REFERENCES

1. Johnson MP. Data, analytics and community-based organizations: transforming data to decisions for community development. I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society 2015;11:49. Available from: https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/isjlpsoc11&div=7&id=&page= [Last accessed on 27 Jul 2022].

2. Mayer LH. The promises and perils of using big data to regulate nonprofits. Washington Law Review; 2019. pp. 1281-1336. Available from: https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/washlr94&div=33&id=&page= [Last accessed on 27 Jul 2022].

3. Anheier HK. nonprofit organizations theory, management, policy. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. 2005. p. 450. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315851044/nonprofit-organizations-helmut-anheier [Last accessed on 27 Jul 2022].

4. Mahmoud M, Yusif B. Market orientation, learning orientation, and the performance of nonprofit organisations (Npos). Int J Product Perform Manag 2012;61:624-52.

5. Kassen M. Adopting and managing open data: stakeholder perspectives, challenges and policy recommendations. Aslib J Inf Manag 2018;70:518-537.

6. Mohamed A, Najafabadi MK, Wah YB, Zaman EAK, Maskat R. The state of the art and taxonomy of big data analytics: view from new big data framework. Artif Intell Rev 2020;53:989-1037.

7. Maxwell NL, Rotz D, Garcia C. Data and decision making: same organization, different perceptions; different organizations, different perceptions. Am J Eval 2016;37:463-85.

8. Hackler D, Saxton GD. The strategic use of information technology by nonprofit organizations: increasing capacity and untapped potential. Public Adm Rev 2007;67:474-87.

9. Trivedi G. Visualization and scientometric mapping of global agriculture big data research. Library Philosophy and Practice; 2019. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Guptnath-Trivedi/publication/333103959_Visualization_and_Scientometric_Mapping_of_Global_Agriculture_Big_Data_Research/links/5ed89de04585152945312a86/Visualization-and-Scientometric-Mapping-of-Global-Agriculture-Big-Data-Research.pdf [Last accessed on 27 Jul 2022].

10. Wang X, Xu Z, Su S, Zhou W. A comprehensive bibliometric analysis of uncertain group decision making from 1980 to 2019. Inf Sci 2021;547:328-53.

11. Shukla AK, Muhuri PK, Abraham A. A bibliometric analysis and cutting-edge overview on fuzzy techniques in Big Data. Eng Appl Artif Intell 2020;92:103625.

12. . Jelvehgaran Esfahani H, Tavasoli K, Jabbarzadeh A. Big data and social media: a scientometrics analysis 2019;3:145-64.

13. Aria M, Cuccurullo C. bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetr 2017;11:959-75.

14. Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J 2008;22:338-42.

15. Moral-muñoz JA, Herrera-viedma E, Santisteban-espejo A, Cobo MJ. Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: an up-to-date review. EPI 2020:29.

16. Zhang Y, Porter AL, Hu Z, Guo Y, Newman NC. “Term clumping” for technical intelligence: a case study on dye-sensitized solar cells. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2014;85:26-39.

17. Callon M, Courtial J, Turner WA, Bauin S. From translations to problematic networks: an introduction to co-word analysis. Soc Sci Inf 1983;22:191-235.

18. Zhang Y, Zhang G, Zhu D, Lu J. Scientific evolutionary pathways: identifying and visualizing relationships for scientific topics. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 2017;68:1925-39.

19. Fleming L. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Manage Sci 2001;47:117-32.

20. Fleming L, Sorenson O. Science as a map in technological search. Strat Mgmt J 2004;25:909-28.

21. Anaf J, Baum FE, Fisher M, Harris E, Friel S. Assessing the health impact of transnational corporations: a case study on McDonald's Australia. Global Health 2017;13:7.

22. Powell LJ, Wittman H. Farm to school in British Columbia: mobilizing food literacy for food sovereignty. Agric Hum Values 2018;35:193-206.

23. Secco L, Favero M, Masiero M, Pettenella DM. Failures of political decentralization in promoting network governance in the forest sector: observations from Italy. Land Use Policy 2017;62:79-100.

24. Mathieu B, Sebastien H, Mathieu J. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Third International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media; 2009: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. Available from: https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/13937 [Last accessed on 27 Jul 2022].

25. Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N, Lim WM. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines. J Bus Res 2021;133:285-96.

26. Hou Y, Wang D. Hacking with Npos: collaborative analytics and broker roles in civic data hackathons. Proc ACM Hum -Comput Interact 2017;1:1-16.

27. Alsolbi I, Agarwal R, Narayan B, et al. Analyzing donors behaviors in nonprofit organizations: a design science research framework. proceedings of 3rd international conference on machine intelligence and signal processing 2021; NIT Arunachal Pradesh, India: Springer. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357877379_Analyzing_Donors_Behaviors_in_Nonprofit_Organizations_A_Design_Science_Research_Framework [Last accessed on 27 Jul 2022].

Journal of Smart Environments and Green Computing
ISSN 2767-6595 (Online)
Follow Us

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/