REFERENCES

1. Nelissen, E. R. Technology-driven strategies for ESG risk management in purchasing and supply management. Master's Thesis, NewSouthWales, Kensington: University of Twente; 2024. Available from: https://purl.utwente.nl/essays/104478 [Last accessed on 22 Jul 2025].

2. Siddique, S. P.; Sciulli, N. Sustainable development of small companies: investors' perspectives. Bus. Strat. Environ. 2018, 27, 1258-71.

3. Iozzelli L; Sandoval Velasco MDC. Mandatory or voluntary?: the hybrid nature of sustainability disclosure in the EU's corporate sustainability reporting directive (CSRD); 2023. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/1814/75910 [Last accessed on 22 Jul 2025].

4. Cheng, L. K.; Huang, H. Influence of environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosures on consumer brand perceptions and behavioral intentions. Asia. Pac. J. Market. log. 2024.

5. Qazi, A. A.; Appolloni, A. A systematic review on barriers and enablers toward circular procurement management. Sustain. Prod. Consump. 2022, 33, 343-59.

6. Li, R.; Cao, F. The impact of sustainable public procurement on corporate ESG performance-The Chinese evidence. PLoS. One. 2023, 18, e0292286.

7. de Hoyos Guevara, A. J.; Dib, V. C. ESG princípios, desafios e oportunidades. J. Innov. Sustain. Risus. 2022, 13, 18-31. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366862920_ESG_principios_desafios_e_oportunidades [Last accessed on 22 Jul 2025].

8. Han, N.; Um, J. Risk management strategy for supply chain sustainability and resilience capability. Risk. Manag. 2024, 26, 138.

9. Wan, G.; Dawod, A. Y.; Chanaim, S.; Ramasamy, S. S. Hotspots and trends of environmental, social and governance (ESG) research: a bibliometric analysis. Data. Sci. Manag. 2023, 6, 65-75.

10. Galbreath, J. ESG in focus: the Australian evidence. J. Bus. Ethics. 2013, 118, 529-41.

11. Chen, Z.; Xie, G. ESG disclosure and financial performance: moderating role of ESG investors. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 2022, 83, 102291.

12. Zhang, D. Does green finance really inhibit extreme hypocritical ESG risk? A greenwashing perspective exploration. Energy. Econ. 2023, 121, 106688.

13. Yu, E. P.; Luu, B. V.; Chen, C. H. Greenwashing in environmental, social and governance disclosures. Res. Int. Bus. Financ. 2020, 52, 101192.

14. Baldi, F.; Pandimiglio, A. The role of ESG scoring and greenwashing risk in explaining the yields of green bonds: a conceptual framework and an econometric analysis. Glob. Financ. J. 2022, 52, 100711.

15. Perano, M.; Cammarano, A.; Varriale, V.; Del Regno, C.; Michelino, F.; Caputo, M. Embracing supply chain digitalization and unphysicalization to enhance supply chain performance: a conceptual framework. Int. J. Phys. Distr. Log. 2023, 53, 628-59.

16. Neef, D. E-Procurement: from strategy to implementation. FT Press; 2001. Available from: http://edl.emi.gov.et/jspui/bitstream/123456789/1466/1/e-Procurement_%20From%20Strategy%20to%20Implementation%20%28%20PDFDrive%20%29.pdf [Last accessed on 22 Jul 2025].

17. Liu, L.; Song, W.; Liu, Y. Leveraging digital capabilities toward a circular economy: reinforcing sustainable supply chain management with Industry 4.0 technologies. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2023, 178, 109113.

18. Lund, S.; Manyika, .; Woetzel, J. Risk, resilience, and rebalancing in global value chains. 2020. Available from: http://dln.jaipuria.ac.in:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/14300/1/Risk-resilience-and-rebalancing-in-global-value-chains-full-report.pdf [Last accessed on 22 Jul 2025].

19. Walker, H.; Brammer, S. The relationship between sustainable procurement and e-procurement in the public sector. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2012, 140, 256-68.

