REFERENCES
1. Jalil, A.; Noor, M. J.; Iram, S.; Qaisar, I. A systematic review: global trend in heavy metal concentration in vegetables, dietary exposure, and health risk assessment. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2026, 198, 252.
2. Jiao, L.; Huo, L.; Stein, A.; An, Y.; Zhang, P. A framework for unveiling multi-pathway mechanisms of soil heavy metal pollution: evidence from five major urban agglomerations in China. J. Environ. Manage. 2026, 401, 128952.
3. Xiao, N.; Wang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Yao, Y.; Shen, C. Four decades of global cereal lead contamination patterns. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2026, 309, 119687.
4. Duarte, N. A. A.; Santos, L. C. D.; Maraslis, F. T.; et al. Blood-based transcriptomic profiles associated with chronic mercury exposure in Amazonian riverine populations. J. Hazard. Mater. 2026, 504, 141273.
5. Jomova, K.; Alomar, S. Y.; Nepovimova, E.; Kuca, K.; Valko, M. Heavy metals: toxicity and human health effects. Arch. Toxicol. 2025, 99, 153-209.
6. Kinjo, Y.; Shibata, E.; Askew, D. J.; Japan Environment and Children’s Study Group. Association of placental weight at birth with maternal whole blood concentration of heavy metals (cadmium, lead, mercury, selenium, and manganese): The Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS). Environ. Int. 2024, 188, 108725.
7. Zhou, J.; Tong, J.; Chen, S.; et al. Placental transfer efficiency of metals and its association with cognitive development in offspring: roles of placental inflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress markers. J. Hazard. Mater. 2025, 500, 140380.
8. Yu, G.; Meng, X.; Tan, Y. Q.; et al. Gestational exposure to metals and small vulnerable newborns: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ. Int. 2026, 208, 110052.
9. Adibi, J. J.; Zhao, Y.; Koistinen, H.; et al. Molecular pathways in placental-fetal development and disruption. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2024, 581, 112075.
10. Andonotopo, W.; Bachnas, M. A.; Dewantiningrum, J.; et al. Endocrine disrupting chemicals: translating mechanisms into perinatal risk assessment. J. Perinat. Med. 2025, 53, 1238-52.
11. Grandjean, P.; Landrigan, P. J. Developmental neurotoxicity of industrial chemicals. Lancet 2006, 368, 2167-78.
12. Barouki, R.; Gluckman, P. D.; Grandjean, P.; Hanson, M.; Heindel, J. J. Developmental origins of non-communicable disease: implications for research and public health. Environ. Health. 2012, 11, 42.
13. Gu, J.; Jin, Z.; Wu, G.; et al. Correlation between essential and toxic elements in maternal blood during early pregnancy and atrial septal defects/ventricular septal defects/patent ductus arteriosus in offspring. Birth. Defects. Res. 2024, 116, e2282.
14. Barrett, E. S.; Rivera-Núñez, Z.; Getz, K.; et al. Protective role of the placental efflux transporter BCRP/ABCG2 in the relationship between prenatal cadmium exposure, placenta weight, and size at birth. Environ. Res. 2023, 225, 115597.
15. Barrett, E. S.; Sharghi, S.; Thurston, S. W.; et al. Associations of exposure to air pollution during the male programming window and mini-puberty with anogenital distance and penile width at birth and at 1 year of age in the multicenter U.S. TIDES cohort. Environ. Health. Perspect. 2023, 131, 117001.
16. Cajachagua-Torres, K. N.; Salvi, N. B.; Seok, E.; et al. Prenatal phthalate exposure and anogenital distance in infants at 12 months. Environ. Int. 2025, 199, 109472.
17. Barrett, E. S.; Sathyanarayana, S.; Mbowe, O.; et al. First-trimester urinary bisphenol A concentration in relation to anogenital distance, an androgen-sensitive measure of reproductive development, in infant girls. Environ. Health. Perspect. 2017, 125, 077008.
18. Bornehag, C. G.; Carlstedt, F.; Jönsson, B. A.; et al. Prenatal phthalate exposures and anogenital distance in Swedish boys. Environ. Health. Perspect. 2015, 123, 101-7.
19. Nelson, W.; Liu, D. Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhong, Z. H.; Wang, Y. X.; Ding, Y. B. In utero exposure to persistent and nonpersistent endocrine-disrupting chemicals and anogenital distance. A systematic review of epidemiological studies†. Biol. Reprod. 2020, 102, 276-91.
20. Andreasen, S. M.; Gehrt, L.; Hagen, C. P.; et al. Correlation of anogenital distance from childhood to age 9 years-a prospective population-based birth cohort-the Odense Child Cohort. Hum. Reprod. Open. 2024, 2024, hoae050.
