REFERENCES

1. Yin, S.; Chen, L.; Yang, J.; et al. A Fe-NC electrocatalyst boosted by trace bromide ions with high performance in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 7489.

2. Shao, R.; Xu, X.; Zhou, Z.; et al. Promoting ordering degree of intermetallic fuel cell catalysts by low-melting-point metal doping. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 5896.

3. Ji, Y.; Kwon, O.; Jeon, O. S.; Yim, S.; Jeon, Y.; Shul, Y. Effective single web-structured electrode for high membrane electrode assembly performance in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell. Sci. Adv. 2023, 9, eadf4863.

4. Khedekar, K.; Zaffora, A.; Santamaria, M.; et al. Revealing in-plane movement of platinum in polymer electrolyte fuel cells after heavy-duty vehicle lifetime. Nat. Catal. 2023, 6, 676-86.

5. Liu, F.; Kim, I. S.; Miyatake, K. Proton-conductive aromatic membranes reinforced with poly(vinylidene fluoride) nanofibers for high-performance durable fuel cells. Sci. Adv. 2023, 9, eadg9057.

6. Li, M.; Ding, H.; Song, J.; et al. Transport-friendly microstructure in SSC-MEA: unveiling the SSC ionomer-based membrane electrode assemblies for enhanced fuel cell performance. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, 2403647.

7. You, S.; Jung, S.; Park, J.; et al. Enhancing durability of automotive fuel cells via selective electrical conductivity induced by tungsten oxide layer coated directly on membrane electrode assembly. Sci. Adv. 2023, 9, eadi5696.

8. Sun, Y.; Mao, L.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Peng, R. Magnetic Array-Aided Visualizing PEMFC Degradation Heterogeneity. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, 2403631.

9. Sharma, R.; Morgen, P.; Chiriaev, S.; et al. Insights into degradation of the membrane-electrode assembly performance in low-temperature PEMFC: the catalyst, the ionomer, or the interface? ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2022, 14, 49658-71.

10. Yao, J.; Yang, Y.; Hou, X.; et al. Fast design of catalyst layer with optimal electrical-thermal-water performance for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J. Energy. Chem. 2023, 81, 642-55.

11. Yu, W.; Yang, X.; Liang, X.; et al. All sprayed fluorine-free membrane electrode assembly for low-platinum and low-humidity proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2023, 11, 9002-8.

12. Podbevšek, D.; Modestino, M. A. A multiscale fluid dynamics perspective on bubble management in water electrolysis. Joule. 2026, 10, 102429.

13. Li, G.; Shen, R.; Hu, S.; Wang, B.; Algadi, H.; Wang, C. Norbornene-based acid-base blended polymer membranes with low ion exchange capacity for proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Adv. Compos. Hybrid. Mater. 2022, 5, 2131-7.

14. Pei, Y.; Zhu, W.; Yue, R.; et al. Controllable construction of Pt/CNT catalyst layers to improve Pt utilization in PEMFCs. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2024, 12, 739-47.

15. Zhao, J.; Liu, H.; Li, X. Structure, property, and performance of catalyst layers in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Electrochem. Energy. Rev. 2023, 6, 13.

16. Zhang, G.; Qu, Z.; Tao, W.; et al. Porous flow field for next-generation proton exchange membrane fuel cells: materials, characterization, design, and challenges. Chem. Rev. 2023, 123, 989-1039.

17. Ahmed, S.; Beauger, C.; Zada, A.; et al. Recent advancements in designing high-performance proton exchange membrane fuel cells: a comprehensive review. Appl. Energy. 2025, 390, 125753.

18. Mo, S.; Du, L.; Huang, Z.; et al. Recent advances on PEM fuel cells: from key materials to membrane electrode assembly. Electrochem. Energy. Rev. 2023, 6, 28.

19. Yang, B.; Xiang, Z. Nanostructure engineering of cathode layers in proton exchange membrane fuel cells: from catalysts to membrane electrode assembly. ACS. Nano. 2024, 18, 11598-630.

20. Lazaridis, T.; Stühmeier, B. M.; Gasteiger, H. A.; El-sayed, H. A. Capabilities and limitations of rotating disk electrodes versus membrane electrode assemblies in the investigation of electrocatalysts. Nat. Catal. 2022, 5, 363-73.

21. Riasse, R.; Lafforgue, C.; Vandenberghe, F.; et al. Benchmarking proton exchange membrane fuel cell cathode catalyst at high current density: a comparison between the rotating disk electrode, the gas diffusion electrode and differential cell. J. Power. Sources. 2023, 556, 232491.

22. Ehelebe, K.; Schmitt, N.; Sievers, G.; et al. Benchmarking fuel cell electrocatalysts using gas diffusion electrodes: inter-lab comparison and best practices. ACS. Energy. Lett. 2022, 7, 816-26.

23. Long, X.; Mao, Z.; He, Y.; et al. Comprehensive analysis of advanced stable anode electrocatalysts for proton exchange membrane water electrolyzer. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2026, 556, 217657.

24. Huang, W.; Li, J.; Edwards, P. P. Mesoscience: exploring the common principle at mesoscales. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2017, 5, 321-6.