20. Saberi, S.; Kouhizadeh, M.; Sarkis, J.; Shen, L. Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 57, 2117-35.

21. Bajomo, M.; Ogbeyemi, A.; Zhang, W. A systems dynamics approach to the management of material procurement for Engineering, Procurement and Construction industry. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2022, 244, 108390.

22. Pandey, S.; Singh, R. K.; Gunasekaran, A. Supply chain risks in Industry 4.0 environment: review and analysis framework. Prod. Plan. Control. 2023, 34, 1275-302.

23. Chen, F.; Liu, Y.; Chen, X. ESG performance and business risk - empirical evidence from China's listed companies. Innov. Green. Dev. 2024, 3, 100142.

24. Wang, H.; Jiao, S.; Ma, C. The impact of ESG responsibility performance on corporate resilience. Int. Rev. Econ. Financ. 2024, 93, 1115-29.

25. He, F.; Ding, C.; Yue, W.; Liu, G. ESG performance and corporate risk-taking: evidence from China. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 2023, 87, 102550.

26. Wei, L.; Chengshu, W. Company ESG performance and institutional investor ownership preferences. Business. Ethics. Environ. Resp. 2024, 33, 287-307.

27. Kiron, D.; Kruschwitz, N.; Haanaes, K.; Reeves, M.; Fuisz-Kehrbach, S. K.; Kell, G. Joining forces: collaboration and leadership for sustainability. Mit. Sloan. Manag. Rev. 2015. Available from: https://sloanreview.mit.edu/projects/joining-forces [Last accessed on 22 Jul 2025].

28. Sajjad, A.; Eweje, G.; Tappin, D. Sustainable supply chain management: motivators and barriers. Bus. Strat. Environ. 2015, 24, 643-55.

29. Fallahpour, A.; Wong, K. Y.; Rajoo, S.; Fathollahi-Fard, A. M.; Antucheviciene, J.; Nayeri, S. An integrated approach for a sustainable supplier selection based on Industry 4.0 concept. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021, 1-19.

30. Li, L.; Suhrab, M.; Radulescu, M.; Banuta, M. Moving toward sustainable finance: leveraging environment, social and governance (ESG) performance and risk management to drive corporate financing efficiency. Inz. Ekon. 2025, 36, 72-95.

31. Turban, E.; Sharda, R.; Aronson, J. E.; King, D. Business intelligence: a managerial approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2008; pp 58-9. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/2009625/Business_intelligence_a_managerial_approach [Last accessed on 22 Jul 2025].

32. Lee, C.; Wang, D.; Lyu, S.; Evans, R. D.; Li, L. A digital transformation-enabled framework and strategies for public health risk response and governance: China's experience. Ind. Manag. Data. Syst. 2023, 123, 133-54.

33. Rane, S. B.; Narvel, Y. A. M.; Bhandarkar, B. M. Developing strategies to improve agility in the project procurement management (PPM) process: perspective of business intelligence (BI). Bus. Process. Manag. J. 2019, 26, 257-86.

34. Sinthiya, C. The impact of supplier relationship management on procurement efficiency and cost reduction. Int. J. Emerg. Res. Eng. Technol. 2023, 4, 15-21.

35. Chen, Z.; Zhang, L.; Su, X. Intelligent processing of design notices in engineering procurement construction projects. Buildings 2025, 15, 805.

36. Waqar, A.; Othman, I.; Shafiq, N. The role of sustainable procurement in attaining sustainable development goals: insights from sustainable logistics and sustainable metamorphosis practices. J. Clean. Prod. 2025, 500, 145285.

37. Du, W. W.; Chen, X. W. A comprehensive risk prediction method for defense mission planning based on probabilistic reasoning and hierarchical analysis. Complex. Eng. Syst. 2024, 4, 9.

38. Anani, A.; Adewuyi, S. O.; Gonzales, C. G. Sustainable copper supply chains: evaluating ESG risks through the lens of regulatory compliance and risk assessment strategies. Extract. Ind. Soc. 2025, 23, 101662.

39. Bai, L.; Song, C.; Zhou, X.; Tian, Y.; Wei, L. Assessing project portfolio risk via an enhanced GA-BPNN combined with PCA. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2023, 126, 106779.