21. Zamani, P.; Hemati, Z.; Kelishadi, R.; Kolahdozan, S.; Dianatinasab, M.; Keikha, M. Association between anogenital distance as a noninvasive index in the diagnosis and prognosis of reproductive disorder: a systematic review. Int. J. Reprod. Biomed. 2023, 21, 599-618.
22. Barrett, E. S.; Hoeger, K. M.; Sathyanarayana, S.; et al. Anogenital distance in newborn daughters of women with polycystic ovary syndrome indicates fetal testosterone exposure. J. Dev. Orig. Health. Dis. 2018, 9, 307-14.
23. Dural, O.; Kurbanova, T.; Yasa, C.; et al. Idiopathic primary ovarian insufficiency is associated with anogenital distance, a marker for prenatal environment. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2021, 258, 304-8.
24. Kulaksiz, D.; Toprak, T. The relationship between anogenital distance and female sexual life. Minerva. Obstet. Gynecol. 2023, 75, 311-5.
25. Celik, M.; Iyigun, I.; Yalcin, S. S.; et al. Perinatal exposure to heavy metals and trace elements of preterm neonates in the NICU: a toxicological study using multiple biomatrices. Toxics 2025, 13, 898.
26. Huang, L.; Huang, S.; Luo, X.; et al. Associations of prenatal exposure to multiple metals with testicular volume and anogenital distance in infant boys: a longitudinal cohort study. Environ. Int. 2020, 143, 105900.
27. Chen, T.; Guestrin, C. XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Min. Association for Computing Machinery; 2016. pp. 785-94.
28. Chipman, H. A.; George, E. I.; McCulloch, R. E. BART: Bayesian additive regression trees. Ann. Appl. Stat. 2010, 4, 266-98.
29. Bobb, J. F.; Valeri, L.; Claus Henn, B.; et al. Bayesian kernel machine regression for estimating the health effects of multi-pollutant mixtures. Biostatistics 2015, 16, 493-508.
30. Bobb, J. F.; Claus Henn, B.; Valeri, L.; Coull, B. A. Statistical software for analyzing the health effects of multiple concurrent exposures via Bayesian kernel machine regression. Environ. Health. 2018, 17, 67.
31. Xie, Y.; Xiao, H.; Zheng, D.; et al. Associations of prenatal metal exposure with child neurodevelopment and mediation by perturbation of metabolic pathways. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 2089.
32. Hu, J.; Papandonatos, G. D.; Zheng, T.; et al. Prenatal metal mixture exposure and birth weight: a two-stage analysis in two prospective cohort studies. Eco. Environ. Health. 2022, 1, 165-71.
33. Chen, X.; Liu, H.; Zhou, A.; et al. Fetal weight growth trajectories and childhood development: a population-based cohort study. Sci. Bull. 2024, 69, 3404-14.
34. Jia, Z.; Zhang, H.; Yu, L.; et al. Prenatal lead exposure, genetic factors, and cognitive developmental delay. JAMA. Netw. Open. 2023, 6, e2339108.
35. Sathyanarayana, S.; Grady, R.; Redmon, J. B.; et al.; TIDES Study Team. Anogenital distance and penile width measurements in The Infant Development and the Environment Study (TIDES): methods and predictors. J. Pediatr. Urol. 2015, 11, 76.e1-6.
36. Olapeju, B.; Hong, X.; Wang, G.; et al. Birth outcomes across the spectrum of maternal age: dissecting aging effect versus confounding by social and medical determinants. BMC. Pregnancy. Childbirth. 2021, 21, 594.
37. Blomberg, M.; Birch Tyrberg, R.; Kjølhede, P. Impact of maternal age on obstetric and neonatal outcome with emphasis on primiparous adolescents and older women: a Swedish Medical Birth Register Study. BMJ. Open. 2014, 4, e005840.
38. Vandekerckhove, M.; Guignard, M.; Civadier, M. S.; Benachi, A.; Bouyer, J. Impact of maternal age on obstetric and neonatal morbidity: a retrospective cohort study. BMC. Pregnancy. Childbirth. 2021, 21, 732.
39. Wilcox, A. J.; Weinberg, C. R.; Basso, O. On the pitfalls of adjusting for gestational age at birth. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2011, 174, 1062-8.
40. Liu, X.; Du, J.; Wang, G.; Chen, Z.; Wang, W.; Xi, Q. Effect of pre-pregnancy body mass index on adverse pregnancy outcome in north of China. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2011, 283, 65-70.
41. Li, S.; Li, J.; Du, L.; et al. Association between parity and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes: a population-based cross-sectional study. Front. Med. 2025, 12, 1697655.
42. Li, L.; Wu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Zhuang, Y.; You, D. Maternal educational inequalities about adverse pregnancy outcomes observed in a rural area of a province of China during a time period (2010-2018). J. Epidemiol. Community. Health. 2022, 76, 458-65.