25. Wei, Y.; Zhao, D.; Wang, D. Mesoscience in hollow multi-shelled structures. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, 2305408.

26. Sun, F.; Yang, C.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Multiscale mass transfer at carbonaceous catalyst-mediated electrocatalytic interface. Joule. 2025, 9, 102170.

27. Buot, F. A. Mesoscopic physics and nanoelectronics: nanoscience and nanotechnology. Phys. Rep. 1993, 234, 73-174.

28. Ryan, E. M.; Mukherjee, P. P. Mesoscale modeling in electrochemical devices - a critical perspective. Progr. Energy. Combust. Sci. 2019, 71, 118-42.

29. Deng, Z.; Kumar, V.; Bölle, F. T.; et al. Towards autonomous high-throughput multiscale modelling of battery interfaces. Energy. Environ. Sci. 2022, 15, 579-94.

30. Olbrich, W.; Kadyk, T.; Sauter, U.; Eikerling, M.; Gostick, J. Structure and conductivity of ionomer in PEM fuel cell catalyst layers: a model-based analysis. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 14127.

31. Ren, H.; Teng, Y.; Meng, X.; et al. Ionomer network of catalyst layers for proton exchange membrane fuel cell. J. Power. Sources. 2021, 506, 230186.

32. Sun, J.; Lin, P.; Zeng, L.; et al. Artificial-intelligence-guided design of ordered gas diffusion layers for high-performing fuel cells via Bayesian machine learning. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 6528.

33. Lim, B. H.; Majlan, E. H.; Tajuddin, A.; et al. Comparison of catalyst-coated membranes and catalyst-coated substrate for PEMFC membrane electrode assembly: a review. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2021, 33, 1-16.

34. Xing, Y.; Li, H.; Avgouropoulos, G. Research progress of proton exchange membrane failure and mitigation strategies. Materials. 2021, 14, 2591.

35. Wang, J.; Wang, H.; Fan, Y. Techno-economic challenges of fuel cell commercialization. Engineering. 2018, 4, 352-60.

36. Cho, S.; Oh, S.; Kim, M.; et al. Mass-transport-engineered CCM architecture employing MPL-free carbon paper and graphene-coated Ni foam channels for high-temperature PEM fuel cells. Adv. Sci. 2026, 13, e75250.

37. Gao, Y.; Yu, H.; Wang, W.; et al. Roadmap toward next-generation proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers. Joule. 2026, 10, 102337.

38. Chen, M.; Zhao, C.; Sun, F.; Fan, J.; Li, H.; Wang, H. Research progress of catalyst layer and interlayer interface structures in membrane electrode assembly (MEA) for proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) system. eTransportation. 2020, 5, 100075.

39. Koch, S.; Metzler, L.; Kilian, S. K.; et al. Toward scalable production: catalyst-coated membranes (CCMs) for anion-exchange membrane water electrolysis via direct bar coating. Adv. Sustainable. Syst. 2023, 7, 2200332.

40. Pan, S.; Wen, Q.; Dan, X.; et al. Enhanced triple-phase interface in PEMFC by proton conductor absorption on the Pt catalyst. ACS. Appl. Energy. Mater. 2023, 6, 763-72.

41. Yu, L.; Tian, B.; Huang, W.; Zhou, X.; Li, W. Advancements in ordered membrane electrode assembly (MEA) for water electrolysis. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2024, 48, 101595.

42. Li, Y.; Wen, Q.; Qin, J.; et al. A high-efficient and low-consumption nanoimprint method to prepare large-area and high-quality Nafion array for the ordered MEA of fuel cell. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 451, 138722.

43. Pan, S.; Qin, J.; Ning, F.; et al. Well-dispersed Nafion array prepared by the freeze-drying method to effectively improve the performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. ACS. Sustainable. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 16770-7.

44. Tan, M.; Zhang, W.; Liu, H.; et al. Revolutionizing high-temperature polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells: unleashing superior performance with vertically aligned TiO2 nanorods supporting ordered catalyst layer featuring Pt nanowires. Fuel. 2024, 357, 130084.

45. Wang, M.; Peng, F.; Zou, J.; et al. Manufacturing-induced irregularities of membrane electrode assemblies: Impacts on proton exchange membrane fuel cells’ performance and diagnosis. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2025, 216, 115707.

46. Wang, G.; Zou, L.; Huang, Q.; Zou, Z.; Yang, H. Multidimensional nanostructured membrane electrode assemblies for proton exchange membrane fuel cell applications. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2019, 7, 9447-77.

47. Zhao, W.; Xu, G.; Dong, W.; et al. Progress and perspective for in situ studies of oxygen reduction reaction in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Adv. Sci. 2023, 10, 2300550.

48. Chen, Z.; Guo, L.; Pan, L.; et al. Advances in oxygen evolution electrocatalysts for proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2022, 12, 2103670.

49. Zhao, Z.; Hossain, M. D.; Xu, C.; et al. Tailoring a three-phase microenvironment for high-performance oxygen reduction reaction in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Matter. 2020, 3, 1774-90.

50. Li, H.; You, J.; Feng, Y.; et al. Comprehensive understanding of oxygen transport at Gas/ionomer/electrocatalyst triple phase boundary in PEMFCs. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 478, 147454.