40. Nagali, V.; Hwang, J.; Sanghera, D.; et al. Procurement risk management (PRM) at hewlett-packard company. Interfaces 2008, 38, 51-60.

41. Alkaraan, F.; Elmarzouky, M.; Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B.; Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J.; Gulko, N. Maximising sustainable performance: integrating servitisation innovation into green sustainable supply chain management under the influence of governance and Industry 4.0. J. Bus. Res. 2025, 186, 115029.

42. Wang, L.; Cheng, Y.; Wang, Z. Risk management in sustainable supply chain: a knowledge map towards intellectual structure, logic diagram, and conceptual model. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2022, 29, 66041-67.

43. Giannakis, M.; Papadopoulos, T. Supply chain sustainability: a risk management approach. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2016, 171, 455-70.

44. Wang, Q.; Jia, G.; Jia, Y.; Song, W. A new approach for risk assessment of failure modes considering risk interaction and propagation effects. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe. 2021, 216, 108044.

45. Gouda, S. K.; Saranga, H. Sustainable supply chains for supply chain sustainability: impact of sustainability efforts on supply chain risk. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2018, 56, 5820-35.

46. Kamalahmadi, M.; Shekarian, M.; Mellat Parast, M. The impact of flexibility and redundancy on improving supply chain resilience to disruptions. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2022, 60, 1992-2020.

47. Alnafrah, I. ESG practices mitigating geopolitical risks: Implications for sustainable environmental management. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 358, 120923.

48. Rodríguez-Espíndola, O.; Chowdhury, S.; Dey, P. K.; Albores, P.; Emrouznejad, A. Analysis of the adoption of emergent technologies for risk management in the era of digital manufacturing. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2022, 178, 121562.

49. Qian, C.; Gao, Y.; Chen, L. Green supply chain circular economy evaluation system based on industrial internet of things and blockchain technology under ESG concept. Processes 2023, 11, 1999.

50. Rauniyar, K.; Wu, X.; Gupta, S.; Modgil, S.; Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. Risk management of supply chains in the digital transformation era: contribution and challenges of blockchain technology. Ind. Manag. Data. Syst. 2023, 123, 253-77.

51. Simonetto, M.; Sgarbossa, F.; Battini, D.; Govindan, K. Closed loop supply chains 4.0: from risks to benefits through advanced technologies. A literature review and research agenda. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2022, 253, 108582.

52. Zavala-Alcívar, A.; Verdecho, M.; Alfaro-Saiz, J. A conceptual framework to manage resilience and increase sustainability in the supply chain. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6300.

53. Ivanov, D.; Dolgui, A. A digital supply chain twin for managing the disruption risks and resilience in the era of Industry 4.0. Prod. Plan. Control. 2021, 32, 775-88.

54. Deiva Ganesh, A.; Kalpana, P. Supply chain risk identification: a real-time data-mining approach. Ind. Manag. Data. Syst. 2022, 122, 1333-54.

55. Zou, Y.; Shi, M.; Chen, Z.; et al. ESGReveal: an LLM-based approach for extracting structured data from ESG reports. J. Clean. Prod. 2025, 489, 144572.

56. Xu, C.; Miao, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Lin, C. DeepGreen: effective LLM-driven green-washing monitoring system designed for empirical testing-evidence from China. arXiv 2025. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.07733 [Last accessed on 22 Jul 2025].

57. Wang, F.; Chen, T.; Koh, L.; Wu, A. Future-proof finance: navigating climate risks and ESG goals with agentic AI and collaborative foresight. 2025.

58. Li, X.; Wang, S.; Zeng, S.; Wu, Y.; Yang, Y. A survey on LLM-based multi-agent systems: workflow, infrastructure, and challenges. Vicinagearth 2024, 1, 9.

59. Handfield, R.; Jeong, S.; Choi, T. Emerging procurement technology: data analytics and cognitive analytics. Int. J. Phys. Distr. Log. 2019, 49, 972-1002.

60. Liu, L.; Song, W.; Han, W. How sustainable is smart PSS? An integrated evaluation approach based on rough BWM and TODIM. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2020, 43, 101042.

Complex Engineering Systems
ISSN 2770-6249 (Online)

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/