REFERENCES

1. Savory E, Parke GAR, Zeinoddini M, Toy N, Disney P. Modelling of tornado and microburst-induced wind loading and failure of a lattice transmission tower. Eng Struct 2001;23:365-75.

2. Okamura T, Ohkuma T, Hongo E, Okada H. Wind response analysis of a transmission tower in a mountainous area. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 2003;91:53-63.

3. Battista RC, Rodrigues RS, Pfeil MS. Dynamic behavior and stability of transmission line towers under wind forces. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 2003;91:1051-67.

4. Yang SC, Hong HP. Nonlinear inelastic responses of transmission tower-line system under downburst wind. Eng Struct 2016;123:490-500.

5. Zhang J, Xie Q. Failure analysis of transmission tower subjected to strong wind load. J Constr Steel Res 2019;160:271-9.

6. Shen GH, Cai CS, Sun BN, Lou WJ. Study of dynamic impacts on transmission-line systems attributable to conductor breakage using the finite-element method. J Perform Constr Facil 2011;25:130-7.

7. Li JX, Wang SH, Fu X. Dynamic response of tower-line system induced by insulator breakage considering the collision between the conductor and the ground surface. J Perform Constr Facil 2019;34:04019098.

8. Yin T, Lam HF, Chow HM, Zhu HP. Dynamic reduction-based structural damage detection of transmission tower utilizing ambient vibration data. Eng Struct 2009;31:2009-19.

9. Zhang Q, Fu X, Ren L, Jia ZG. Modal parameters of a transmission tower considering the coupling effects between the tower and lines. Eng Struct 2020;220:110947.

10. Hsu TY, Chien CC, Shiao SY, Chen CC, Chang KC. Analysis of environmental and typhoon effects on modal frequencies of a power transmission tower. Sensors 2020;20:5169.

11. Bhowmik C, Chakraborti P. Analytical and experimental modal analysis of electrical transmission tower to study the dynamic characteristics and behaviors. KSCE J Civ Eng 2020;24:931-42.

12. Fu X, Tan ZX, Li HN, Li G. Static and dynamic response characteristics of a full-scale long-cantilever tower under various loading conditions. J Struct Eng 2023;149:05023002.

13. Zhu YM, Sun Q, Zhao C, Wei ST, Yin Y, Su YH. Operational modal analysis of two typical UHV transmission towers: A comparative study by fast Bayesian FFT method. Eng Struct 2023;277:115425.

14. Zhu YM, Sun Q, Zhao C, Qi H, Su YH. Bayesian operational modal analysis with interactive optimization for model updating of large-size UHV transmission towers. J Struct Eng 2023;149:04023184.

15. Cucuzza R, Rosso MM, Aloisio A, Melchiorre J, Giudice ML, Marano GC. Size and shape optimization of a guyed mast structure under wind, ice, and seismic loading. Appl Sci 2022;12:4875.

16. Li ZL, Hu YJ, Tu X. Wind-induced response and its control of long-span cross-rope suspension transmission line. Appl Sci 2022;12:1488.

17. Liu ZH, Liu ZJ, He CG, Lu HL. Dimension-reduced probabilistic approach of 3-D wind field for wind-induced response analysis of transmission tower. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 2019;190:309-21.

18. Roy S, Kundu CK. State of the art review of wind induced vibration and its control on transmission towers. Structures 2021;29:254-64.

19. Tang ZQ, Li ZL, Wang T. GPR-based prediction and uncertainty quantification for bearing capacity of steel tubular members considering semi-rigid connections in transmission towers. Eng Fail Anal 2022;142:106854.

20. Li J, Chen JB. Stochastic dynamics of structures Singapore: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.

21. Tang ZQ, Li ZL, Wang T. Direct prediction method for semi-rigid behavior of K-joint in transmission towers based on surrogate model. Int J Struct Stab Dyn 2023;23:2350027.

22. National Energy Administration. Technical specification for the design of steel supporting structures of overhead transmission line (DL/T 5486-2020) Beijing: China Planning Press; 2020.

23. Tang ZQ, Li ZL, Wang T, Lu DG, Tan YQ. PDEM-based multi-component and global reliability evaluation framework for steel tubular transmission towers with semi-rigid connections. Eng Struct 2023;295:116838.

24. Li C, Pan HY, Tian L, Bi WZ. Lifetime multi-hazard fragility analysis of transmission towers under earthquake and wind considering wind-induced fatigue effect. Struct Saf 2022;99:102266.

25. Newmark NM. A method of computation for structural dynamics. Trans ASCE 1962;127:1406-33.

26. Li J, Chen JB. The principle of preservation of probability and the generalized density evolution equation. Struct Saf 2008;30:65-77.

27. Li J, Chen JB. Probability density evolution method for dynamic response analysis of structures with uncertain parameters. Comput Mech 2004;34:400-9.

28. Fan WL, Chen JB, Li J. Solution of generalized density evolution equation via a family of $$\delta$$ sequences. Comput Mech 2009;43:781-96.

29. Zhou QY, Fan WL, Li ZL, Ohsaki M. Time-variant system reliability assessment by probability density evolution method. J Eng Mechan 2017;143:04017131.

30. Fan WL, Ang AHS, Li ZL. Reliability assessment of deteriorating structures using Bayesian updated probability density evolution method (PDEM). Struct Saf 2017;65:60-73.

31. Chen GH, Yang DX. Direct probability integral method for stochastic response analysis of static and dynamic structural systems. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 2019;357:112612.

32. Chen JB, Yang JY, Li J. A GF-discrepancy for point selection in stochastic seismic response analysis of structures with uncertain parameters. Struct Saf 2016;59:20-31.

33. Joint Committee on Structural Safety (JCSS). Probabilistic model code-part 3-resistance models (JCSS-2001) Denmark: JCSS; 2001.

34. Dolsek M. Incremental dynamic analysis with consideration of modeling uncertainties. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2009;38:805-25.