REFERENCES
1. Xiang N, Li J. Effect of exterior concrete shear keys on the seismic performance of laminated rubber bearing-supported highway bridges in China. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2018;112:185-97.
2. Yamamoto M, Minewaki S, Yoneda H, Higashino M. Nonlinear behavior of high-damping rubber bearings under horizontal bidirectional loading: full-scale tests and analytical modeling. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2012;41:1845-60.
3. Zhou Y, Banerjee S, Shinozuka M. Socio-economic effect of seismic retrofit of bridges for highway transportation networks: a pilot study. Struct Infrastruct Eng 2010;6:145-57.
4. Decò A, Bocchini P, Frangopol DM. A probabilistic approach for the prediction of seismic resilience of bridges. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2013;42:1469-87.
5. Bruneau M, Chang SE, Eguchi RT, et al. A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthq Spectra 2003;19:733-52.
6. Akiyama M, Frangopol DM, Matsuzaki H. Life-cycle reliability of RC bridge piers under seismic and airborne chloride hazards. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2011;40:1671-87.
7. Pang Y, Wei K, He H, Wang W. Assessment of lifetime seismic resilience of a long-span cable-stayed bridge exposed to structural corrosion. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2022;157:107275.
8. Biondini F, Camnasio E, Titi A. Seismic resilience of concrete structures under corrosion. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2015;44:2445-66.
9. Titi A, Biondini F. On the accuracy of diffusion models for life-cycle assessment of concrete structures. Struct Infrastruct Eng 2016;12:1202-15.
10. Biondini F, Vergani M. Deteriorating beam finite element for nonlinear analysis of concrete structures under corrosion. Struct Infrastruct Eng 2015;11:519-32.
11. Capacci L, Biondini F. Probabilistic life-cycle seismic resilience assessment of aging bridge networks considering infrastructure upgrading. Struct Infrastruct Eng 2020;16:659-75.
12. Padgett JE, Desroches R. Bridge functionality relationships for improved seismic risk assessment of transportation networks. Earthq Spectra 2007;23:115-30.
13. Mackie KR, Stojadinović B. Post-earthquake functionality of highway overpass bridges. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2006;35:77-93.
14. Mitoulis SA, Argyroudis SA, Loli M, Imam B. Restoration models for quantifying flood resilience of bridges. Eng Struct 2021;238:112180.
15. Lian Q, Zhang P, Li H, Yuan W, Dang X. Adjustment method of bridge seismic importance factor based on bridge network connectivity reliability. Structures 2021;32:1692-700.
16. Wei K, Yuan W, Bouaanani N. Experimental and numerical assessment of the three-dimensional modal dynamic response of bridge pile foundations submerged in water. J Bridge Eng 2013;18:1032-41.
17. Guan Z, Zhang J, Li J. Multilevel performance classifications of tall RC bridge columns toward postearthquake rehabilitation requirements. J Bridge Eng 2017;22:04017080.
18. Karamlou A, Bocchini P. Functionality-fragility surfaces. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2017;46:1687-709.
19. Kameshwar S, Misra S, Padgett JE. Decision tree based bridge restoration models for extreme event performance assessment of regional road networks. Struct Infrastruct Eng 2020;16:431-51.
20. CJJ 166-2011 Code for seismic design of urban bridges. Beijing: Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China; 2011. Available from: https://ebook.chinabuilding.com.cn/zbooklib/book/detail/show?bookID=56396&SiteID=1 [Last accessed on 25 Sep 2023].
21. Caltrans. Seismic design criteria. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Transportation; 2010.
22. Imbsen RA. AASHTO guide specifications for LRFD seismic bridge design. American Association of State Highway Transport Officials, Subcommittee for seismic effects on bridges; 2007. Available from: http://www.ce.memphis.edu/7119/PDFs/AASHTO/2007-03-09GuideSpec.pdf [Last accessed on 25 Sep 2023].
23. Chen X, Xiang N, Guan Z, Li J. Seismic vulnerability assessment of tall pier bridges under mainshock-aftershock-like earthquake sequences using vector-valued intensity measure. Eng Struct 2022;253:113732.
24. He Z, Liu W, Wang X, Ye A. Optimal force-based beam-column element size for reinforced-concrete piles in bridges. J Bridge Eng 2016;21:06016006.
25. Scott BD, Park R, Priestley MJ. Stress-strain behavior of concrete confined by overlapping hoops at low and high strain rates. J Process 1982;79:13-27.
26. Guirguis JEB, Mehanny SSF. Erratum for “evaluating code criteria for regular seismic behavior of continuous concrete box girder bridges with unequal height piers” by J. E. B. Guirguis and S. S. F. Mehanny. J Bridge Eng 2013;18:931.
27. Wang X, Ye A, He Z, Shang Y. Quasi-static cyclic testing of elevated RC pile-cap foundation for bridge structures. J Bridge Eng 2016;21:04015042.
28. Ismail M, Casas JR, Rodellar J. Near-fault isolation of cable-stayed bridges using RNC isolator. Eng Struct 2013;56:327-42.
29. Xiang N, Alam MS. Displacement-based seismic design of bridge bents retrofitted with various bracing devices and their seismic fragility assessment under near-fault and far-field ground motions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2019;119:75-90.
30. Mazza F, Mazza M. Nonlinear seismic analysis of irregular r.c. framed buildings base-isolated with friction pendulum system under near-fault excitations. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2016;90:299-312.
31. Chen X, Li C. Seismic performance of tall pier bridges retrofitted with lead rubber bearings and rocking foundation. Eng Struct 2020;212:110529.
32. Chen X. System fragility assessment of tall-pier bridges subjected to near-fault ground motions. J Bridge Eng 2020;25:04019143.
33. Nielson BG, DesRoches R. Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach. Earthq Eng Structl Dyn 2007;36:823-39.
34. Padgett JE, Desroches R. Methodology for the development of analytical fragility curves for retrofitted bridges. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2008;37:1157-74.
35. Zhang J, Huo Y. Evaluating effectiveness and optimum design of isolation devices for highway bridges using the fragility function method. Eng Struct 2009;31:1648-60.
36. Zheng Y, Dong Y, Li Y. Resilience and life-cycle performance of smart bridges with shape memory alloy (SMA)-cable-based bearings. Constr Build Mater 2018;158:389-400.
37. Alam MS, Bhuiyan MAR, Billah AHMM. Erratum to: seismic fragility assessment of SMA-bar restrained multi-span continuous highway bridge isolated by different laminated rubber bearings in medium to strong seismic risk zones. Bull Earthq Eng 2012;10:1911-3.
38. Argyroudis SA, Nasiopoulos G, Mantadakis N, Mitoulis SA. Cost-based resilience assessment of bridges subjected to earthquakes. Int J Disaster Resil Built Environ 2021;12:209-22.
39. Liu Y, Cao L, Yang D, Anderson BC. How social capital influences community resilience management development. Environ Sci Policy 2022;136:642-51.
40. He X, Cha EJ. State of the research on disaster risk management of interdependent infrastructure systems for community resilience planning. Sustain Resilient Infrastruct 2022;7:391-420.
41. Kunde M, Jangid R. Seismic behavior of isolated bridges: a-state-of-the-art review. Electron J Struct Eng 2003;3:140-70.