51. Li, C.; Yu, K.; Bird, A.; et al. Unraveling the core of fuel cell performance: engineering the ionomer/catalyst interface. Energy. Environ. Sci. 2023, 16, 2977-90.

52. Sun, R.; Xia, Z.; Xu, X.; Deng, R.; Wang, S.; Sun, G. Periodic evolution of the ionomer/catalyst interfacial structures towards proton conductance and oxygen transport in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Nano. Energy. 2020, 75, 104919.

53. Li, Y.; Wu, Z.; Wang, C.; et al. Engineering triple-phase boundary in Pt catalyst layers for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 34, 2310428.

54. Xu, S.; Liu, H.; Zheng, N.; Tao, H. B. Physical degradation of anode catalyst layer in proton exchange membrane water electrolysis. Adv. Mater. Interfaces. 2025, 12, 2400549.

55. Agmon, N. The Grotthuss mechanism. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 244, 456-62.

56. Eskandari, H.; Paul, D. K.; Young, A. P.; Karan, K. Humidity-dependent hydration and proton conductivity of PFSA ionomer thin films at fuel-cell-relevant temperatures: effect of ionomer equivalent weight and side-chain characteristics. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2022, 14, 50762-72.

57. Kim, B.; Park, J.; Park, J. Effect of blended perfluorinated sulfonic acid ionomer binder on the performance of catalyst layers in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Membranes. 2023, 13, 794.

58. Ning, F.; Qin, J.; Dan, X.; et al. Nanosized proton conductor array with high specific surface area improves fuel cell performance at low Pt loading. ACS. Nano. 2023, 17, 9487-500.

59. Tian, Z. Q.; Lim, S. H.; Poh, C. K.; et al. A highly order-structured membrane electrode assembly with vertically aligned carbon nanotubes for ultra-low Pt loading PEM fuel cells. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2011, 1, 1205-14.

60. Fan, J.; Chen, M.; Zhao, Z.; et al. Bridging the gap between highly active oxygen reduction reaction catalysts and effective catalyst layers for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Nat. Energy. 2021, 6, 475-86.

61. Wen, G.; Sun, L.; Qin, Y.; et al. COF-assisted construction of steric mass-charge channels to boost activity for high-performance fuel cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2025, 64, e202424179.

62. Islam, M. N.; Mansoor, Basha. A. B.; Kollath, V. O.; Soleymani, A. P.; Jankovic, J.; Karan, K. Designing fuel cell catalyst support for superior catalytic activity and low mass-transport resistance. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 6157.

63. Lee, Y. J.; Kim, H.; Oh, H.; et al. Lens-shaped carbon particles with perpendicularly-oriented channels for high-performance proton exchange membrane fuel cells. ACS. Nano. 2022, 16, 2988-96.

64. Owejan, J. P.; Owejan, J. E.; Gu, W. Impact of platinum loading and catalyst layer structure on PEMFC performance. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2013, 160, F824-33.

65. Zhang, R.; Min, T.; Liu, Y.; Chen, L.; Tao, W. Pore-scale study of effects of different Pt loading reduction schemes on reactive transport processes in catalyst layers of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. 2021, 46, 20037-53.

66. Zhang, G.; Qu, Z.; Tao, W.; et al. Advancing next-generation proton-exchange membrane fuel cell development in multi-physics transfer. Joule. 2024, 8, 45-63.

67. Wang, Z.; Yang, Y.; Mo, J.; Zhao, C.; Yan, C. Control on Pt-containing ordered honeycomb mesoporous nanostructures via self-assembly of block copolymer. Colloid. Surface. A. 2023, 656, 130392.

68. Xia, Z.; Wang, S.; Jiang, L.; et al. Bio-inspired construction of advanced fuel cell cathode with Pt anchored in ordered hybrid polymer matrix. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 16100.

69. Yang, G.; Komini, Babu. S.; Liyanage, W. P. R.; et al. Coaxial nanowire electrodes enable exceptional fuel cell durability. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2301264.

70. Marconot, O.; Pauc, N.; Buttard, D.; Morin, A. Vertically aligned platinum copper nanotubes as PEM fuel cell cathode: elaboration and fuel cell test. Fuel. Cells. 2018, 18, 723-30.

71. Zeng, Y.; Shao, Z.; Zhang, H.; et al. Nanostructured ultrathin catalyst layer based on open-walled PtCo bimetallic nanotube arrays for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Nano. Energy. 2017, 34, 344-55.

72. Yang, G.; Lee, C.; Qiao, X.; Babu, S. K.; Martinez, U.; Spendelow, J. S. Advanced electrode structures for proton exchange membrane fuel cells: current status and path forward. Electrochem. Energy. Rev. 2024, 7, 9.

73. Bai, J.; Ke, S.; Song, J.; et al. Surface engineering of carbon-supported platinum as a route to electrocatalysts with superior durability and activity for PEMFC cathodes. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2022, 14, 5287-97.

74. Zeng, Y.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Z.; et al. Nano-engineering of a 3D-ordered membrane electrode assembly with ultrathin Pt skin on open-walled PdCo nanotube arrays for fuel cells. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2018, 6, 6521-33.