43. Yen, F. S.; Wei, J. C.; Wu, Y. L.; et al. Impact of family income on the development of gestational diabetes mellitus and the associated birth outcomes: a nationwide study. J. Diabetes. Investig. 2025, 16, 51-9.
44. Barrera-Gómez, J.; Basagaña, X. Models with transformed variables: interpretation and software. Epidemiology 2015, 26, e16-7.
45. Linden, A. A comparison of approaches for stratifying on the propensity score to reduce bias. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 2017, 23, 690-6.
46. Thomas, L. E.; Thomas, S. M.; Li, F.; Matsouaka, R. A. Addressing substantial covariate imbalance with propensity score stratification and balancing weights: connections and recommendations. Epidemiol. Methods. 2023, 12, 20220131.
47. Li, F.; Thomas, L. E.; Li, F. Addressing extreme propensity scores via the overlap weights. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2019, 188, 250-7.
48. Wen, J.; Yao, X.; Lu, R.; et al. Associations between seminal plasma metals/metalloids and semen quality: a cross-sectional study. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2024, 279, 116472.
49. Chedrese, P. J.; Piasek, M.; Henson, M. C. Cadmium as an endocrine disruptor in the reproductive system. Immunol. Endocr. Metab. Agents. Med. Chem. 2006, 6, 27-35.
50. Alamdar, A.; Tian, M.; Huang, Q.; et al. Enhanced histone H3K9 tri-methylation suppresses steroidogenesis in rat testis chronically exposed to arsenic. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 170, 513-20.
51. Branch, F. M.; Perry, M. J.; Chen, Z.; Louis, G. M. B. Metal(loid)s and human semen quality: the LIFE Study. Reprod. Toxicol. 2021, 106, 94-102.
52. Culty, M.; Albert, O. Antiandrogens and male reproduction. Encyclopedia. of. Reproduction. , 2026. pp. 813-22.
53. Chaturvedi, N. K.; Kumar, S.; Negi, S.; Tyagi, R. K. Endocrine disruptors provoke differential modulatory responses on androgen receptor and pregnane and xenobiotic receptor: potential implications in metabolic disorders. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2010, 345, 291-308.
54. Li, H.; Liu, J.; Huang, L.; et al. Hexavalent chromium inhibits testosterone synthesis in bovine testicular leydig cells through mitochondrial damage via BNIP3. Reprod. Biol. 2026, 26, 101181.
55. Shobana, N.; Kumar, M. K.; Navin, A. K.; Akbarsha, M. A.; Aruldhas, M. M. Prenatal exposure to excess chromium attenuates transcription factors regulating expression of androgen and follicle stimulating hormone receptors in Sertoli cells of prepuberal rats. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2020, 328, 109188.
56. Kong, L.; Tang, M.; Zhang, T.; et al. Nickel nanoparticles exposure and reproductive toxicity in healthy adult rats. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 21253-69.
57. Ashrap, P.; Sánchez, B. N.; Téllez-Rojo, M. M.; et al. In utero and peripubertal metals exposure in relation to reproductive hormones and sexual maturation and progression among girls in Mexico City. Environ. Res. 2019, 177, 108630.
58. Hill, J.; Linero, A.; Murray, J. Bayesian additive regression trees: a review and look forward. Ann. Rev. Stat. Appl. 2020, 7, 251-78.
59. Kou, M.; Wang, Z.; Wang, M.; et al. Cadmium and lead ions interaction: a model for assessing combined heavy metal contamination in soils for food safety risk evaluation. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2025, 298, 118324.
60. Obeng-Gyasi, E.; Obeng-Gyasi, B. Association of combined lead, cadmium, and mercury with systemic inflammation. Front. Public. Health. 2024, 12, 1385500.
61. Schisterman, E. F.; Cole, S. R.; Platt, R. W. Overadjustment bias and unnecessary adjustment in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology 2009, 20, 488-95.
62. Thomas, L. E.; Li, F.; Pencina, M. J. Overlap weighting: a propensity score method that mimics attributes of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2020, 323, 2417-8.
63. Rosen, E. M.; Stevens, D. R.; McNell, E. E.; et al. Variability and longitudinal trajectories of phthalate and replacement biomarkers across pregnancy in the human placenta and phthalates study. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 13036-46.
64. Bartell, S. M.; Purdue, M. P.; Rhee, J.; Nøst, T. H.; Rusiecki, J.; Steenland, K. How well does a single blood sample represent long-term exposure for epidemiological studies of PFOA among men in the general population? Environ. Int. 2024, 192, 109056.
65. Thankamony, A.; Pasterski, V.; Ong, K. K.; Acerini, C. L.; Hughes, I. A. Anogenital distance as a marker of androgen exposure in humans. Andrology 2016, 4, 616-25.
