking: a hybrid fuzzy-robust stochastic programming approach. Appl Soft Comput 2020;92:106267.
15. Schramm VB, Cabral LPB, Schramm F. Approaches for supporting sustainable supplier selection - a literature review. J Clean Prod 2020;273:123089.
16. Nath SD, Eweje G, Bathurst R. The invisible side of managing sustainability in global supply chains: evidence from multitier apparel suppliers. J Bus Logist 2021;42:207-32.
17. Köksal D, Strähle J. Social sustainability in fashion supply chains - understanding social standard implementation failures in Vietnam and Indonesia using agency theory. Sustainability 2021;13:2159.
18. Majumdar A, Shaw M, Sinha SK. COVID-19 debunks the myth of socially sustainable supply chain: a case of the clothing industry in South Asian countries. Sustain Prod Consum 2020;24:150-5.
19. Karami S, Ghasemy Yaghin R, Mousazadegan F. Supplier selection and evaluation in the garment supply chain: an integrated
20. Wang CN, Hoang Viet VT, Ho TP, Nguyen VT, Nguyen VT. Multi-criteria decision model for the selection of suppliers in the textile industry. Symmetry 2020;12:979.
21. Kaushik V, Kumar A, Gupta H, Dixit G. A hybrid decision model for supplier selection in Online Fashion Retail (OFR). Int J Logist Res Appl 2022;25:27-51.
22. Kusi-Sarpong S, Gupta H, Khan SA, Chiappetta Jabbour CJ, Rehman ST, Kusi-sarpong H. Sustainable supplier selection based on industry 4.0 initiatives within the context of circular economy implementation in supply chain operations. Prod Plan Control 2023;34:999-1019.
23. Maalouf MM, Hasle P, Vang J, Hamja A. Complementarities between operations and occupational health and safety in garments. Sustainability 2021;13:4313.
24. Kuo RJ, Wang YC, Tien FC. Integration of artificial neural network and MADA methods for green supplier selection. J Clean Prod 2010;18:1161-70.
25. Chiou CY, Hsu CW, Hwang WY. Comparative investigation on green supplier selection of the American, Japanese and Taiwanese electronics industry in China. In: 2008 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management; 2008 Dec 08-11; Singapore. IEEE; 2009. p. 1909-14.
26. Rajesh R, Ravi V. Supplier selection in resilient supply chains: a grey relational analysis approach. J Clean Prod 2015;86:343-59.
27. Chen YJ. Structured methodology for supplier selection and evaluation in a supply chain. Inf Sci 2011;181:1651-70.
28. Sawik T. On the risk-averse optimization of service level in a supply chain under disruption risks. Int J Prod Res 2016;54:98-113.
29. Punniyamoorthy M, Mathiyalagan P, Parthiban P. A strategic model using structural equation modeling and fuzzy logic in supplier selection. Expert Syst Appl 2011;38:458-74.
30. Yu Q, Hou F. An approach for green supplier selection in the automobile manufacturing industry. Kybernetes 2016;45:571-88.
31. Büyüközkan G, Çifçi G. Evaluation of the green supply chain management practices: a fuzzy ANP approach. Prod Plan Control 2012;23:405-18.
32. Hsu CH, Wang FK, Tzeng GH. The best vendor selection for conducting the recycled material based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR. Resour Conserv Recycl 2012;66:95-111.
33. Rezaei J, Ortt R. Multi-criteria supplier segmentation using a fuzzy preference relations based AHP. Eur J Oper Res 2013;225:75-84.
34. Chan FTS, Kumar N. Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach. Omega 2007;35:417-31.
35. Wang J, Cheng C, Huang KC. Fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS for supplier selection. Appl Soft Comput 2009;9:377-86.
36. Adobor H, Mcmullen R. Supplier diversity and supply chain management: a strategic approach. Bus Horiz 2007;50:219-29.
37. Zhang HC, Li J, Merchant ME. Using fuzzy multi-agent decision-making in environmentally conscious supplier management. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 2003;52:385-8.
38. Hosseini S, Barker K. A Bayesian network model for resilience-based supplier selection. Int J Prod Econ 2016;180:68-87.