75. Wang, K.; Zhou, T.; Cao, Z.; et al. Advanced 3D ordered electrodes for PEMFC applications: From structural features and fabrication methods to the controllable design of catalyst layers. Colloid. Surface. A. 2024, 9, 1336-65.

76. Huang, J.; Zhang, J.; Eikerling, M. Unifying theoretical framework for deciphering the oxygen reduction reaction on platinum. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, 11776-86.

77. Martínez-Hincapié, R.; Climent, V.; Feliu, J. M. Peroxodisulfate reduction as a probe to interfacial charge. Electrochem. Commun. 2018, 88, 43-6.

78. Sinha, P. K.; Gu, W.; Kongkanand, A.; Thompson, E. Performance of nano structured thin film (NSTF) electrodes under partially-humidified conditions. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2011, 158, B831.

79. Inaba, M.; Suzuki, T.; Hatanaka, T.; Morimoto, Y. Fabrication and cell analysis of a Pt/SiO2 platinum thin film electrode. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2015, 162, F634-8.

80. Hu, L.; Zhang, M.; Komini babu, S.; Kongkanand, A.; Litster, S. Ionic conductivity over metal/water interfaces in ionomer-free fuel cell electrodes. ChemElectroChem. 2019, 6, 2659-66.

81. Liu, Y.; Cai, X.; Lu, J.; Du, A.; Lin, R. Pt active site density optimization of the catalyst layer for an ultralow-Pt-loading PEMFC. Energy. Fuels. 2024, 38, 21423-31.

82. Murata, S.; Imanishi, M.; Hasegawa, S.; Namba, R. Vertically aligned carbon nanotube electrodes for high current density operating proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J. Power. Sources. 2014, 253, 104-13.

83. Wu, J.; Liu, H.; Song, Y.; Wang, Y. A modeling study of PEM fuel cells with novel catalyst monolayers under low platinum loading. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2022, 10, 4076-86.

84. Seselj, N.; Alfaro, S. M.; Bompolaki, E.; Cleemann, L. N.; Torres, T.; Azizi, K. Catalyst development for high-temperature polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (HT-PEMFC) applications. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2302207.

85. Balogun, E.; Cassegrain, S.; Mardle, P.; Adamski, M.; Saatkamp, T.; Holdcroft, S. Nonconformal particles of hyperbranched sulfonated phenylated poly(phenylene) ionomers as proton-conducting pathways in proton exchange membrane fuel cell catalyst layers. ACS. Energy. Lett. 2022, 7, 2070-8.

86. Lee, Y. J.; Kim, H. E.; Lee, E.; et al. Ultra-low Pt loaded porous carbon microparticles with controlled channel structure for high-performance fuel cell catalysts. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2021, 11, 2102970.

87. Chen, Y.; Lin, H.; Huo, J.; et al. Multi-scale revealing how real catalyst layer interfaces dominate the local oxygen transport resistance in ultra-low platinum PEMFC. J. Colloid. Interface. Sci. 2024, 671, 344-53.

88. Deng, H.; Hou, Y.; Chen, W.; Pan, F.; Jiao, K. Lattice Boltzmann simulation of oxygen diffusion and electrochemical reaction inside catalyst layer of PEM fuel cells. Int. J. Heat. Mass. Transfer. 2019, 143, 118538.

89. Jiao, L.; Arman, T. A.; Hwang, S.; et al. Self-sacrificial template synthesis of Fe-N-C catalysts with dense active sites deposited on a porous carbon network for high performance in PEMFC. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2024, 14, 2303952.

90. Ramaswamy, N.; Kumaraguru, S. Materials and design selection to improve high current density performance in PEMFC. ECS. Trans. 2018, 85, 835-42.

91. Yarlagadda, V.; Carpenter, M. K.; Moylan, T. E.; et al. Boosting fuel cell performance with accessible carbon mesopores. ACS. Energy. Lett. 2018, 3, 618-21.

92. Wang, M.; Zhang, J.; Favero, S.; et al. Resolving optimal ionomer interaction in fuel cell electrodes via operando X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 9390.

93. Song, S.; Liang, Y.; Li, Z.; et al. Effect of pore morphology of mesoporous carbons on the electrocatalytic activity of Pt nanoparticles for fuel cell reactions. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2010, 98, 132-7.

94. Choi, J.; Yang, L.; Kishimoto, T.; et al. Is the rapid initial performance loss of Fe/N/C non precious metal catalysts due to micropore flooding? Energy. Environ. Sci. 2017, 10, 296-305.

95. Chen, H.; Zhang, R.; Xia, Z.; Weng, Q.; Zhang, T.; Pei, P. Experimental investigation on PEM fuel cell flooding mitigation under heavy loading condition. Appl. Energy. 2023, 349, 121632.

96. Chen, L.; Zhang, R.; Min, T.; Kang, Q.; Tao, W. Pore-scale study of effects of macroscopic pores and their distributions on reactive transport in hierarchical porous media. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 349, 428-37.

97. Manna, N.; Singh, M.; Kurungot, S. Microporous 3D-structured hierarchically entangled graphene-supported Pt3Co alloy catalyst for PEMFC application with process-friendly features. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2023, 15, 28023-35.

