REFERENCES
1. Ritchie H, Rosado P, Roser M. Our world in data: natural disasters. Available from: https://ourworldindata.org/natural-disasters. [Last accessed on 26 Jul 2023].
2. Munich Re. Natural disaster risks: rising trends in losses. Available from: https://www.munichre.com/en/risks/natural-disasters.html. [Last accessed on 26Jul 2023].
3. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) US. Billion-dollar weather and climate disasters. Available from: https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/billions/. [Last accessed on 26 Jul 2023].
4. Sattar S, Kersting R, Arendt L, et al. Recommended options for improving the built environment for post-earthquake reoccupancy and functional recovery time. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST); 2021.
5. Zhang Y, Fung JF, Johnson KJ, et al. Review of seismic risk mitigation policies in earthquake-prone countries: lessons for earthquake resilience in the united states. J Earthq Eng 2022;26:6208-35.
6. United States Geological Survey (USGS). Nearly half of americans exposed potentially damaging earthquakes. Available from: https://www.usgs.gov/news/featured-story/nearly-half-americans-exposed-potentially-damaging-earthquakes. [Last accessed on 26 Jul 2023].
7. Fung J, Zhang Y, Johnson K, et al. A framework to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of recovery-based design. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST); 2022.
8. International Code Council (ICC). A national approach to seismic functional recovery for new construction: a roundtable discussion convened by the international code council and california building officials. 2019. Available from: http://media.iccsafe.org/2019_MarComm/Misc/19-17983_COMM_Seismic_RT_Report_FINAL_MIDrez.pdf. [Last accessed on 26 Jul 2023].
9. Panagioutou M. Earthquake resilience and functional recovery of buildings in the united states: problem statement and technical solutions. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337290394_Earthquake_Resilience_and_Functional_Recovery_of_Buildings_in_the_United_States_Problem_Statement_and_Technical_Solutions. [Last accessed on26 Jul 2023].
10. Sattar S, McAllister T, Johnson KJ, et al. Research needs to support immediate occupancy building performance objective following natural hazard events. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST); 2018.
11. Rowan L. Hazard-Resilient Buildings: Sustaining occupancy and function after a natural disaster. Congressional Research Service (CRS); 2022. Available from: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R47215. [Last accessed on 26 Jul 2023].
12. Harris J, Johnson KJ, McCabe SL. ICSSC Biennial progress report for 2018: report on progress towards implementation of executive order 13717: establishing a federal earthquake risk management standard - reporting period: february 2, 2016 to february 1, 2018. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST); 2021.
13. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Community resilience program. Available from: https://www.nist.gov/programs-projects/community-resilience-program. [Last accessed on 26 Jul 2023].
14. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Community. FEMA Glossary. 2020. Available from: https://www.fema.gov/glossary/community. [Last accessed on 26 July 2023].
15. Baek JS, Meroni A, Manzini E. A socio-technical approach to design for community resilience: a framework for analysis and design goal forming. Design Studies 2015;40:60-84.
17. Bruneau M, Chang SE, Eguchi RT, et al. A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthquake Spectra 2003;19:733-52.
18. ICC (International Code Council). 2018 International existing building code. Available from: https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/IEBC2018P4. [Last accessed on 26 Jul 2023].
19. ICC (International Code Council). 2018 international building code. Available from: https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/IBC2018. [Last accessed on 26 Jul 2023].
20. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE/SEI 7-16. 2017.
21. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Guidelines for performance-based seismic design of buildings. FEMA; 2018. Available from: https://peer.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/tbi-working-group-led-by-co-chairs-ron-ha-burger-and-jack-moehle_10.9.17_withlinks.pdf. [Last accessed on 26 Jul 2023].
22. Cook D, Sattar S. The effect of increased strength and stiffness requirements on the functional recovery performance of reinforced concrete special moment frames. Proceedings of the 12th National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Salt Lake City, UT; 2022.
23. Kersting RA, Fahnestock LA, Lopez WA. Seismic design of steel buckling-restrained braced frames: a guide for practicing engineers. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST); 2016.
24. Cook D, Sattar S, and Johnson KJ (2023). A framework to develop minimum prescriptive design requirements to meet recovery-based design goals. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland. In Preparation.
25. Gebelein J, Barnard M, Burton H, et al. Considerations for a framework of resilient structural design for earthquakes. SEAOC Convention Proceedings, 2017. Available from: http://static-assets.hbrisk.com.s3.amazonaws.com/presentations/SEAOC+2017+Considerations+for+a+Framework+of+Resilient+Structural+Design+for+Earthquakes.pdf. [Last accessed on 26 Jul 2023]
26. Sullivan TJ. Post-earthquake reparability of buildings: the role of non-structural elements. Struct Eng Int 2020;30:217-23.
