REFERENCES

1. Gür, T. M. Carbon dioxide emissions, capture, storage and utilization: review of materials, processes and technologies. Progr. Energy. Combust. Sci. 2022, 89, 100965.

2. Du, X. Thoughts on strategies and paths to achieve carbon peaking and carbon neutrality in China. Front. Energy. 2023, 17, 324-31.

3. Abrahams, L. S.; Samaras, C.; Griffin, W. M.; Matthews, H. S. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from U.S. liquefied natural gas exports: implications for end uses. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 3237-45.

4. Lin, N.; Ouyang, X. Global liquified natural gas trade under energy transition. Energies 2021, 14, 6617.

5. Yarlagadda, B.; Iyer, G.; Binsted, M.; Patel, P.; Wise, M.; McLeod, J. The future evolution of global natural gas trade. iScience 2024, 27, 108902.

6. He, T.; Chong, Z. R.; Zheng, J.; Ju, Y.; Linga, P. LNG cold energy utilization: prospects and challenges. Energy. 2019, 170, 557-68.

7. Wang, Z. Progress of LNG cold energy cascade utilization research. Acad. J. Sci. Technol. 2025, 14, 196-200.

8. Tian, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Bolat, P.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, W. Responding to low-carbon shipping via a novel BOG-ORC-CCS system onboard LNG carrier: 4E analyses and optimization. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 478, 143959.

9. Syauqi, A.; Uwitonze, H.; Chaniago, Y. D.; Lim, H. Design and optimization of an onboard boil-off gas re-liquefaction process under different weather-related scenarios with machine learning predictions. Energy. 2024, 293, 130674.

10. Li, N.; Wang, J.; Liu, R.; Höök, M. Methane emission reduction in China’s natural gas industry: construction of technology inventory and selection of optimal technology programs. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2024, 44, 39-54.

11. Gómez, J. R.; Gómez, M. R.; Garcia, R. F.; Catoira, A. D. M. On board LNG reliquefaction technology: a comparative study. Pol. Marit. Res. 2013, 21, 77-88.

12. Kochunni, S. K.; Chowdhury, K. Use of dual pressure Claude liquefaction cycles for complete and energy-efficient reliquefaction of boil-off gas in LNG carrier ships. Energy 2020, 198, 117345.

13. Guo, T.; Liu, L.; Shen, J.; et al. Optimization and control strategy of BOG re-liquefaction process for LNG vessels. Int. J. Refrig. 2023, 153, 253-65.

14. Kim, J. S.; Kim, D. Y. Energy, exergy, and economic (3E) analysis of boil-off gas re-liquefaction systems using LNG cold energy for LNG-fueled ships. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 587.

15. Kochunni, S. K.; Chowdhury, K. LNG boil-off gas reliquefaction by Brayton refrigeration system - Part 1: exergy analysis and design of the basic configuration. Energy 2019, 176, 753-64.

16. Son, S. H.; Kim, K. Simulation model of regenerative LNG refrigeration system for Re-liquification of BOG. Energies 2020, 13, 3894.

17. Lee, S.; Jeon, J.; Lee, U.; Lee, C. J.; Han, C. A novel dynamic modeling methodology for boil-off gas recondensers in liquefied natural gas terminals. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 2015, 48, 841-7.

18. Shin, K.; Son, S.; Moon, J.; Jo, Y.; Kwon, J. S. I.; Hwang, S. Dynamic modeling and predictive control of boil-off gas generation during LNG loading. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2022, 160, 107698.

19. Kurle, Y. M.; Xu, Q.; Palanki, S. Dynamic simulation study for boil-off gas minimization at liquefied natural gas exporting terminals. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018, 57, 5903-13.

20. Noor Akashah, M. H.; Rozali, N. E. M.; Mahadzir, S.; Liew, P. Y. Utilization of cold energy from LNG regasification process: a review of current trends. Processes 2023, 11, 517.

21. Kanbur, B. B.; Xiang, L.; Dubey, S.; Choo, F. H.; Duan, F. Cold utilization systems of LNG: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy. Rev. 2017, 79, 1171-88.

22. Qyyum, M. A.; Khan, A.; Ali, S.; et al. Assessment of working fluids, thermal resources and cooling utilities for organic Rankine cycles: state-of-the-art comparison, challenges, commercial status, and future prospects. Energy. Convers. Manage. 2022, 252, 115055.

23. Sun, Z.; Lai, J.; Wang, S.; Wang, T. Thermodynamic optimization and comparative study of different ORC configurations utilizing the exergies of LNG and low grade heat of different temperatures. Energy 2018, 147, 688-700.

24. Pan, J.; Li, M.; Zhu, M.; Li, R.; Tang, L.; Bai, J. Energy, exergy and economic analysis of different integrated systems for power generation using LNG cold energy and geothermal energy. Renew. Energy. 2023, 202, 1054-70.

25. Joy, J.; Chowdhury, K. Appropriate number of stages of an ORC driven by LNG cold energy to produce acceptable power with reasonable surface area of heat exchangers. Cryogenics 2022, 128, 103599.

26. Zhou, T.; Liu, J.; Ren, J.; Yang, S. Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of a multi-stage Rankine cycle power system combining with hydrate energy storage for liquefied natural gas cold energy utilization. J. Energy. Storage. 2022, 56, 105974.

27. Calise, F.; d’Accadia, M. D.; Vanoli, L.; Vicidomini, M. Exergetic and exergoeconomic analysis of a novel hybrid solar-geothermal polygeneration system producing energy and water. Energy. Convers. Manag. 2016, 115, 200-20.

28. Wang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Hou, H.; Zhang, J.; Xu, C. Transient performance study of high pressure fuel gas supply system for LNG fueled ships. Cryogenics 2022, 125, 103510.

29. He, T.; Ma, J.; Mao, N.; Qi, M.; Jin, T. Exploring the stability and dynamic responses of dual-stage series ORC using LNG cold energy for sustainable power generation. Appl. Energy. 2024, 372, 123735.

30. Aspen Technology, Inc. Aspen HYSYS Unit Operations V11 Reference Guide. Aspen Technology: Bedford, MA, USA, 2019. https://esupport.aspentech.com/S_Article?id=000052892 (accessed 2026-04-28).

31. Obalanlege, M. A.; Xu, J.; Markides, C. N.; Mahmoudi, Y. Techno-economic analysis of a hybrid photovoltaic-thermal solar-assisted heat pump system for domestic hot water and power generation. Renew. Energy. 2022, 196, 720-36.

32. He, T.; Ju, Y. Dynamic simulation of mixed refrigerant process for small-scale LNG plant in skid mount packages. Energy 2016, 97, 350-8.

33. Joseph, S. B.; Dada, E. G.; Abidemi, A.; Oyewola, D. O.; Khammas, B. M. Metaheuristic algorithms for PID controller parameters tuning: review, approaches and open problems. Heliyon 2022, 8, e09399.

34. Liu, Y.; Shi, X.; Laurenceson, J. Dynamics of Australia’s LNG export performance: a modified constant market shares analysis. Energy. Econ. 2020, 89, 104808.

35. The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. The LNG Shipping Forecast: costs rebounding, outlook uncertain. Oxford, UK; 2018. https://globallnghub.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/The-LNG-Shipping-Forecast-costs-rebounding-outlook-uncertain-Insight-27.pdf (accessed 2026-04-22).