98. Trogadas, P.; Ramani, V.; Strasser, P.; Fuller, T. F.; Coppens, M. O. Hierarchically structured nanomaterials for electrochemical energy conversion. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 122-48.

99. Pan, S.; Ye, Y.; Zhang, C.; et al. A review of designing hierarchical structure within membrane electrode assembly for water electrolyzer. Adv. Sci. 2025, 12, e10546.

100. Baek, J.; Son, H.; Lee, E.; Yoo, S. J.; Kim, M.; Lee, G. Hierarchically porous Co-N-C electrocatalysts with enhanced mass transport and cobalt utilization efficiency for oxygen reduction reaction in high-performance PEMFCs. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2025, 13, 11445-57.

101. Wang, M. J.; Zhao, T.; Luo, W.; et al. Quantified mass transfer and superior antiflooding performance of ordered macro-mesoporous electrocatalysts. AIChE. J. 2018, 64, 2881-9.

102. Lee, C.; Kort-kamp, W. J. M.; Yu, H.; et al. Grooved electrodes for high-power-density fuel cells. Nat. Energy. 2023, 8, 685-94.

103. Xuan, L.; Mei, D.; Zhou, C.; Mao, W.; Wang, Y. Development of a double-side ordered membrane electrode assembly based on titanium nitride nanoarrays. Ind. Chem. Mater. 2024, 2, 622-33.

104. Wang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Liu, H.; et al. Cultivating titanium dioxide nanoarrays on gas diffusion layer for advancing self-humidifying proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Fuel. 2024, 366, 131322.

105. Lee, D.; Jo, W.; Yuk, S.; et al. In-Plane Channel-structured catalyst layer for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018, 10, 4682-8.

106. Tian, B.; Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; et al. Ordered membrane electrode assembly with drastically enhanced proton and mass transport for proton exchange membrane water electrolysis. Nano. Lett. 2023, 23, 6474-81.

107. Ahluwalia, R. K.; Peng, J.; Wang, X.; Cullen, D. A.; Steinbach, A. J. Long-term stability of nanostructured thin film electrodes at operating potentials. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2017, 164, F306-20.

108. Schneider, P.; Scherzer, A.; Ney, L.; et al. In-situ characterization of cathode catalyst degradation in PEM fuel cells. Sci. Data. 2024, 11, 828.

109. Roiron, C.; Cosenza, A.; Ferro, G.; Chen, J. L.; Wang, H.; Atanassov, P. Carbon catalyst supports for Pt-based polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells: porosity, graphitization, and chemical modifications. Adv. Sci. 2025, 12, e08841.

110. Luo, W.; Feng, A.; Xie, H.; et al. A review of coupled degradation mechanisms in PEMFCs: thermal management, hydrogen crossover and mitigation strategies. Batteries. 2026, 12, 275.

111. Ni, W.; Liu, Z.; Li, J.; Zhang, L.; Chen, Q.; Zhao, D. Multiple synergistic degradation parameter identification of PEM fuel cells utilizing threat response adaptive differential evolution algorithm. Energies. 2026, 19, 894.

112. Bernhardt, A.; Lange, K.; Göckeritz, R.; et al. Degradation mechanisms in PEM water electrolysis: diagnosis and impact. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2026, 11, e02419.

113. Kim, S.; Hyun, K.; Kwon, Y. Effects of voltage stress conditions on degradation of iridium-based catalysts occurring during high-frequency operation of PEM water electrolysis. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 496, 154288.

114. Li, P.; Zhou, Z.; Qiu, D.; Peng, L. Insight into oxygen transport in proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers by in situ X-ray characterization. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, 2405658.

115. Ai, L.; Xu, Z.; Holmes, S. M.; Zhai, H. Improving interlayer interactions in proton exchange membrane fuel cell through carbon nanotube-based catalyst design. Adv. Sci. 2025, 12, e14404.

116. Okonkwo, P. C. Proton exchange membrane fuel cell catalyst layer degradation mechanisms: a succinct review. Catalysts. 2025, 15, 97.

117. Zhu, Y.; Qu, Z.; Zhang, G.; Yu, B. A one-dimensional model for Pt degradation and precipitation in proton exchange membrane fuel cell considering Pt nucleation, particle size growth, and band formation. Electrochim. Acta. 2024, 475, 143590.

118. Li, Y.; Hart, J. L.; Gawas, R.; et al. Unveiling the origin of morphological instability in topologically complex electrocatalytic nanostructures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 33482-94.

119. Liu, H.; Yang, Y.; Liu, J.; et al. Constructing robust 3D ionomer networks in the catalyst layer to achieve stable water electrolysis for green hydrogen production. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2024, 16, 16408-17.

120. Zasypkina, A. A.; Ivanova, N. A.; Spasov, D. D.; Mensharapov, R. M.; Sinyakov, M. V.; Grigoriev, S. A. Recent advances in the development of nanocarbon-based electrocatalytic/electrode materials for proton exchange membrane fuel cells: a review. Catalysts. 2024, 14, 303.