27. Yeow TZ, Orumiyehei A, Sullivan TJ, et al. Seismic performance of steel friction connections considering direct-repair costs. Bull Earthquake Eng 2018;16:5963-93.
28. Hooper J, Holmes W, Moehle J, et al. Development of NIST measurement science r&d roadmap: earthquake risk reduction in buildings. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST); 2013. Available from: https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=915478. [Last accessed on 26 Jul 2023].
29. Applied Technology Council (ATC). Seismic analysis, design, and installation of nonstructural components and systems - background and recommendations for future work. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST); 2017.
30. Applied Technology Council (ATC). Recommendations for improved seismic performance of nonstructural components. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST); 2017.
31. California Department of Health Care Access and Information (HCAI). OSHPD special seismic certification preapproval (OSP). Available from: https://hcai.ca.gov/construction-finance/preapproval-programs/oshpd-special-seismic-certification-preapproval-osp/. [Last accessed on 26 Jul 2023].
32. Tasligedik AS, Pampanin S. Rocking cantilever clay brick infill wall panels: a novel low damage infill wall system. J Earthq Eng 2017;21:1023-49.
33. Mulligan J, Sullivan TJ, Dhakal RP. Experimental seismic performance of partly-sliding partition walls. J Earthq Eng 2022;26:1630-55.
34. Araya-letelier G, Miranda E, Deierlein G. Development and testing of a friction/sliding connection to improve the seismic performance of gypsum partition walls. Earthquake Spectra 2019;35:653-77.
35. Pourali A, Dhakal RP, Macrae G, Tasligedik AS. Fully floating suspended ceiling system: experimental evaluation of structural feasibility and challenges. Earthquake Spectra 2017;33:1627-54.
36. Bianchi S, Ciurlanti J, Pampanin S. Comparison of traditional vs low-damage structural and non-structural building systems through a cost/performance-based evaluation. Earthquake Spectra 2021;37:366-85.
37. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI). Functional recovery: a conceptual framework with policy options. 2019. Available from: https://www.eeri.org/images/policy/EERI-Functional-Recovery-Conceptual-Framework-White-Paper-201912.pdf. [Last accessed on 26 Jul 2023].
38. Seismic Performance Prediction Platform (SP3). Announcing the new ATC-138 functional recovery (beta) method! Available from: https://sp3risk.com/2022/01/21/announcing-the-new-atc-138-functional-recovery-beta-method/. [Last accessed on 26 Jul 2023].
39. American Lifelines Alliance (ALA). Protecting our critical infrastructure: findings and recommendations from the american lifelines alliance roundtable. National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS); 2005. Available from: https://www.americanlifelinesalliance.com/pdf/RoundtableReportWebPosted081705.pdf. [Last accessed on 26 Jul 2023].
40. Bilal M. Infrastructure Resilience Division of ASCE. Hazard-resilient infrastructure: analysis and design. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2021.
41. Applied Technology Council (ATC). Proceedings of FEMA-sponsored workshop on functional recovery. 2022. ATC 58-7. Available from: https://www.atcouncil.org/docman/atc-publications/327-atc-58-7-fr-workshop-report-2022-2/file. [Last accessed on 26 Jul 2023]
42. International Code Council (ICC). Seismic functional recovery: resources. Available from: https://www.iccsafe.org/advocacy/seismic-functional-recovery-resources/. [Last accessed on 26 Jul 2023].
43. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures, ASCE/SEI 7-22. Available from: https://ascelibrary.org/doi/book/10.1061/9780784415788. [Last accessed on 26 Jul 2023].
44. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings, ASCE/SEI 41-17. Available from: https://ascelibrary.org/doi/book/10.1061/9780784414859. [Last accessed on 26 Jul 2023].
45. ACI Committee 318. 318-19(22): building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary (reapproved 2022). Available from: https://www.concrete.org/publications/internationalconcreteabstractsportal.aspx?m=details&ID=51716937. [Last accessed on 26 Jul 2023].
46. American Institute of Steel Construction. Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. Available from: https://www.aisc.org/globalassets/aisc/publications/standards/seismic-provisions-for-structural-steel-buildings-ansi-aisc-341-16.pdf. [Last accessed on 26 Jul 2023].
47. American Institute of Steel Construction. Specification for structural steel buildings. Available from: https://www.aisc.org/globalassets/aisc/publications/standards/a360-16w-rev-june-2019.pdf. [Last accessed on 26 Jul 2023].
48. American Wood Council. 2021 SDPWS. Available from: https://awc.org/publications/2021-sdpws/. [Last accessed on 26 Jul 2023].
49. American Wood Council. 2018 NDS. Available from: https://awc.org/publications/2018-nds/. [Last accessed on 26 Jul 2023].
50. The Masonry Society. TMS 402/602-22 building code requirements and specification for masonry structures. Available from: https://masonrysociety.org/product/tms-402-602-22/. [Last accessed on 26 Jul 2023].
