REFERENCES
1. Rahman, M.; Islam, M. R.; Hossain, M. A.; Rana, M.; Hossain, M.; Gray, E. M. Resiliency of forecasting methods in different application areas of smart grids: a review and future prospects. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2024, 135, 108785.
2. Judge, M. A.; Khan, A.; Manzoor, A.; Khattak, H. A. Overview of smart grid implementation: frameworks, impact, performance and challenges. J. Energy. Storage. 2022, 49, 104056.
3. Lopez-Garcia, T. B.; Dominguez-Navarro, J. A. Power flow analysis via typed graph neural networks. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2023, 117, 105567.
4. Glover, J. D.; Sarma, M. S.; Overbye, T. Power system analysis and design, 6th ed. Stamford, CT: CengageLearning; 2017.
5. Milano, F. Continuous newton′s method for power flow analysis. IEEE. Trans. Power. Syst. 2009, 24, 50-7.
6. Huang, S.; Wang, L.; Xiong, L.; et al. Hierarchical robustness strategy combining model-free prediction and fixed-time control for islanded AC microgrids. IEEE. Trans. Smart. Grid. 2025, 16, 4380-94.
7. Ding, X.; Wang, H.; Zhang, X.; Ma, C.; Zhang, H. Dual nature of cyber–physical power systems and the mitigation strategies. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2024, 244, 109958.
8. Khaloie, H.; Dolányi, M.; Toubeau, J.; Vallee, F. Review of machine learning techniques for optimal power flow. Appl. Energy. 2025, 388, 125637.
9. Pineda, S.; Perez-ruiz, J.; Morales, J. M. Beyond the neural fog: interpretable learning for AC optimal power flow. IEEE. Trans. Power. Syst. 2025, 40, 4912-21.
10. Canyasse, R.; Dalal, G.; Mannor, S. Supervised learning for optimal power flow as a real-time proxy. In 2017 IEEE Power & Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT), Washington, DC, USA, April 23-26, 2017; pp 1-5.
11. Ng, Y.; Misra, S.; Roald, L. A.; Backhaus, S. Statistical learning for DC optimal power flow. In 2018 Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC), Dublin, Ireland, June 11-15, 2018; pp 1-7.
12. Liu, C.; Li, Y.; Xu, T. A neural network approach to physical information embedding for optimal power flow. Sustainability 2024, 16, 7498.
13. Grigoras, G.; Cartina, G.; Bobric, E.; Barbulescu, C. Missing data treatment of the load profiles in distribution networks. In 2009 IEEE Bucharest PowerTech (POWERTECH), Bucharest, Romania, June 28-July 2, 2009; pp 1-5.
14. Wringe, C.; Trefzer, M.; Stepney, S. Reservoir computing benchmarks: a tutorial review and critique. Int. J. Parallel. Emergent. Distrib. Syst. 2025, 40, 313-51.
15. Li, X.; Zhu, Q.; Zhao, C.; et al. Tipping point detection using reservoir computing. Research 2023, 6, 0174.
16. Sakemi, Y.; Morino, K.; Leleu, T.; Aihara, K. Model-size reduction for reservoir computing by concatenating internal states through time. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 21794.
17. Gao, L.; Deng, X.; Yang, W. Smart city infrastructure protection: real-time threat detection employing online reservoir computing architecture. Neural. Comput. Applic. 2021, 34, 833-42.
18. Yang, C.; Sun, Y.; Zou, Y.; et al. Optimal power flow in distribution network: a review on problem formulation and optimization methods. Energies 2023, 16, 5974.
19. Grisales-Norena, L. F.; Montoya, O. D.; Gil-Gonzalez, W. J.; Perea-Moreno, A.; Perea-Moreno, M. A comparative study on power flow methods for direct-current networks considering processing time and numerical convergence errors. Electronics 2020, 9, 2062.
20. Niu, Z.; Zhang, C.; Li, Q.; Liu, X. Power flow calculation of small impedance branches system based on improved rectangular coordinate newton method. In 2022 5th International Conference on Electronics and Electrical Engineering Technology (EEET), Beijing, China, December 2-4, 2022; pp 110-9.
21. Montoya, O. D. On the existence of the power flow solution in DC grids with CPLs through a graph-based method. IEEE. Trans. Circuits. Syst. II. 2020, 67, 1434-8.
22. Tang, Y.; Dvijotham, K.; Low, S. Real-time optimal power flow. IEEE. Trans. Smart. Grid. 2017, 8, 2963-73.
23. Niu, M.; Wan, C.; Xu, Z. A review on applications of heuristic optimization algorithms for optimal power flow in modern power systems. J. Mod. Power. Syst. Clean. Energy. 2014, 2, 289-97.
24. Cui, T.; Wang, S.; Qu, Y.; Chen, X. Parameters optimization of electro-hydraulic power steering system based on multi-objective collaborative method. Complex. Eng. Syst. 2023, 3, 2.
25. Bakirtzis, A.; Biskas, P.; Zoumas, C.; Petridis, V. Optimal power flow by enhanced genetic algorithm. IEEE. Trans. Power. Syst. 2002, 17, 229-36.
26. Ghasemi, M.; Taghizadeh, M.; Ghavidel, S.; Aghaei, J.; Abbasian, A. Solving optimal reactive power dispatch problem using a novel teaching–learning-based optimization algorithm. Engineering. Applications. of. Artificial. Intelligence. 2015, 39, 100-8.
