REFERENCES
1. Fletcher R, Mahindroo A, Santhanam N, Tschiesner A. The case for an end-to-end automotive-software platform. Available from: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Industries/Automotive%20and%20Assembly/Our%20Insights/The%20case%20for%20an%20end%20to%20end%20automotive%20software%20platform/The-case-for-an-end-to-end-automotive-software-platform.pdf [Last accessed on 10 Mar 2023].
2. Gougeon P, Goubier T, Nguyen K, et al. Pre-integrated architectures for sustainable complex cyber-physical systems. 2021 24th Euromicro Conference on Digital System Design (DSD). IEEE 2021:319-24.
3. Garbie IH. Concepts and measurements of industrial complexity: a state-of-the-art survey. Int J Ind Syst Eng 2012;12:42-83.
4. Gomes VM, Paiva JRB, Reis MRC, et al. Mechanism for measuring system complexity applying sensitivity analysis. Complexity 2019; doi: 10.1155/2019/1303241.
5. Simon HA. The architecture of complexity, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, Vol. 106, No. 6; 1962. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/985254 [Last accessed on 10 Mar 2023].
6. Braha D, Maimon O, Braha D, et al. The measurement of a design structural and functional complexity; 1998. pp. 241-77.
7. Reilhac P, Eustache J P, Simon L, Deshouillers P. Modular rear closure: an analogy with the ‘Tetris’® game for electrical component design and integration. SAE Technical Paper; 2002.
9. Sinha K, de Weck OL. Structural complexity quantification for engineered complex systems and implications on system architecture and design. International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Am Soc Mech Eng 2013;55881:V03AT03A044.
10. Koto J, Efendy MH, Bahadi N. Dependency structure matrix and its application on offshore structures construction. Available from: https://isomase.org/OCAri/E-Learning-5.php [Last accessed on 10 Mar 2023].
12. Alkan B, Vera D, Ahmad B, et al. A method to assess assembly complexity of industrial products in early design phase. IEEE Access 2017;6:989-99.
13. NIST. Framework for cyber-physical systems. Release 1.0. Available from: https://s3.amazonaws.com/nist-sgcps/cpspwg/files/pwgglobal/CPS_PWG_Framework_for_Cyber_Physical_Systems_Release_1_0Final.pdf [Last accessed on 10 Mar 2023].
14. Sheikh ZA, Singh Y, Singh PK, Ghafoor KZ. Intelligent and secure framework for critical infrastructure (CPS): current trends, challenges, and future scope. Comput Commun 2022;193:302-31.
15. Sampayo M, Peças P. CPSD2: a new approach for cyber-physical systems design and development. J Ind Inf Integr 2022;28:100348.
16. Thakur P, Sehgal VK. Emerging architecture for heterogeneous smart cyber-physical systems for industry 5.0. Comput Ind Eng 2021;162:107750.
17. INCOSE. Feature-based systems and software product line engineering: a primer. Available from: https://conference.conflr.com/events/Demo/showcases/incose/INCOSE%20PLE%20Primer.pdf [Last accessed on 10 Mar 2023].
18. Online Browsing Platform (OBP). Software and systems engineering - methods and tools for the feature-based approach to software and systems product line engineering. Available from: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso-iec:26580:ed-1:v1:en [Last accessed on 10 Mar 2023].
19. McEver J, Sheard SA, Cook S, et al. A complexity primer for systems engineers. Available from: https://connect.incose.org/StoreProducts/A%20Complexity%20Primer%20for%20Systems%20Engineers.pdf [Last accessed on 10 Mar 2023].
20. Woods C. My favorite application using graph eigenvalues: graph energy. Available from: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=146946acc67db5cd321f5dcc835ad1dff2db9dd9 [Last accessed on 10 Mar 2023].
21. CPS4EU. Project deliverable D7.3, Automotive use case software integration; Feb 2021, CPS4EU confidential document.
22. Dcode website. Eigenvalues of a matrix. Available from: https://www.dcode.fr/matrix-eigenvalues [Last accessed on 10 Mar 2023].