39. Kannan D, Govindan K, Rajendran S. Fuzzy Axiomatic Design approach based green supplier selection: a case study from Singapore. J Clean Prod 2015;96:194-208.
40. Finkbeiner M, Neugebauer S, Berger M. Carbon footprint of recycled biogenic products: the challenge of modelling CO2 removal credits. Int J Sustain Eng 2013;6:66-73.
41. Tseng ML, Chiu ASF. Evaluating firm’s green supply chain management in linguistic preferences. J Clean Prod 2013;40:22-31.
42. Humphreys P, Mcivor R, Chan F. Using case-based reasoning to evaluate supplier environmental management performance. Expert Syst Appl 2003;25:141-53.
43. Mahdiloo M, Saen RF, Lee KH. Technical, environmental and eco-efficiency measurement for supplier selection: an extension and application of data envelopment analysis. Int J Prod Econ 2015;168:279-89.
44. Cheng H, Chen C, Wu S, Mirza ZA, Liu Z. Emergy evaluation of cropping, poultry rearing, and fish raising systems in the drawdown zone of Three Gorges Reservoir of China. J Clean Prod 2017;144:559-71.
45. Sardar S, Lee YH, Memon MS. A sustainable outsourcing strategy regarding cost, capacity flexibility, and risk in a textile supply chain. Sustainability 2016;8:234.
46. Schiessl A, Müller R, Volk R, Schultmann F. Site-specific environmental impact assessment as a basis for supplier selections - exemplary application to aluminum. J Clean Prod 2021;290:125703.
47. Wu S, Cao Y, He L. Temporal changes of carbon emission transmissions in China’s supply chain, 1997-2017. J Clean Prod 2020;269:122367.
48. Zhang X, Gao B, Zhao S, Wu P, Han L, Liu X. Optimization of a “coal-like” pelletization technique based on the sustainable biomass fuel of hydrothermal carbonization of wheat straw. J Clean Prod 2020;242:118426.
49. Mangla SK, Sharma YK, Patil PP, Yadav G, Xu J. Logistics and distribution challenges to managing operations for corporate sustainability: study on leading Indian diary organizations. J Clean Prod 2019;238:117620.
50. De Bernardi C, Pedrini M. Transforming water into wine: environmental bricolage for entrepreneurs. J Clean Prod 2020;266:121815.
51. Chen CC, Tseng ML, Lin YH, Lin ZS. Implementation of green supply chain management in uncertainty. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management; 2010 Dec 07-10; Macao, China. IEEE; 2010. p. 260-4.
52. Neubig CM, Vranken L, Roosen J, et al. Action-related information trumps system information: influencing consumers’ intention to reduce food waste. J Clean Prod 2020;261:121126.
53. Büyüközkan G, Çifçi G. A novel fuzzy multi-criteria decision framework for sustainable supplier selection with incomplete information. Comput Ind 2011;62:164-74.
54. Ehrgott M, Reimann F, Kaufmann L, Carter CR. Social sustainability in selecting emerging economy suppliers. J Bus Ethics 2011;98:99-119.
55. Awasthi A, Kannan G. Green supplier development program selection using NGT and VIKOR under fuzzy environment. Comput Ind Eng 2016;91:100-8.
56. Sarkis J, Dhavale DG. Supplier selection for sustainable operations: a triple-bottom-line approach using a Bayesian framework. Int J Prod Econ 2015;166:177-91.
57. Blome C, Hollos D, Paulraj A. Green procurement and green supplier development: antecedents and effects on supplier performance. Int J Prod Res 2014;52:32-49.
58. Govindan K, Khodaverdi R, Jafarian A. A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. J Clean Prod 2013;47:345-54.
59. Zimmer K, Fröhling M, Schultmann F. Sustainable supplier management - a review of models supporting sustainable supplier selection, monitoring and development. Int J Prod Res 2016;54:1412-42.
60. Shaw K, Shankar R, Yadav SS, Thakur LS. Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy multi-objective linear programming for developing low carbon supply chain. Expert Syst Appl 2012;39:8182-92.