27. Papadimitrakis, M.; Giamarelos, N.; Stogiannos, M.; Zois, E.; Livanos, N.; Alexandridis, A. Metaheuristic search in smart grid: a review with emphasis on planning, scheduling and power flow optimization applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy. Rev. 2021, 145, 11072.
28. Stankovic, S.; Söder, L. Optimal power flow based on genetic algorithms and clustering techniques. In 2018 Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC), Dublin, Ireland, June 11-15, 2018; pp 1-7.
29. Huang, W.; Pan, X.; Chen, M.; Low, S. H. DeepOPF-Ⅴ: solving AC-OPF problems efficiently. IEEE. Trans. Power. Syst. 2022, 37, 800-3.
30. Bottcher, L.; Wolf, H.; Jung, B.; et al. Solving AC power flow with graph neural networks under realistic constraints. In 2023 IEEE Belgrade PowerTech, Belgrade, Serbia, June 25-29, 2023; pp 1-7.
31. Zhang, H. F.; Lu, X. L.; Ding, X.; Zhang, X. M. Physics-informed line graph neural network for power flow calculation. Chaos 2024, 34, 113123.
32. Hansen, J. B.; Anfinsen, S. N.; Bianchi, F. M. Power flow balancing with decentralized graph neural networks. IEEE. Trans. Power. Syst. 2023, 38, 2423-33.
33. Zhou, Y.; Lee, W.; Diao, R.; Shi, D. Deep reinforcement learning based real-time AC optimal power flow considering uncertainties. J. Mod. Power. Syst. Clean. Energy. 2022, 10, 1098-109.
34. Nellikkath, R.; Chatzivasileiadis, S. Physics-informed neural networks for AC optimal power flow. Elect. Power. Syst. Res. 2022, 212, 108412.
35. Singh, M. K.; Kekatos, V.; Giannakis, G. B. Learning to solve the AC-OPF using sensitivity-informed deep neural networks. IEEE. Trans. Power. Syst. 2022, 37, 2833-46.
36. Yan, M.; Huang, C.; Bienstman, P.; Tino, P.; Lin, W.; Sun, J. Emerging opportunities and challenges for the future of reservoir computing. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 2056.
37. Yildiz, I. B.; Jaeger, H.; Kiebel, S. J. Re-visiting the echo state property. Neural. Netw. 2012, 35, 1-9.
38. Lukoševičius, M. A practical guide to applying echo state networks. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2012; pp 659-86.
39. Jaeger, H. The "echo state" approach to analysing and training recurrent neural networks – with an Erratum note. 2001.
40. Wood, A. J.; Wollenberg, B. F.; Sheblé, G. B. Power generation, operation, and control, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
41. Watts, D. J.; Strogatz, S. H. Collective dynamics of ′small-world′ networks. Nature 1998, 393, 440-2.
42. Emelianova, A. A.; Maslennikov, O. V.; Nekorkin, V. I. Higher-order interactions, adaptivity, and phase transitions in a novel reservoir computing model. Chaos 2025, 35, 103110.
43. Keriven, N. Not too little, not too much: a theoretical analysis of graph (over) smoothing. Adv. Neural. Inf. Process. Syst. 2022, 35, 2268-81.
44. Birchfield, A. B.; Xu, T.; Gegner, K. M.; Shetye, K. S.; Overbye, T. J. Grid structural characteristics as validation criteria for synthetic networks. IEEE. Trans. Power. Syst. 2017, 32, 3258-65.
45. Thurner, L.; Scheidler, A.; Schafer, F.; et al. Pandapower - an open-source python tool for convenient modeling, analysis, and optimization of electric power systems. IEEE. Trans. Power. Syst. 2018, 33, 6510-21.
46. Yang, Y.; Yang, Z.; Yu, J.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, H. Fast calculation of probabilistic power flow: a model-based deep learning approach. IEEE. Trans. Smart. Grid. 2020, 11, 2235-44.
47. Owerko, D.; Gama, F.; Ribeiro, A. Optimal power flow using graph neural networks. In ICASSP 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Barcelona, Spain, May 4-8, 2020; pp 5930-4.
48. Gallicchio, C.; Micheli, A. Graph echo state networks. In 2010 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Barcelona, Spain, July 18-23, 2010; pp 1-8.
49. Srinivasan, K.; Coble, N.; Hamlin, J.; Antonsen, T.; Ott, E.; Girvan, M. Parallel machine learning for forecasting the dynamics of complex networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022, 128, 164101.
50. Gao, M.; Yu, J.; Yang, Z.; Zhao, J. Physics embedded graph convolution neural network for power flow calculation considering uncertain injections and topology. IEEE. Trans. Neural. Netw. Learn. Syst. 2024, 35, 15467-78.
51. Wang, J.; Srikantha, P. Data-driven AC optimal power flow with physics-informed learning and calibrations. In 2024 IEEE International Conference on Communications, Control, and Computing Technologies for Smart Grids (SmartGridComm), Oslo, Norway, September 17-20, 2024; pp 289-94.
52. Lukoševičius, M.; Jaeger, H. Lukoševičius reservoir computing approaches to recurrent neural network training. Comput. Sci. Rev. 2009, 3, 127-49.
53. Gauthier, D. J.; Bollt, E.; Griffith, A.; Barbosa, W. A. S. Next generation reservoir computing. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 5564.
54. Dambre, J.; Verstraeten, D.; Schrauwen, B.; Massar, S. Information processing capacity of dynamical systems. Sci. Rep. 2012, 2, 514.
55. Ratas, I.; Pyragas, K. Application of next-generation reservoir computing for predicting chaotic systems from partial observations. Phys. Rev. E. 2024, 109, 064215.