121. Ren, Y.; Liu, L.; Hwang, D. K.; Lee, C. Template-based structured electrodes for high power and durable proton exchange membrane fuel cells. SusMat. 2026, 6, e70081.

122. Huang, W.; Jiang, Y.; Ning, F.; et al. Occlusal ordered membrane electrode assembly (MEA) with conformal array structure and superior performance by constructing nested interface. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025, 36, e08864.

123. Meng, X.; Deng, X.; Zhou, L.; et al. A highly ordered hydrophilic-hydrophobic Janus Bi-functional layer with ultralow Pt loading and fast gas/water transport for fuel cells. Energy. Environ. Mater. 2020, 4, 126-33.

124. Deng, R.; Xia, Z.; Sun, R.; Wang, S.; Sun, G. Nanostructured ultrathin catalyst layer with ordered platinum nanotube arrays for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. J. Energy. Chem. 2020, 43, 33-9.

125. Wang, Z.; Yu, H.; Na, J.; et al. A low Ir loading Inverse opal self-supporting electrode for efficient and durable PEM water electrolysis. Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. 2025, 114, 97-105.

126. Ma, H.; Tong, Y.; Hung, Y. M.; Wang, X. Progress on the durability of catalyst layer interfaces in proton-exchange membrane fuel cells. Process. Saf. Environ. Prot. 2024, 192, 358-77.

127. Zhang, F.; Zu, B.; Wang, B.; et al. Developing long-durability proton-exchange membrane fuel cells. Joule. 2025, 9, 101853.

128. Wei, P.; Sui, Y.; Meng, X.; Zhou, Q. The advances development of proton exchange membrane with high proton conductivity and balanced stability in fuel cells. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2023, 140, e53919.

129. Huang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Que, L.; et al. Ordered Nafion composite membranes doped with Ce-UiO-66: improved performance and decreased H2 crossover in PEM water electrolysis. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2026, 17, 4870-8.

130. Dong, S.; Zhang, C.; Yue, Z.; et al. Overall design of anode with gradient ordered structure with low iridium loading for proton exchange membrane water electrolysis. Nano. Lett. 2022, 22, 9434-40.

131. Ryu, S.; Kim, J.; Lee, J.; Moon, S. Investigation of the effects of electric fields on the nanostructure of Nafion and its proton conductivity. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2018, 6, 20836-43.

132. Han, D.; Sun, J.; Ge, J.; et al. Magnetically aligned composite membranes based on sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) and phosphotungstic acid-loaded magnetic nanoparticles for fuel cell. Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. 2024, 57, 301-14.

133. Kugarajah, V.; Dharmalingam, S. Sulphonated polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane/sulphonated poly ether ether ketone nanocomposite membranes for microbial fuel cell: insights to the miniatures involved. Chemosphere. 2020, 260, 127593.

134. Cai, Y. Y.; Yang, Q.; Sun, L. X.; et al. Bioinspired layered proton-exchange membranes with high strength and proton conductivity. Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. 2021, 46, 4087-99.

135. Ren, K.; Liu, X.; Rao, Z. Effect of temperature and external electric field on proton transport in ordered and amorphous proton exchange membranes: a molecular dynamics study. Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. 2024, 54, 1422-35.

136. Zhu, L.; Li, Y.; Ye, P.; et al. Ultra-stable, highly proton conductive, and self-healing proton exchange membranes based on molecule intercalation technique and noncovalent assembly nanostructure. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2210453.

137. Fan, C.; Peng, Q.; Wu, H.; et al. A quantum dot intercalated robust covalent organic framework membrane for ultrafast proton conduction. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2022, 10, 6616-22.

138. Zhang, L.; Lyu, B.; Gao, Z.; et al. Emerging covalent organic frameworks for efficient proton conductors. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2023, 62, 16545-68.

139. Gao, Z.; Yin, Z.; Kong, Y.; et al. Robust and highly proton conductive COF composite membranes for fuel cell and electrochemical hydrogen compression. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 490, 151368.

140. Kutter, M.; Hilgert, A.; Maier, M.; et al. LiF@PFSA-based composite membranes for PEM fuel cells at intermediate temperature conditions. ACS. Appl. Polym. Mater. 2025, 7, 599-610.

141. Li, L.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Construction of proton exchange membrane with high proton conductivity based on 3D self-assembly structures as multiple proton transport channels. Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. 2025, 97, 419-30.

142. Shao, Z.; Xue, X.; Gao, K.; et al. Sulfonated covalent organic framework packed Nafion membrane with high proton conductivity for H2/O2 fuel cell applications. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2023, 11, 3446-53.

143. Park, M. J.; Balsara, N. P. Anisotropic proton conduction in aligned block copolymer electrolyte membranes at equilibrium with humid air. Macromolecules. 2009, 43, 292-8.

144. Yun, S.; Shin, S.; Lee, J.; et al. Effect of pressure on through-plane proton conductivity of polymer electrolyte membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 417-418, 210-6.

145. Sahu, A. K.; Pitchumani, S.; Sridhar, P.; Shukla, A. K. Nafion and modified-Nafion membranes for polymer electrolyte fuel cells: An overview. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2009, 32, 285-94.