61. Luthra S, Govindan K, Kannan D, Mangla SK, Garg CP. An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains. J Clean Prod 2017;140:1686-98.
62. Awasthi A, Govindan K, Gold S. Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach. Int J Prod Econ 2018;195:106-17.
63. Gupta H, Barua MK. Supplier selection among SMEs on the basis of their green innovation ability using BWM and fuzzy TOPSIS. J Clean Prod 2017;152:242-58.
64. Banaeian N, Mobli H, Fahimnia B, Nielsen IE, Omid M. Green supplier selection using fuzzy group decision making methods: a case study from the agri-food industry. Comput Oper Res 2018;89:337-47.
65. Babbar C, Amin SH. A multi-objective mathematical model integrating environmental concerns for supplier selection and order allocation based on fuzzy QFD in beverages industry. Expert Syst Appl 2018;92:27-38.
66. Gupta S, Soni U, Kumar G. Green supplier selection using multi-criterion decision making under fuzzy environment: a case study in automotive industry. Comput Ind Eng 2019;136:663-80.
67. Moheb-alizadeh H, Handfield R. Sustainable supplier selection and order allocation: a novel multi-objective programming model with a hybrid solution approach. Comput Ind Eng 2019;129:192-209.
68. Memari A, Dargi A, Akbari Jokar MR, Ahmad R, Abdul Rahim AR. Sustainable supplier selection: a multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method. J Manuf Syst 2019;50:9-24.
69. Stević Ž, Pamučar D, Puška A, Chatterjee P. Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCDM method: measurement of alternatives and ranking according to COmpromise solution (MARCOS). Comput Ind Eng 2020;140:106231.
70. Mahmoudi A, Deng X, Javed SA, Zhang N. Sustainable supplier selection in megaprojects: grey ordinal priority approach. Bus Strat Env 2021;30:318-39.
71. Amiri M, Hashemi-tabatabaei M, Ghahremanloo M, Keshavarz-ghorabaee M, Zavadskas EK, Banaitis A. A new fuzzy BWM approach for evaluating and selecting a sustainable supplier in supply chain management. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 2021;28:125-42.
72. Li F, Wu CH, Zhou L, Xu G, Liu Y, Tsai SB. A model integrating environmental concerns and supply risks for dynamic sustainable supplier selection and order allocation. Soft Comput 2021;25:535-49.
74. Brauers WKM, Zavadskas EK. Multimoora optimization used to decide on a bank loan to buy property. Technol Econ Dev Econ 2011;17:174-88.
75. Kilincci O, Onal SA. Fuzzy AHP approach for supplier selection in a washing machine company. Expert Syst Appl 2011;38:9656-64.
76. Ramanathan R. Supplier selection problem: integrating DEA with the approaches of total cost of ownership and AHP. Int J Supply Chain Manag 2007;12:258-61.
77. Lima Junior FR, Osiro L, Carpinetti LCR. A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection. Appl Soft Comput 2014;21:194-209.
78. Beikkhakhian Y, Javanmardi M, Karbasian M, Khayambashi B. The application of ISM model in evaluating agile suppliers selection criteria and ranking suppliers using fuzzy TOPSIS-AHP methods. Expert Syst Appl 2015;42:6224-36.
79. Kannan D, Lopes de Sousa Jabbour AB, Chiappetta Jabbour CJ. Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: using fuzzy TOPSIS applied to a Brazilian electronics company. Eur J Oper Res 2014;233:432-47.
80. Awasthi A, Chauhan SS, Goyal SK. A fuzzy multicriteria approach for evaluating environmental performance of suppliers. Int J Prod Econ 2010;126:370-8.
81. Büyüközkan G, Çifçi G. A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Syst Appl 2012;39:3000-11.
82. Gan J, Zhong S, Liu S, Yang D. Resilient supplier selection based on fuzzy BWM and GMo-RTOPSIS under supply chain environment. Discrete Dyn Nat Soc 2019;2019:1-14.
83. Kumar A, Alora A, Gupta H. Evaluating green performance of the airports using hybrid BWM and VIKOR methodology. Tour Manag 2020;76:103941.
