REFERENCES
1. Zhou, Z.; Ma, T.; Zhang, H.; et al. Carbon dioxide capture from open air using covalent organic frameworks. Nature 2024, 635, 96-101.
2. Zhu, Z.; Tsai, H.; Parker, S. T.; et al. High-capacity, cooperative CO2 capture in a diamine-appended metal-organic framework through a combined chemisorptive and physisorptive mechanism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146, 6072-83.
3. Morris, R. E.; Wheatley, P. S. Gas storage in nanoporous materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2008, 47, 4966-81.
4. Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, L.; et al. Post-modified porous aromatic frameworks for carbon dioxide capture. Chem. Synth. 2024, 4, 40.
5. Wang, X.; Alzayer, M.; Shih, A. J.; et al. Tailoring hydrophobicity and pore environment in physisorbents for improved carbon dioxide capture under high humidity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146, 3943-54.
6. Li, H.; Zhou, Z.; Ma, T.; et al. Bonding of polyethylenimine in covalent organic frameworks for CO2 capture from air. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146, 35486-92.
8. Furukawa, H.; Yaghi, O. M. Storage of hydrogen, methane, and carbon dioxide in highly porous covalent organic frameworks for clean energy applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 8875-83.
9. Breunig, H.; Rosner, F.; Saqline, S.; et al. Achieving gigawatt-scale green hydrogen production and seasonal storage at industrial locations across the U.S. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 9049.
10. Yin, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, X. et. al. Ultrahigh-surface area covalent organic frameworks for methane adsorption. Science 2024, 386, 693-96.
11. Hwang, H. T.; Varma, A. Hydrogen storage for fuel cell vehicles. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2014, 5, 42-8.
12. Zhang, C.; Cao, X.; Bujlo, P.; et al. Review on the safety analysis and protection strategies of fast filling hydrogen storage system for fuel cell vehicle application. J. Energy. Storage. 2022, 45, 103451.
13. Kumar, K. V.; Preuss, K.; Titirici, M. M.; Rodríguez-Reinoso, F. Nanoporous materials for the onboard storage of natural gas. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 1796-825.
14. He, Y.; Chen, F.; Li, B.; Qian, G.; Zhou, W.; Chen, B. Porous metal–organic frameworks for fuel storage. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2018, 373, 167-98.
15. Saha, D.; Grappe, H. A.; Chakraborty, A.; Orkoulas, G. Postextraction separation, on-board storage, and catalytic conversion of methane in natural gas: a review. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 11436-99.
16. He, Y.; Zhou, W.; Qian, G.; Chen, B. Methane storage in metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5657-78.
17. Wang, Y.; Xue, Y.; Züttel, A. Nanoscale engineering of solid-state materials for boosting hydrogen storage. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2024, 53, 972-1003.
18. Makal, T. A.; Li, J. R.; Lu, W.; Zhou, H. C. Methane storage in advanced porous materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 7761-79.
19. Zhang, R.; Daglar, H.; Tang, C.; et al. Balancing volumetric and gravimetric capacity for hydrogen in supramolecular crystals. Nat. Chem. 2024, 16, 1982-8.
20. Yu, B.; Tao, Y.; Yao, X.; et al. Single-crystalline 3D covalent organic frameworks with exceptionally high specific surface areas and gas storage capacities. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146, 28932-40.
22. Luo, D.; Li, M.; Ma, Q.; et al. Porous organic polymers for Li-chemistry-based batteries: functionalities and characterization studies. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022, 51, 2917-38.
23. Ma, T.; Zhou, Y.; Diercks, C. S.; et al. Catenated covalent organic frameworks constructed from polyhedra. Nat. Synth. 2023, 2, 286-95.
24. Lee, J. M.; Cooper, A. I. Advances in conjugated microporous polymers. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 2171-214.
25. Tan, L.; Tan, B. Hypercrosslinked porous polymer materials: design, synthesis, and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 3322-56.
26. Asif, M. B.; Kim, S.; Nguyen, T. S.; Mahmood, J.; Yavuz, C. T. Covalent organic framework membranes and water treatment. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146, 3567-84.
27. Sun, T.; Liang, Y.; Luo, W.; Zhang, L.; Cao, X.; Xu, Y. A general strategy for kilogram-scale preparation of highly crystal-line covalent triazine frameworks. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2022, 61, e202203327.
28. Ben, T.; Ren, H.; Ma, S.; et al. Targeted synthesis of a porous aromatic framework with high stability and exceptionally high surface area. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2009, 48, 9457-60.
29. Yuan, D.; Lu, W.; Zhao, D.; Zhou, H. C. Highly stable porous polymer networks with exceptionally high gas-uptake capacities. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 3723-5.
30. Ben, T.; Pei, C.; Zhang, D.; et al. Gas storage in porous aromatic frameworks (PAFs). Energy. Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 3991.
31. Jia, J.; Chen, Z.; Jiang, H.; et al. Extremely hydrophobic POPs to access highly porous storage media and capturing agent for organic vapors. Chem 2019, 5, 180-91.