146. Oikawa, H.; Fujita, S.; Kasai, H.; Okada, S.; Tripathy, S. K.; Nakanishi, H. Electric field-induced orientation of organic microcrystals with large dipole moment in dispersion liquid. Colloid. Surface. A. 2000, 169, 251-8.

147. Besharat, F.; Manteghian, M.; Gallone, G.; Lazzeri, A. Electric field induced alignment of graphene oxide nanoplatelets in polyethersulfone matrix. Nanotechnology. 2020, 31, 155701.

148. Gahlot, S.; Kulshrestha, V. Dramatic improvement in water retention and proton conductivity in electrically aligned functionalized CNT/SPEEK nanohybrid PEM. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015, 7, 264-72.

149. Liu, X.; Li, Y.; Xue, J.; et al. Magnetic field alignment of stable proton-conducting channels in an electrolyte membrane. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 842.

150. Sun, J.; Han, D.; Mohideen, M. M.; et al. Constructing vertical proton transport channels in proton exchange membranes of fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. 2024, 50, 1456-80.

151. Allahyarov, E.; Taylor, P. L. Predicted electric-field-induced hexatic structure in an ionomer membrane. Phys. Rev. E. 2009, 80, 020801.

152. Wang, F.; Wang, D.; Zhu, H. Montmorillonite-polybenzimidazole inorganic-organic composite membrane with electric field-aligned proton transport channel for high temperature proton exchange membranes. Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng. 2018, 57, 1752-9.

153. Xie, T.; Feng, S.; Yan, Z.; Yang, T. Tribo-magnetization of the PTFE composites containing ferromagnetic fillers of Fe, Co, or Ni. Wear. 2019, 424-425, 233-45.

154. Huang, L.; Qi, R. A comprehensive review on assembly design strategies on proton exchange membrane applications. Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. 2022, 47, 33903-18.

155. Hyun, J.; Doo, G.; Yuk, S.; et al. Magnetic field-induced through-plane alignment of the proton highway in a proton exchange membrane. ACS. Appl. Energy. Mater. 2020, 3, 4619-28.

156. Breitwieser, M.; Klingele, M.; Vierrath, S.; Zengerle, R.; Thiele, S. Tailoring the membrane-electrode interface in PEM fuel cells: a review and perspective on novel engineering approaches. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2018, 8, 1701257.

157. Zhang, Y.; Liu, F.; Shan, J.; Zhang, X.; Wu, X.; Hou, Z. Advances of high-performance and stable finely-ordered patterned membrane for proton exchange membrane fuel cell applications. J. Power. Sources. 2024, 595, 234053.

158. Lee, S.; Oh, S.; Kim, S.; et al. Patterned ion-pair membrane for high-temperature proton-exchange membrane fuel cells. Small. Struct. 2024, 6, 2400430.

159. Jang, S.; Kang, Y. S.; Kim, D.; et al. Multiscale architectured membranes, electrodes, and transport layers for next-generation polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2204902.

160. Li, Y.; Wen, Q.; Zou, S.; et al. Multiscale architectured Nafion membrane derived from lotus leaf for fuel cell applications. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2023, 15, 29084-93.

161. Zhang, Z.; He, P.; Dai, Y.; Jin, P.; Tao, W. Study of the mechanical behavior of paper-type GDL in PEMFC based on microstructure morphology. Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. 2020, 45, 29379-94.

162. Xu, K.; Di, Q.; Sun, F.; Chen, M.; Wang, H. Degradation mechanism analysis of substrate and microporous layer of gas diffusion layer in proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Fuel. 2024, 358, 130198.

163. Kang, Y.; Lee, S.; Lee, J.; et al. Anisotropically wettable porous transport layers for gas management in water electrolyzers. Adv. Sci. 2026, 13, e08569.

164. Shrestha, P.; Ouellette, D.; Lee, J.; et al. Graded microporous layers for enhanced capillary-driven liquid water removal in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Adv. . Mater. Interfaces. 2019, 6, 1901157.

165. Yin, B.; Xu, S.; Yang, S.; Dong, F. Influence of microelliptical groove gas diffusion layer (GDL) on transport behavior of proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC). Int. J. Heat. Mass. Transfer. 2021, 180, 121793.

166. Wen, Q.; Pan, S.; Li, Y.; et al. Janus gas diffusion layer for enhanced water management in proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs). ACS. Energy. Lett. 2022, 7, 3900-9.

167. Zhang, Q.; Gu, T.; Shi, R.; et al. Chemically engineered microporous layer with superhydrophobicity for high-performance proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Energy. Fuels. 2024, 38, 1477-86.

168. Zhang, T.; Meng, L.; Chen, C.; et al. Similarities and differences between gas diffusion layers used in proton exchange membrane fuel cell and water electrolysis for material and mass transport. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, 2309440.

169. Wang, W.; Yu, S.; Li, K.; et al. Insights into the rapid two-phase transport dynamics in different structured porous transport layers of water electrolyzers through high-speed visualization. J. Power. Sources. 2021, 516, 230641.

170. Niblett, D.; Niasar, V.; Holmes, S. Enhancing the performance of fuel cell gas diffusion layers using ordered microstructural design. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, 013520.