84. Li X, Zhao C. Selection of suppliers of vehicle components based on green supply chain. In: 2009 16th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management; 2009 Oct 21-23; Beijing, China. IEEE; 2009. p. 1588-91.
85. Fu X, Zhu Q, Sarkis J. Evaluating green supplier development programs at a telecommunications systems provider. Int J Prod Econ 2012;140:357-67.
86. Sanayei A, Farid Mousavi S, Yazdankhah A. Group decision making process for supplier selection with VIKOR under fuzzy environment. Expert Syst Appl 2010;37:24-30.
87. Zandi A, Roghanian E. Extension of Fuzzy ELECTRE based on VIKOR method. Comput Ind Engin 2013;66:258-63.
88. Azadi M, Jafarian M, Farzipoor Saen R, Mirhedayatian SM. A new fuzzy DEA model for evaluation of efficiency and effectiveness of suppliers in sustainable supply chain management context. Comput Oper Res 2015;54:274-85.
89. Bai C, Sarkis J. Determining and applying sustainable supplier key performance indicators. Int J Supply Chain Manag 2014;19:275-91.
90. de Boer L, Labro E, Morlacchi P. A review of methods supporting supplier selection. Eur J Purch Supply Manag 2001;7:75-89.
91. Wang X, Chan HK, Yee RWY, Diaz-Rainey I. A two-stage fuzzy-AHP model for risk assessment of implementing green initiatives in the fashion supply chain. Int J Prod Econ 2012;135:595-606.
92. Nasr AK, Tavana M, Alavi B, Mina H. A novel fuzzy multi-objective circular supplier selection and order allocation model for sustainable closed-loop supply chains. J Clean Prod 2021;287:124994.
93. Celik E, Yucesan M, Gul M. Green supplier selection for textile industry: a case study using BWM-TODIM integration under interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2021;28:64793-817.
94. Majumdar A, Jeevaraj S, Kaliyan M, Agrawal R. Selection of resilient suppliers in manufacturing industries post-COVID-19: implications for economic and social sustainability in emerging economies. IJOEM 2021;ahead of print.
95. Fallahpour A, Olugu EU, Musa SN, Yew Wong K, Noori S. A decision support model for sustainable supplier selection in sustainable supply chain management. Comput Ind Engin 2017;105:391-410.
96. Ulutaş A, Topal A, Bakhat R. An application of fuzzy integrated model in green supplier selection. Math Probl Eng 2019;2019:1-11.
97. Wang CN, Yang CY, Cheng HC. A fuzzy multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) model for sustainable supplier evaluation and selection based on triple bottom line approaches in the garment industry. Processes 2019;7:400.
98. Yang Y, Wang Y. Supplier selection for the adoption of green innovation in sustainable supply chain management practices: a case of the chinese textile manufacturing industry. Processes 2020;8:717.
99. Wang CN, Thi Pham TD, Nhieu NL. Multi-layer fuzzy sustainable decision approach for outsourcing manufacturer selection in apparel and textile supply chain. Axioms 2021;10:262.
100. Ben-daya M, Hassini E, Bahroun Z. Internet of things and supply chain management: a literature review. Int J Prod Res 2019;57:4719-42.
101. Kouhizadeh M, Sarkis J. Blockchain practices, potentials, and perspectives in greening supply chains. Sustainability 2018;10:3652.
102. Banica L, Hagiu A. 4 - Using big data analytics to improve decision-making in apparel supply chains. Inf Syst Fash Appar Ind 2016:63-95.
103. Yan J, Meng Y, Lu L, Li L. Industrial big data in an industry 4.0 environment: challenges, schemes, and applications for predictive maintenance. IEEE Access 2017;5:23484-91.
104. Bo Y, Meifang Y. Construction of the knowledge service model of a port supply chain enterprise in a big data environment. Neural Comput Appl 2021;33:1699-710.
105. Jiang W. An intelligent supply chain information collaboration model based on internet of things and big data. IEEE Access 2019;7:58324-35.
107. Qiao W, Huang K, Azimi M, Han S. A novel hybrid prediction model for hourly gas consumption in supply side based on improved whale optimization algorithm and relevance vector machine. IEEE Access 2019;7:88218-30.