51. FEMA. Reducing the risks of nonstructural earthquake damage-a practical guide. Available from: https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/2020-07/fema_earthquakes_reducing-the-risks-of-nonstructural-earthquake-damage-a-practical-guide-fema-e-74.pdf. [Last accessed on 26 Jul 2023].
52. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). Structural applications of steel cables for buildings. Available from: https://ascelibrary.org/doi/book/10.1061/9780784414392. [Last accessed on 26 Jul 2023].
53. Vibration Isolation and Seismic Control Manufacturer’s Association (VICSMA). Seismic restraint specification guidelines for mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems. VISCMA 101-15. Available from: https://viscma.com/wp-content/uploads/VISCMA_101-15_Seismic_Restraint_Specification_Guidelines_for_Mechanical_Electrical_and_Plumbing_Systems.pdf. [Last accessed on 26 Jul 2023].
54. Vibration Isolation and Seismic Control Manufacturer’s Association (VICSMA). Vibration isolation specification guidelines for mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems. VISCMA 102-12. Available from: https://viscma.com/wp-content/uploads/VISCMA_102-12_Vibration_Isolation_Specification_Guidelines_for_Mechanical_Electrical_and_Plumbing_Systems.pdf. [Last accessed on 26 Jul 2023].
55. ASTM International. C635/C635M-22: Standard specification for manufacture, performance, and testing of metal suspension systems for acoustical tile and lay-in panel ceilings. Available from: https://www.astm.org/c0635_c0635m-22.html. [Last accessed on 26 Jul 2023].
56. ASTM International. C636/C636M-19: Standard practice for installation of metal ceiling suspension systems for acoustical tile and lay-in panels. Available from: https://www.astm.org/c0636_c0636m-19.html. [Last accessed on 26 Jul 2023].
57. ASTM International. E580/E580M-22: Standard practice for installation of ceiling suspension systems for acoustical tile and lay-in panels in areas subject to earthquake ground motions. Available from: https://www.astm.org/e0580_e0580m-22.html. [Last accessed on 26 Jul 2023].
58. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). A17.1/CSA B44-2016: Handbook on safety code for elevators and escalators. Available from: https://www.asme.org/codes-standards/find-codes-standards/a17-1-csa-b44-handbook-safety-code-elevators-escalators. [Last accessed on 26 Jul 2023].
59. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). NFPA 13: Standard for the installation of sprinkler systems. Available from: https://www.nfpa.org/codes-and-standards/all-codes-and-standards/list-of-codes-and-standards/detail?code=13. [Last accessed on 26 Jul 2023].
60. ASTM International. E2506-15(2020)e1: Standard guide for developing a cost-effective risk mitigation plan for new and existing constructed facilities. Available from: https://www.astm.org/e2506-15r20e01.html. [Last accessed on 26 Jul 2023].
61. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). FEMA BCA toolkit 6.0 installation instructions. Available from: https://www.fema.gov/fact-sheet/fema-bca-toolkit-60-installation-instructions. [Last accessed on 27 Jul 2023].
62. Zhang Y, Fung JF, Cook D, et al. Benefit-cost analysis for earthquake resilient building design and retrofit: the state of the art and future research needs. Under review 2023.
63. Abrahams L, Van Pay L, Sattar S, et al. NIST-FEMA post-earthquake functional recovery workshop report. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST); 2021.
64. Fung JF, Cook DT, Zhang Y, et al. Economic considerations for recovery-based design. Proceedings of The 12th National Conference in Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah; 2022.
65. Sobhaninia S, Buckman ST. Revisiting and adapting the Kates-Pijawka disaster recovery model: a reconfigured emphasis on anticipation, equity, and resilience. Int J Disast Risk Re 2022;69:102738.
66. Burke A. The stages of policy development. Available from: https://openoregon.pressbooks.pub/ccj230/chapter/3-3-the-stages-of-policy-development/. [Last accessed on 27 Jul 2023].
67. Kolozvari K, Terzic V. Methodology for developing practical recovery-based design requirements for buildings. Eng Struct 2023;274:115102.
68. Johnson KJ, Sattar S, Segura C, et al. Lessons on recovery of function from Anchorage, Alaska after the 2018 cook inlet earthquake. Available from: https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=929893. [Last accessed on 27 July 2023]
69. Tsu VD, LaMontagne DS, Atuhebwe P, et al. National implementation of HPV vaccination programs in low-resource countries: lessons, challenges, and future prospects. Prev Med 2021;144:106335.
70. Sattar S, Segura C, Johnson KJ, et al. Building design considerations to support immediate occupancy performance objectives. 12th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Quebec, Canada; 2019. Available from: https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=927374. [Last accessed on 27 Jul 2023]
71. Molina Hutt C, Hulsey AM, Kakoty P, et al. Toward functional recovery performance in the seismic design of modern tall buildings. Earthquake Spectra 2022;38:283-309.