171. He, C.; Wen, Q.; Ning, F.; et al. A new integrated GDL with wavy channel and tunneled rib for high power density PEMFC at low back pressure and wide humidity. Adv. Sci. 2023, 10, 2302928.

172. Chen, L.; Lin, R.; Dong, M.; Yu, X.; Lou, M.; Hao, Z. Optimizing the mass-transfer efficiency of a microporous layer for high-performance proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2021, 125, 14122-33.

173. Huang, B.; Lei, C.; Sun, X.; et al. Improving mass transfer in anion exchange membrane water electrolysis by ordered gas diffusion layer. Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. 2023, 48, 35453-62.

174. Lu, Z.; Waldecker, J.; Xie, X.; Lai, M.; Hussey, D. S.; Jacobson, D. L. Investigation of water transport in perforated gas diffusion layer by neutron radiography. ECS. Trans. 2013, 58, 315-24.

175. Wang, S.; Hu, K.; Chen, W.; et al. The influence of patterned microporous layer on the proton exchange membrane fuel cell performances. Nano. Res. 2024, 17, 6095-101.

176. Zhu, Z.; Liu, X.; Gao, R.; et al. Enhancing mass transport efficiency in high-current density PEMECs by constructing Ti-fiber oriented porous transport layers. Small. 2025, 21, 2411817.

177. Liu, C.; Padgett, E.; Arregui-Mena, J. D.; et al. Performance improvement of proton exchange membrane water electrolysis by surface modification of porous transport layers. J. Power. Sources. 2025, 652, 237624.

178. Bozzetti, M.; Berger, A.; Cuadrado, Collados. C.; Thommes, M.; Gasteiger, H. A.; Tileli, V. On tortuosity and water management in hydrophobic and hydrophilic microporous layers with different carbon structures. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2025, 172, 036505.

179. Zhukovsky, K.; Pozio, A. Maximum current limitations of the PEM fuel cell with serpentine gas supply channels. J. Power. Sources. 2004, 130, 95-105.

180. Saha, M. S.; Li, R.; Sun, X. High loading and monodispersed Pt nanoparticles on multiwalled carbon nanotubes for high performance proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J. Power. Sources. 2008, 177, 314-22.

181. Ning, F.; Bai, C.; Qin, J.; et al. Great improvement in the performance and lifetime of a fuel cell using a highly dense, well-ordered, and cone-shaped Nafion array. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2020, 8, 5489-500.

182. Zaman, S.; Moradizadeh, L.; Murugaiah, D. K.; Khalid, M.; Roohan, Farooq. Lala. S.; Shahgaldi, S. Exploring the degradation of catalyst layer and porous transport layer in proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers. EES. Catal. 2026, 4, 11-30.

183. Weber, C. C.; Wrubel, J. A.; Gubler, L.; Bender, G.; De, Angelis. S.; Büchi, F. N. How the porous transport layer interface affects catalyst utilization and performance in polymer electrolyte water electrolysis. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2023, 15, 34750-63.

184. Park, S. H.; Park, Y. J.; Jang, S.; et al. Triple-layer porous transport layers with ultra-high porosity for enhanced oxygen transport and catalyst utilization in water electrolysis. Nano-Micro. Lett. 2025, 17, 316.

185. Lei, C.; Xie, Z.; Wu, K.; Fu, Q. Controlled vertically aligned structures in polymer composites: natural inspiration, structural processing, and functional application. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2103495.

186. Ding, R.; Ding, Y.; Zhang, H.; et al. Applying machine learning to boost the development of high-performance membrane electrode assembly for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2021, 9, 6841-50.

187. Rui, Z.; Ding, R.; Hua, K.; et al. Design of proton exchange membranes with high durability for fuel cells: From the perspective of machine learning. J. Membr. Sci. 2023, 683, 121831.

188. Yang, G.; Xie, Z.; Yu, S.; et al. All-in-one bipolar electrode: a new concept for compact and efficient water electrolyzers. Nano. Energy. 2021, 90, 106551.

189. Zeng, Z.; Ouimet, R.; Bonville, L.; et al. Innovative duo-recombination layer design for effective hydrogen crossover mitigation in advanced MEAs for PEM water electrolyzers. Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. 2025, 114, 534-44.

190. Wan, L.; Xu, Z.; Xu, Q.; Wang, P.; Wang, B. Overall design of novel 3D-ordered MEA with drastically enhanced mass transport for alkaline electrolyzers. Energy. Environ. Sci. 2022, 15, 1882-92.

191. Fu, X.; Yang, M.; Zhai, M.; Zhang, C.; Niu, H.; Li, Y. Precision anode vacancy engineering for long-lasting and fast-charging Na-Ion batteries. Energy. Storage. Mater. 2024, 70, 103450.

192. He, Z.; Han, T.; Liu, W.; et al. 3D printed sodium-ion batteries via ternary anode design affording hybrid ion storage mechanism. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2025, 14, 2303296.

193. Cao, R.; Liu, L.; Yu, W.; Ding, S. External field-assisted metal-air batteries: mechanisms, progress, and prospects. SusMat. 2024, 5, e251.

Energy Z
ISSN : 3070-5541 (Online)

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/