REFERENCES
1. Lindecke, O.; Schneider, W. T.; Vintulis, V.; et al. Disruptive effects of brief radiofrequency noise exposure on migratory bat navigation. Science 2026, 392, 977-9.
2. Holland, R. A. Orientation and navigation in bats: known unknowns or unknown unknowns? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2007, 61, 653-60.
3. Holland, R. A.; Thorup, K.; Vonhof, M. J.; Cochran, W. W.; Wikelski, M. Navigation: bat orientation using Earth’s magnetic field. Nature 2006, 444, 702.
4. Lindecke, O.; Elksne, A.; Holland, R. A.; Pētersons, G.; Voigt, C. C. Experienced migratory bats integrate the sun’s position at dusk for navigation at night. Curr Biol 2019, 29, 1369-73.e3.
5. Schneider, W. T.; Holland, R. A.; Keišs, O.; Lindecke, O. Migratory bats are sensitive to magnetic inclination changes during the compass calibration period. Biol Lett 2023, 19, 20230181.
6. Nicholls, B.; Racey, P. A. Bats avoid radar installations: could electromagnetic fields deter bats from colliding with wind turbines? PLoS One 2007, 2, e297.
7. Nicholls, B.; Racey, P. A. The aversive effect of electromagnetic radiation on foraging bats: a possible means of discouraging bats from approaching wind turbines. PLoS One 2009, 4, e6246.
8. Nordmann, G. C.; Balay, S. D.; Kapuruge, T. N.; et al. A global screen for magnetically induced neuronal activity in the pigeon brain. Science 2026, 391, 1155-60.
9. Hurme, E.; Lenzi, I.; Wikelski, M.; Wild, T. A.; Dechmann, D. K. N. Bats surf storm fronts during spring migration. Science 2025, 387, 97-102.
10. Hurme, E.; Fahr, J.; Eidolon Monitoring Network, Eric-Moise, B. F.; et al. Fruit bat migration matches green wave in seasonal landscapes. Funct Ecol 2022, 36, 2043-55.
11. Russo, D.; Ancillotto, L. Sensitivity of bats to urbanization: a review. Mamm Biol 2015, 80, 205-12.
12. Jung, K.; Threlfall, C. G. Urbanisation and its effects on bats - a global meta-analysis. In Bats in the anthropocene: conservation of bats in a changing world; Voigt, C. C.; Kingston, T., Eds.; Springer: Cham, 2016; pp 13-33.
13. Frick, W. F.; Kingston, T.; Flanders, J. A review of the major threats and challenges to global bat conservation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2020, 1469, 5-25.
14. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz). Health Phys 2020, 118, 483-524.
15. Karipidis, K.; Brzozek, C.; Mate, R.; Bhatt, C. R.; Loughran, S.; Wood, A. W. What evidence exists on the impact of anthropogenic radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on animals and plants in the environment: a systematic map. Environ Evid 2023, 12, 9.
16. Froidevaux, J. S. P.; Recuero Virto, L.; Czerwiński, M.; Thielens, A.; Park, K. J. Addressing wildlife exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields: time for action. Environ Sci Technol Lett 2024, 11, 3-4.
17. Velghe, M.; Joseph, W.; Debouvere, S.; Aminzadeh, R.; Martens, L.; Thielens, A. Characterisation of spatial and temporal variability of RF-EMF exposure levels in urban environments in Flanders, Belgium. Environ Res 2019, 175, 351-66.
18. Loizeau, N.; Haas, D.; Zahner, M.; et al. Spatiotemporal trends of ambient radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) during the 5G rollout in Switzerland. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2026.
19. Balmori, A. Anthropogenic radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as an emerging threat to wildlife orientation. Sci Total Environ 2015, 518-9, 58-60.
20. Balmori, A. Electromagnetic radiation as an emerging driver factor for the decline of insects. Sci Total Environ 2021, 767, 144913.
21. Bréchignac, F. Protection of the environment: how to position radioprotection in an ecological risk assessment perspective. Sci Total Environ 2003, 307, 35-54.