72. Advisory Committee on Earthquake Hazards Reduction (ACEHR). Effectiveness of the national earthquake hazards reduction program: a report from the advisory committee on earthquake hazards reduction. 2019. Available from: https://nehrp.gov/pdf/September_2019_ReporttotheNISTDirector.pdf. [Last accessed on 27 Jul 2023].
73. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 26000 and OECD guidelines-practical overview of the linkages. Available from: https://www.iso.org/publication/PUB100418.html. [Last accessed on 27 Jul 2023].
75. Kominers SD, Teytelboym A, Crawford VP. An invitation to market design. Oxford Rev Econ Pol 2017;33:541-71.
76. Bocchini P, Frangopol DM. Optimal resilience- and cost-based postdisaster intervention prioritization for bridges along a highway segment. J Bridge Eng 2012;17:117-29.
77. Zhang W, Nicholson C. A multi-objective optimization model for retrofit strategies to mitigate direct economic loss and population dislocation. Sustain Resil Infras 2016;1:123-36.
78. Zhang J, Li G, Zhang M. Multi‐objective optimization for community building group recovery scheduling and resilience evaluation under earthquake. Computer aided Civil Eng 2022;38:1657-76.
80. Chakravarty SR. Equity and efficiency as components of a social welfare function. Int J Econ Theory 2009;5:181-99.
81. Fleurbaey, Marc. Normative economics and economic justice. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2022 Edition). Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/economic-justice/. [Last accessed on 27 Jul 2023].
82. Singh RR, Bruneau M, Stavridis A, Sett K. Resilience deficit index for quantification of resilience. Resilient Cities and Structures 2022;1:1-9.
83. Zhan S, Chang-Richards A, Elwood K, et al. Post-earthquake functional recovery: a critical review. Proceedings of the 2022 New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Annual Technical Conference. Available from: http://13.237.132.70/handle/nzsee/2507. [Last accessed on 27 Jul 2023]
84. McAllister T. Community resilience planning guide for buildings and infrastructure systems, Volume I. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST); 2015.
85. Gilbert SW, Butry DT, Helgeson JF, Chapman RE. Community resilience economic decision guide for buildings and infrastructure systems. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST); 2015.
86. Helgeson, J, P Lavappa, and D Webb. EDGe$ (Economic Decision Guide Software) online tool, Version 1.0, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Available from: https://data.commerce.gov/edge-economic-decision-guide-software-online-tool-version-10. [Last accessed on 27 Jul 2023.
88. Prewitt Diaz JO, Dayal A. Sense of place: a model for community based psychosocial support programs. Australasian Journal of Disaster And Trauma studies 2008;63(8);820-827.Available fron: https://www.massey.ac.nz/~trauma/issues/2008-1/prewitt_diaz.htm. [Last accessed on 27 Jul 2023].
89. Spoon J, Hunter CE, Gerkey D, et al. Anatomy of disaster recoveries: tangible and intangible short-term recovery dynamics following the 2015 Nepal earthquakes. Int J Disast Risk Re 2020;51:101879.
90. Ghosh SK. Is seismic design by US codes and standards deficient? Structure 2019. Available from: https://www.structuremag.org/?p=14725. [Last accessed on 27 Jul 2023].
91. Tokas CV. Nonstructural components and systems-designing hospitals for post earthquake functionality. Available from: https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/41168%28399%2945.[Last accessed on 7 Sep 2023]
92. Bilginsoy Z, Fraser S. Turkey’s lax policing of building codes known before quake. AP News 2023. Available from: https://apnews.com/article/politics-2023-turkey-syria-earthquake-government-istanbul-fbd6af578a6056569879b5ef6c55d322. [Last accessed ON 27 Jul 2023].
93. Hurwiz L. Implementation and enforcement in institutional modeling. In: Barnett WA, Hinich MJ, Schofield NJ, editors. International Symposium in Economic Theory and Econometrics. Cambridge University Press; 1993.
94. Cerna L. The nature of policy change and implementation: a review of different theoretical approaches. Organisation for Economic Development (OECD) 2013. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/The%20Nature%20of%20Policy%20Change%20and%20Implementation.pdf. [Last accessed on 27 Jul 2023].
95. Amirzadeh M, Sobhaninia S, Sharifi A. Urban resilience: a vague or an evolutionary concept? Sustain Cities Soc 2022;81:103853.
96. Johnson KJ, Fung JF, McAllister T, et al. Social and economic components of resilient multihazard building design. Nat Hazards Rev 2020:21(1).
97. Scott DR, Cerino AC, Pekelnicky RG, Yu K. Resilience for critical facitilies. Available from: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/gcr/2023/NIST.GCR.23-037.pdf.[Last accessed on 7 Sep 2023]