32. Li, M.; Ren, H.; Sun, F.; et al. Construction of porous aromatic frameworks with exceptional porosity via building unit engineering. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, e1804169.
33. Kim, D. W.; Chen, Y.; Kim, H.; et al. High hydrogen storage in trigonal prismatic monomer-based highly porous aromatic frameworks. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, e2401739.
34. Chen, Z.; Kirlikovali, K. O.; Idrees, K. B.; Wasson, M. C.; Farha, O. K. Porous materials for hydrogen storage. Chem 2022, 8, 693-716.
35. Zhou, S.; Qiu, T.; Wang, H.; et al. Flexible porous organic polymers constructed using C(sp3)-C(sp3) coupling reactions and their high methane-storage capacity. Chem. Sci. 2024, 15, 10830-7.
36. Li, H.; Chen, F.; Guan, X.; et al. Three-dimensional triptycene-based covalent organic frameworks with ceq or acs topology. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 2654-9.
37. Gong, W.; Gao, P.; Gao, Y.; et al. Modulator-directed counterintuitive catenation control for crafting highly porous and robust metal-organic frameworks with record high SO2 uptake capacity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146, 31807-15.
38. Zhu, Q.; Wang, X.; Clowes, R.; et al. 3D cage COFs: a dynamic three-dimensional covalent organic framework with high-connectivity organic cage nodes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 16842-8.
39. Yang, Q.; Chen, K.; Schoedel, A.; Wojtas, L.; Perry Iv, J. J.; Zaworotko, M. J. Network diversity through two-step crystal engineering of a decorated 6-connected primary molecular building block. CrystEngComm 2016, 18, 8578-81.
40. Zhou, J.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, L.; et al. Mixed-ligand strategy affording two 6-connected 3-fold interpenetrated metal-organic frameworks with binuclear CoII2/NiII2 subunits: synthesis, crystal structures and magnetic properties. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2020, 111, 107624.
41. Li, W.; Probert, M. R.; Kosa, M.; et al. Negative linear compressibility of a metal-organic framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 11940-3.
42. Yin, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, X.; et al. Single-crystal three-dimensional covalent organic framework constructed from 6-connected triangular prism node. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 22329-34.
43. Zhao, Y.; Irie, T.; Wen, D.; et al. Highly selective separation of benzene/cyclohexane by three-dimensional covalent organic framework with 8,8-connected bcu net topology. ACS. Materials. Lett. 2024, 6, 3063-70.
44. Alezi, D.; Belmabkhout, Y.; Suyetin, M.; et al. MOF crystal chemistry paving the way to gas storage needs: aluminum-based soc-MOF for CH4, O2, and CO2 storage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 13308-18.
45. Liu, W.; Wu, E.; Yu, B.; et al. Reticular synthesis of metal-organic frameworks by 8-connected quadrangular prism ligands for water harvesting. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2023, 62, e202305144.
46. Chen, F.; Zheng, H.; Yusran, Y.; Li, H.; Qiu, S.; Fang, Q. Exploring high-connectivity three-dimensional covalent organic frameworks: topologies, structures, and emerging applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2025, 54, 484-514.
47. Chen, Z.; Li, P.; Anderson, R.; et al. Balancing volumetric and gravimetric uptake in highly porous materials for clean energy. Science 2020, 368, 297-303.
48. Parks, G.; Boyd, R.; Cornish, J.; Remick, R. Hydrogen station compression, storage, and dispensing technical status and costs. 2014. https://docs.nrel.gov/docs/fy14osti/58564.pdf. (accessed 31 Dec 2025).
49. Wang, Z.; Jiang, L.; Jia, J.; Zhu, G. Targeted synthesis of interpenetration-free mesoporous aromatic frameworks by manipulating catalysts as templates. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2025, 64, e202420746.
50. Gómez-Gualdrón, D. A.; Colón, Y. J.; Zhang, X.; et al. Evaluating topologically diverse metal–organic frameworks for cryo-adsorbed hydrogen storage. Energy. Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 3279-89.
51. Budzianowski, W. M.; Brodacka, M. Biomethane storage: evaluation of technologies, end uses, business models, and sustainability. Energy. Convers. Manag. 2017, 141, 254-73.
52. Yang, S.; Zhong, Z.; Hu, J.; Wang, X.; Tan, B. Dibromomethane knitted highly porous hyper-cross-linked polymers for efficient high-pressure methane storage. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, e2307579.
53. Tan, J.; Tao, Y.; Zhang, X.; et al. Control over interpenetration for boosting methane storage capacity in metal–organic frameworks. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2021, 9, 24857-62.
54. Froudas, K. G.; Vassaki, M.; Papadopoulos, K.; et al. Expanding the reticular chemistry building block library toward highly connected nets: ultraporous MOFs based on 18-connected ternary, trigonal prismatic superpolyhedra. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146, 8961-70.





